User talk:Zikrullah

Hello Zikrullah! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Just H^{editor review} 12:57, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

thank you!Zikrullah (talk) 04:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[[kara {kaushambi)]]

Meaning of "wikify"

"Wikify" means to change the text formatting, internal links, and layout of an article so that it follows the Wikipedia style guidelines and the guide to layout. Anyone can do it. Awyong J. M. Salleh 12:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanksZikrullah (talk) 04:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanksZikrullah (talk) 04:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 04:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

plz improve

AfD Nomination: Islamic Peace

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Islamic Peace meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Peace. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 06:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peace in Islamic Thought

I'm glad to hear that Islamic Peace is moving; it's good we could save this one. There is a technical matter about how to move it, however. Simply creating a new article with the new name isn't the preferred procedure. There is a move command, which would copy the article, along with its history and talk pages, to the new location. I would suggest nominating your new article Peace in Islamic Thought for speedy deletion (creators can nominate their own articles) and then move Islamic Peace to the new title. The "move" tab should be to the right of the history tab if you're logged in. To nominate Peace in Islamic Thought (not Islamic Peace, which you want to preserve so you can move it), add {{Db-author|rationale=Optional reason will be displayed in red}} to the main article page, inserting your rationale. Once this is done, you can move Islamic Peace, report the move to the AfD discussion page, and that hopefully should close the issue. RJC ^Talk 19:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Islamic Peace, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. RJC ^Talk 20:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peace in the Qur'an

Hi Zikrullah,

Here is an academic source on the concept of peace in the Qur'an: [1]. You may want to create a section titled:"In the Qur'an"

When sourcing, please use the following citation: "Earle H. Waugh, Peace, Encyclopedia of the Qur'an

Good Luck!

--Be happy!! (talk) 17:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Walaykum as Salaam

I am tired. How are you? Do you need help with anything? MezzoMezzo (talk) 14:38, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ibn Taymiyyah

What does "fundamentalist" mean in the context of 13th-century Islam? Many people would wonder whether it really means anything... AnonMoos (talk) 17:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

what does salafi mean in 21st century? Your argument is laughable. Wikipedia is not a website of ibn taymiah's descendents. Zikrullah (talk) 17:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever -- I am not a follower (or "descendent"???) of his -- considering that I am not a Muslim at all, to start with. However, the word "fundamentalist" emerged in a context of early 20th-century English-speaking Protestantism, and academic scholars have become increasingly wary of applying it to historical epochs and cultures which are quite remote from early 20th-century English-speaking Protestantism. AnonMoos (talk) 18:09, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i will still call you his descendent as your narrow mind is incapable of understanding the fact that fundamentalism here is not taken in the context of history but concern about fundamental sources of islamic law i.e. Qur'an and Sunnah of prophet on which ibn taymiyyah's reform of islam was based. Fundamentalism is a type of extreme thought towards origins. Zikrullah (talk) 18:09, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ihya ul uloom al deen.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 23:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ihya ul uloom al deen

Your article was not declined because of sourcing, but because it is not written neutrally ("widely regarded as the greatest work"). It also has a table of contents ("part one is...part two is...etc.) which is discouraged. Note that I also have blanked much of your userpage because it contained copyrighted material. Do not re-add that stuff. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 16:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What should I do if it is really regarded as greatest work. It's most influential work in islamic history ever. So on this point your criticism is not precise. Though you are right in other points. If I put something on my userpage it may be from anywhere as I am not using it for commercial purpose nor I am claiming that it's written by myself. So your this step is offensive. Sorry. I will not add it again but I want an explanation from you. Thanks for your guidance and kind attention. Zikrullah (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If it is really regarded as a great work, then you should be able to find some reliable, independent sources saying so. As to your userpage, I already explained it to you. Whether or not your are using it for commercial purposes, we cannot host copyrighted content. Here's the relevant policy. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 16:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And on looking though the article's current sources I realized you had copied much of it. Please don't use copyrighted content. I have blanked your submission, but feel free to rewrite and resubmit it. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 16:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's just an anti sufi movement in wikipedia and the proof is that ghazali's other works are still existing in wikipedia like the alchemy of happiness but as this book ihyaul uloom is hated by wahhabis so it does not exist on wikipedia. I wonder why did you not tell me to provide sources as you denied in your first message here and told me other reason that its not neutral. Now I doubt on your credibility as a neutral editor as you tried to deceive me that the article is not neutral. Do you know ghazali ? Do you know ihya ul uloom al deen ? why are you so over confident on this issue? First you said its not neutral now you are saying that it's lacking source? You Are prejudiced? why? You people are spreading deception and not helping in constructive way. I do not need your comments and I will try again but not now. I am very sorry as you are discouraging me. Thanks for giving me explanation. You SHOULD ALSO REMOVE ALL PORTIONS IN ALL WIKIPEDIA ARTICLES WHERE A COPYRIGHTED PART is added. I think you will need to edit all articles on wikipedia. This argument is foolish that we do not host. All article have some part taken from copyrighted source. Thank you. Zikrullah (talk) 16:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ihya ul uloom al deen concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ihya ul uloom al deen, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:03, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Ihya ul uloom al deen

Hello Zikrullah. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Ihya ul uloom al deen.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ihya ul uloom al deen}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salafism

There's a discussion that you might be interested in here GregKaye ✍♪ 20:04, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zikrullah. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zikrullah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert for India, Pakistan and Afghanistan

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Note that North East Delhi riots is one of the many articles covered by these sanctions. Doug Weller talk 09:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]