Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 January 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 14 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 16 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 15[edit]

03:41:11, 15 January 2019 review of submission by Weihuang2019[edit]


Weihuang2019 (talk) 03:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


03:41:11, 15 January 2019 review of submission by Weihuang2019

no No action Nothing to do here. Sandbox deleted as WP:U1. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:27, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:05:37, 15 January 2019 review of submission by Anand ghumaliya model[edit]


Anand ghumaliya model (talk) 05:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not even an attempt at an article - I'm not sure whether G12 would apply to a page that consists purely of a URL, but there's nothing to reconsider Nosebagbear (talk) 18:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:28:39, 15 January 2019 review of submission by LOD Planner[edit]


I am trying to write a factual company description page for LOD Planner Inc. - we are not trying to promote we are just trying to document what the company does. Can you offer some advice what we should focus on changing? Any help would be much appreciated. Many thanks. LOD Planner (talk) 05:28, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 14:18, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:15:30, 15 January 2019 review of submission by Gumatas[edit]


Gumatas (talk) 06:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the reviewer's comments? Do not resubmit until AFTER the election. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 14:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:00:38, 15 January 2019 review of submission by The Great Yan[edit]


The Great Yan (talk) 08:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@The Great Yan: welcome. Please read WP:FIRSTARTICLE to get started, but don't feel tempted to write an article about yourself. Wikipedia isn't a place to promote yourself or your business. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:58, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

help needed[edit]

HI , can you help me completing my page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Divya_krishnan), i can give you all information you need with source, or pls let me know my mistakes, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abidn2 (talk • contribs) 09:39, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Abidn2: please read WP:FIRSTARTICLE and Wikipedia:Verifiability and then ask again here if you still have questions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:48, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:25:37, 15 January 2019 review of submission by ChristinFrohne[edit]

Hey, I am wondering why you declined my article. It would be great if you could explain it a bit more and give me advises about how to change it. Thank you very much ChristinFrohne (talk) 12:25, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ChristinFrohne: take a look at User:Joe_Decker/IsThisNotable and WP:SPAM. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:35:18, 15 January 2019 review of submission by Alexpage9650[edit]


Firstly, I'd like to request a review for the biography because the biography contains the full details of the prominent Dr.Hisham Safadi which should be granted a page on your website for references from clients. It's a biography that contains all his life achievements and awards and should deserve an approved page here. I also belive the biography is of full quality containing all properties an accurate biography should have. Alexpage9650 (talk) 13:35, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Alexpage9650 (talk) 13:35, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:BLP. All biographies of living people must include at least one reliable source. I suggest you to add more secondary, reliable sources that are independent of the subject to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 14:22, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:13:00, 15 January 2019 review of draft by Lvazq064[edit]


Lvazq064 (talk) 14:13, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon, I have previosuly finished working on the Draft: The Power of Patient Stories, is there anything that I need to do for it to be checked? I tried to add it to "Check your Drafts" but I am not sure how it works. Thank you and have a great day! Lvazq064 (talk) 14:13, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For User:Lvazq064/sandbox, I Declined your submission since we do not accept blank submissions. For Draft:The Power of Patient Stories, most of the sources are primary sources (which is the book itself) and they are not reliable sources. It needs more secondary, independent sources to show notability. See WP:NBOOK ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 14:25, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:16:32, 15 January 2019 review of submission by Leonid-luminate[edit]

I would like to understand why the submission was rejected. It has absolutely no advertisement content. All claims are verified by references that fully meet the wikipedia referencing policy and only facts are mentioned. Multiple references are provided for each fact. Leonid-luminate (talk) 14:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Leonid-luminate#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:08:58, 15 January 2019 review of submission by Horncritic[edit]


Article was submitted Dec. 11, 2018, and accepted soon thereafter for publication, but it has not been posted. Could you please let me know when that might happen?

Horncritic (talk) 15:08, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Horncritic: I am not sure what you mean by 'it has not been posted'. The article was accepted on 11 December and been part of Wikipedia since then. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:14, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:24:49, 15 January 2019 review of submission by Rorosab[edit]


I have checked the Wikipedia tutorial and templates and updated the content of the page and I would like from you to check the updated page and consider publishing it. Rorosab (talk) 17:24, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rorosab: The draft article that you've created about the Softlookup website is not suitable for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and has criteria for which subjects it includes articles about. The relevant criteria in this case can be found at WP:NWEB. Your draft fails those criteria, so the subject will not be accepted for inclusion. Wikipedia is not a place to promote your site. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:29:39, 15 January 2019 review of submission by The Great Yan[edit]


The Great Yan (talk) 17:29, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I change my sandbox according to your guideline. Is it good to go?

@The Great Yan: You are welcome to use your sandbox as a place to experiment. However the only content there at the moment is a line of text saying "This is my sandbox Place. I edit in this place to understand more about wikipedia." This is clearly not an article suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:33, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:42:17, 15 January 2019 review of submission by DaiPedia2018[edit]


Hello, I noticed my article got declined due to suspicion of COI. At first I didn't understand why, but after doing a more thorough research of wording, I realized my mistakes and is already working on a more clinical edit of the text. I can guarantee you, that I have absolutely no personal relationship with Ms.Daiane Sodre and I'm definitely not getting paid to create an article about her. Please let me know how to proceed with the editing and what I have to do. I appreciate all your help! :-) Thank you! DaiPedia2018 (talk) 18:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DaiPedia2018: Please read WP:NMODEL, Help:Referencing for beginners and WP:EXT. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:48, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DaiPedia2018: hello. While Draft:Daiane_Sodre has not been tagged for having any COI issues, I do remember tagging Draft:Daiane_Sodre (2) with COI and UDP tags. I did this after noticing an image your used in the draft ([1]) was furnished to you my an established photographer; to me, this indicated a possible conflict of interest, as OTRS confirmed at the WMC that the release of the image was legitimate. I asked you about this on your talk page, but never recieved a response to my COI inquest. Some clarification on your part would be welcome, and will impact on how we move forward in this situation.--SamHolt6 @SamHolt6: I already sent the below to you in another place, but since this is all new to me, I'll post the same reply here. Hopefully we'll communicate one way or the other. I apologize for my mistakes, but have read as much as I could about how to communicate on the Talk page. Hopefully it works? First I want to apologize for not responding to your message above. Unfortunately I had a personal problem and have not been online for the past 3-4 weeks :-( Like I wrote in a reply to another person, I have absolutely no personal or professional affiliation with Ms.Daiane Sodre. When I decided to create a WP article about her, I browsed 100's of images to see if I could find a royalty free image to use. Since I didn't find any, I ended up writing to the photographer asking if I could use his image for the article. He responded that the image is from 2012, so since it's an older image he would have no problem with me using it for the article and he gave his authorization. If the image is violating any WP rules, I'll be happy to remove it. Just FYI, I'm also editing the text for it to be more neutral as well I have been researching more about Ms.Daiane Sodre and will add more information to the article as well as source references and links. Again, thank you for your patience and please let me know how to proceed from here. DaiPedia2018 (talk) 19:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:35:51, 15 January 2019 review of draft by Wmwillis3[edit]


Hi, I'm trying to get a photo (personal shot) of the biography I submitted, and it was flagged up front- and not allowed to be even reviewed. I own the photo- and have more to help lend credence and help with the article. The owner was my Dad; he's deceased, and I have been providing personal photos of his music days to many authors and publications, and I was accredited "courtesy of Martin Willis", in every one. I understand the copyright/trademark requirements, but these are personal photos (?!?)- yikes...please help if and when you can; the most important part is to get the article posted so it also helps out Bill Black's bio, and a few others. Thanks a lot...and thanks for your support. R, "Wmwillis3" William Willis Wmwillis3 (talk) 19:35, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wmwillis3: Please read Wikipedia:Uploading images and/or Wikipedia:Wikimedia Commons. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:43, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:31:34, 15 January 2019 review of submission by Johnhoye1[edit]

I'm trying set up a page for John Hoye I have published book ISBN info below

'More information in This Day In Music's guild to Iron Maiden by Joe Shoomam ISBN 978-1-9995927-5-2 (page 164 - 167)'

I would think that is sufficient to verify the page for John Hoye, as well as links from an existing page for the band Urchin where John is also cited.

Thank you

Johnhoye1 (talk) 20:31, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnhoye1: Please read WP:COI, WP:NMUSICIAN, Help:Referencing for beginners and WP:EXT. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:36, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pink clock Awaiting administrative action Please could an admin compare the draft against the article deleted as a result of this AfD to establish whether it is eligible for WP:G4? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Substantially the same, Curb Safe Charmer – "They rehearsed in the cellar of John’s house or in the back room of Dave Murray's house and on the stage of John’s school" was found in both, for example. Deleted as G4 (created "simply to circumvent Wikipedia's deletion policy")/G11. User:Johnhoye1 too, for the same reasons. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:42:08, 15 January 2019 review of draft by Riseupstrategies[edit]


We will make changes due to it being declined. But there is one section where we talk about Yuri's parents with no reference. The reason there is no reference is because it was written from a personal source. Will this be a problem?

Thanks!

Riseupstrategies (talk) 20:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Riseupstrategies. Please clarify what you mean by "we". The policy on Wikipedia is "one user—one account". Usernames should not be shared by multiple individuals. If you are close enough to the subject to know things about his family that are not public, you have a conflict of interest, and really shouldn't be writing about him. If you write about him nonetheless, then you should declare the nature of your connection. In any case, Wikipedia articles may contain only information that is verifiable in reliable, published sources, not material from the personal experience of editors. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:56:18, 15 January 2019 review of draft by Siphelele GoodenoughThemba[edit]

Just wanted to know why my Article is being deleted

Siphelele GoodenoughThemba (talk) 20:56, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Siphelele GoodenoughThemba: I have answered your question at the Teahouse. Please see my reply there. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:56, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:30:01, 15 January 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Gracelandet[edit]


I created this draft for which I've been updating and expect to update with additional information over the next couple weeks. I made it a draft to allow others to make contributions if possible. Someone created another page for which I just got an email saying it was being considered for deletion (not this article but the other one Courtney_Hadwin). So I guess I just want to make sure that first, this draft is in fact searchable by others to make contributions and therefore would avoid duplicate drafts for this subject. So my primary concern is someone trying to create another article from scratch for "Courtney Hadwin" rather than updating this draft! Please let me know if I should have taken different steps. Thank You very much!

Gracelandet (talk) 22:30, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gracelandet: I recommend you await the outcome of the discussion on whether the existing article should be deleted. If the outcome is that it should be kept, you should abandon your draft and improve the existing article in mainspace instead. If the outcome is that it should be deleted, then it is because the Wikipedia editor community considers that she is not a suitable subject for a Wikipedia article and so submitting your draft is unlikely to see it accepted. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2019_January_15&oldid=879403728"