User talk:Was Kisevalter Nash?

Welcome!

Hello, Kisevalter Was Nash, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 09:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding changing username

Hi, I see you have a question on your user page (permalink). Yes, you can change username, go to Special:GlobalRenameRequest and read the instructions and proceed there. Thanks. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 09:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Kisevalter Was Nash (talk) 09:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Signing in articles

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Yuri Nosenko. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article? Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kisevalter Was Nash, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kisevalter Was Nash! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Referencing as you go

Adding (or removing) content while planning to reference it later will get content reverted, and you warned about vandalism (some of that by ClueBot, an automated vandalism detector). Avoid this by referencing as you go. Consider drafting content in your Sandbox, the adding it to the article after the ref is prepared. David notMD (talk) 14:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Kisevalter Was Nash! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to re-confirm my e-mail address?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why hasn't my request been granted? Because there was no discussion on it? Kisevalter Was Nash (talk) 20:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I see now that you were referring to a different issue. My bad. Thanks. Kisevalter Was Nash (talk) 21:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone please create an article on deceased CIA officer and author Tennent H. Bagley?

Bagley, who was a high-level CIA officer and worked with the more widely known George Kisevalter, was the chief handler and eventual "harsh interrogator" of one of the Cold War's most controversial KGB defectors to the U.S., Yuri Nosenko. After reading the file on another recent KGB defector (Anatoliy Golitsyn) shortly after Bagley and Kisevalter had interviewed Nosenko five or six times in Geneva in 1962, Bagley became convinced that Nosenko was a false defector. Bagley then convinced the head of CIA Counterintelligence, James Angleton, of same, but Nosenko was eventually "cleared" by others in CIA, remunerated for his troubles and hired to teach counterintelligence to its new recruits.

PS: Just be sure to include references to the three things Bagley wrote: 1) His book "Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games" (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007), 2) His book "Spymaster: Startling Cold War Revelations of a Soviet KGB Chief" New York: Skyhorse Publishing, 2013, 3) and his journal article: "Ghosts of the Spy Wars: A Personal Reminder to Interested Parties" International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 28, no. 1 (Spring 2015): 1-37.

Thanks. Was Kisevalter Nash? (talk) 00:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Writing that article is outside my abilities and interests, sorry, but noting a couple of things that may help you or someone else to write it. (A) you'll need some third-party sources in addition to his own writings. (B) For anyone questioning notability, NYTimes and WaPo published obituaries:

Martin, Douglas (3 March 2014). "Tennent H. Bagley, Who Aided, Then Mistrusted a Soviet Spy, Dies at 88". The New York Times.

Langer, Emily (24 February 2014). "Tennent H. 'Pete' Bagley, noted CIA officer, dies at 88". Washington Post.

Also, there is T. H. Bagley (Q9356716) and pl:Tennent Bagley. The Polish article is brief; it mentions Smith (2003), Encyclopedia of the Central Intelligence Agency, as a source.

Cheers, Pelagic ( messages ) – (12:11 Sun 21, AEDT) 01:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tennent H. Bagley (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Asilvering were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost all of this is sourced to unreliable sources (see WP:RS) or to Bagley himself. Most of it is actually about Yuri Nosenko - you could improve that article instead?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tennent H. Bagley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 07:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tennent H. Bagley has been accepted

Tennent H. Bagley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 11:01, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Igor Kochnov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Igor Kochnov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Igor Kochnov (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CurryTime7-24 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Igor Kochnov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aleksander Kopatzky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Igor Orlov. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bruce Leonard Solie

Hello, Was Kisevalter Nash?. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bruce Leonard Solie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How to submit my draft article?

When I'm ready to submit my draft article on Bruce Leonard Solie (I want to add a few more citations first), how do I go about doing that? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Was Kisevalter Nash? (talk • contribs) 08:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed your submission at Draft:Bruce Leonard Solie. For future drafts, please feel free to use the submission wizard at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Submitting. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce Leonard Solie (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Potentially notable, however, insufficient WP:RS - please see WP:SELFPUBLISHED

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bruce Leonard Solie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 03:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce Leonard Solie (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bruce Leonard Solie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Igor Kochnov

Hello, Was Kisevalter Nash?. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Igor Kochnov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Igor Kochnov

Hello, Was Kisevalter Nash?. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Igor Kochnov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]