Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 23

< November 22	November 24 >

November 23

Template:2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – CONMEBOL table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – CONMEBOL table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use template. Subst and delete. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:41, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The table is important to keep up with the eventual updates for the 2026 FIFA World Cup qualifiers for the South American sector. There is no point to ask for its removal, as it is a essential way to inform readers, researchers and even the supporters of the participating national association football teams. 2804:14D:BE8A:94AA:1DFF:142A:B6FA:99F8 (talk) 19:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IP, I'm aware that the table is important. However, you'll notice that it'll be moved to the article space as I said it'll be "Substited and deleted". The information will not be lost, but the template is not needed. –Aidan721 (talk) 21:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Giant Snowman 16:13, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per IP above - the table will likely be used in multiple articles in due course. Substing now goes against its purpose. Giant Snowman 16:14, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@GiantSnowman: We can transclude sections as has been precedent for previous year tables. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:31, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 22:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It'll be used again, as noted above. TheBigE1980 (talk) 08:45, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Edward W. Hardy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Edward W. Hardy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Little used template, created by a now stale sockpuppet of Maximum023. There are four separate links to The Woodsman but they are are all links to the same article. Other mentions on this template are to articles by sockpuppets that have now been deleted. There are two films where he is listed as a violinist but he is not mentioned at the articles. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:18, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I came across this about 18 months ago and noted that a bunch of SPA editors seemed to be creating a walled garden of articles about the subject; it's no surprise that they have all been confirmed as socks of each other. As the nominator states, there is really only one article here, repeated four times: the other three bluelinked articles don't mention the subject at all, so there is nothing to navigate here. Richard3120 (talk) 01:37, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough useful links, for the reasons explained by the nom. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:47, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WTournament

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WTournament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

per the deletion discussion of template:wrcode, we don't need to include these numbers. Frietjes (talk) 20:39, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:18, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:24, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WomenRugbyUnionReport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WomenRugbyUnionReport (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to template:rugbybox Frietjes (talk) 18:27, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:18, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:24, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2000-01 International Baseball League of Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:IBLA. ✗plicit 23:56, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2000-01 International Baseball League of Australia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:IBLA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:2000-01 International Baseball League of Australia with Template:IBLA.
Merge into {{IBLA}}. Single season with one-off teams does not need own navbox per WP:NENAN. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:18, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Xpd family of templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 December 1. ✗plicit 00:26, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Xpd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Xpd1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Xpd2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Xpd3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1994 FIFA World Cup groups talk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:09, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1994 FIFA World Cup groups talk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. This page appears to have been used in the templates listed at this TFD. It's not quite a speedy G8, but it is pretty close. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:49, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Giant Snowman 19:38, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, not used or needed. Giant Snowman 19:41, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:17, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).