Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 August 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

August 18[edit]

Image:Risperidone-icon.jpg[edit]

Image:Risperidone-icon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moop stick (notify | contribs).
  • Low quality, no evidence that this image has been released into the public domain. —Remember the dot (talk) 00:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
  • The image is not public domain. It appears to be scanned from page 434 of Essential Psychopharmacology, 2nd Edition by Stephen M. Stahl (ISBN: 0-521-64615-4). It should be replaced with an illustration created from scratch. --Supergloom 04:19, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Deleted, Commonsbleed. – Quadell (talk) (random) 01:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
  • delete. It seems to be copyrighted materiial and likely should go--Expo512 (talk) 10:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:07imac iphoto.png[edit]

Image:07imac iphoto.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Keyser Söze (notify | contribs).
  • This image does not meet the first criterion required for claiming Fair Use. As listed on the policy page (Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Policy), number one says: "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." The product in the picture exists and can be bought, which means a free equivalent could be created in little time. I've left two messages on related pages (Image talk and Uploader talk) with no response. ALTON .ıl 07:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Very easily replaced image. Upload page should make clear some examples like this (as with photos of living persons) that are never fair use. Something like "Invalid fair use - publicity or advertising photo of current product". -- fourdee ᛇᚹᛟ 07:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:P2230049.JPG[edit]

Image:P2230049.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jjhrmz (notify | contribs).
  • Not used anywhere, not usefull for any ensyclopedic articke. Sherool (talk) 07:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete -- fourdee ᛇᚹᛟ 08:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:I-35WBridgeOverhead.jpg[edit]

Image:I-35WBridgeOverhead.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by OverlordQ (notify | contribs).
  • Orphan Image with better alternatives already uploaded. Q T C 10:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Deleted, Commonsbleed. – Quadell (talk) (random) 01:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
  • OverlordQ and Quadell, I probably caused this link to go from red back to blue. Yes it is low resolution but the view and sense of scale are helpful so for the moment I linked the commons copy to the bridge article. Of course no way to know for how long. Thanks very much for the perspective this photo gives. -Susanlesch 01:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:60099.jpg[edit]

Image:60099.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cassio91 (notify | contribs).
  • obvious copyvio like other uploads by this user. Please delete them all. Polarlys 11:16, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete and warn user. -- fourdee ᛇᚹᛟ 11:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:AmazingRaceMap.gif[edit]

Image:AmazingRaceMap.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cabus (notify | contribs).

Image:Emma Watson in 2005 Harry Potter Premiere.jpg[edit]

Image:Emma Watson in 2005 Harry Potter Premiere.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cheveux (notify | contribs).
  • UE (just look, you'll see why), possible CV also. BencherliteTalk 12:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
(note - uploader has just been blocked for 31 hours for vandalism. BencherliteTalk 12:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC))
  • Speedy delete - Poor copy of Image:Emma Watson.jpg (which is on commons). --h2g2bob (talk) 00:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete this image will most likely never be used on any wikipedia article. -Icewedge 21:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Hannah Taylor Gordon .jpg[edit]

Image:Hannah Taylor Gordon .jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Robors (notify | contribs).

Image:Cardinal Medinaat2005papalelection.jpg[edit]

Image:Cardinal Medinaat2005papalelection.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gavin Scott (notify | contribs).
  • no permission given. Please check all other uploads by this user, he uploads „PD-self“ images with „fair-use rationales“ (see Image:Com0506c.jpg or Image:O'brein and murphey.JPG. > copyvios. Polarlys 15:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
  • I thought all images required rationales? Thats what the over-zealous wikimedia -patrol tell me...Gavin Scott 16:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Only non-free images require rationales. —Remember the dot (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sheila_Rogers_Nomination_for_Emmys.jpg[edit]

Image:Sheila_Rogers_Nomination_for_Emmys.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Brainchannels (notify | contribs).
  • Logo of a TV program used to illustrate the fact that a person was on the program. Delete per WP:NFCC#8. Videmus Omnia Talk 18:55, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


I don't really care if you delete this or not. It doesn't matter.

Image:2006-09-26_23h20m54.png[edit]

Image:2006-09-26_23h20m54.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fidelfair (notify | contribs).
  • High resolution video game screenshot being used to illustrate articles that are not about the game. Videmus Omnia Talk 22:06, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Speedy delete fair use rationale is not good enough, states that picture is low quality, it is not. -Icewedge 21:35, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Camelotsetup.jpg[edit]

Image:Camelotsetup.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Soadfan413 (notify | contribs).

I am also listing:

Ten Pound Hammer(Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsReview?) 23:43, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Look see, I happen to be in Washington, DC frequently, and there are virtually no photographs renewed, period. Quadell knows as well as I do that this photograph was never renewed, yet Quadell just overrided the consunsus here to impose a unilateral decision against the evidence. And, even lacking 100% concrete proof that there is no renewal, e.g., a statement from the Nobel Foundation that they never renewed copyrights in the US, it's still demonstrably public domain in the EU. Did Quadell forget that? We just discussed it two paragraphs above. ... Kenosis 16:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
    • If you think my actions were inappropriate, you're free to bring this up at WP:DRV, WP:ANI, or wherever you think the appropriate forum is. I stand by my closing decision. (By the way, our servers are located in the U.S., so if the U.S. considers an image to be copyrighted then we can't consider it free, even if it's PD elsewhere.) – Quadell (talk) (random) 02:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)