Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 April 21

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< April 20 << Mar | April | May >> April 22 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 21

[edit]

02:35:59, 21 April 2021 review of submission by 210.212.1.92

[edit]

THINKTUB INTERACTIVES OPC PRIVATE LIMITED IS A REGISTERED INDIAN STARTUP WHO PLEDGE THE UTILIZATION OF AI AND BLOCKCHAIN. IT AN OFFICIALLY REGISTERED UNDER INDIAN COMPANIES ACT 2013. ITS OFFICIAL WEBSITE IS https://www.thinktub.live/ 210.212.1.92 (talk) 02:35, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thinktubopc. Please don't write in ALL CAPS, it may be considered shouting. Given the general sanctions on all pages with content related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, broadly construed, Draft:ThinkTub Interactives (OPC) Private Limited is about as hopeless a topic as it's possible to imagine. However, if you can add at least three independent, reliable, secondary sources containing significant coverage of it - ones not excluded by elements of WP:NCORP - then you may submit the draft for review. The current backlog is about 5 months. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03:44:30, 21 April 2021 review of submission by JSJS 22

[edit]


JSJS 22 (talk) 03:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:King_Street_Sounds

I took away all the advice made by Dan arndt, but still cannot be reviewed again by anyone. How can I get this reviewed?

Hi JSJS 22. The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed for 2 months. The current backlog is 5 months. There are millions of ways to improve Wikipedia while you wait. Check out the Wikipedia:Task Center if you aren't sure where to start. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03:59:57, 21 April 2021 review of submission by Darzubair

[edit]

This person is notable professional football coach from india, google searches also available. Why are you rejecting it.plz help. Darzubair (talk) 03:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Darzubair. Saying that Dar is notable doesn't make it true. The draft has been declined twice and finally rejected because, as one reviewer said, Dar "has not played or managed at the fully professional level (being an assistant coach at a professional football club is not a notable position, neither is being the head coach at a football academy)". You have repeatedly failed to show how you think he meets the notability criteria. Now you're effectively out of the game, having been shown a yellow card, and then a red card. Reviewers don't intend to consider the draft again, but there are millions of Wikipedia pages unrelated to Dar that you're welcome to edit. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:39, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04:57:04, 21 April 2021 review of draft by Rjmjrjm

[edit]


Is there a time format template for "1 pm"? Example: At {{hour formatter}} the mob entered Jacksonville

Russ Marsh 04:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rjmjrjm. I'm not aware of a template for that. There are, however, Manual of Style guidelines for how to format times at MOS:TIME. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:30:05, 21 April 2021 review of draft by Rachwoo

[edit]


Hi, where can I update the url below from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jiang_Lu_Xia

to

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jiang_Luxia

I would like to standardized the name of chinese actor by merging the middle names together without spaces.

Thank you.

Rachwoo (talk) 08:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Looks better than 99% of all submissions. Not only have I moved the Draft, I will also publish to mainspace.Naraht (talk) 13:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:15:14, 21 April 2021 review of submission by Xicomaia

[edit]


Xicomaia (talk) 10:15, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Xicomaia You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 10:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! It's my first page here on Wikipedia, so I'm sorry if something is not properly done! If possible I would like to know why this was rejected. Thank you very much! Xicomaia (talk) 10:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Xicomaia Your draft was rejected because it appears that this company does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources that have chosen on their own to write about the company(i.e. no press releases or announcements of routine business). The draft needs to do more than confirm the existence of the company. Please review Your First Article.
If you work for this company, please review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures. Please put further comments in this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. 331dot (talk) 10:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! First of all I would like to thank you for answer. I do not work for this company, nor am I affiliated with it. I just like what they do and I am a fan of their work, in this case, their well-known Farming Simulator game series. It's true we can't find much about the company itself, but we can find lots of articles about their Farming Simulator games. Thank you for your help! Xicomaia (talk) 11:28, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Xicomaia If you have several good sources about the "Farming Simulator games" then shift your focus to rather write about the game instead of the company. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:26:00, 21 April 2021 review of submission by 117.201.155.216

[edit]


117.201.155.216 (talk) 10:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but the draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:18:58, 21 April 2021 review of submission by Ghaynes19

[edit]

Added additional information relating this former mill site to the cedar creek superfund site. Ghaynes19 (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ghaynes19 The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. No amount of editing can confer notability on the subject. 331dot (talk) 13:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:56:43, 21 April 2021 review of submission by Evgeniy Akimbaev

[edit]

Hello everyone! I want to ask why my draft rejected? As an example, I used this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_P-06. But the only conceptual difference I see - my draft has straight links to some developer's socials, which by the way is also the main social platforms for the game itself. Will everything be fine if I delete these links or I need to fix something else? Evgeniy Akimbaev (talk) 14:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Evgeniy Akimbaev The draft tells about the existence of the game and its plot, but not much else. The draft needs to summarize what independent reliable sources state about the game. You have some links to what seem to be articles that potentially discuss the game, but don't otherwise mention them. The example article you cite(which isn't always a good thing to do) does discuss what independent reliable sources say about the game.
If you are associated with this game, please review conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 15:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:09:03, 21 April 2021 review of submission by NotAbleToBeAEditor

[edit]


NotAbleToBeAEditor (talk) 17:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

NotAbleToBeAEditor (talk) 17:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Look, i wanted to create that page because Acrello is verified![reply]
As far as I am aware, having a verified TikTok account confers zero notability. Theroadislong (talk) 17:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:39:48, 21 April 2021 review of submission by Sussyboi420

[edit]


Sussyboi420 (talk) 18:39, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


How Can I make this so the submisison gets accepted?

You can't. It was completely unsourced; note that other Wikipedia articles are not sources, per WP:CIRCULAR, nor is Spotify. Please see Your First Article, and I might spend time editing existing articles first, to gain experience before attempting to create a new article, which is the most difficult task to perform on Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:02:26, 21 April 2021 review of draft by John From AMRS

[edit]


My article has been denied and flagged for speedy deletion because it was seen as only to "publicize and promote a business". In contrast, the article is a historical overview of the company that doesn't mention anything dealing with the sale or advertising of products, services, or the like. I would like to see how I can go about getting my draft proofread and revised rather than speed deleted. Thank you for your help! John From AMRS (talk) 19:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John From AMRS Wikipedia is not a place for businesses to tell the world about themselves, and has no interest in what a business wants to say about itself or what it considers to be its own history. Wikipedia is interested in what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a business, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable business. That means Wikipedia is interested in what others completely unaffiliated with your business consider its history to be. The sources in your draft are 1) the company website, which is a primary source, 2) an annoucement of a routine business transaction, 3) the company website again, 4) an announcement of a niche industry award- which while likely notable to your business, is not on the level of an Academy Award or Tony Award, and 5) a simple profile in a directory type website. None of these things establish notability. Please see Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 19:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:29:18, 21 April 2021 review of submission by Esr

[edit]


The creation of a separate page for the Model M variants table was requested by many contributors to the Model M entry. Why was it rejected?

Esr (talk) 23:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NLIST. Sources are still very much required. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 23:52, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_April_21&oldid=1020074977"