Jump to content

User talk:Webmaster862

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi I'm trying to improve Mold Masters page on Wikipedia. Please don't delete it.

October 2020

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Serj Tankian has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Serj Tankian. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 01:52, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck I am sorry could you please explain what exactly was the issue?? I added a recent political statement made by Serj Tankian. I know that political statements can be controversial. Is it maybe that you didn't like the statement that he made because it was about Israel? Please explain the issue. Webmaster862 (talk) 02:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Webmaster862, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Webmaster862! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)


November 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Flying Cunts of Chaos—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 02:35, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wait wait wait.. this page is still under construction and I am still making more changes to it. Please let me finish and add more info and sources and if you decide it is not notable, you can nominate if for deletion. Do not just make this decision. Its got so far 10 sources including Rolling Stone and it meets notability criteria for musicians. In what way is it doesn't appear constructive??? Webmaster862 (talk) 02:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Success Principles for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Success Principles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Success Principles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

signed, Rosguill talk 18:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Tabor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 49er. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Expertwikiguy per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Expertwikiguy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 00:35, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]