User talk:Darzubair

This is Darzubair's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muzamil Mahmood (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muzamil Mahmood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muzamil Mahmood, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Darzubair! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please and please help me i am not able to understand why my Article got declined, please tell me in simple language, the person whose article i had made is a professional footballer of Asian football confederation plz tell me why you declined it. Darzubair (talk) 14:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muzamil Mahmood (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muzamil Mahmood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muzamil Mahmood, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 17:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Darzubair, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 17:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Muzamil Mahmood has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Muzamil Mahmood. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me in getting this page verified...

If you can help in in getting this stuff verified. Darzubair (talk) 05:27, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

Hello, Darzubair, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Darzubair786 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that account is Operated by my brother, darzubair786 Darzubair786 (talk) 15:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Darzubair786, Oh, I see. Your WP:BROTHER. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please elaborate why my draft was not accepted for publication, although i had provided proper references. The subject is a football coach associated with Asian Football Confederation "B" license holder. Plz help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muzamil Mahmood (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL, has not played or managed at the fully professional level (being an assistant coach at a professional football club is not a notable position, neither is being the head coach at a football academy)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muzamil Mahmood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muzamil Mahmood, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is the professional football coach of AIFF and his article is not getting verified while as his junior mates have got theirs published. Plz help Darzubair (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to 2019–20 Indian Women's League season. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not getting published in Wikipedia, The subject is a professional football coach of AIFF. While as other coaches who are junior than him have their Wikipedia page. Can you please help in getting that published Darzubair (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Javid Parsa (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:GNG for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.

If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Javid Parsa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Javid Parsa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:50, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Javid Parsa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Javid Parsa, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://parsafoods.com/founder.aspx. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CUPIDICAE💕 16:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ZUBAIR UL ISLAM

Hello, Darzubair. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ZUBAIR UL ISLAM".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muzamil Mahmood (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muzamil Mahmood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muzamil Mahmood, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:50, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gogjigund

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Gogjigund, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gogjigund has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gogjigund. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gogjigund (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeromeenriquez was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gogjigund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gogjigund, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 04:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gogjigund has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gogjigund. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:04, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gogjigund has been accepted

Gogjigund, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rap-Kid Arfat moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rap-Kid Arfat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 10:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Submitting Draft:Muzamil Mahmood for review

Darzubair, it looks like you have used the Articles for Creation process before to submit drafts for review, so you know how it is done. Please do that in Draft:Muzamil Mahmood instead of posting requests to multiple users on their user talk pages; you have now asked sixteen different editors (including some that are indefinitely blocked) to "help [you] in getting this Draft Published". Draft:Muzamil Mahmood has been submitted for review before and declined, most recently just a couple of weeks ago, but instead of working on that draft and re-submitting it you have moved the draft, had it deleted at the new title, and then moved your sandbox to the same title as the previously declined draft. That is a form of gaming the system, and it is not constructive.

I have posted a comment at Draft:Muzamil Mahmood, as well. --bonadea contributions talk 10:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not gaming the System. Actually i am new to Wikipedia that is the reason something wrong has happened. Dar zubair 10:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But you have submitted several drafts for review before, as seen by the notices on this talk page. In fact, you have submitted earlier versions of this draft, so it is difficult to understand why you would not use the same process now. I just realised that it wasn't you but one of the editors you contacted who moved your sandbox to the draftspace, but it is still very very odd that you'd move the old draft away from there and tag it for deletion. In any case, this is just a request that you submit drafts for review by clicking the "Submit for review" button in future, and not have drafts deleted and recreated when they have been declined once. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 10:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information, Dar zubair 10:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sherpathri has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sherpathri. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rap-Kid Arfat (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A biography of a living person, especially a child, needs significant coverage in multiple reliable and secondary sources. In this draft, two of the sources (wionews.com and dnaindia.com) are identical; DNA India simply reprinted the WION text. That source is not an in-depth article, and the Hindustan Times source is just a brief notice. gaana.com is a mp3 downloads site which should not be used at all.

Wikipedia articles cannot contain text copied and pasted from a source, unless it is properly quoted and attributed. The "Biography" section is copied from WION/DNA India with only minimal changes.

The sources spell his name "Arafat Mohideen Bhat", and the nickname "Rap-kid" is not mentioned in any of them.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rap-Kid Arfat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rap-Kid Arfat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 07:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sherpathri has been accepted

Sherpathri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 15:43, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaurav Taneja (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Darzubair/Gaurav Taneja and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Darzubair/Gaurav Taneja, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Bbb23 (talk) 13:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darzubair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. I have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements. But i disclose that i am not being paid for editing by anyone nor i have any personal affiliations with the Subject. I am working for expanding the Wikipedia without receiving any monetary gains and affiliations. I only edit the article of subjects that i have knowledge about and are in the news.

I am new to Wikipedia and currently in learning mode. I will now always try to follow the Wikipedia rules.

Now i request kindly, Unblock my account so that i can continue to contribute towards expanding the Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

There are various clues to me with your edit history and specific edits that cause me to very much doubt your claims here. I don't think you are a new user and I don't believe you are editing about the topics you are by chance. Until you choose to be completely forthcoming, there is no pathway forward here. As such, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:36, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darzubair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am still on my words, i again declare that i have no personal affiliations nor i am receiving any monetary benefits. If you will get any concrete evidence then keep my account suspended. I might have breached some rules but believe me i am just trying to expand the Wikipedia without any personal gains. I like to work for these online platforms, i am also expanding other online tools as well and i am on high levels on those. I choose this as my passion. I have done edits of only those articles which are in news in our state and i have knowledge about. I request you kindly Unblock me, i am still trying to understand all Wikipedia policies properly. Please tell me where i have done wrong. I give in written that i will never repeat that. Hope you will understand me and Unblock this time

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:26, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darzubair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request kindly Unblock my account now, i have read and understood all the policies of Wikipedia and i think i have been misunderstood due to my various edits, but i want make it clear that i haven't received any monetary benefits for that. The subject is a professional coach in our State and i have no personal affiliations with him. I know him just through the Football Club he represents. I don't think it was a right thing to block me for the thing i never received i.e, monetary benefit. I am still new on Wikipedia. I will keep this all in mind in future and will avoid those edits,articles which can create a Confusion. Hope someone will unblock and give me a chance to expand the Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Rap-Kid Arfat

Hello, Darzubair. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rap-Kid Arfat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darzubair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

•I have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements. •But i disclose that i am not being paid for editing by anyone nor i have any personal affiliations with the Subject. I know the subject as he is from my town and he is too famous. I only edit the article of subjects that i have knowledge about and are in the news. * I am still new to Wikipedia and currently in learning mode. I will now always try to follow the Wikipedia rules.

Decline reason:

Agree with the previous decline. Your edit history suggests you are not a new editor. It is unlikely you spontaneously created these various drafts, rather than for pay. You will need a more convincing explanation for creating these various articles on non-notable figures, than just suggesting they are from your town. -- Euryalus (talk) 00:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darzubair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to expand wikipedia at local level but some wikipedians with high powers blocked me because as per them i am receiving monetary benefits but in reality i am trying to publish articles from myy State who deserve to be here. How many times i have to say i am not receiving any benefits. Now i am requesting you at last kindly unblock me.

Decline reason:

We can keep you blocked as per our perception. Our perception is that you are not being honest. That you are working with a conflict of interest, and that you are not a new user. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 07:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darzubair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How can i prove i am not being paid, you could have warned me if i was doing something against rules. Kindly unblock me i will keep it in mind now Dar zubair 09:51, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Hi Darzubair. Have again noted your claim that you have not been paid to create these various non-notable biographies. But as with everyone else who has reviewed your unblock requests I'm afraid I don't find that believable. They read like paid-for biographies, they have the usual over-emphasis on doubtful sources, and you've consistently failed to offer any alternative explanation for making them other than vaguely suggesting they're from your local area. With respect, that is not a believable claim either. Unfortunately this all leaves us right where we started, with a well-founded suspicion that you were appropriately blocked as an undisclosed paid editor. There's really nowhere to go from that, other than admitting it and following the requirements of WP:PAID. In addition this is your seventh declined unblock request and it is becoming a waste of volunteer time to keep responding to identical requests without any further facts or updates. To avoid this I am removing talkpage access. Any future appeals can be via WP:UTRS. Regards. -- Euryalus (talk) 09:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been told what you can do to get unblocked. Note that payment/compensation does not have to be in money or even anything tangible. We do not believe you are editing about these topics by chance or just because they are from your local area, and until you tell us how you have come to edit about them in a satisfactory manner, there is no pathway forward here. Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Darzubair/Gaurav Taneja

Hello, Darzubair. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Darzubair/Gaurav Taneja, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Muzamil Mahmood

Hello, Darzubair. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muzamil Mahmood, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Darzubair/Gaurav Taneja

Hello, Darzubair. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gaurav Taneja".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Muzamil Mahmood

Hello, Darzubair. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muzamil Mahmood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:04, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]