Jump to content

Wadsleyite: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

4 January 2024

17 June 2023

20 February 2023

16 February 2023

28 January 2023

2 November 2022

11 August 2022

5 July 2022

  • curprev 19:3819:38, 5 July 20222601:246:c700:c:e814:99c9:2f79:49b0 talk 15,791 bytes +226 Lead presents original material rather than summarizing the main body of the article. For instance, the mention of the water reservoir is only in the lead, the 520 km depth limit of the mineral appears only in the lead, not in the article, etc. As well, rest of article, not just the one section, is overly reliant on primary source, making this a draft review article from WP editors, rather than an encyclopedic article (citing published reviews). undo
  • curprev 19:3019:30, 5 July 20222601:246:c700:c:e814:99c9:2f79:49b0 talk 15,565 bytes +141 Properly formatted the last mentioned citation. undo
  • curprev 19:2619:26, 5 July 20222601:246:c700:c:e814:99c9:2f79:49b0 talk 15,424 bytes +140 Replaced the link-only citation of the Handbook of Mineralogy with a proper citation. undo
  • curprev 19:1919:19, 5 July 20222601:246:c700:c:e814:99c9:2f79:49b0 talk 15,284 bytes +464 →‎Structure: Section based fully on primary sources, violating WP guidelines. Subscription-only primary sources make verification impossible here. No mention of spinels, Mg-Si ordering, or oct-tet sites in abstract of first cited source, which is otherwise unrelated to first three sentences. All sources cited are dated, the least of which is the 2007 paper whose introduction seems to have been uesd instead of seeking a secondary source, and a 2013 comps paper whose use is overly speculative. undo
  • curprev 18:4518:45, 5 July 20222601:246:c700:c:e814:99c9:2f79:49b0 talk 14,820 bytes −9 →‎Biographic sketch: Alternative section title proposed. Also, citation checking needed in the Structure section — it is not clear that all information provided comes from these three sources, and if so, which is the source of the last sentece's content. Finally, that paragraph is jargon filled, and while I as a PhD chemist understand it, I doubt that a general audience would. undo

12 May 2022

14 March 2022

13 March 2022

7 March 2022

3 February 2022

13 January 2022

31 December 2021

18 October 2021

30 August 2021

13 May 2021

31 March 2021

1 January 2021

30 December 2020

12 December 2020

21 November 2020

19 November 2020

18 November 2020

24 September 2020

2 September 2020

5 March 2020

14 June 2019

9 June 2019

26 January 2018

25 January 2018

7 November 2017

2 July 2017

19 October 2016

10 September 2016

21 April 2016

4 April 2016

1 April 2016

28 March 2016

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)