User talk:Willermoz

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Star-Spangled Banner, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tedickey (talk) 18:05, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Societas Rosicruciana edits

I'm glad someone was able to find more information (especially on the difference between SRIAm and SRICF), but it would be useful if you could add in the citation for said information, especially since your edit comment notes that it comes from an official history. MSJapan (talk) 18:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William A. Hunter

The article William A. Hunter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, unclear notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rd232 ^talk 01:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. William A. Hunter (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. William A. Hunter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Origamite^ⓣⓒ 18:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Willermoz, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Origamite^ⓣⓒ 18:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hi, you noted that none of the references so much as reference the man. Did you not see the TV interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4SbEVtkvPs&noredirect=1 or the in text reference here: http://books.google.com/books?id=0o9XOlnUb-4C&pg=PR22&lpg=PR22&dq=William+Hunter,+Nahuatl&source=bl&ots=UKF4vk-qji&sig=lI6RMUiqc6X9rfcuwcy7tm3Wa2U&hl=en&sa=X&ei=bWYdUNavNOT40gGh5oDYCg&ved=0CFMQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=William%20Hunter%2C%20Nahuatl&f=false to Hunter's 1960 publication or the The Calderonian Auto Sacramental. El Gran Teatro del Mundo: An Edition and Translation of a Nahuatl Version.

Author(s): William A. Hunter found here: http://mari.tulane.edu/publicationseries.html? Of still further notoriety beyond the realm of academics, Hunter and his wife discovered Pedro Juan Labarthe's body hanging upon his suicide. Willermoz (talk) 18:50, 26 September 2014 (UTC) Willermoz[reply]

Dr. William A. Hunter

Hi Origamite, I updated the references, and I have a scanned image of the University Professors for Academic Order journal. Willermoz (talk) 05:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Willermoz[reply]

Hi. I'm seeing more on Hunter's work than on Hunter in many of the sources, and many just point out that it and he exist. Why don't you move the video into the references section, and perhaps write more about his work, which you can reference, than his friends, which you can't? Origamite^ⓣⓒ 21:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Thank you for the thoughtful response. Due to the nature of Hunter's career, there are academic references that are largely unscanned or not yet digitized that reference him and his work. The bulk of his career in the government was not public due to opsec. I did locate two newspaper articles on Hunter over the weekend. One is in the Mena Arkansas paper. The other in the Shreveport Times. Additionally, I scanned a copy of the 1980 Vol. XI No. 4 Journal for University Professors for Academic Order. It features a photo of Hunter with Dr. Howard Hurwitz and Senator S.I. Hayakawa I'll in include these in the next edit. Willermoz (talk) 12:43, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Willermoz[reply]

Ok, good! Every reliable source you can find helps make the draft better. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 14:39, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dr. William A. Hunter

Hello, Willermoz. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Dr. William A. Hunter".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Dr. William A. Hunter}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:23, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. William A. Hunter (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. William A. Hunter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dr. William A. Hunter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dr. William A. Hunter, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dr. William A. Hunter

Hello, Willermoz. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Dr. William A. Hunter".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 08:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:LotaData

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:LotaData, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/lotadata-insights-23-mobile-phones-accidentally-during-kumar. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:40, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LotaData (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:LotaData may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:44, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Draft:LotaData was so blatantly promotional that I'm blocking you for it.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=Please unblock me.  I was not aware that it was in violation of the promotional policy you mentioned.  I have read the referenced links and now understand.  You will not have to worry about it happening again.  Happy to move on now that I have been advised of the problem.  Please know that my intent was pure.  Did not realize that content was in violation of any policies.  Mea culpa!  I won't make that mistake again.  @MER-C: }}

. MER-C 20:52, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]