Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 3
August 3
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete, broken template test. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Tabari (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Single-use external link template (Note: Deleting this would empty Category:Islamic text templates.) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:50, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Andy Mabbett, how is this an external link template? looks like a broken internal link template to me. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- You're correct; I was mislead by the category mentioned above being in category:External link templates. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted here. ~ Rob13Talk 20:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Bce (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
External link template, created in 2011. Only three transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- keep and include these. Caorongjin (talk) 20:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob13Talk 19:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Template:EDAM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Single use. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- delete after replacing. Frietjes (talk) 15:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob13Talk 19:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Template:REP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- delete, found some potential uses, but not enough for a template in my opinion. Frietjes (talk) 15:45, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Wrapper for {{Coord}}, created in 2005. Only 41 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- delete, this method of linking has fallen out of favour. Frietjes (talk) 14:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- comment, Pigsonthewing, should probably consider Template:Mapit-AUS-suburbscale as well? I just merged about fifty of them into the infobox in Australian place articles. Frietjes (talk) 21:29, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- I considered that, but that template also emits a text label (unlike the Canadian one discussed here). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Pigsonthewing, sure, but check transclusions like Lidcombe Shopping Centre. I am having a hard time seeing where it would be that useful in articles. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- I considered that, but that template also emits a text label (unlike the Canadian one discussed here). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted here. ~ Rob13Talk 20:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Template:UEFA coach (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- weak keep and add to these articles. Frietjes (talk) 14:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Given that this defaults to keep, this template should be fixed unless there's consensus in the future to delete. ~ Rob13Talk 20:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Displays patent nonsense: The image belongs to June 2015 while the legend given for it is for a non-existent June 2016 map. For example, the color red on the image does not represent Opera Mini, purple does not represent Android Browser and blue does not represent Microsoft Edge.
If one cannot give correct information, one must not give wrong information. The correct course of action, which is editing the template to show the correct info is already tried and met with a revert. Hence, TfD is the next stop. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- That's a shame. Either establish the correct information, even if a table is needed per User:FleetCommand, or delete per nom —PC-XT+ 03:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- We have a better option than table: File:Usage share of web browsers (Source StatCounter).svg. It is updated up to May 2015 and is updatable with R code. The real potential of this template is showing a regional division map. The fact that it shows patent nonsense is its undoing. —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 18:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep and fix. It shouldn't be hard to change the text to match the image. -- Beland (talk) 19:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep and reinstate my fix, per Beland. We shouldn't dignify any revert with a discussion. FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 16:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks for posting that fix. I put it back with a note explaining this data is from before the Microsoft Edge launch; I think that had caused some confusion contributing to the revert of the fix. This template is now completely sensical. -- Beland (talk) 19:07, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Omni Flames (talk) 07:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 20:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
External link template, created 2006, with only two transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Omni Flames (talk) 07:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob13Talk 20:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Dominican Summer League Pirates 2 roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
defunct team Joeykai (talk) 04:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- delete, defunct. Frietjes (talk) 14:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).