Jump to content

User talk:Wikiforyou123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome, fellow video game enthusiast![edit]

Hello, Wikiforyou123, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mediran talk 11:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Suggested WikiProjects[edit]

If editing articles on video games interests you, consider joining the Video games WikiProject and/or one or more of these platform specific projects: WikiProject Xbox, WikiProject PlayStation and/or the Nintendo task force. Cheers, Mediran talk 11:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I create the account Wikiforyou789, please use the {{Template:welcome-dbz}} template to welcome me.

September 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm EncMstr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —EncMstr (talk) 19:51, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't invite me to the teahouse again.[edit]

Never invite me to the teahouse again.

Speedy deletion declined: Linguist List[edit]

Hello Wikiforyou123. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Linguist List, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: enough significance is asserted to pass A7, and speedy has been declined before, see [1]. Take to AfD if you think it should be deleted. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 12:45, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Quiddity. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Quiddity (talk) 15:00, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —EncMstr (talk) 17:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiforyou123 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sir, somebody blocked me from editing. Add the {{unblocked}} template. Wikiforyou123 (talk) 19:30, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm looking at some of your edits. Here, you pretended to 'block' another user, although you are not an administrator and don't have the technical ability to make blocks. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:51, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here, you tagged the article Linguist List for speedy deletion for lacking an assertion of notability, though that article does make a claim to notability and cites several reasonable sources to support that claim. If that article were to be deleted, it would not be through the speedy deletion process, but through a discussion at WP:AFD. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Here, you changed a different user's user page to make it appear that user was a member of the "SpongeBob SquarePants work group," causing him to have to undo your edit. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:55, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This message doesn't even make sense. Autoblocking is an automatic process carried out by Wikipedia software, as the name implied- people don't autoblock anyone. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:56, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I could keep looking... it looks like you have made some useful edits, but also some very strange ones. It's hard to tell what you are doing- deliberate disruption, or just a high error rate. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiforyou123 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Don't say that again. Don't use the {{unblock reviewed}} template. Use the {{unblocked}} template.

Decline reason:

This is not a meaningful unblock request. I will assume that it was a mistake, not deliberate vandalism, and so I will not remove your talk page access to prevent similar nonsense. However, any further similar editing will be likely to lead to loss of talk page access. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:31, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

...so you chose to go for the loss of talk page access. Why am I not surprised? JamesBWatson (talk) 12:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you![edit]

Well, I salute you with this, in order to be unblocked! TwinkleUser333 (talk) 10:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you![edit]

I also salute you with this, for a total unblock! TwinkleUser333 (talk) 10:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]