Venezuelan municipal elections, 2017

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Venezuelan regional elections, 2017

← 2013 10 December 2017 (2017-12-10) 2021 →
Turnout 47.32% Decrease (official)
~20% (independent est.)[1]

 
Alliance GPP MUD
Popular vote 6,517,506 2,622,058
Percentage Increase 71.31% Decrease 28.68%
Chiefs 306 25
Chiefs +/– Increase 50 Decrease 56

Results by Municipality.
Red denotes states won by the Great Patriotic Pole. Blue denotes those won by the Coalition for Democratic Unity.
Coat of arms of Venezuela.svg
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Venezuela

The Venezuelan municipal elections of 2017 were held on 10 December 2017[2] to elect mayors throughout Venezuela. This is the first municipal election held since 2013, when elections were delayed from 2012 following the death of Hugo Chávez. The election resulted with many PSUV officials being elected as heads of municipal governments throughout Venezuela.

Irregularities[edit]

Delayed elections[edit]

Controversy arose surrounding on whether the election would be held or not since the National Electoral Council (CNE) had not determined a date only two months ahead of the expected date, with some believing that this is due to the belief that if elections were held, the ruling party, United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV), would suffer one of its largest losses in over a decade.[3]

On 18 October 2016, head of the CNE, Tibisay Lucena, stated that regional and municipal elections would not be held until mid-2017, stating the delay was due to a so-called "economic war" and low oil prices. Government sources cited by Reuters stated that the true reason of the delay was the hope that higher oil prices may raise the popularity of the PSUV.[4]

After President Maduro's National Constituent Assembly proposal was approved by the head of the CNE, Tibisay Lucena, she also announced that municipal elections would be held on 10 December 2017, even though the National Constituent Assembly chose its members based on the decisions of municipal governments, which held a PSUV majority since 2013.[2]

Relocation of voting centers[edit]

On 2 December 2017, Súmate denounced the relocation of 169 polling stations, including in the Chacao and Libertador municipality,[5][6] with the Táchira state having the most, 27. Francisco Castro, director of Súmate, indicated that 106 were relocated to new centers and the remaining 63 were migrated to existing stations. He added that the most affected states with the relocation to new stations were Mérida and Aragua, with 15 centros; Miranda, with 13; Táchira and Zulia, with 12, and Carabobo, with 9. Voting centers were relocated by the pro-government National Electoral Council (CNE) citing security reasons, despite that the 2017 Venezuelan protests ended after the Constituent Assembly election.[7]

Un Nuevo Tiempo[edit]

On 2 December 2017, Vicente Bello, the National Electoral Council representative of the Un Nuevo Tiempo (UNT) opposition political party denounced irregularities during the audit of the voting machines and delivered a document to rector Luis Emilio Rondón (es) that stated that "the established protocol related with the selection of samples in the line of production by state and its subsequent verification", "the schedules set for the start of the daily activity" and that the respective turns were modified without prior notice, warning that the CNE did not establish that the samples of the selected machines were subsequently verified in their proper functioning. The electoral technician clarified that the UNT would not participate in the elaboration and signature of the acts that would be carried out as result of the audit of the production of voting machines.[8]

Global Observatory of Communication and Democracy[edit]

The Global Observatory of Communication and Democracy detected several irregularities since the announcement of the elections, including that it must have been done with six months of anticipation to comply with the electoral norms, organizing the electoral process in less than a month. The Observatory also states that the law establishes that the election of the representatives of the municipal councils should have been done along the municipal elections and that the CNE violated the Special Law of the Municipal Regime of the Metropolitan Area of Caracas (es) by suspending the election of the metropolitan mayors of Caracas and Alto Apure District (es), as well as the representatives to the metropolitan cabildos (town halls).[9] Days after the elections, on 20 December 2017, the Constituent Assembly approved the Constituent Decree for the Suppression and Liquidation of the Metropolitan Area and the Alto Apure District, dissolving both entities.[10] On 9 January 2018, the National Assembly with opposition majority declared the "absolute nullity" of the Constituent's Assembly decision to supress the entities.[11] Likewise, the Observatory indicated that the norms corresponding to the announcement were violated by publishing the electoral schedule without formal announcements or press conference of the electoral body and by performing electoral activities, such as the nomination of candidates, before the publication of the schedule. It also declared that norms related to the candidates postulation were also violated by granting only five days for the application, curation, admission and rejection, interposition, decision of appeals against the applications, as well as for the substitutions and modifications, and that the substitution and modification of candidacies rules were violated when the CNE established only two days for the process, when the Organic Law of Electoral Processes (es) specifies that the political parties may modify candidacies up to ten days before the election.[9]

Furthermore, the Observatory denounced the elimination of the inscription of new voters for the Electoral Registry, its precarious revision and the limitation for national and international observation, whose accreditations are granted discretionally by the CNE. Other factors criticized by the organization were the arbitrary conformation of the municipal regional boards, whose chosen voters were the same ones chosen in a public and automated raffle on 31 March 2016, and the fact that despite that the CNE promised to review the modification and relocation of the polling stations during the previous regional elections, two days before the election several centers remained in different locations without determining the total amount of stations that remained in that condition. The general director of the Observatory, Griselda Colina, warned about the inequity and lack of coverage of the activities of all the candidates in the public media; she stressed the lack of information for voters about the electoral offer and the outdate of the Electoral Registry since 2015, where according to unofficial estimates, approximately two million Venezuelans are being excluded. The national coordinator of the Electoral Observation Network of the Education Assembly, José Domingo Mujica, stated that the municipal elections "drag fundamental faults since the governors elections" and due to "a hasty election to the election" a "a huge cut in the electoral schedule activities" was provoked, he also pointed to the exclusion of the municipal council elections and the metropolitan mayors and also expressed his belief that there was a pro-government advantage in the electoral campaign, citing the "abuse of the official media to openly promote the pro-government candidates" and "the difference of conditions for the participants".[9]

Ángel Prado[edit]

In the Simón Planas municipality in the Lara state, the chavista and Constituent Assembly member Ángel Prado at first was denied the inscription of the independent candidacy despite getting signatures of 32% of the voters on the municipaly, receiving later support from the Communist Party of Venezuela, the MEP, the Tupamaro, the ORA and the Patria para Todos parties, of which the latter changed its support for the PSUV candidate to Ángel Pardo, change endorsed by Resolution Nro. 17/11/09/-00 of 13 November of the very Municipal Electoral Board.[12][13] The National Constituent Assembly directive declared that no member could to be a candidate without the written endorsement of its directive, reason why a thousand people mobilized to Caracas to demand the permit, request that was ignored.[12][14][15] At the time of the elections only the PPT card appeared, which received 57.45% of the total votes.[12][13] At the end, the CNE decided to finally award the position to the PSUV candidate, Jean Ortíz.[12][13]

Election day[edit]

Election center in Caracas with few voters

During the elections, the CNE rector Luis Emilio Rondón (es) stated that the more frequent complaints were related to assisted voting and political proselytizing near polling stations, mostly in the Barinas, Carabobo and Zulia states.[16] The Electoral Observation Network of the Education Assembly (ROE) and Venezuelan Electoral Observatory (OEV) reported that the electios were characterized by abstention and the abstence of both board members and witnesses, causing many voting centers to open after the stipulated time due to the lack of board members, and that several boards had to be constituted by accidental members, voters waiting in line and willig to fill the vacancies. The Democratic Unity Roundtable announced that in the primary process the candidates for the municipal elections would be elected, after the denouncement by the opposition coalition in the October 2017 regional elections the MUD decided not to field candidacies in these elections. However, some MUD member parties fielded candidates, such as Un Nuevo Tiempo and Avanzada Progresista[17][18]

According to reports of the Observation Network, the average of the national participation was 21%, being Táchira the state with most participationg, 35%, and Aragua with the least, 9%. The low presence of witnesses in the polling stations remained during the closure of the centers in municipalities such as Sucre, Chacao and Libertador, where the lines were too short or there were no voters waiting to vote, contrary to previous elections or the 2015 parliamentary elections. According to the reports received by the organization, the abstention reached over 70% at 4:00 pm.[19] However, the government's National Electoral Council has estimated that 47.32% of people eligible to vote did so.[20]

According to Domingo Mujica, the ROE national coordinator, violations of the companion voting rule were detected in 15 % on a national scale, use of public funds to mobilize voters in 16%, that 10% of the centers reported technical failures with the voting machines and that there were incidents in 5% of the stations. Other irregularities denounced by the specialists were the disproportionate use of political propaganda near polling stations and the use of the Carnet de la Patria (es) as a coercion method of the voter. Ignacio Ávalos, director of the OEV, indicated that the delay in the opening was also due to the fact that in several centers the voters refused to volunteer. According to the Observation Network, approximately 48% of the polling stations throughout the country had to be constituted by accidental members and 45% of the polling stations had no witnesses.[21]

There were complaints of voting centers in the Libertador municipality of Caracas where "red points" were installed for the verification of the voter's Carnet de la Patria and where propaganda in favor of the pro-government candidates was shown, an act forbidden during the electoral processes prohibited act during the electoral processes.[22][23] Despite that Jorge Rodríguez clarifyed that only the identity card was needed to vote, president Nicolás Maduro, vicepresident Tareck El Aissami and Rodríguez encouraged voters to vote with the Carnet de la Patria.[24][25] In a afternoon press conference, Jorge Rodríguez assured that those who voted in the municipal elections and registered their participation in the tricolor points with the Carnet de la Patria "would receive a gift".[26]

The coordinator of the electoral center of the Andrés Bello school in La Candelaria parish in Caracas denounced that the National Electoral Council did not hagive the credentials to the board members and witnesses who supported the candidate for mayor of the Libertador municipality Maribel Castillo, so they could not seal, sign or access the polling station, while they were delivered the night before to the representatives of the Patria Para Todos party and the United Socialist Party of Venezuela.[23] In the Udón Pérez voting center, in Maracaibo, twenty motorcyclists with passengers verbally threatened voters and journalists, including Zulia state candidate Manuel Rosales, throwing explosives before retiring.[18][27] In the Portuguesa state three persons were detained for attempting to illegally enter in a voting center.[28] In the San Cristóbal and Junín municipalities in Táchira state there were three preventive detentions for the destruction of the electoral ballot and the damage of a voting machine, respectively.[29]

Public opinion[edit]

Date(s)
conducted
Polling organization Sample size MUD GPP Undecided Lead
15–30 April 2017 Hercon 1,200 63.3% 16.9% 19.7% 46.4%

Results[edit]

According to the results published by the National Electoral Council (CNE) on its website, the United Socialist Party and the Great Patriotic Pole obtained 306 municipalities, while the opposition and independents that participated obtained 29 municipalities.

References[edit]

  1. ^ León, Ibis (10 December 2017). "Abstención sobre 70% en elecciones municipales estima Red de Observación Electoral". Efecto Cocuyo. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
  2. ^ a b Orozco, Jose (24 May 2017). "Venezuela's Setting of Electoral Calendar Fails to Dispel Anger". Bloomberg. Retrieved 24 May 2017.
  3. ^ Vasquez S., Alex (6 October 2016). "Venezuela skipping regional election to keep Chavista governors in place, critics say". Fox News Latino. Retrieved 7 October 2016.
  4. ^ Cawthorne, Andrew (19 October 2016). "Venezuela delays state elections to 2017, opposition angry". Reuters. Retrieved 19 October 2016.
  5. ^ Pineda Sleinan, Julett (10 December 2017). "A electores de Chacao les volvieron a "esconder" los centros de votación para el #10D". Efecto Cocuyo. Retrieved 9 December 2017.
  6. ^ "Votantes del Colegio La Consolación en Caracas fueron reubicados sin previo aviso". Efecto Cocuyo. 10 December 2017.
  7. ^ Nederr, Sofía. "Súmate denuncia que 169 centros de votación fueron reubicados". El Nacional (in Spanish).
  8. ^ "UNT denuncia irregularidades en auditoría de máquinas de votación a tres días de las municipales". Efecto Cocuyo. 7 December 2017.
  9. ^ a b c León, Ibis (9 December 2017). "Observadores electorales detectan 11 irregularidades en el proceso de municipales". Efecto Cocuyo. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
  10. ^ "ANC aprobó supresión y liquidación del Área Metropolitana de Caracas". El Nacional. 20 December 2017. Retrieved 20 December 2017.
  11. ^ "AN declara nula eliminación de alcaldías metropolitanas decretada por la Constituyente". Efecto Cocuyo. 9 January 2018. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
  12. ^ a b c d Arias, Ángel. "De cómo el gobierno pisotea brutalmente la voluntad del pueblo de Simón Planas". La Izquierda Diario (in Spanish). Retrieved 28 December 2017.
  13. ^ a b c Alba TV. "Ángel Prado sumó 57,45% de los votos en Simón Planas - Alba TV". www.albatv.org (in Spanish). Retrieved 28 December 2017.
  14. ^ "La unidad de la oposición de izquierda y el chavismo opositor es una urgente necesidad | LaClase.info". laclase.info (in Spanish). Retrieved 28 December 2017.
  15. ^ Voces Urgentes- Aporrea.org. "Lara: Presidenta de la ANC bloqueó la candidatura comunera de Ángel Prado en municipio Simón Planas". Aporrea (in Spanish). Retrieved 28 December 2017.
  16. ^ Moreno Losada, Vanessa (10 December 2017). "Denuncias por numerosos votos asistidos son las más comunes este #10Dic, según Rondón". Efecto Cocuyo. Retrieved 11 December 2017.
  17. ^ Pineda Sleinan, Julette (10 December 2017). "A "cuentagotas" salió a votar Chacao este #10D". Efecto Cocuyo.
  18. ^ a b "En las regiones reinó la abstención durante elecciones municipales". El Nacional. 10 December 2017. Retrieved 11 December 2017.
  19. ^ Flores Riofrio, Jorge (10 December 2017). "Contada afluencia de electores persiste al cierre de jornada comicial #10Dic". Efecto Cocuyo.
  20. ^ https://www.lapatilla.com/site/2017/12/10/paticipacion-durante-elecciones-de-alcaldes-fue-de-4732-segun-el-cne/
  21. ^ Pineda Sleina, Juletter (10 December 2017). "Sin testigos cerca de 45% de las mesas de votación, según Red de Observación Electoral #10D". Efecto Cocuyo.
  22. ^ Avendaño, Shari (10 December 2017). "Colas para verificar el carnet de la patria son más largas que para votar en Caracas". Efecto Cocuyo.
  23. ^ a b Avendaño, Shari (10 December 2017). "Con ausentismo y "puntos rojos" abren centros de votación en Candelaria". Efecto Cocuyo.
  24. ^ Flores Riofrio, Jorge (10 December 2017). "Jorge Rodríguez aclaró que para votar solo hace falta la cédula de identidad". Efecto Cocuyo.
  25. ^ "Tareck El Aissami insta a electores a registrar su voto con el carnet de la patria". Efecto Cocuyo. 10 December 2017.
  26. ^ Flores Riofrio, Jorge (10 December 2017). "Jorge Rodríguez confirma promesa de "regalo" a quienes registraron su voto con carnet de la patria". Efecto Cocuyo.
  27. ^ Urdaneta, Sheyla; Angulo, Nataly (10 December 2017). "Colectivos amenazan a electores y lanzan explosivos en centros de votación en Maracaibo". El Pitazo. Retrieved 11 December 2017.
  28. ^ León, Ibis (10 December 2017). "Detenidas tres personas por intentar "ingresar ilegalmente" a centro de votación en Portuguesa". Efecto Cocuyo.
  29. ^ Silva, José; Abadí, Aliana (10 December 2017). "Siga el minuto a minuto de las elecciones municipales 2017". El Universal. Retrieved 11 December 2017.