User talk:Pastore Italy
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Computing Assessment requests
[edit]Given the number you have made can you complete some of the other requests? Let me know when you have and I'll take a second look as well to make sure its reasonable. EDIT: It's good to spread the work :). -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 08:35, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- it is usually extremely informal below GA standard which the computing assessment page handles. I.e. I'll have a quick read through the article and see which category it is in. I'll do a couple of more formal reviews either on an article talk page or on my/your talk page over the next week so you can see what to do. I don't think anyone is too bothered - if it's borderline B/C then either would generally be fine to give. But it's worth seeing how it works. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 15:46, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Interwiki
[edit]These links you proposed here are alreay done by interwiki-bots. You do not need to fix all these links by hand. An overview and documentation of pywikipediabot you may find on m:Pywikipediabot. There are several links to other language codes. And btw. #redirect does not work between different language codes. You have to use a direct link like [[:en:User talk:Pastore Italy]] which leads to this page here. On en-wiki and some other wikis you may use {{softredirect}} but this only displays this link and a redirect icon. Greetings Xqt (talk) 11:15, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
IT risk
[edit]Ciao Pastore,
I am also not a native English speaker: I just used a spell-checker of MS Word. And I don't have anything to do with IT risks so I can't judge the quality of the article. What I know is how to find EU legislation and how to find out if it is e.g. already expired or replaced by another piece of legislation. But it remains your job to read it all and incorporate it into the article. Regards
Dzsi (talk) 11:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Computing Review
[edit]Sorry for taking so long to get round to it, but I had a look at Stuxnet this evening and I think its B class - it has a good lead, lots of sources and covers the topic reasonably and is pretty well written - especially once you get into it you can be quite quick and only take 5-10 minutes to look at the article. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]
Your addition to Asset (computing) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
The source's CC-BY-NC-SA is incompatible with Wikipedia's license. --Pnm (talk) 02:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- Same goes for copyrighted content in Factor Analysis of Information Risk. --Pnm (talk) 02:50, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Impact (security) for deletion
[edit]
The article Impact (security) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impact (security) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pnm (talk) 03:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed 2
[edit] Your addition to IT risk management has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Pnm (talk) 07:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Computer security books
[edit]I've just reverted your addition of Bruce Schneier to Category:Computer security books, because he is not a book. I notice that you appear to have added a few other people to the category. I don't think that's what the category is for, but I'll take it up on Category talk:Computer security books. Mitch Ames (talk) 11:53, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Apple media events
[edit]Hello, I see you have listed yourself as a participant at Wikiproject Computing Assessment, as being interested in evaluating computing-related articles. There is a discussion right now at Talk:Apple media events about the article Apple media events. The questions are: 1) Does the article Apple media events fall under Wikiproject Computing; and if so, 2) What Importance (Top, High, Mid, Low) should it be assigned? Your participation is appreciated! Thanks... Zad68 (talk) 18:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject Computer Security user status
[edit]Hello Pastore Italy,
I would just like to inquire on your status on WikiProject Computer Security as the list of WikiProject Computer Security/Members is going to be improved to list active and inactive users.
This is update is being done according to a request for comments on the WikiProject Computer Security talk page. Be sure to state your status at the User status section in the WikiProject Computer Security talk page before the end of four weeks as this will state your status as inactive in the project if not done before then.