Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 14

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:49, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this is an unused template, having been superseded by Template:2017–18 Danish Superliga Regular Season table (same naming style as in the previous season) ⇒ Chris0282 (talk) 17:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator of these, it does not appear these records are still on the books, so their templates are no longer needed. In the case of Janvrin, the record is still valid but has been replaced by a format template, the more efficient way to present this information. For those of you in search of more brownie points for deleting more templates, all it takes is the labor to convert the information into the appropriate format template. Trackinfo (talk) 18:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Trackinfo, some of the other records templates are being used in more than one article, like List of world records in masters athletics and List of United States records in masters athletics. I see that you have substituted some of these two-use templates in the "United States" page, like {{Gary Miller M50 World Record Score}}. is the general consensus that we should not worry about the duplication, and substitute these templates even if they are used in more than one article (assuming they have been converted to one of the {{Decathlon score}} or related templates)? Frietjes (talk) 13:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
These templates, if still valid, can be replaced by copying the data into the appropriate template, for example Template:Masters Heptathlon Score. Certain templates require the appropriate age range. These were created for layout efficiency rather than necessarily the microscopic server efficiency. Gaehling for example is deprecated because her 2005 record was surpassed as both World and European records by the 2010 record of Template:Sonia Del Prete W40 Heptathlon World Record. Del Prete's record can be expressed in the Masters Heptathlon Score, then copied and pasted into both articles but since I had already created the individual template I haven't bothered to do the labor to take that additional step after I created the universal score display template. The ones that are no longer in any of the three mainspace masters records articles are likely to have been surpassed, verifiable (sourced) by checking the appropriate governing body records pages. You can also save time in most cases by looking at the world site first and the appropriate national based site only after the world record is deprecated. Trackinfo (talk) 17:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and all the links go to the same page (Kalamazoo-class monitor) Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unused and won't be useful in the future. Brad 05:13, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Delete. Unnecessary. The ships were never completed; the likelihood that each will have its own article and need template navigation are vanishingly small. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 06:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, out-of-date, and all red links Frietjes (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 21. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and out-of-date (Jeunesse Esch#Current squad has a more recent squad, but even that is a year old) Frietjes (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:13, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates navigation found in Template:Aircraft gas turbine engine components Frietjes (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates Bandung_Institute_of_Technology#Faculties_and_Programs Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and from "what links here", it looks like it hasn't been used for a long time Frietjes (talk) 15:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

not used Frietjes (talk) 14:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:45, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:45, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a list of presenters of TV programming, it fails WP:PERFNAV. --Rob Sinden (talk) 12:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 22. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:46, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; contradictory information to other templates. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
05:53, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:46, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and orphaned. Redundant to {{Railway line legend}}. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
05:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:46, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
05:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:02, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 03:51, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:02, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 03:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).