User talk:XLinkBot/RevertList/archives/June 2008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Proposed additions[edit]

visituzbekistan.eu[edit]

Inserted by 86.149.183.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · what links to user page · count · COIBot · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
visituzbekistan.eu: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:frMER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • Meta: SRB-XWiki - COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: searchVeinor pagesmeta • Yahoo: backlinks • Domain: domaintoolsAboutUs.orgDomainsDB.netAlexaWhosOnMyServer.com

Yes check.svg Done --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

noooxml.org[edit]


oxfordcommariddim.com[edit]

Inappropriate addition of blog links from IP - 172.X range.

Diffs= [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Link adder took a dislike to User:Funeral for removing his link and vandalised his talk page here and here. A little name calling here. Forwarding request on my talk page from regular IP editor "Libs" - 156.34.x range.--Alf melmac 12:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Adding spamlink template. --Beetstra (public) (Dirk BeetstraT C on public computers) 15:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

cardassiaprimera.com.ar[edit]

This site is continually being inserted in Klingon, Borg starships, Vulcan starships and Borg. As per WP:EL, this url is neither helpful nor informative as it is purely in Spanish. I have warned (within a range of IP addresses) several times and suggested they try the Spanish Wikipedia—I am not able to judge whether the site is up to scratch for that. User:EEMIV and User:BlueCanary9999 have also been reverting these edits. Here are the diffs 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16; 17; 18; 19; 20
Here the IP addresses 190.188.157.163; 190.189.64.72; 190.188.142.252; 190.188.157.163; 190.188.146.29

TINYMARK 14:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

biosites.org[edit]

I'm proposing this be added per WP:SBL#biosites.org. Spellcast (talk) 06:55, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Already added to the SBL.--Hu12 (talk) 06:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


Proposed deletions[edit]

whatbird.com[edit]

Hi, Pls remove whatbird.com from the Revertlist of the XlinkBot. The link contains the birdcalls and songs of the birds that cannot be added to the wiki. Thanks for your consideration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ropm (talkcontribs) 18:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

We know you're being paid to add those links. Spammers are not welcome on Wikipedia. X mark.svg Not done. MER-C 11:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Mises.org, Cato.org, Lewrockwell.com[edit]

Please remove links to "\bcato\.org" (Cato Institute), "\bmises\.org" (Ludwig von Mises Institute) and "\blewrockwell\.com" (Lewrockwell.com) as these web addresses often contain writings of notable figures (40+, see linked articles) and thus these websites meet WP:RS at the very least in virtue of WP:SPS. In refusing this request, please explain why these sites are blacklisted to begin with. Thanks, скоморохъ 15:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

For those there is not an appropriate log, they were added before we started logging. I am having a look around. Please be aware, that the bot only reverts IPs and new accounts, and that good link can be added to this wikipedia inappropriately (being pushed, spammed, or added with promotional intent etc.), and that may be the reason that it is on the revertlist.
  • mises.org, seems to be widely used, there appear to be a couple of accounts that have this site as a favourite, but no clear sign of spamming, removed
  • cato.org, no sign of spamming, not as widely used, removed.
  • lewrockwell.com, similar, no clear spamming, removed.
Thanks for the question, guess one of the operators added it when we were still working with the internal database (not with this list) while there were some IPs using the link too often. Hope this helps!
Yes check.svg Done --Dirk Beetstra T C 19:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your swift, succinct and very unbitey response, Dirk. As the above sites are all written from a particular point of view (libertarian/anarcho-capitalist), it's possible some POV-warrior used them disruptively in the past; that said, each is host of well-respected scholarship, and Wikipedia is the better for having restored their use. Regards, скоморохъ 00:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)