Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 3

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete, broken template test. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use external link template (Note: Deleting this would empty Category:Islamic text templates.) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:50, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Mabbett, how is this an external link template? looks like a broken internal link template to me. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You're correct; I was mislead by the category mentioned above being in category:External link templates. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted here. ~ Rob13Talk 20:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External link template, created in 2011. Only three transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob13Talk 19:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Single use. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob13Talk 19:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrapper for {{Coord}}, created in 2005. Only 41 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted here. ~ Rob13Talk 20:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Given that this defaults to keep, this template should be fixed unless there's consensus in the future to delete. ~ Rob13Talk 20:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Displays patent nonsense: The image belongs to June 2015 while the legend given for it is for a non-existent June 2016 map. For example, the color red on the image does not represent Opera Mini, purple does not represent Android Browser and blue does not represent Microsoft Edge.

If one cannot give correct information, one must not give wrong information. The correct course of action, which is editing the template to show the correct info is already tried and met with a revert. Hence, TfD is the next stop. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for posting that fix. I put it back with a note explaining this data is from before the Microsoft Edge launch; I think that had caused some confusion contributing to the revert of the fix. This template is now completely sensical. -- Beland (talk) 19:07, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Omni Flames (talk) 07:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 20:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External link template, created 2006, with only two transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Omni Flames (talk) 07:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob13Talk 20:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

defunct team Joeykai (talk) 04:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).