Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 10

< March 9	March 11 >

March 10

Template:Dominican Summer League Orioles 2 roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:09, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dominican Summer League Orioles 2 roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Team no longer exists. Orioles will field one team this year. NYGiantsfan1991 (talk) 22:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Since the team doesn't exist, it doesn't have a roster. NatureBoyMD (talk) 22:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jeay Sindh Liberal Front

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:10, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jeay Sindh Liberal Front (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Just text; unclear what it is intended to be used for. And it is unused. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cameron Aggies women's basketball coach navbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. No issue with a REFUND if a few more articles are written. Primefac (talk) 22:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cameron Aggies women's basketball coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Two links... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 22:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

indifferent, but please don't put it back into the articles directly. Frietjes (talk) 23:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The number of bluelinks has increased since the nomination was made, hence the relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adele songs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 05:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adele songs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Adele (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Adele songs with Template:Adele.
No need for two navboxes. Can easily be handled by one. See this version. Rob Sinden (talk) 08:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ - And merge the songs template with the Adele template. She has only released three albums, with a limited amount of singles. Hardly any are non-singles which have their own article. It's completely pointless having two templates for such a small amount of links when compared with other singers who have released a lot more thus they need two navigation templates, I agree, but I don't agree with the which one should be merged. — Calvin999 09:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I've just noticed the version you've linked to: that is the one I think should be re-instated. I would Support Adele songs being merged back with Adele. I misinterpreted which one you thought should be merged with the other. (The Adele songs navigation template isn't even on her song articles). — Calvin999 09:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it might not have been needed in the past, but she's released more songs now (even if only counting single releases) that have their own articles. It's getting close to (if not already at) the point where having songs in the main navbox would overfill it. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It really isn't anywhere near that point! It's a relatively small navbox, and with all the singles in one group (rather than split by album like in the song-specific navbox), there's room for plenty more! Picking some completely random examples, have a look at {{Kate Bush}} or {{Tori Amos}}. --Rob Sinden (talk) 13:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

support, no need for two navboxes here. Frietjes (talk) 00:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above Snuggums comment. L3X1 (distant write) 02:07, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - if done like this, it's not cluttered, still maintains all of its information and links. We are very far away from being motivated by necessity (i.e. a too-large navbox) to be splitting it at this point. Primefac (talk) 02:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above, no need for two templates when the links in one form a subset of the links in the other. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:56, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ToledoWalleyeCoach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:11, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ToledoWalleyeCoach (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only has one link, only used in one place. Unnecessary. Yosemiter (talk) 00:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).