Jump to content

User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive147

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment

[edit]

Hey there. It needs some work that's for sure. I put it in for FA because I had run out of ideas and needed some reviews to give me new ideas. Others chipping in would be great to make it even more comprehensive, which I believe in ranks up there with Lancashire's and Yorkshire's pages. The early history surrounding the Hambledon Club and it's years in promotion to first-class cricket as well as it's first 50 years after the clubs second elevation to first-class cricket. HampshireCricketFan (talk) 22:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of batsmen who have scored over 10000 One Day International cricket runs

[edit]

What else needs to be added? Aaroncrick (talk) 00:31, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't going to FLC like that are you? You might want to explain that ODIs only started in 1971, and that their frequency has been increasing ever since, hence there only being recent folks I guess. Maybe that the scores and averages have consistently risen as well. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 00:48, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, definitely not! Hadn't even thought about that. Just wondering what to add as I was just expanding the article I created. Aaroncrick (talk) 04:47, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FAR rules

[edit]

What are the rules regarding nominating articles for FAR? I was under the impression that they were changed so that an editor could have only one nomination at FAR at any one time. Is this the way it works? In other words, I cannot nominate another article until Delrina (my last nomination) is off the list. Also, would you prefer that I not contribute to FAR? Or would it be ok if I continued to contribute? Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 15:10, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can have a second. That's how the regs are meant, because this one is way deep into FAR, about three months YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 00:46, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


South Vietnamese division/corps articles

[edit]

Would you mind adding at least a general source to these articles? Buckshot06(prof) 22:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 02:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


FA removal

[edit]

YM, did you get this one at WP:FA and WP:FFA? Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and did both of those: [1] SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:40, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NYT articles

[edit]

As I've said on the WP:MILHIST talk page, I have the NYT articles you requested for 1962 South Vietnamese Independence Palace bombing. The articles are in PDF form, and the "E-mail this user" buttons on userpages don't allow you to attach PDF. Therefore, please e-mail me (using the userpage link) with your e-mail address and I'll send the articles to you as PDFs. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 01:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:20, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Broken reference

[edit]

In this edit of 29 October 2009 you added a reference <Ref name=revo/> to Nguyen Ngoc Tho. Could you please go back and give the details of that reference, or tell me where you found it? BTW, the "r" of "ref" is usually spelled uncapitalised in Wikipedia. Debresser (talk) 08:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing it. Debresser (talk) 05:47, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I usually am not too fussy about the caps as it makes no difference to the output. Sometimes I work on something on teh harddrive and paste it in, and it overlaps some AWB edits by some people who change the caps. There is no particuarly reason for my scheme except saving time YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Virender Sehwag/archive3

[edit]

Please Revisit. Thanks Abeer.ag (talk) 02:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

[edit]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

[edit]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

[edit]
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XLIV (October 2009)
From the coordinators
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. 1982 British Army Gazelle friendly fire incident
  2. Amagi class battlecruiser
  3. Battle of the Alamo
  4. Brazilian cruiser Bahia
  5. Ellis Wackett
  6. Inner German border

New featured lists:

  1. List of Knight's Cross recipients of the Waffen-SS
  2. Order of battle in the Atlantic campaign of 1806

New featured portals:

  1. United States Air Force

New featured pictures:

  1. A synagogue in New York City remained on D-Day
  2. Battle of Kennesaw Mountain
  3. Journée du Poilu. 25 et 26 décembre 1915
  4. Siege of Sevastopol, 1855
  5. The burning of Columbia, South Carolina, February 17, 1865

New A-Class articles:

  1. AH-56 Cheyenne
  2. John Lloyd Waddy
  3. Lewis McGee
  4. M22 Locust
  5. Operation Coburg
  6. Operation Teardrop
  7. SMS Nassau
  8. Tosa class battleship
  9. USS Congress (1799)
  10. USS President (1800)
  11. Winter War
Project news
Contest department
  • The contest department has completed its thirty-first month of competition; its second month under the new and improved scoring system. A total of 53 articles were entered by nine editors. Sturmvogel 66 came in first with 96 points, followed by Auntieruth55 on 80 points. They are presented the Chevrons and Writer's Barnstar respectively. Honorable mentions go to Ian Rose (38), Abraham, B.S. (33) and Parsecboy (10). Our thanks go to Cuprum17, Ed!, The ed17 and Piotrus, who also fielded entries. All editors are encouraged to submit any articles that are working on for next month's contest.
Awards and honours

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Email

[edit]

You have an email.--AM (talk) 12:29, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of India women ODI cricketers

[edit]

Anything to add to List of India women ODI cricketers before taking to FLC? Not sure if any deeper stats are required -- Win% against Aus/Eng/NZ is lower than 50 while it's over 70 against everyone else, not sure it merits inclusion. I'll convert the red links to blue today. (Aaron, feel free to chime in). cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 01:20, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No I can't think of anythin YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FLC open now. Your comments awaited :) cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 06:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Australian cricket team in England in 1948

[edit]

Seeing the article is 125kb, it will probably be months until reviewed. Aaroncrick (talk) 09:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see how cric have: Loxton, Cook, Australian cricket team in England in 1948 and Nash at GAN. Aaroncrick (talk) 09:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we need fresh blood with Dweller, Rambling Man, Phanto and Mattinbgn inactive or barely active YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Never heard of Phanto. I'm not extremely active at the moment. Aaroncrick (talk) 06:02, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Phanto282 (talk · contribs) : Alan Kippax, Bradman, Ian Chappell, Chuck Fleetwood-Smith and Lindsay Hassett were all by him YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 06:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh; have seen his name somewhere - Chappell or Bradman maybe? I saw matt resigned from adminship. Aaroncrick (talk) 06:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Please see User talk:Jimbo Wales#! and the Craigslist want ad linked there, which seeks an admin for hire to do PR on Wikipedia. Please, please, please consider applying for the job to try to find out who is hiring. That a company wants an admin to edit the company's article and post additional "listings" is especially smelly. —Finell (Talk) 06:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC) (To preserve the continuity of the conversation, I will watch for your reply, if any, here on your Talk page)[reply]

I'm no use for sting operations YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 00:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Paine and other matters

[edit]

Yes, won't be reviewed for two months though, but will do soon. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 03:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rambling Man thought the SCG runchase part was too much like trivia. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 03:05, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delete File talk:Ponting.jpg? As it looks a lot like a TV shot. Also are you going to do Bradman in 1930 one day? Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 04:19, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hold it. Admin User:TerriersFan seems to have uploaded it in Dec 06. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 04:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It does appear pretty suspicious with the rings YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 04:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm 100% sure it's taken from TV. What do you think of Ponting opening? While I'm pinging in the questions, check out Nick Riewoldt and you'll find 14 templates. User:BrianBeahr also has decided to add St Kilda logos to the infoboxes against consensus, and is continuing to go along his merry way. If you care see discussions at: User talk:BrianBeahr and WP:AFL. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 04:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone can open. He'll be fine. I guess they think that Marsh isn't match-fit yet. Wonder what Hussey's keeping is like. They could just use him and stick Marsh in there. India should get Abhinav Mukund in there (me in left field again. Johnson doesn't bowl as well to lefthanders, at least he can't get wickets with big leg side wides that way) if Gambhir/Sehwag aren't fit. These high school pages have so much vandalism YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 04:42, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ponting kept for Mowbray. Talking about that area, construction starting at Invermay Park behind Aurora Stadium, so the old stand might be moved in a few months. A lot of construction workers at the ground because 3,000 bike riders from the mainland went to the ground for something and Jimmy Barnes performed. Nothing in the paper to add to the article though. Strange (I Get sidetracked easy). It's the worst Australian team since the 80's and how on earth did Henqriques get in? What about North, Katich, Jacques, Hughes and co? Haddin kept for NSW yesterday. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 04:50, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
They picked on T20 Champions league I guess. There aren't many other allrounders around at all, Aaron O'Brien, A McDonald probably considered too slow, Chris Simpson? can't think of any, well, Noffke, or Krejza if people think his batting is useful although Hodge should be in there as always. I guess with no Clarke and White being vulnerable they want more bowling at all costs. YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 05:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simpson averages about 10 with bat in List A cricket - so no. Hussey should keep and they should play hodge or katich. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 05:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If they create an equivalent template for AA, hmm, Ponting will have 14/15 of those just for being a contracted player for 14 years. Then how many more for most runs by an Australian in a calendar year? And ICC Team of the Year? And every multilateral ODI tournament that Australia has won. Lol. If White isn't going to bowl, I would definitely have Hodge ahead of him, and he can bowl darts anyway. Or just check NHenriques and go for the extra bowler. Johnson can bat high. Australia'll be right once the injuries straighten out again. Lee, Hopes, Bracken, Clarke, Paine, Haddin, Ferguson, that's a lot. YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 05:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
hmm... the monkey could get a game? Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 05:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, him, the Sehwag impersonator who tries to cut everything from offstump, and bowls pace even slower than Ganguly and Cosgrove. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:59, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, they pulled two spinners out of the depths of grade cricket. I suppose the slower you bowl on those tracks the harder it is to get the ball away. :) Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 06:05, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not if you bowl at least one full toss and one half-tracker every over, as well as a slow wide. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Johnson, Krejza? Anyhow, no one has done anything on Bradman's centuries! Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 06:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It'd be easy to recycle all the centuries and 5WI from all the FAs/GAs. Just reuse the prose. Easy..... Wonder if CRIC can get 20% of all the FLs again. Lol. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:20, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent) 20% of all sports even? :) Although there's a lot of lists to write! Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 06:24, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The cricket FLC factory died out in early 2006, but FLs can be down relatively mechanically, as long as there are no redlinks to worry about. Some take 4-5 hours, and if we just recycled prose from the comprehensive FA/GAs, maybe even less. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:27, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, in the India women's Test list, I had to worry about over fifty redlinks, with the ODI one, it reduced to about 10-15; I'm hoping for the T20, there'll be none! -SpacemanSpiff 06:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That too, any male Test/ODI/T20 cricketers lists won't need any article-filling. Australian Olympic medalists in swimming was 95% redlink writing. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:58, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ponting's gonna become 200kb, so need to do spin off articles. What wouldn't get deleted. Series articles would get deleted, would series? Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 07:11, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Early life wouldn't, a separate WC one should survive, maybe a captaincy one. I don't think it will be too much trouble really. Just wait until all the info is in there. I wonder if a Harbhajan v Ponting one people would try and delete it as OR/new topic kind of thing. Because the giant monologues of Ponting can't all fit in there, eg Sharjah altercation YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 07:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Harbhajan v Ponting should be fine as there are similar tennis articles. Ricky Ponting with the Australian cricket team against India in India in 2008 is mostly a fork. Didn't realise it was in the article namespace - was intending for it to be in my user space and just realised it wasn't. Might have to merge it with other series. Although it is a fairly important tour for an Australian captain and it had notable controversies. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 10:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Aren't autos misleading! [2]. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 10:18, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
They can be. I read snippets of Gilly's and it is a bit ambiguous/misleading in a possibly deliberate self-serving way in a lot of places. Steve Waugh's is pretty self-promoting. Why isn't the Ponting fork in the same naming convention like the others "in India in 08-09" YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, done now. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 03:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It should be in, not against. Hassett done! Hopefully not a three-month wait for the formalities YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 03:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suggesting anything? Yeah it will take a while. Zim 7/37 against Ban. LOL! Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 03:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I stuck a note on the main GAN page. I wonder if that will attract a review more quickly YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 03:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:YellowMonkey/Invincibles

Got the template ready YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 03:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sweet. Zimbabwe all out for 44. Pathetic. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 04:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green pitch? Hopefully my red banner at the top is effective YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:55, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bangladesh lost 4 wickets. Nah, dust spinning wicket according to Shakib. Spinners took 12 wickets. Well you would probably have a lot of followers. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 07:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Datheisen has blown my oppose complletely out of proportion over at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Franamax. Interestingly you opposed over the same issue without a reply. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 08:22, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes they might choose to challenge a person they think is not so powerful. Sometimes powerful people in retaliation for a FAC oppose and get lots of mates to join in and nobody will challenge them. YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 05:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

[edit]

Good morning,

A couple of weeks ago you protected some articles for me, and I was wondering if you would be willing to do that again. The article in question is same-sex marriage in Maine, and because of yesterday's vote and the national headlines, it is experiencing an increased level of vandalism -- particularly section blanking and additions of non-neutral POVs. I'm keeping an eye on it, but I can't babysit it 24/7, and it would be extraordinarily helpful if it could be protected against anonymous IPs, at least for the next few days.

Thanks,

–BMRR (talk) 16:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 05:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! –BMRR (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re Template talk:Did you know#Roanoke River Light

[edit]

The article was developed in user space first, which is why it has a long edit history. Mangoe (talk) 02:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I should have looked more carefully YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 05:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:YellowMonkey/Archive147&oldid=1136123303"