User talk:ANB

My Talk Archives

Hi ANB - was hoping to get in touch to try and source a higher resolution image of Constanceandeva.jpg‎ - I would like to use it to promote a talk on Eva Gore-Booth in the National Library of Ireland in June. Would greatly appreciate it if you could contact me regarding the file - I do not know how to contact you directly, and am a very inexperienced Wikipedia user. Email address is rabjet@yahoo.com. many thanks, rabjet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabjet (talk • contribs) 15:58, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Frankflood.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Frankflood.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I'd like to get this matter resolved. A little concerned that other images may also be vulnerable to the same issue. We may need to get some expert advice on copyright, what do you think? Best. RashersTierney (talk) 08:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is worrying. It's been up for a good while now with no problems. I also think it's sufficiently old to be out of copyright. I'll try and search out the website I got it from. Do you know where we might look for advice? There are a lot of pictures up on WP from the 1916-23 period justified with the same out of copyright tag I put on this. ANB (talk) 12:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I expect these images were included in Tim Carey's book, so their original provenance should be easily determined if you have access to it. If you don't, just say and I'll try to get it as inter-library loan. (The originals were probably from contemporary mass cards) RashersTierney (talk) 00:41, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I own a copy, but it's at home in Ireland. I'll see if I can get a family member to dig it out and check when I ring home next (probably tonight). Unfortunately, much googling failed to turn up the website where I got the photo originally. I looks like it's been taken down since. The photo was featured on the TG4 documentary on the Forgotten Ten (recently been uploaded to youtube) - considering how indebted that production is to Carey's research, I suspect you may be spot on about that book being the source. Will let you know! ANB (talk) 12:01, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Flood portrait is partly reproduced on p12 of 'Honouring The Mountjoy Martyrs (The Forgotten Ten)' by the National Graves Association, 2001. Unfortunately, there is no mention of anything relating to copyright of any images they have used. Evidently, the NGA are confident that there is no outstanding issue of copyvio. The WP P. Doyle image was certainly used on his Mass card, as is clear from p14 of the same booklet. RashersTierney (talk) 16:27, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be ok with a source, to show that it was first published prior to 1939. BigDunc 19:52, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone has access to Irish Times archive, it might be worth a look. I'm afraid mine has 'expired'. Should be enough to show it as having been published before '39. RashersTierney (talk) 20:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be surprised if it's in IT archive (to which I dearly wish I had access). I did a research project a while back on press reaction to Kevin Barry's death and trawled through news reports about him and, for comparison, the other executed volunteers. There was a distinct dearth of pictures in my recollection. I've asked my sister to dig out my Tim Carey book and check there. Hopefully we can find something to keep the bots happy. ANB (talk) 20:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tried the National Library today for Carey's book. They have never had a copy, which ironically caused a little kefuffle re. copyright entitlements (the publishers can expect a snooty letter pretty soon). While there I also searched the on-line IT archives, to no avail. You were right re. dearth of historic images. You had any better luck? RashersTierney (talk) 18:05, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have emailed Domer about this as of yet no reply must be busy. BigDunc 19:20, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd left a note at his TP. I may not have too much time myself to chase this up in the coming days. RashersTierney (talk) 19:23, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am in the same boat as I am very busy at the moment and I am only popping in when I have a spare few mins but I will try find something. BigDunc 19:27, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive research work all round. I think we can eliminate Carey's book from enquiries. A member of my (long-suffering) family very kindly searched out the copy I have in Dublin and went through it with a fine tooth comb. None of the images of Flood correspond to this one. Those that there are have been reproduced by permission of Kilmainham Gaol Museum, so it's possible this photo may also be in their collection, but I've no way to be sure. A while ago I was in contact with a seller on ebay who had a repro of an image of Kevin Barry that I had never seen before (formal portrait, three quarter view). He said he took it from a postcard that was sold in Ireland in the the 20s and that it was common for such images to be distributed in that format at the time. This image looks like a likely candidate for such dissemination. Still, that doesn't get us much futher. It would be a pity to lose this, all the other images I've seen are of much poorer quality.ANB (talk) 23:17, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While searching for a contact for the museum at Mountjoy, I came across this little gem. You'll need to scroll down to find the piece I mean. I know the museum is worked only by a handful of volunteers, but I'll see if they can help re the photo. Also left message with Niall Bergin at Kilmainham. We'll see. 'Fraid thats me out of ideas. RashersTierney (talk) 07:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appears this portrait was taken by Keogh Brothers Ltd., which may make the c'right issue more rather than less intractable. Salavat has delayed the deletion process to give us a chance to sort this out. RashersTierney (talk) 10:35, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you've done some amazing work - I'm afraid I wouldn't even know where to begin digging into this whole area and am horribly hampered by geography. Thanks also for getting in contact with Salavat. Seems from the link that the National Library are the c/right owners the versions of this photo in the Keogh Collection there, though I can't see one that has been signed and tinted like our one (which may not affect things anyway). Do you think we could possibly use one the of National Library versions (they are of excellent quality, though I think the second one may be a different Frank Flood) and justify it according to the rationale given for this image of a similar date and origin? The Prison Education service page is a fascinating find, I hadn't seen it before. ANB (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a prob. with using one of them under 'fair use' if it comes to it. (Almost feel we need to consult with senior council ;-). Still hoping to hear from Seán Reynolds at Mountjoy or Niall Bergin at Kilmainham with (hopefully) confirmation that copies of our image were in the public domain prior to '39. RashersTierney (talk) 15:50, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update. Just had chat with Niall who has viewed the image here and is now familiar with this issue. He will check their collection and will also liaise with Mr. Reynolds re. same. Now we wait! RashersTierney (talk) 14:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whitley Stokes image

Hi, thanks for uploading the photo of Whitley Stokes. I moved it to Commons (brightening the colors in the process) so that it could also be used in the French and Cornish articles about him, as well as any future articles in other languages. +An gr 20:16, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad it's of use. And thanks for brightening it up, it looks a lot better now. ANB (talk) 15:38, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Macswiney.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Macswiney.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Nedfoley.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Nedfoley.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source of pictures

Hi ANB. The Wild Geese site has the pictures of Maher and Foley. This may have been where you located them originally? Hope this helps. RashersTierney (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, that's where they came from. I've supplied that as the source, which hopefully solves the problem. Thanks Rashers! ANB (talk) 15:51, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Muscatine

Hello.

Thank you for creating the article on Charles Muscatine. This marvelous man was my teacher, my advisor, my mentor, and my friend while I was a student at Berkeley. I remember him with a great deal of affection and respect. -- Michael David (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! You're very lucky to have been taught be him and sincere condolences on his death. He seems to have been a wonderful person on every level. I never met him, but his book on Chaucer and the French Tradition was instrumental in getting me hooked on medieval studies as an undergrad. ANB (talk) 18:43, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Charles Muscatine

Hello! Your submission of Charles Muscatine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Storye book (talk) 12:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Charles Muscatine

On March 28, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles Muscatine, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Countessmarkieviczandchildren.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Countessmarkieviczandchildren.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done (unless there is need to elaborate). Best. RashersTierney (talk) 21:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) ANB (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. Glad to see you back. RashersTierney (talk) 22:07, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you be so kind as to give us support!

Hello, I hope you're doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. I've just read your profile and I understood that you're an Irishman (I wish I can visit your wonderful country some time soon!), so you understand what are a minorized language and culture and maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... I'm a member of a Catalan association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this hasn't been approved up to that moment. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: Wikimedia CAT. Supporting us will be like giving equal opportunity to minorized languages and cultures in the future! Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care! Keep on preserving your great culture, country, music and language! Slán agat! Capsot (User talk:Capsottalk) 07:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing 'Golden Team'

Although your contributions are appreciated, your efforts to make my article adhere to a more concise language has nearly ruined my article that has taken my years to write. You have removed approximately 40% of facts and data after your edits and have altered the nature and style of my work. I am the main author of this article and am asking you to please stop editing this article immediately. I'll incorporate some of your style into the eventual rollback. Thank you for your attention. OliverTwist88 (OliverTwist88talk) July 09 2010

I hadn't intended to 'ruin' it and wikipedia is a collaborative process. Numerous editors had suggested a complete rewrite of the article was necessary and the article itself has been tagged to this effect. I was careful to delete only information that I considered repetitive and avoid deleting factual material, though I realise this may seem like a subjective judgement. In any case, I'm sorry to have upset you in any way and I realise you obviously put a lot of work into this. It would be nice to see the article developed further though, as I said on the talk page, there's a lot of good stuff there. Thanks. ANB (talk) 21:41, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Golden Team'

This article was in part written in a style that is not at all overwhelming. It was my intention to infuse it with a sort of linquistic prowess that other articles lack. Your due efforts are 'simplfying' or 'toning down' the verbage has caused considerable loss of data in the text, approximately 40% of what you edited resulted in deletion. Although, you mean well and wanted to tighten up the language to be it more consice, you subjectively removed around 40% of my work that I started in December of 2005. Wholesale "reformation" doesn't serve this article well, it's meant to be written in a sophisticated factual way that I have put numerous years into. I have had discussions with editors via chat to gain suggestions about what is needed in the article, and citations are the most needed, not a general revamping of the literature itself. Thank you for your high interest in seeing the article receives eventual class-B or class-A recognition and your help is appreciated. But as the principal author, this sort of 'pruning' and sublimation has taken the gist and core of what I am trying to convey. In all due respect, your suggestions are welcome, but please do not 'edit' this article with such broad sweeping strokes. Sincerely and thank you. OliverTwist88 (OliverTwist88talk) July 09 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 23:55, 9 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I'm writing of the 1954 WC final

Hey ANB, I've reverted back a lot of what you subjectively edited but kept some of your ideas and thoughts in the revision. I'm starting to write about the 1954 World Cup Final for the 'Golden Team' article that has taken me 4 1/2 years to incrementally write. As you'll see the "Miracle of Berne" is written in not a condensed style as the above chapters keeping your more simplified style in mind. I've made sure to check all the facts before I include them, and a quick question for you. Is this style better than the style I've written the majority of my work? —Preceding unsigned comment added by OliverTwist88 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iollan/Uilliam Mac an Leagha

Hmmm, interesting point. There just does not seem to be much literature on the Mac an Leagha's, never mind who Iollan or William was. And I cannot think of any such rebuttal offhand. So, sorry, but keep looking! We need more in any article on Medieval Ireland! Fergananim (talk) 07:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks is much appreciated! See if you can try and publish some of the articles in some of the smaller journals like The Septs, Journal of the Irish Genealogical Research Society or some such from the perspective of Mac an Leagha family history article. They don't generally get too many people writing about Irish family history back that far, and would very much appreciate new writers. Check out the following

or indeed the heritage journal of the region Mac an Leaga hailed from. Fergananim (talk) 01:11, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again

Started to see you pop up after a break. Welcome back! RashersTierney (talk) 21:46, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Popped off to focus on thesis and job applications (both still in progress). 'Tis good to be back :) Hope you're doing well - I see you've been busy as ever round here. ANB (talk) 22:39, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tippin' along. You know yourself. RashersTierney (talk) 22:55, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

There seem to be some errors in referencing at Mario Esposito. You are probably in a better position to rectify them. Happy to help out if you think I can. Best. RashersTierney (talk) 22:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh. There are indeed. Thanks for letting me know! When I get a moment, I'll go through them properly and see if things can be made more accurate. On reflection, it might be better to give the full book reference (page numbers etc.) in each instance, rather than the google book url. I've recently discovered that google books don't necessarily make the same pages viewable in different countries. I'll see if I can dig out the library copy. ANB (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jedward

Hey, thanks for your nice comments about my Jedward edit! As with a lot of bios of current artists, it had been added to in bits and pieces over the years and I thought it could do with a rewrite :D Robyn2000 (talk) 00:37, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. When you recently edited Jedward discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomasmacurtain.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tomasmacurtain.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Macswineyfuneral.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Macswineyfuneral.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:O'higginswedding.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:O'higginswedding.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Roryoconnor.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Roryoconnor.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Liammellows.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Liammellows.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Seantreacy.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Seantreacy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Peadarkearney.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Peadarkearney.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Thomasashe.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Thomasashe.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Richardibest.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Richardibest.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ernieo'malley.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ernieo'malley.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Tomasmacurtain.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Tomasmacurtain.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:10, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ernestomalley.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ernestomalley.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Macswiney.jpg

The file File:Macswiney.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]