User talk:ZT2000
Welcome![edit]
|
February 2021[edit]
Hello ZT2000. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Jalisco, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ZT2000. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ZT2000|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.svg) | ZT2000, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Magnolia677 for their contributions to Wikipedia. |
As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Maryland, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:ZT2000, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ZT2000|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Please fix your COI template; I am not paying you. Also, stop editing with your IP. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Jalisco shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (CC) Tbhotch™ 06:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Need to comunicate[edit]
Need to know if your able to talk about some of your changes. An integral part of contributing here is communication with others. WP:NOTHERE.--Moxy 🍁 18:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Amigo[edit]
En buen plan, si no comienzas a comunicarte con los demás terminarás con la cuenta bloqueada. (CC) Tbhotch™ 06:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Jalisco High School moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Jalisco High School, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 21:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Jalisco High School[edit]
Hello, ZT2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jalisco High School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Jalisco High School[edit]
Hello, ZT2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jalisco High School".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 21:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)