Jump to content

Wieferich prime: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
neither 1093, nor 3511 divide any Mersenne or Fermat number
Line 71: Line 71:
=== Connection with pseudoprimes ===
=== Connection with pseudoprimes ===


It was observed that the two known Wieferich primes are the square factors of all [[Square-free integer|non-square free]] base-2 [[Fermat pseudoprime]]s up to 25{{e|9}}.<ref>{{Citation | author1-link=Paulo Ribenboim | last1=Ribenboim | first1=P. | title=The Little Book of Bigger Primes | location=New York | publisher=Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. | year=2004 | isbn=0-387-20169-6 | page=99 |chapter=[http://trex58.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/ribenboimbook1.pdf Chapter 2. How to Recognize Whether a Natural Number is a Prime]}} {{WebCite|url=http://www.webcitation.org/5uTrtgMk3}}</ref> Furthermore if ''p'' is a Wieferich prime, then ''p''<sup>2</sup> is a [[Catalan pseudoprime]].<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Aebi | first1 = C. | last2 = Cairns |first2 = G. | title = Catalan numbers, primes and twin primes | journal = Elemente der Mathematik |volume=63 |issue=4 | pages = 153–164 | year = 2008 | url = http://gradelle.educanet2.ch/christian.aebi/.ws_gen/9/catalan.pdf | doi = 10.4171/EM/103}}</ref>
It was observed that the two known Wieferich primes are the square factors of all [[Square-free integer|non-square free]] base-2 [[Fermat pseudoprime]]s up to 25{{e|9}}.<ref>{{Citation | author1-link=Paulo Ribenboim | last1=Ribenboim | first1=P. | title=The Little Book of Bigger Primes | location=New York | publisher=Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. | year=2004 | isbn=0-387-20169-6 | page=99 |chapter=[http://trex58.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/ribenboimbook1.pdf Chapter 2. How to Recognize Whether a Natural Number is a Prime]}} {{WebCite|url=http://www.webcitation.org/5uTrtgMk3}}</ref> Later computations showed that the only repeated factors of the pseudoprimes up to 10<sup>12</sup> are 1093 and 3511.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Pinch | first = R. G. E. | title = The Pseudoprimes up to 10<sup>13</sup> | journal = Lecture Notes in Computer Science | volume = 1838 | pages = 459-473 | year = 2000 | url = http://130.203.133.150/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.32.3849&rep=rep1&type=pdf | doi = 10.1007/10722028_30}}</ref> Furthermore if ''p'' is a Wieferich prime, then ''p''<sup>2</sup> is a [[Catalan pseudoprime]].<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Aebi | first1 = C. | last2 = Cairns |first2 = G. | title = Catalan numbers, primes and twin primes | journal = Elemente der Mathematik |volume=63 |issue=4 | pages = 153–164 | year = 2008 | url = http://gradelle.educanet2.ch/christian.aebi/.ws_gen/9/catalan.pdf | doi = 10.4171/EM/103}}</ref>


=== Connection with directed graphs ===
=== Connection with directed graphs ===

Revision as of 10:09, 18 August 2012

Wieferich prime
Named afterArthur Wieferich
Publication year1909
Author of publicationWieferich, A.
No. of known terms2
Subsequence ofCrandall numbers[1]
Wieferich numbers[2]
Lucas-Wieferich primes[3]
near-Wieferich primes
First terms1093, 3511
Largest known term3511
OEIS indexA001220

In number theory, a Wieferich prime is a prime number p such that p2 divides 2p − 1 − 1,[4] therefore connecting these primes with Fermat's little theorem, which states that every odd prime p divides 2p − 1 − 1. Wieferich primes were first described by Arthur Wieferich in 1909 in works pertaining to Fermat's last theorem, at which time both of Fermat's theorems were already well known to mathematicians.[5][6]

Despite a number of extensive searches, the only known Wieferich primes to date are 1093 and 3511 (sequence A001220 in the OEIS).

Explanation of the Wieferich property

The stronger version of Fermat's little theorem, which a Wieferich prime satisfies, is usually expressed as a congruence relation, namely the congruence 2p − 1 ≡ 1 (mod p2). From the definition of the congruence relation on integers it follows that this property is equivalent to the definition given at the beginning. Thus if a prime p satisfies this congruence, this prime divides the Fermat quotient . The following are two illustrative examples using the primes 11 and 1093:

For 11 we get which is 93 and leaves a remainder of 5 after division by 11, hence 11 is not a Wieferich prime. For 1093 we get or 530585362....3096656895 (320 intermediate digits omitted for clarity), which leaves a remainder of 0 after division by 1093 and thus 1093 is a Wieferich prime.

History and search status

In 1902 W. F. Meyer proved a theorem about solutions of the congruence ap − 1 ≡ 1 (mod pr).[7]: 930  Later in that decade Arthur Wieferich showed specifically that if the first case of Fermat's last theorem has solutions for an odd prime exponent, then that prime must satisfy that congruence for a = 2 and r = 2. In other words, if there exist solutions to xp + yp + zp = 0 in integers x, y, z and p an odd prime with p xyz, then p satisfies 2p − 1 ≡ 1 (mod p2). In 1913, Bachmann examined the residues of . He asked the question when this residue vanishes and tried to find expressions for answering this question.[8]

The prime 1093 was found to be a Wieferich prime by Waldemar Meissner in 1913 and confirmed to be the only such prime below 2000. He calculated the smallest residue of for all primes p < 2000 and found this residue to be zero for t = 364 and p = 1093, thereby providing a counterexample to a conjecture by Grawe about the impossibility of the Wieferich congruence.[9] E. Haentzschel later ordered verification of the correctness of Meissners congruence via only elementary calculations.[10]: 664  Inspired by an earlier work of Euler, he simplified Meissners proof by showing that 10932 | (2182 + 1) and remarked that (2182 + 1) is a factor of (2364 − 1).[11] The prime 3511 was found to be a Wieferich prime by N. G. W. H. Beeger in 1922.[12] In 1960, Kravitz[13] doubled a previous record set by Fröberg[14] and in 1961 Riesel extended the search to 500000 with the aid of BESK.[15] Around 1980, Lehmer was able to reach the search limit of 6×109.[16] This limit was extended to over 2.5×1015 in 2006,[17] finally reaching 3×1015. It is now known, that if any other Wieferich primes exist, they must be greater than 6.7×1015.[18] The search for new Wieferich primes is currently performed by the distributed computing project Wieferich@Home. In December 2011, another search was started by the PrimeGrid project.[19] As of May 2012, PrimeGrid has extended the search limit to 17×1015 and continues.[20]

Chris Caldwell conjectured that only a finite number of Wieferich primes exist.[4] It has also been conjectured (as for Wilson primes) that infinitely many Wieferich primes exist, and that the number of Wieferich primes below x is approximately log(log(x)), which is a heuristic result that follows from the plausible assumption that for a prime p, the (p − 1)-th degree roots of unity modulo p2 are uniformly distributed in the multiplicative group of integers modulo p2.[21]

Properties

Connection with Fermat's last theorem

The following theorem connecting Wieferich primes and Fermat's last theorem was proven by Wieferich in 1909:[22]

Let p be prime, and let x, y, z be integers such that xp + yp + zp = 0. Furthermore, assume that p does not divide the product xyz. Then p is a Wieferich prime.

The above case (where p does not divide any of x, y or z) is commonly known as the first case of Fermat's last theorem (FLTI)[23][24] and we say that FLTI fails for a prime p, if solutions to the Fermat equation exist for that p, otherwise FLTI holds for p.[25] In 1910, Mirimanoff expanded[26] the theorem by showing that, if the preconditions of the theorem hold true for some prime p, then p2 must also divide 3p − 1 − 1. Granville and Monagan further proved that p2 must actually divide mp − 1 − 1 for every prime m ≤ 89.[27] Suzuki extended the proof to all primes m ≤ 113.[28]

Connection with the abc conjecture

A non-Wieferich prime is a prime p satisfying 2p − 1 ≢ 1 (mod p2). J. H. Silverman showed in 1988 that if the abc conjecture holds, then there exist infinitely many non-Wieferich primes.[29] Numerical evidence suggests that very few of the prime numbers in a given interval are Wieferich primes. A proof of the abc conjecture would not automatically prove that there are only finitely many Wieferich primes, since the set of Wieferich primes and the set of non-Wieferich primes could possibly both be infinite and the finiteness or infiniteness of the set of Wieferich primes would have to be proven separately. The existence of infinitely many non-Wieferich primes would also follow if there exist infinitely many square-free Mersenne numbers.[30]

Connection with Mersenne and Fermat primes

It is known that the nth Mersenne number Mn = 2n − 1 is prime only if n is prime. Fermat's little theorem implies that if p > 2 is prime, then Mp−1 (= 2p − 1 − 1) is always divisible by p. Since Mersenne numbers of prime indices Mp and Mq are co-prime,

A prime divisor p of Mq, where q is prime, is a Wieferich prime if and only if p2 divides Mq.[31]

Thus, a Mersenne prime cannot also be a Wieferich prime. A notable open problem is to determine whether or not all Mersenne numbers of prime index are square-free. If a Mersenne number Mq is not square-free, that is, there exists a prime p for which p2 divides Mq, then p is a Wieferich prime. Therefore, if there are only finitely many Wieferich primes, then there will be at most finitely many Mersenne numbers that are not square-free. Rotkiewicz showed that the converse is also true, that is, if there are infinitely many square-free Mersenne numbers, then there are infinitely many non-Wieferich primes.[32]

Similarly, if p is prime and p2 divides some Fermat number Fn = 22n + 1, then p must be a Wieferich prime.[33]

For the primes 1093 and 3511 it was shown that neither of them is a factor of any Mersenne or Fermat number.[34]

Connection with other equations

Scott and Styer showed that if p is a Wieferich prime greater than 1015, then the Diophantine equation px−2y=pu−2v has solutions in p, x, y, u, v with xu.[35] They were later able to extend this result to other equations.[36]

Binary periodicity of p−1

Johnson observed[37] that the two known Wieferich primes are one greater than numbers with periodic binary expansions (1092 = 0100010001002; 3510 = 1101101101102). The Wieferich@Home project searches for Wieferich primes by testing numbers that are one greater than a number with a periodic binary expansion, but up to a "bit pseudo-length" of 3500 of the tested binary numbers generated by combination of bit strings with a bit length of up to 24 it has not found a new Wieferich prime.[38]

Equivalent congruences

Wieferich primes can be defined by other congruences equivalent to the one usually used. If p is a Wieferich prime, one can multiply both sides of the congruence 2p-1 ≡ 1 (mod p2) with 2 to get 2p ≡ 2 (mod p2). Thus a Wieferich prime satisfies 2p2 ≡ 2 (mod p2), since it must satisfy 2kp ≡ 2 (mod p2) for all integers k ≥ 1.

Bolyai showed that if p and q are primes, a is a positive integer not divisible by p and q such that ap-1 ≡ 1 (mod q), aq-1 ≡ 1 (mod p), then apq-1 ≡ 1 (mod pq). Setting p = q leads to ap2-1 ≡ 1 (mod p2).[39]: 284  It was shown that ap2-1 ≡ 1 (mod p2) if and only if ap-1 ≡ 1 (mod p2).[39]: 285–286 

Connection with pseudoprimes

It was observed that the two known Wieferich primes are the square factors of all non-square free base-2 Fermat pseudoprimes up to 25×109.[40] Later computations showed that the only repeated factors of the pseudoprimes up to 1012 are 1093 and 3511.[41] Furthermore if p is a Wieferich prime, then p2 is a Catalan pseudoprime.[42]

Connection with directed graphs

For all primes up to 100000 L(pn+1) = L(pn) only for two cases: L(10932) = L(1093) = 364 and L(35112) = L(3511) = 1755, where m is the modulus of the doubling diagram and L(m) gives the number of vertices in the cycle of 1. The term doubling diagram refers to the directed graph with 0 and the natural numbers less than m as vertices with arrows pointing from each vertex x to vertex 2x reduced modulo m.[43]: 74  It was shown, that for all odd prime numbers either L(pn+1) = p × L(pn) or L(pn+1) = L(pn).[43]: 75 

Alternative definition

Let Hp be a set of pairs of integers with 1 as their greatest common divisor, p being prime to x, y and x + y, (x + y)p-1 ≡ 1 (mod p2), (x + ξy) being the pth power of an ideal of K with ξ defined as cos 2π/p + i sin 2π/p. K = Q(ξ) is the field extension obtained by adjoining all polynomials in the algebraic number ξ to the field of rational numbers (such an extension is known as a number field or in this particular case, where ξ is a root of unity, a cyclotomic number field).[27]: 332 

From uniqueness of factorization of ideals in Q(ξ) it follows that if the first case of Fermat's last theorem has solutions x, y, z then p divides x+y+z and (x, y), (y, z) and (z, x) are elements of Hp.[27]: 333 

Granville and Monagan showed that (1, 1) ∈ Hp if and only if p is a Wieferich prime.[27]: 333 

Generalizations

Near-Wieferich primes

A prime p satisfying the congruence 2(p−1)/2 ≡ ±1 + Ap (mod p2) with small |A| is commonly called a near-Wieferich prime (sequence A195988 in the OEIS).[21][44] Near-Wieferich primes with A = 0 represent Wieferich primes. Recent searches, in addition to their primary search for Wieferich primes, also tried to find near-Wieferich primes.[18][45] The following table lists all near-Wieferich primes with |A| ≤ 10 in the interval [1×109, 3×1015].[46] This search bound was reached in 2006 in a search effort by P. Carlisle, R. Crandall and M. Rodenkirch.[17][47]

p 1 or −1 A
3520624567 +1 −6
46262476201 +1 +5
47004625957 −1 +1
58481216789 −1 +5
76843523891 −1 +1
1180032105761 +1 −6
12456646902457 +1 +2
134257821895921 +1 +10
339258218134349 −1 +2
2276306935816523 −1 −3

Dorais and Klyve[18] used a different definition of a near-Wieferich prime, defining it as a prime p with small value of where is the Fermat quotient of 2 with respect to p modulo p (the modulo operation here gives the residue with the smallest absolute value). The following table lists all primes p ≤ 6.7 × 1015 with .

p
1093 0 0
3511 0 0
2276306935816523 +6 0.264
3167939147662997 −17 0.537
3723113065138349 −36 0.967
5131427559624857 −36 0.702
5294488110626977 −31 0.586
6517506365514181 +58 0.890

Base-a Wieferich primes

A Wieferich prime base a is a prime p that satisfies

ap − 1 ≡ 1 (mod p2).[7]

Such a prime cannot divide a, since then it would also divide 1.

Wieferich pairs

A Wieferich pair is a pair of primes p and q that satisfy

pq − 1 ≡ 1 (mod q2) and qp − 1 ≡ 1 (mod p2)

so that a Wieferich prime p ≡ 1 (mod 4) will form such a pair (p, 2): the only known instance in this case is p = 1093. There are 6 known Wieferich pairs.[48]

Wieferich numbers

A Wieferich number is an odd integer w ≥ 3 satisfying the congruence 2φ(w) ≡ 1 (mod w2), where φ(·) denotes the Euler function. If Wieferich number w is prime, then it is a Wieferich prime. The first few Wieferich numbers are:

1093, 3279, 3511, 7651, 10533, 14209, 17555, 22953, 31599, 42627, 45643, … (sequence A077816 in the OEIS)

It can be shown that if there are only finitely many Wieferich primes, then there are only finitely many Wieferich numbers. In particular, if the only Wieferich primes are 1093 and 3511, then there exist exactly 104 Wieferich numbers, which matches the number of Wieferich numbers currently known.[2]

Another definition specifies a Wieferich number as positive odd integer q such that q and are not coprime, where m is the multiplicative order of 2 modulo q. The first of these numbers are:[49]

21, 39, 55, 57, 105, 111, 147, 155, 165, 171, 183, … (sequence A182297 in the OEIS)

As above, if Wieferich number q is prime, then it is a Wieferich prime.

Lucas-Wieferich primes

A Lucas-Wieferich prime associated with the pair (P, Q) is a prime p such that Up-ε ≡ 0 (mod p2), where Up-ε denotes the Lucas sequence of the first kind and P and Q are integers. All Wieferich primes are Lucas-Wieferich primes associated to the pair (3, 2).[3]: 2088 

See also

References

  1. ^ Franco, Z.; Pomerance, C. (1995), "On a conjecture of Crandall concerning the qx+1 problem" (PDF), Math. Of Comput., 64 (211), American Mathematical Society: 1333–1336, doi:10.2307/2153499.
  2. ^ a b Banks, W. D.; Luca, F.; Shparlinski, I. E. (2007), "Estimates for Wieferich numbers" (PDF), The Ramanujan Journal, 14 (3), Springer: 361–378, doi:10.1007/s11139-007-9030-z.
  3. ^ a b McIntosh, R. J.; Roettger, E. L. (2007), "A search for Fibonacci-Wieferich and Wolstenholme primes", Mathematics of Computation, 76 (260), AMS: 2087–2094, doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-07-01955-2, archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-12-10
  4. ^ a b The Prime Glossary: Wieferich prime
  5. ^ Israel Kleiner (2000), "From Fermat to Wiles: Fermat's Last Theorem Becomes a Theorem" (PDF), Elem. Math., 55: 21, doi:10.1007/PL00000079.Template:WebCite
  6. ^ Leonhard Euler (1736), "Theorematum quorundam ad numeros primos spectantium demonstratio" (PDF), Novi Comm. Acad. Sci. Petropol. (in Latin), 8: 33–37.
  7. ^ a b Wilfrid Keller; Jörg Richstein (2005), "Solutions of the congruence ap−1 ≡ 1 (mod pr)" (PDF), Math. Comp., 74 (250): 927–936, doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-04-01666-7.{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. ^ Bachmann, P. (1913). "Über den Rest von ". Journal für Mathematik (in German). 142 (1): 41–50.
  9. ^ Meissner, W. (1913), "Über die Teilbarkeit von 2p − 2 durch das Quadrat der Primzahl p=1093", Sitzungsber. D. Königl. Preuss. Akad. D. Wiss. (in German), Zweiter Halbband. Juli bis Dezember, Berlin: 663–667
  10. ^ Haentzschel, E. (1926), "Über die Kongruenz 21092 ≡ 1 (mod 10932)", Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung (in German), 34: 284
  11. ^ Haentzschel, E. (1925), "Über die Kongruenz 21092 ≡ 1 (mod 10932)", Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung (in German), 34: 184
  12. ^ Beeger, N. G. W. H. (1922), "On a new case of the congruence 2p − 1 ≡ 1 (p2)", Messenger of Mathematics, 51: 149–150Template:WebCite
  13. ^ Kravitz, S. (1960). "The Congruence 2p-1 ≡ 1 (mod p2) for p < 100,000" (PDF). Math. Comp. 14: 378. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1960-0121334-7.
  14. ^ Fröberg C. E. (1958). "Some Computations of Wilson and Fermat Remainders" (PDF). Math. Comp. 12: 281. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-58-99270-6.
  15. ^ Riesel, H. (1964). "Note on the Congruence ap-1 ≡ 1 (mod p2)" (PDF). Math. Comp. 18: 149–150. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1964-0157928-6.
  16. ^ Lehmer, D. H. "On Fermat's quotient, base two" (PDF). Math. Comp. 36 (153): 289–290. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1981-0595064-5.
  17. ^ a b Ribenboim, Paulo (2004), Die Welt der Primzahlen: Geheimnisse und Rekorde (in German), New York: Springer, p. 237, ISBN 3-540-34283-4
  18. ^ a b c Dorais, F. G. (2011). "A Wieferich Prime Search Up to 6.7×1015" (PDF). Journal of Integer Sequences. 14 (9). Zbl 05977305. Retrieved 23-10-2011. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: Zbl (link)
  19. ^ PrimeGrid Announcement of Wieferich and Wall-Sun-Sun searches
  20. ^ PrimeGrid Wieferich prime search server statistics
  21. ^ a b Crandall, Richard E.; Dilcher, Karl; Pomerance, Carl (1997), "A search for Wieferich and Wilson primes" (PDF), Math. Comput., 66 (217): 433–449, doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-97-00791-6.
  22. ^ Wieferich, A. (1909), "Zum letzten Fermat'schen Theorem", Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (in German), 136 (136): 293–302, doi:10.1515/crll.1909.136.293.
  23. ^ Coppersmith, D. (1990), "Fermat's Last Theorem (Case I) and the Wieferich Criterion" (PDF), Math. Comp., 54 (190), AMS: 895–902, JSTOR 2008518.
  24. ^ Cikánek, P. (1994), "A Special Extension of Wieferich's Criterion" (PDF), Math. Comp., 62 (206), AMS: 923–930, JSTOR 3562296.
  25. ^ Dilcher, K.; Skula, L. (1995), "A new criterion for the first case of Fermat's last theorem", Math. Comp., 64 (209), AMS: 363–392, JSTOR 2153341
  26. ^ Mirimanoff, D. (1910), "Sur le dernier théorème de Fermat", Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des sciences (in French), 150: 293–206.
  27. ^ a b c d Granville, A.; Monagan, M. B. (1988), "The First Case of Fermat's Last Theorem is true for all prime exponents up to 714,591,416,091,389", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 306 (1): 329–359, doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1988-0927694-5.
  28. ^ Suzuki, Jiro (1994), "On the generalized Wieferich criteria", Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci., 70: 230–234
  29. ^ Charles, D. X. On Wieferich primes
  30. ^ Ribenboim, P. (1979). 13 Lectures on Fermat's Last Theorem. New York: Springer. p. 154. ISBN 0-387-90432-8.
  31. ^ Mersenne Primes: Conjectures and Unsolved Problems
  32. ^ Rotkiewicz, A. (1965). "Sur les nombres de Mersenne dépourvus de diviseurs carrés et sur les nombres naturels n, tels que n2∣2n-2". Mat. Vesnik (in French). 2 (17): 78–80.
  33. ^ Ribenboim, Paulo (1991), The little book of big primes, New York: Springer, p. 64, ISBN 0-387-97508-X
  34. ^ Bray, H. G.; Warren, L. J. (1967), "On the square-freeness of Fermat and Mersenne numbers", Pacific J. Math., 22 (3): 563–564, MR 0220666, Zbl 0149.28204
  35. ^ Scott, R. (April 2004). "On px-qy=c and related three term exponential Diophantine equations with prime bases". Journal of Number Theory. 105 (2). Elsevier: 212–234. doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2003.11.008. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  36. ^ Scott, R. (2006). "On the generalized Pillai equation ±ax±by=c" (PDF). Journal of Number Theory. 118 (2): 236–265. doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2005.09.001. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  37. ^ Wells Johnson (1977), "On the nonvanishing of Fermat quotients (mod p)", J. Reine angew. Math., 292: 196–200
  38. ^ Dobeš, Jan; Kureš, Miroslav (2010), "Search for Wieferich primes through the use of periodic binary strings" (PDF), Serdica Journal of Computing, 4: 293–300, Zbl 05896729.{{citation}}: CS1 maint: Zbl (link)
  39. ^ a b Kiss, E. (2004). "On a congruence by János Bolyai, connected with pseudoprimes" (PDF). Mathematica Pannonica. 15 (2): 283–288. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  40. ^ Ribenboim, P. (2004), "Chapter 2. How to Recognize Whether a Natural Number is a Prime", The Little Book of Bigger Primes, New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., p. 99, ISBN 0-387-20169-6 {{citation}}: External link in |chapter= (help) Template:WebCite
  41. ^ Pinch, R. G. E. (2000). "The Pseudoprimes up to 1013". Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 1838: 459–473. doi:10.1007/10722028_30.
  42. ^ Aebi, C.; Cairns, G. (2008). "Catalan numbers, primes and twin primes" (PDF). Elemente der Mathematik. 63 (4): 153–164. doi:10.4171/EM/103.
  43. ^ a b Ehrlich, A. (1994), "Cycles in Doubling Diagrams mod m" (PDF), The Fibonacci Quarterly, 32 (1): 74–78.
  44. ^ Joshua Knauer; Jörg Richstein (2005), "The continuing search for Wieferich primes" (PDF), Math. Comp., 74 (251): 1559–1563, doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-05-01723-0.{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  45. ^ About project Wieferich@Home
  46. ^ PrimeGrid, Wieferich & near Wieferich primes p < 11e15
  47. ^ Ribenboim, Paulo (2000), My numbers, my friends: popular lectures on number theory, New York: Springer, pp. 213–229, ISBN 978-0-387-98911-2
  48. ^ Weisstein, Eric W. "Double Wieferich Prime Pair". MathWorld.
  49. ^ Müller, H. (2009). Mitteilungen der Mathematischen Gesellschaft in Hamburg (in German). 28. Mathematische Gesellschaft in Hamburg: 121-130 http://books.google.com/books?ei=BTWeT5XzF_TV4QTTurGqDg&hl=de&id=hgYTAQAAMAAJ&dq=wieferich+21%2C+39%2C+55%2C+57%2C+105%2C+111%2C+147%2C+155%2C+165%2C+171%2C+183&q=21%2C+39%2C+55%2C+57%2C+105%2C+111%2C+147%2C+155%2C+165%2C+171%2C+183#search_anchor. {{cite journal}}: |chapter= ignored (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)

Further reading

External links