FBI search of Mar-a-Lago
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Classified_intelligence_material_found_during_search_of_Mar-a-Lago.jpg/260px-Classified_intelligence_material_found_during_search_of_Mar-a-Lago.jpg)
| ||
---|---|---|
Business and personal 45th President of the United States Tenure Impeachments Prosecutions Interactions involving Russia ![]() |
||
26°40′37″N 80°02′13″W / 26.67694°N 80.03694°W
On August 8, 2022, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) executed a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago, the residence of former U.S. president Donald Trump in Palm Beach, Florida.
The search warrant application was authorized by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland and approved by Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, following a criminal referral by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The order, unsealed a few days after the search, showed that the FBI obtained the search warrant as part of an investigation into Trump relating to three federal criminal statutes:
- violations of the Espionage Act regarding unauthorized retention of national defense information;
- destroying or concealing records "with the intent to impede obstruct or influence" federal government activity;
- illegal removal or destruction of federal government records (without respect to cause).[1][2]
Later, courts made public a heavily redacted version of the affidavit explaining the FBI's goals in this search[3] and a detailed list of what the FBI seized.[4][5]
In 2021, NARA tried to recover material, and Trump went through the material in his possession at the end of that year.[6] Surveillance footage subpoenaed by the Justice Department in June 2022 showed boxes were moved in and out of a storage room at some point.[7][8] The Justice Department said the classified documents at Mar-a-Lago were likely "concealed and removed" to block investigation.[9][10]
Over 13,000 government documents were recovered.[11][5][12][13] They included nuclear-related information and FBI, CIA, and NSA information about national security interests. Of these documents, 325 were classified: 184 handed over in January 2022, 38 turned over under subpoena in June 2022, and 103 seized in the August search of Mar-a-Lago.[4][14][9]
Background
Handling, storage, and disposition of U.S. government records
The Presidential Records Act (44 U.S.C. ch. 22) establishes that presidential records belong to the United States and must be surrendered to the Archivist of the United States at the end of a president's term of office (or second term of office, if consecutive).[15][16] Unauthorized removal and retention of classified information of the United States government is a criminal offense under U.S. federal law; it has been a felony since the enactment of the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017, which was signed into law by President Donald Trump in January 2018 and increased the maximum term of imprisonment for this offense from one year to five years.[17]
Criminal laws listed on search warrant
The search warrant and accompanying affidavit listed three federal criminal statutes as the basis of the investigation: "18 U.S.C. §§ 793, 2071, [and] 1519". The Sections cited are:
- § 793, enacted as part of the Espionage Act of 1917, makes the unauthorized retention or disclosure of documents related to national defense, which could be used to harm the United States or aid a foreign adversary, a crime. The maximum penalty is 10 years in prison.[2][18][a] The Espionage Act was passed before the development of the modern classification system of the United States government, and thus does not refer to the classification status of the documents; unclassified "national defense information" would still be covered under the Espionage Act.[18] As noted by the Congressional Research Service, the "affidavit supporting the warrant focuses on subsection (e), which applies when an individual is in unauthorized possession of certain national defense information".[19]
- § 2071 criminalizes the theft or destruction of government records, regardless of their relevance to national security. The maximum penalty is 10 years in prison.[2][18][b]
- § 1519, enacted as part of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act, criminalizes the act of destroying or concealing documents or records, regardless of their relevance to national security, "with the intent to impede, obstruct or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter" within the jurisdiction of any federal department or agency. The maximum penalty is 20 years in prison.[18][c]
Classified material and the presidency
Beginning in 1940, U.S. presidents have used the constitutional and statutory powers of the president of the United States to create classification systems through executive orders.[20][21] The Code of Federal Regulations contains rules for classified material as 32 CFR 2001.[citation needed]
Generally, the president and the United States National Security Council set information security policy such as the sharing and classification of information.[citation needed] The day-to-day oversight of the government-wide classification system is handled by the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), a component of the National Archives.[22]
Declassification, presidential powers and regulations
Since the 1988 Supreme Court decision in Department of the Navy v. Egan, there is consensus that a sitting president has broad Constitutional powers to classify (and declassify) information.[23][24] However, there are procedures for doing so. Following former President Trump's claims that the documents found at Mar-a-Lago had been declassified, the Congressional Research Service issued a policy paper in August 2022 highlighting relevant regulations: per 32 CFR 2001.25, the declassification process requires markings "uniformly and conspicuously applied to leave no doubt about the declassified status of the information and who authorized the declassification".[19]
In 2003, Scooter Libby, former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, claimed to have received a direct but unrecorded disclosure order from President George W. Bush and Cheney to leak classified information to reporters. In what became known as the Plame affair, Libby was ultimately not charged for releasing classified information. Steven Aftergood, a critic of U.S. government secrecy policy, said the case "highlights the fact that the president purports to, or does, stand outside of the classification system".[25]
Protocols for loss or compromise of classified material
Federal regulations require that "any person who has knowledge that classified information has been or may have been lost, possibly compromised or disclosed to an unauthorized person(s) shall immediately report the circumstances to an official designated for this purpose." Regulations also require notification of the Director of the ISOO if the specific classified information could attract "significant public attention", if the information in question is voluminous, or if a key vulnerability has been exposed. The Department of Justice is also to be consulted if criminality is suspected.[26]
Trump's handling of U.S. government records during his term in office
During his term in office, Trump's attitude toward and handling of classified information had worried U.S. federal intelligence officials.[27][8][28] His behavior led to mistrust in intelligence and law enforcement agencies who were also alarmed by Trump's mixing with guests during his frequent trips to Mar-a-Lago, viewing the practice as "ripe to be exploited by a foreign spy service eager for access to the epicenter of American power".[27]
In December 2019, Trump spoke to Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward privately in the Oval Office. Trump showed a photograph of himself with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un, telling Woodward: "This is me and him. That’s the line, right? Then I walked over the line. Pretty cool." Trump also showed Woodward letters that Kim had written to him, which the U.S. government had classified,[29] adding: "And don’t say I gave them to you, okay?"[30] Woodward dictated the letters into his tape recorder, and in 2020, CNN published a transcript of two of these letters.[31]
In 2021, Trump reportedly told close associates that he regarded some presidential documents, such as the correspondence with Kim, to be his personal property.[1]
Destruction of presidential records
Trump regularly shredded "both sensitive and mundane" papers while at the White House, at Mar-a-Lago, and on Air Force One,[32][33] despite repeated admonishments from at least two of his chiefs of staff and from White House counsel.[32] His aides had developed special practices and protocols early in his presidency to retrieve the piles of torn paper and attempt to tape documents back together with the help of staffers from the Office of the Staff Secretary or the Oval Office Operations team.[32][34]
Not all materials were recovered; Trump White House staffers frequently used "burn bags" to destroy documents.[32] On at least two occasions, Trump allegedly flushed documents down the toilet at the White House residence.[35][36]
Departure from office
Trump's presidential term ended at noon on January 20, 2021.[37] His departure from the White House was "rushed and chaotic". In the last weeks of the Trump presidency, White House staff quit and aides resigned, leaving an increasing amount of work to a decreasing number of staff. A former Trump aide said they were "30 days behind what a typical administration would be", with White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and Trump taking little interest in the preservation of presidential records.[38] The Wall Street Journal quoted a former aide as saying: "If you only start packing with two days left to go, you're just running low on time. And if he's the one just throwing things in boxes, who knows what could happen?"[39]
The day before he left office, Trump designated seven senior Trump administration officials, including Meadows, White House counsel Pat Cipollone, and Deputy White House Counsel Patrick F. Philbin, "as his representatives to handle all future requests for presidential records" for compliance with the Presidential Records Act.[40][41] Trump subsequently notified NARA to add Kash Patel, a former Trump administration official, and journalist John Solomon as "representatives for access to Presidential records of my administration".[42][43]
Post-presidency
The US head of state does not hold a formal security clearance, and is neither "read in" or "read out" of classified matters, but according to former chief of staff John F. Kelly, Trump should have received an exit briefing "in some hopes that he would not violate all these rules on classified materials. The important message would have been, 'Once you're not the president anymore, all the rules apply to you'".[44]
At the beginning of his term in office, President Joe Biden barred Trump from receiving the courtesy intelligence briefings traditionally given to former presidents, citing Trump's "erratic behavior". This is the first time a former president's access to the classified briefings has been denied.[8][45]
Events leading to the search
NARA actions to retrieve presidential records from Mar-a-Lago
By May 2021, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), the federal agency that preserves government records, had realized they were missing the correspondence sent from North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un to Trump. They also knew they were missing other presidential documents like the altered Hurricane Dorian map. NARA contacted Trump's representatives.[37][46] On May 6, NARA emailed Trump's lawyers with the request for their "immediate assistance" to return the Kim letters[47] along with "roughly two dozen" boxes that were in Trump's White House residence during the final days of his presidency and that were sent to Florida, although Cipollone had determined they should have been sent to NARA.[48][49][50] In June 2021, NARA instructed a former lawyer in Trump's White House counsel's office to send them the Kim letters via FedEx. Amid continued negotiations between NARA and Trump's lawyers,[40] Trump reportedly went through the boxes at Mar-a-Lago at the end of 2021.[6]
In January 2022, NARA retrieved 15 boxes of documents, gifts, and other government property from Mar-a-Lago that should have been transferred to NARA at the end of Trump's term.[40][51][52] The boxes included documents from the CIA, the FBI, and the National Security Agency on a variety of topics of national security interest. Archivists and federal agents determined that 184 unique documents (totaling 700 pages)[53] had classification markings, of which 25 documents were marked "top secret", 92 "secret" and 67 "confidential".[54][55] This material included:
- "sensitive national security information",[56][57][52][51] including signals intelligence[58] and the Kim letters[40]
- documents governed by special access programs (SAP), a type of protocol reserved for extremely sensitive U.S. operations conducted abroad, intended to significantly limit access to the information[59][60][61]
- documents marked as "HCS, FISA, ORCON, NOFORN, and SI"[55][62]
The documents were stored in a sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF) while DOJ officials considered how to proceed.[51]
Trump's statement regarding return of records to NARA
According to The Washington Post, Trump attorney Alex Cannon helped to facilitate transfer of the 15 boxes of presidential records to the National Archives. Trump then dictated a statement he wanted to be released, stating that "everything" requested by NARA had been returned, and told Cannon to send a similar statement to NARA. Cannon declined because he was not sure all requested material had been returned, and a different statement was released three days later, saying that "[t]he papers were given easily and without conflict and on a very friendly basis". On February 8, NARA lawyer Gary Stern told colleagues that Cannon had told him he was unsure whether all relevant documents had been turned over.[63][64][65]
FBI/DOJ launches criminal investigation and issues subpoenas
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a8/NARA_Letter_May_10%2C_2022.pdf/page1-220px-NARA_Letter_May_10%2C_2022.pdf.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/38px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png)
On February 9, 2022, the National Archives sent a criminal referral to the Department of Justice (DOJ).[40][55] Following an initial review,[51] the DOJ opened a criminal investigation and initiated a grand jury process in April 2022.[57][52][37] The same month, the DOJ instructed NARA not to share further details about the materials recovered from Mar-a-Lago with the House Oversight Committee, indicating that the FBI had opened a criminal investigation.[40] The FBI interviewed Trump administration officials and aides at Mar-a-Lago about the handling of presidential records,[37] including former White House Counsel Pat Cipollone and his former deputy Patrick Philbin.[66][67]
Tom Fitton, president of activist group Judicial Watch, advised Trump in February 2022 not to give any more records to NARA.[68] As justification, Fitton cited a 2012 case in which a federal judge said that NARA had no authority to designate materials as "presidential records" nor did it have the right to seize materials.[68][69][d] That case concerned audio tapes of historian Taylor Branch privately interviewing his friend, Bill Clinton, during Clinton's presidency.[69][70] Though NARA had previously said the tapes were private property, Judicial Watch demanded NARA seize the tapes and hand them over to Judicial Watch. The judge dismissed the lawsuit.[69]
On April 12, 2022, NARA said it would let the FBI access the documents retrieved from Mar-a-Lago. Trump's lawyers sought to delay this outcome.[71] On May 10, Debra Steidel Wall, the acting Archivist of the United States, wrote Trump's attorney M. Evan Corcoran to reiterate that Trump had taken hundreds of pages of classified materials with him, including highly classified Special Access Programs materials, and that their extended negotiations over alleged executive privilege was delaying investigations and threat assessments already underway. She said that based on legal counsel she had decided not to honor their request for further delays. An ally of Trump made the letter public on August 22.[71][72][73][53] When NARA provided the FBI with access to the records it retrieved, the FBI provided copies to individual agencies of the US Intelligence Community to conduct classification reviews and determine whether their disclosure could put at risk sensitive sources.[74]
On May 11, the DOJ subpoenaed Trump for "any and all documents or writings in the custody or control of Donald J. Trump and/or the Office of Donald J. Trump bearing classification markings".[75][57] Trump's advisers repeatedly urged him to fully comply with the subpoena, despite his desire to keep some documents.[8] According to The New York Times, Trump told his advisers in the spring of 2022 that he had returned all government records and did not want to discuss the matter further.[76] On May 12, the DOJ issued a grand jury subpoena to the National Archives for the classified documents they had provided to the House select committee investigating the January 6 United States Capitol attack.[77]
After the subpoena was issued, "Walt" (Waltine) Nauta,[78] a former Navy sailor[79] who served as a White House valet and personal aide to Trump at Mar-a-Lago, was recorded on Mar-a-Lago security cameras and seen to have been moving boxes from a storage room to Trump's private residence, claiming it was at Trump's request. He has reportedly spoken with the FBI.[80][81][82]
Investigators from the DOJ and the FBI met with Trump's attorneys at Mar-a-Lago on June 3 about the classified material that was subpoenaed on May 11.[57][52][37] One of those lawyers gave the agents 38 classified documents with HCS, SI and FISA markings in "a single Redweld envelope, double-wrapped in tape".[83][9] During this visit, however, FBI agents noticed over 50 boxes in the storage room but were prohibited from looking inside the boxes.[84][85] With the help of an informant, the DOJ came to believe that more classified documents remained on the premises.[86][87][88][89][90][91]
During the June 3 meeting, Trump's custodian of records, Christina Bobb, gave the DOJ a signed declaration that had been drafted by Trump attorney Evan Corcoran, attesting that all classified material had been returned. Two months later, after the falsehood came to light, The New York Times reported that the signed declaration possibly indicated that Trump's legal team had not been forthright with federal investigators about the material.[8][92][93]
On June 8, the FBI told Trump's team to better secure the storage area, so Trump aides added a padlock to the room.[37][94][95] Less than two weeks later, Trump notified NARA to add Kash Patel, a former Trump administration official, and journalist John Solomon as "representatives for access to Presidential records of my administration."[42][43] On June 24, the FBI served a subpoena (issued two days previously) to the Trump Organization for surveillance footage at Mar-a-Lago, including views from outside the storage room between January 10 and June 24.[83][60][37] In response, on July 6, the Trump Organization provided a hard drive.[84] The footage showed that boxes had been moved in and out of the room after one instance when the Justice Department had been in contact with Trump's representatives.[8]
FBI/DOJ obtains search warrant from federal court
Federal agents established probable cause to obtain a search warrant against Trump because, while he had turned over some classified documents to federal authorities, agents suspected he was unlawfully withholding other classified information.[96] The warrant was obtained by the Justice Department's National Security Division at the request of NARA to collect material that Trump had potentially not turned over to NARA.[56] The New York Times reported: "Two people briefed on the classified documents that investigators believe remained at Mar-a-Lago indicated that they were so sensitive in nature, and related to national security, that the Justice Department had to act".[61] However, Attorney General Merrick Garland had contemplated for weeks whether to approve the application for the search warrant, after many meetings between senior DOJ and FBI officials.[97]
The search warrant showed that the FBI was investigating Trump for suspected violations of three Title 18 federal laws – , Section 793 (a part of the Espionage Act of 1917); Section 1519 (part of the fiscal oversight Sarbanes–Oxley Act); and Section 2071.[1][98][99][18][100] Trump had not been charged with any crime.[18][101] If charged and convicted under the third law, Trump would be "disqualified from holding any office under the United States". However, a number of legal scholars have questioned the constitutionality of that provision in the statute.[102][103]
Federal magistrate judge Bruce Reinhart of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida approved the warrant on August 5, 2022.[104][105] Reinhart, who has a reputation for being particularly careful, had previously been a federal prosecutor for a decade, was misidentified by some sources as being a Trump appointee, but the position in fact is one filled by the courts themselves.[104]
Reviewing and approving search warrants is a typical duty of federal magistrate judges.[104] Legal experts noted that, given the high profile of the operation, the application for a search warrant (granted on probable cause) would have been first scrupulously scrutinized by federal authorities.[106][107] Will Hurd, a former CIA agent and former Texas Republican congressman, said: "Trump and his lawyers admitted to and then handed over presidential documents improperly taken from and stored outside the White House. Of course the FBI had probable cause to go in looking for more".[108]
Search of Mar-a-Lago
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Classified_intelligence_material_found_during_search_of_Mar-a-Lago.jpg/330px-Classified_intelligence_material_found_during_search_of_Mar-a-Lago.jpg)
On August 8, 2022, at 9 a.m.,[109][110] FBI agents searched Trump's residence at Mar-a-Lago for the material specified in a warrant, including classified material. The material pertained to special access programs according to The New York Times[61] and – according to The Washington Post – nuclear weapons.[14][111][58][112] The FBI notified the Secret Service of the search a few hours in advance.[52] The Secret Service facilitated the FBI's access to Mar-a-Lago,[52][56] but did not participate in the search.[52]
Trump's son Eric Trump said on Fox News that he received a call about the search and informed his father shortly thereafter.[113][114] Two of Trump's lawyers, Christina Bobb and Lindsey Halligan, were present for the search[52] but were not allowed inside.[115] Trump and his family watched most of the FBI search from New York remotely via a live video feed transmitted from Mar-a-Lago's system of security cameras.[116][117] Trump and his attorneys refused the FBI's requests to turn off the cameras.[118] Eric Trump later said that his family would release the footage "at the right time".[119][118]
FBI agents conducted the search using "taint teams"[120] to ensure that no privileged correspondence between Trump and his lawyers were removed.[96] The New York Times reported the FBI agents "carried out the search in a relatively low-key manner" and intentionally did not wear the usual navy-blue agency jackets.[56] FBI agents searched a storage unit in the basement, where they broke through the newly installed padlock.[56][94] They further searched what was called Trump's "45 Office,"[121] where they opened a "hotel-style" safe containing "nothing of consequence", and finally Trump's residence.[56][100] Classified documents were also recovered from unsecured locations, and were found outside of the locked storage room.[122] In accordance with the usual procedure for executing search warrants, the FBI provided Trump's counsel with a copy of the warrant and a detailed three-page manifest,[61][123] called a property receipt, which listed the inventory of seized records.[56][124][125][126] The FBI agents left the property around 6:30 p.m. with the boxes.[115]
Peter Schorsch, the publisher of FloridaPolitics.com, was the first to report on the event.[96][127] Trump also publicly acknowledged the search.[109]
The FBI afterwards issued another subpoena for surveillance video from Mar-a-Lago for the weeks leading up to the search, suggesting Trump may still be withholding additional government documents.[6]
Release of search warrant, property receipt, and affidavit
Release of search warrant and property receipt
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c8/Mar-a-Lago_Search_and_Seizure_Warrant_08-05-2022_%28S.D._Fl._22-mj-8332-BER%29.pdf/page1-220px-Mar-a-Lago_Search_and_Seizure_Warrant_08-05-2022_%28S.D._Fl._22-mj-8332-BER%29.pdf.jpg)
In keeping with longstanding DOJ reticence to comment on ongoing investigations,[128] as well as the tight limits Attorney General Merrick Garland placed on such public statements, the government did not initially comment on the search.[129]
While the DOJ remained silent, a person close to Trump contacted a DOJ official to send a message from Trump to Garland. Trump wanted Garland to know that people around the country were angered by the search and what Trump could do to "reduce the heat".[8]
On August 11, the DOJ filed a motion in court to unseal the search warrant and property receipt, unless Trump objected to making them public.[130][131][f] On the same day, Garland held a press conference, in which he said that the department had filed a motion to unseal the warrant and the property receipt "in light of the former president's public confirmation of the search, the surrounding circumstances, and the substantial public interest in this matter", and that he had personally approved the decision to seek the search warrant.[105][131][126] Garland also said that "upholding the rule of law means applying the law evenly, without fear or favor" and criticized "recent unfounded attacks on the professionalism of the FBI and Justice Department agents and prosecutors".[126][131][10]
Trump later said on social media that he supported the release of the warrant and related documents,[132] though he declined to release them himself,[61][124][125] and his legal team agreed that the court should release them.[133] The search warrant and property receipt were unsealed (made publicly available) on the afternoon of August 12,[98][134][g] with the signatures of two FBI agents redacted.[136]
Seized materials
FBI agents seized over 13,000 government documents,[5][12] among which they found 103 classified government documents.[137][123][4] Documents and empty folders with classified markings were found both in the basement storage room and in Trump's 45 Office.[138] The classified material was grouped into 11 sets. Of the classified material:
- 18 documents (grouped into five sets) were marked top secret, and one these sets had the control system protocol "top secret/SCI" (i.e., sensitive compartmented information).
- 54 documents (grouped into three sets) were marked secret.
- 31 documents (grouped into three sets) were marked confidential.[137][123][4]
Some documents were related to Trump's pardon of his ally Roger Stone and some were related to the president of France.[137][123] The property receipt, signed by Trump's attorney Christina Bobb at 6:19 p.m. at the end of the search,[139] showed that Trump possessed documents marked "TS/SCI" and another item labeled "Info re: President of France".[98]
During the search, one personal and two official passports belonging to Trump, the personal and one official one expired, were taken from a desk drawer in Trump's office and later returned to him. In an August 30 court filing, the DOJ noted that the passports were located in a desk drawer in Trump's office that "contained classified documents and governmental records commingled with other documents" and thus subject to the terms of the warrant.[140]
Of the 13,000 documents seized, the Justice Department's filter team set aside 520 pages as potentially subject to attorney-client privilege.[141]
On September 6, The Washington Post reported that some of the seized documents contained details of special-access programs requiring special clearances on a need-to-know basis that could only be granted by "the president, some members of his Cabinet or a near-Cabinet-level official". They would normally be kept in a "secure compartmented information facility, with a designated control officer to keep careful tabs on their location." One of the documents described "a foreign government's military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities".[14] Topics included Iran's missile program and U.S. intelligence operations involving China.[142]
Missing materials
On October 1, 2022, The Washington Post reported that, according to two unnamed sources, NARA had informed the House Oversight Committee that some presidential records had not been recovered.[143] On October 6, The New York Times reported that, according to two unnamed sources, the Justice Department informed Trump's lawyers "in recent weeks" that Trump is still holding material.[144]
Motions to release search warrant affidavit
Many newspapers and media organizations motioned to unseal the probable-cause affidavit which had been submitted to the judge on August 5 in support of the search warrant application.[k]
In court filings, DOJ opposed the affidavit's release, writing that "this investigation implicates highly classified materials" and that disclosure would compromise the integrity of the criminal investigation and the cooperation of witnesses in the matter and "other high-profile investigations"; the DOJ also cited "widely reported threats made against law enforcement personnel in the wake of the August 8 search".[148] The DOJ said that if the magistrate judge ordered the release of the affidavit, the necessary redactions would render the unsealed text "devoid of any meaningful context", saying the "redacted version would not serve any public interest".[147][148] The DOJ requested the magistrate to instead unseal other information, including a cover sheet, the DOJ's August 5 motion to seal the warrant and the judge's sealing order of the same day.[148]
On August 18, the federal magistrate judge held a hearing to discuss requests to unseal investigators' probable cause affidavit.[149][150] Jay Bratt, head of the DOJ's counterintelligence division, said the investigation was in its "early stages". He argued that releasing the affidavit could reveal investigative techniques, jeopardize the identities of "several witnesses" from their specific accounts of events, as well as expose federal agents to threats.[150][151] Bratt revealed that the affidavit contained "substantial grand jury information", including details about how "evidence of obstruction" would be found at Mar-a-Lago.[151] Several media organizations asked the judge to unseal it with the necessary redactions, citing the public interest. The judge signalled that he planned to unseal portions of the affidavit and gave the DOJ a week to submit proposed redactions.[150][151] Trump on social media repeatedly called for the release of the unredacted affidavit[152][153] but his lawyers did not file a motion asking the court to do so.[154]
Also on August 18, the magistrate judge unsealed several procedural documents related to the warrant affidavit, including the criminal cover sheet, a redacted copy of the August 5 warrant application, the DOJ's original motion to seal warrant documents, and the order granting the sealing request. The documents showed that the FBI was specifically investigating whether there was "willful retention of national defense information", concealment or removal of government records, and obstruction of a federal investigation.[155][156][l]
In a 13-page order, released on August 22, the judge said he "carefully reviewed" the affidavit before approving the search warrant and was "satisfied that the facts sworn by the affiant are reliable". He said that the DOJ had shown a "compelling interest that overrides any public interest" in fully unsealing the affidavit. He indicated that he might agree with the DOJ that the necessary redactions would render the document useless. He rejected the DOJ's argument that partially unsealing the affidavit would set a dangerous precedent, highlighting the significance of this case. He requested the DOJ to submit proposed redactions and provide additional evidence and arguments within a week.[157][m]
On August 25, the Justice Department submitted a legal brief proposing redactions to the affidavit.[158][159][160] The brief was under seal, and multiple media companies requested the judge to unseal it, as well as direct the DOJ to make public any other sealed documents.[159] The judge soon agreed to the proposed redactions and ordered the DOJ to release the redacted affidavit the following day.[158][159] The judge's decision to release the affidavit was seen as surprising, because probable-cause affidavits are typically kept under seal (i.e., not made public) before charges are filed.[156]
Release of redacted search warrant affidavit
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c8/August_2022_Mar-a-Lago_Search_Redacted_Affidavit.pdf/page1-220px-August_2022_Mar-a-Lago_Search_Redacted_Affidavit.pdf.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/38px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png)
The redacted search warrant affidavit, along with a redacted copy of the legal brief that justified redactions to the affidavit,[n] were unsealed and made public on August 26.[161][162] The New York Times, The Washington Post, and CNN released annotated versions of the search warrant affidavit as well.[163][164][3]
The legal brief had argued that the DOJ's proposed redactions were necessary to protect the identities of cooperating witnesses and FBI agents who might otherwise be exposed to threats and retaliation, as well as to prevent obstruction of the investigation, protect privacy interests, protect grand jury information, and maintain the safety of law enforcement personnel.[162][161]
The affidavit listed four main goals of the FBI investigation:
- To "determine how the documents with classification markings and records were removed from the White House (or any other authorized location(s) for the storage of classified materials) and came to be stored at [Mar-a-Lago]";[165]
- To "determine whether the storage location(s) at [Mar-a-Lago] were authorized locations for the storage of classified information";[165]
- To "determine whether any additional classified documents or records may have been stored in an unauthorized location at [Mar-a-Lago] or another unknown location, and whether they remain at any such location";[165]
- And to "identify any person(s) who may have removed or retained classified information without authorization and/or in an unauthorized space".[165]
The FBI said there was "probable cause to believe" that classified national security materials were improperly transferred to "unauthorized" locations at Mar-a-Lago, that materials relating to national defense or presidential records "subject to record retention requirements" still remained at Mar-a-Lago, and that "evidence of obstruction" would be found at Mar-a-Lago.[162][55] The FBI noted that several of the seized documents contained Trump's "handwritten notes" and were "unfoldered, intermixed with other records, and otherwise unproperly [sic] identified".[166]
The FBI attached to the affidavit a May 25 letter to the DOJ from Trump lawyer Evan Corcoran. In the letter, Corcoran argued against proceeding with a criminal investigation, saying that presidents have the "absolute authority" to declassify documents, although he did not clarify whether Trump had done so.[166]
Special counsel investigation
On November 18, 2022, Garland appointed a special counsel, federal prosecutor Jack Smith, to oversee the federal criminal investigation.[167][168][169]
Trump lawsuit
On August 22, Trump filed a motion in the Southern District of Florida asking for, among other relief, the appointment of a special master to review all material seized for material not covered by the warrant or potentially privileged under attorney-client confidentiality or excluded under executive privilege. He also asked that the Justice Department provide a property receipt with more detail than the brief list that was handed to his lawyer when the search concluded.[170][171][172] The case was assigned to District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee.[173][174]
On August 23, Cannon ordered Trump's legal team to refine their arguments,[175] asking them to explain how Trump is affected by the case before Judge Reinhart, what they want Judge Cannon to do about it, and why they believe she is empowered to do it.[o]
Trump responded on August 26,[176][177] asserting that the district judge had jurisdiction to appoint a special master.[177][p] His court filing argued that the redacted affidavit "raise[d] more questions than answers" and "provides almost no information ... to understand why the raid took place, or what was taken from his home".[176] Trump did not request immediate action from the judge or clarify what the special master should filter out.[176][177] Trump's brief did not suggest he had any "standing order" to declassify materials, a defense he had initially proposed.[178]
Trump's lawyers also cited a 1991 decision of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals,[q] regarding the powers of a sitting president. The court had ruled that while in office, the president has "virtually complete control" over the administration's records. Trump's lawyers claimed that this ruling further suggests the Presidential Records Act is not criminally enforceable. According to Politico, "there are complications with the Trump team's argument. The 1991 ruling did not discuss criminal enforcement of the Presidential Records Act or address the actions of former presidents ... the decision also offered no view on whether retaining White House records without authority might violate one of the laws the FBI and prosecutors did cite as the basis for the warrant: a broad prohibition on stealing, misusing or concealing government records".[177]
On August 27, Judge Cannon said she was inclined to approve Trump's request.[179][180][r] She asked the DOJ to provide the detailed property receipt Trump had requested as well as a status of any and all DOJ review of that material, including whether DOJ had filtered the documents for potentially privileged information.[181][182][183][184] Legal experts believed Trump's demand for a special master was a strategic error, according to The New York Times.[185]
DOJ filing about its review of materials
A three-page legal brief filed by the Justice Department on August 29 said that the review of seized materials had already been completed.[s][186] It explained that the FBI filter team had finished their examination of documents, "identified a limited set of materials that potentially contain attorney-client privileged information", and were following relevant procedures to deal with privilege disputes.[187] Criminal investigators would not be allowed to access or review such protected documents. According to The Washington Post, the Justice Department's acknowledgement of a completed document review process may "undercut the former president's efforts to have a special master appointed to review the files".[187][188]
The DOJ also confirmed that they and the US intelligence community were conducting a classification review and damage assessment.[189] They had been conducting a rolling review of the classified records taken from Mar-a-Lago since mid-May to determine their classification level and mitigate any immediate risk of the documents being held there.[74] The filing also revealed that some of the recovered materials were so sensitive in nature that "FBI counterintelligence personnel and DOJ attorneys conducting the review required additional clearances before they were permitted to review certain documents".[190][191]
DOJ response to request for special master
On August 30, the Department of Justice filed their response along with a detailed timeline of events leading up to the search.[192][193][194][9][195] According to The New York Times, the 36-page filing "made clear that prosecutors are now unmistakably focused on the possibility that Mr. Trump and those around him took criminal steps to obstruct their investigation".[196]
The DOJ stated that, when they were present in the storage room at Mar-a-Lago during the June 3 handover of classified documents, they "developed evidence that government records were likely concealed and removed from the Storage Room and that efforts were likely taken to obstruct the government's investigation".[192][9][197][93][191][195] The DOJ stated that Trump's counsel or custodian had never asserted that Trump declassified the documents or asserted executive privilege over them, but rather "handled them in a manner that suggested counsel believed that the documents were classified: the production included a single Redweld envelope, double-wrapped in tape, containing the document".[9][197][195] The DOJ claimed that Trump's lawyers "explicitly prohibited government personnel from opening or looking inside any of the boxes that remained in the storage room" to confirm whether classified documents remained there.[9][93] Though Trump's lawyers certified they had conducted a "diligent search" following the May 11 subpoena to prepare to hand over all subpoenaed material on June 3, the DOJ said that the FBI's search on August 8 "cast serious doubt" on those claims.[197][93][191][195][198]
The DOJ stated that Trump lacked standing over presidential records since they are considered government property under the Presidential Records Act.[9] They urged the judge to reject Trump's executive privilege claims: “The former President cites no case – and the government is aware of none – in which executive privilege has been successfully invoked to prohibit the sharing of documents within the Executive Branch."[195] The DOJ argued that appointing a special master was "unnecessary" and would impede the ongoing criminal investigation and delay the intelligence community's classification review.[197][195]
The DOJ attached a photo of a spread of classified documents laid out on the floor as evidence.[191][199] Multiple red and yellow cover sheets bore classified markings of “Top Secret,” “Secret” and “Sensitive Compartmented Information.”[195][198] Some were White House records marked "Confidential". Other records were marked with ORCON and NOFORN controls. Another "Top Secret" document had HCS-P/SI/TK control markings, indicating that they included details of human sources, electronic surveillance, and spy satellites.[191][199]
The DOJ included a copy of its May subpoena to Trump from a DC federal grand jury after authorization for it to be made public from Chief Judge Beryl Howell in the DC District Court.[9][195]
The DOJ also filed a more detailed Receipt for Property and a summary of the government's search, both under seal;[t] on August 31, the News Media filed a motion opposing the sealing.[u]
Trump reply
On August 31, Trump's lawyers filed a 19-page reply. They claimed that "this 'discovery' [of classified information within the material recovered in January] was to be fully anticipated given the very nature of Presidential records", as such records often "contain sensitive information". They referred to the place where the documents were found at Mar-a-Lago as a "secure setting" and said it was "unjustified" for the government to "criminaliz[e]" the former president's possession of classified documents. Given their claim that it is not a crime for Trump to keep classified material in his personal residence, they said that if NARA believed its January 2022 negotiations had been unsuccessful in recovering all material, NARA should have asked Trump once again for his cooperation rather than referring the matter to the Justice Department. Trump's attorneys characterized the months they had resisted the government's efforts to reclaim his presidential records as the "standard give-and-take between former Presidents and (the National Archives and Records Administration) regarding Presidential library contents."[200]
They also said that, should Trump's request for a special master be granted, he "agrees that it would be appropriate for the special master to possess a Top Secret/SCI security clearance".[200] They rejected the DOJ's assertion that it had screened out any attorney-client privileged records, arguing that their filter team had "virtually unchecked discretion" in addressing potential privilege disputes.[201][200] Trump's lawyers requested copies of the seized materials, the search warrant, and unredacted copies of the underlying application materials.[200]
Hearing on September 1
The DOJ argued that the FBI had already reviewed 520 pages from 64 document sets to look for privileged material and that Trump had no right to keep them or exert executive privilege over them, an assertion that Cannon pushed back against.[202] Trump's lawyers argued the government had misconstrued the role of the Presidential Records Act. They also stated that Trump, while president, was allowed to designate records as "personal" outside the review of a court.[203] They compared the conflict over the documents with an "overdue library book scenario".[203][204]
Cannon ordered the DOJ to release the detailed property list they had previously filed under seal. Neither DOJ nor Trump's team objected to making it public.[202]
Release of detailed property list
The detailed property list was unsealed on September 2.[5][4][205][206] The list showed how classified items had been intermingled with other items like documents and photographs without classification markings, news clippings, unspecified "gift items", items of clothing, and a book.[207][5] A box found in Trump's office is listed as containing "43 empty folders with classified banners; 28 empty folders labeled 'Return to Staff Secretary/Mili[t]ary Aide'; 24 government documents marked confidential, secret or top secret; 99 news articles and other printed media; and 69 government documents or photos that were not classified."[207]
Judge halts criminal investigation
In a ruling on September 5, Cannon ordered the DOJ to halt its review of the materials while allowing the intelligence community to continue its assessment of the potential harm caused to national security. She announced that she would grant Trump's request for a special master to review the seized documents for attorney-client and executive privilege and ordered the DOJ and Trump to file a joint list of candidates "with the requisite security clearances and legal expertise" by September 9.[141][208][209]
Among other reasons for appointing a special master, she cited an "interest in ensuring the integrity of an orderly process amidst swirling allegations of bias and media leaks" and the historic nature of the case,[209] and that the Supreme Court "did not rule out the possibility of a former President overcoming an incumbent President on executive privilege matters."[208] Cannon noted that the filter team had screened out medical documents, correspondence on taxes, and accounting information among "[p]ersonal effects without evidentiary value" as well as 500 pages of material potentially subject to attorney-client privilege.[208][209] She criticized that in two instances the investigative team "had been exposed to" potentially privileged materials it then gave to the filter team.[209]
Expert reactions
Legal experts called the judgment deeply flawed and giving special treatment to Trump.[141] Other experts said that the judge did not seem to understand the nature of executive privilege and that there was no basis for her "to expand a special master's authority to screen materials that were also potentially subject to executive privilege". The New York Times noted that "The Justice Department is itself part of the executive branch, and a court has never held that a former president can invoke the privilege to keep records from his time in office away from the executive branch itself." Stanford law professor David Alan Sklansky emphasized the contradictions with a ruling that allows "the executive branch to use the files [to assess the risk to national security] while blocking it from using them for an active criminal investigation."[210] Former Trump administration attorney general William Barr said that the judge was wrong in deciding that a former president can keep the executive branch from reviewing documents while investigating a potential crime by invoking executive privilege over those documents.[211]
Motions filed after the ruling
On September 8, the DOJ asked the judge to rescind her rulings to have the special master review classified material and halt FBI access to classified material seized during the search by September 15, arguing that it was "inextricably linked with the criminal investigation" and that her orders had also halted the intelligence community's review of classified material. They said that they would appeal those rulings to an appellate court if she did not repeal them herself. They did not oppose the appointment of a special master to review personal documents and "some other items".[212][213][214]
On September 9, the DOJ and Trump's lawyers submitted their joint filing, each side proposing two different candidates and differing views on the tasks and duration of the special master's review.[212] The DOJ suggested Barbara Jones and Thomas Griffith and Trump's legal team suggested Raymond Dearie and Paul Huck Jr..[215]
On September 12, the DOJ filed court papers saying that they would accept one of the two people proposed by Trump, former chief federal judge Raymond J. Dearie, while Trump's lawyers filed a document rejecting both judges proposed by the DOJ. Trump's filing also suggested that some documents marked classified may not be and that Trump may have the right to have them in his possession.[216]
Appointment of special master
On September 15, Cannon appointed Dearie special master and tasked him to review all documents seized in the August 8 search. She upheld her September 5 ruling blocking the use of any of the material for investigative purposes until they had been reviewed, refusing to grant even the DOJ's request of a limited stay to allow them to again access the approximately 100 documents bearing classification markings.[217] She ruled that Dearie should finish the review by November 30 and that Trump will have to pay the costs of the review.[218][219] Dearie accepted the appointment.[220]
DOJ appeal
On September 16, the DOJ asked the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to immediately allow the criminal investigation to proceed. Regarding the classified documents, DOJ requested the right to review them;[221][222][223][224] to have them exempted from review by the special master; and not to disclose them to Trump's lawyers,[223][224] who may be "witnesses to 'relevant events' in the criminal probe."[222] On September 21, the federal appeals court granted the DOJ's request. The three-judge panel unanimously declared it was in the public interest for the DOJ "to determine whether any of the records were improperly disclosed, risking national security damage."[225][226]
On September 30, the DOJ asked the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals for an expedited ruling on its appeal to overturn Cannon's order installing a special master and the "expansive powers" she had given him. Trump's lawyers opposed the request.[227][228] On October 5, the court agreed to expedite the case.[229][230] The DOJ filed its brief asking the 11th Circuit to reverse the court's order,[5][11][231] Trump's team responded,[232] and then the court heard oral arguments on November 22.[233]
Trump application to Supreme Court
On October 4, Trump asked the U.S. Supreme Court to vacate the 11th Circuit's stay of the special master, arguing that the appeals court lacked jurisdiction over Cannon's order. On October 11, the DOJ urged the Supreme Court to stay out of the case.[227][234] On October 13, the Supreme Court denied Trump's request, without offering further details nor recording any dissents.[235][236][237]
Special master review
On September 20, at the first hearing about the special master's review, Dearie indicated that if Trump's lawyers "decide not to advance a claim of declassification", then he would accept the government's prima facie evidence that the documents remain classified, once that evidence is provided.[238][239][240] During the hearing, Dearie said that he "can't allow litigation strategy to dictate the outcome of [his review and] recommendations to Judge Cannon", referring to vague declassification claims by Trump's side.[241]
On September 22, Dearie gave Trump one week to formally submit any specific claim of inaccuracies with the inventory of seized documents, including if any of the materials listed "were not seized from the Premises on August 8, 2022".[242][243] The DOJ was also instructed to submit electronic copies of all unclassified documents to both Dearie and the Trump legal team by September 26.[244]
On September 28, Trump's team objected, arguing that Cannon initially had not ordered them to confirm the inventory, that they could not review the classified documents because they no longer had access to them, and that Dearie had not given them enough time to review what they claimed to be nearly "200,000 pages".[13] Their 200,000 page estimate was disputed at the time as much too large for the volume of materials seized,[245] and in its October 14 pleading before the 11th Circuit, the DOJ noted that there were approximately 13,000 documents totaling 22,000 pages.[246] On September 29, Cannon blocked several of Dearie's orders, agreeing with Trump's legal team on multiple issues.[247][248][249] Dearie later clarified the actual number of pages to be 21,792, with the DOJ saying the discrepancy in page count arose following an overestimation by a company hired to digitize and database the documents.[250][251]
On November 14, a pair of legal briefs were partially unsealed. In the arguments made to the special master, Trump's attorneys claimed that some of the seized documents were designated as "personal property" per the Presidential Records Act, and may also be protected by executive privilege claims; while the Department of Justice argued to reject such reasoning on multiple grounds.[252][253] According to The Wall Street Journal, the DOJ legal filing "revealed that Mr. Trump’s legal team has only asserted privilege on a tiny subset of the thousands of documents seized during the search" and that "Mr. Trump's lawyers have claimed that 121 documents are protected by executive privilege and only one document is protected by attorney-client privilege".[254]
Reactions
Congress
NARA's revaluation of presidential records retrieved from Mar-a-Lago raised concern within Congress; the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, chaired by U.S. Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, began an investigation.[40][255] In a February 24 letter to NARA, Maloney wrote, "I am deeply concerned that former President Trump may have violated the law through his intentional efforts to remove and destroy records that belong to the American people".[40] She requested the National Archives to provide documents about discussions among top Trump advisers about preserving and storing White House records.[255] Maloney and Rep. Adam Schiff, chair of the House Intelligence Committee, later sent a letter to Avril Haines, director of National Intelligence (DNI) requesting a classified congressional briefing and a damage assessment.[256][257] Haines responded that the DOJ and Intelligence Community were conducting a classification review of materials taken to Mar-a-Lago and a damage assessment of the potential risk to national security.[258][259]
Mark Warner and Marco Rubio, chair and ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, sent a private letter to Garland and Haines requesting that the DOJ and the Office of the DNI provide the committee with the classified documents seized and a damage assessment of potential risks to national security.[260][261] According to an August 26 letter from Haines, a classification review and damage assessment inquiry is ongoing.[258][262] The eight congressional leaders who are briefed on classified intelligence matters, colloquially known as the Gang of Eight, have asked the Biden administration for access to the seized documents.[263]
The Congressional Research Service issued a "Sidebar" bulletin to brief members and Committees of Congress on the legal aspects of the case.[19]
White House
The White House said that President Biden and White House officials were not aware of the search until it was reported on the news. Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said "those investigations should be free from political influence" and did not comment on the search itself except that the independent Department of Justice was carrying out the investigation.[264][265][266][267]
On August 17, the White House, in a statement to CNN, condemned calls from some members of the Republican Party to "defund the FBI".[268]
White House officials were privately concerned over the classified material stored in Mar-a-Lago, including whether it could put at risk the sources and methods of the US intelligence community.[269] On August 26, Biden mocked Trump for saying he had declassified all of the material he took with him to Mar-a-Lago[162][270] and said he would let the DOJ make a determination on the risk to national security.[271]
In another speech on August 30, Biden condemned the threats against law enforcement and calls to defund the FBI as "sickening". He criticized Republicans for their hypocrisy in their calls for "riots in the streets" and refusal to condemn the January 6 United States Capitol attack.[272][273]
National Archives
The National Archives made multiple press statements concerning Trump's presidential records in response to media queries.[274] They have also released numerous records relevant to the Trump administration's adherence to the Presidential Records Act in response to FOIA requests.[275]
On August 24, NARA staff told the House Committee on Oversight and Reform they could not be certain they had all of Trump's presidential records.[276] The same day, in an internal letter to all NARA employees, acting Archivist Debra Wall said NARA had received both threats and praise from members of the public for its role in the ongoing FBI investigation.[277][278]
On September 13, Rep. Carolyn Maloney of the House Oversight and Reform Committee wrote a letter to NARA,[279] requesting an "urgent review" of all recovered documents and an assessment regarding any and all "presidential records [that] remain unaccounted for and potentially in the possession of the former president".[280] On September 30, the National Archives responded to the committee's request,[281] writing in part: "While there is no easy way to establish absolute accountability, we do know that we do not have custody of everything we should ... With respect to the second issue concerning whether former President Trump has surrendered all presidential records, we respectfully refer you to the Department of Justice in light of its ongoing investigation".[282][283]
Trump, his family, and his attorneys
On August 14, Trump demanded the return of boxes of seized documents that were alleged covered by attorney-client privilege and executive privilege.[284][285]
Beginning with his first announcement after the search, Trump and his attorneys made a variety of statements relating to the search and the F.B.I. investigation; these statements have been criticized as "shifting" over time[286][287] and "often contradictory and unsupported".[288] Zolan Kanno-Youngs and Maggie Haberman, writing for The New York Times, said that the former President's response "follow[s] a familiar playbook" which "[h]e has used ... over decades", including during the investigation into whether the Trump campaign conspired with Russia and during his first impeachment trial. They also said that Trump's statements did not explain why he kept the documents after the government began investigating him.[288] In an August 30 Fox News appearance, Trump attorney Jim Trusty said that his client's actions were comparable to someone with "an overdue library book" in their possession, and suggested that government prosecutors are holding Trump to a different standard of scrutiny than they would apply to others.[198]
According to The Washington Post, Trump has struggled to assemble an experienced legal defense team, with many of his former lawyers declining to take part in the case. Trump spokesman Taylor Budowich said that Trump's lead counsel were exceptionally talented and had "litigated some of the most complex cases in American history".[289] The New York Times credits political advisor Boris Epshteyn for his role in assembling Trump's legal team. Epshteyn previously assisted in the defense of Trump's false claims of a stolen election in 2020. Former Trump attorney David Schoen has said the current situation remains problematic, with members of the defense team "rotating in and out", and lacking clear leadership.[290] Trump later added former Florida solicitor general Chris Kise to his legal team for the case,[291][292] but within a month, Kise's role was reportedly reduced.[293][294] According to The New York Times, Kise had "suggested hiring a forensic firm to search for additional documents" following requests from Jay Bratt at the Justice Department, who expressed concern that more documents were still missing. Disagreement between Trump's lawyers reportedly led to a minimization of Kise's participation on the defense team, due to his more conciliatory approach.[295]
Trump's political action committee, the Save America PAC, sent out more than 100 fundraising emails in the days following the FBI search. Daily donations increased from an average of $200,000–$300,000 to more than $1,000,000 for at least two days. The emails claimed that former president Trump was being politically persecuted.[296] In July, the Save America PAC paid almost $1,000,000 to civil and criminal lawyers representing Trump and the Trump Organization in lawsuits.[297]
Claims of political motivation, planted evidence, and Obama precedent
Trump likened the search to the 1970s Watergate scandal.[298] He made unsubstantiated allegations that it was politically motivated to stop him from running for president in 2024,[299][300][301] and a "politically motivated move" by the Biden administration.[302] He criticized the FBI for searching his wife Melania Trump's rooms and belongings in Mar-a-Lago.[303]
On August 11, Trump made the unsubstantiated claim that the FBI might have doctored evidence to support its search warrant and might have planted incriminating materials and recording devices at Mar-a-Lago. Trump's allies echoed these conspiracist claims.[87][304] On August 12, he claimed that his lawyers had been fully cooperating with federal investigators prior to the search: "The government could have had whatever they wanted, if we had it".[105]
On August 12, Trump falsely claimed that former president Barack Obama had taken "33 million pages of documents, much of them classified" to Chicago;[305][306] the falsehoods were amplified by conservative commentators on Fox News.[307][308] NARA responded that they had taken "exclusive legal and physical custody" of Obama's records when he left office in 2017,[305] and that Obama had "no control over where and how" NARA stored the records, with NARA "exclusively" maintaining around 30 million pages of unclassified Obama records near Chicago, while classified Obama records were maintained by NARA in its Washington, D.C facility.[309]
After The Washington Post reported that nuclear documents were being sought in the search of Mar-a-Lago, Trump said on August 12: "Nuclear weapons issue is a Hoax".[117] Trump also claimed that former president Obama had retained "lots" of nuclear documents, however, the National Archives refutes that accusation.[309]
Claims of declassifying all documents
On August 12, Trump posted to Truth Social claiming that the documents he brought to Mar-a-Lago were "all declassified" before he left office.[310][2][311] That day, his office issued a statement admitting that he had frequently taken home classified documents and further claiming that he had issued a "standing order" that anything he took home was automatically and "instantly" declassified. (His lawyers said on September 20 that they were refraining from mentioning Trump's claim of a "standing order" in court as it might reveal a potential defense in a future indictment.)[98][312]
Kash Patel told Breitbart in May 2022 that Trump, before leaving office, had declassified material but that "White House counsel failed to generate the paperwork to change the classification markings" and this is why some documents recovered by the National Archives in January 2022 had classification markings.[2][313] Sections of the Code of Federal Regulation addressing declassification require markings that are "uniformly and conspicuously applied to leave no doubt about the declassified status of the information and who authorized the declassification".[19]
Except for Kash Patel,[314] former Trump administration officials said they never heard of such a "standing order" issued by Trump, and labeled the claim false.[315]
- John Bolton, who was Trump's national security advisor, said that Trump's claim was a "complete fiction" and "almost certainly a lie". Bolton said he never heard of such an order before, during, or after his tenure as national security advisor. Bolton said: "When somebody begins to concoct lies like this, it shows a real level of desperation".[288][312]
- Glenn S. Gerstell, who served as the general counsel for the National Security Agency from 2015 to 2020, called Trump's claim "preposterous", as declassification requires recordkeeping as well as notifying the agencies that used the information.[316]
- Leon Panetta, former Secretary of Defense and Director of the CIA under the Obama administration, similarly said Trump's claim was "pretty much BS". He explained that the declassification process requires authorization by various agencies.[317] "There is nothing that I'm aware of that indicates that a formal step was taken by this president to, in fact, declassify anything", Panetta said.[317]
A Congressional Research Service memo noted that a proper declassification process would have required Trump to communicate his intent to declassify specific documents. The same memo points out that the government had a legal basis to seize presidential records regardless of whether they are classified, and that classified material could furthermore indicate a violation of the Espionage Act.[19]
On September 21, Trump appeared on the Hannity show on Fox News, claiming that "there doesn't have to be a process" and a president "can declassify just by saying, 'It's declassified.' Even by thinking about it."[318] However, this notion was "mocked" by legal experts[319] and further, a three-judge appellate panel of the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit noted that there was "no evidence that any of these records were declassified", and also wrote that when lawyers for Mr. Trump appeared before Judge Dearie on September 20, they too "resisted providing any evidence that he had declassified any of these documents."[320] Lawyers noted that "even if Trump did somehow declassify the documents, he had no right to take them when he left office on Jan. 20, 2020 ... [Trump] had no (legal) interest in these documents." Judges of the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit noted that "the declassification argument is a 'red herring'."[319][321]
Trump allies and supporters
On the day of the search, a group of about two dozen Trump supporters gathered in protest in front of Mar-a-Lago;[300][322] others held protests in front of FBI offices in Phoenix, Arizona, and Washington D.C.[323] Over the next few days, Trump supporters continued to demonstrate outside Mar-a-Lago,[324] and at several pickets outside a number of FBI field offices in various states.[325][326][327][328][329][330] A small group of armed Trump supporters protested outside the FBI office in Phoenix.[328]
CBS News reporter Robert Costa reported that within Trump's circle, "Some allies are urging him to speed up his decision on 2024 in the wake of this, that no one in [the] GOP will challenge him now... others are telling him to stay cool, wait".[96]
Trump allies in Congress and in right-wing media spread a wide variety of misinformation and baseless conspiracy theories: that the FBI may have planted evidence; that the FBI search aimed to stop Trump from exposing criminals in government; that the FBI conducted a "military occupation" of Mar-a-lago; that the FBI entered Mar-a-lago "unannounced" and was "taking whatever they want for themselves"; and that some FBI agents went "rogue".[331] Patel repeatedly blamed the General Services Administration (GSA) for "mistakenly pack[ing] some boxes and mov[ing] them to Mar-a-Lago". The GSA replied that it was the outgoing presidential transition team and their volunteers who packed the boxes, put them on pallets, and shrink-wrapped them.[290][332][333]
Many of Trump's allies, including Steve Bannon, urged Trump to publicly release some of the surveillance footage of the search or use it in political campaign ads. Others cautioned him that releasing the tapes could backfire by revealing the sheer volume of classified information removed from his residence and countering some of his unsupported claims.[118] The footage could further expose the identities of FBI agents videotaped and subject them to further threats and harassment.[334]
Fox News host Brian Kilmeade, while guest hosting Tucker Carlson Tonight, showed a doctored photo depicting the federal magistrate judge who approved the warrant together with convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell; Kilmeade later described the fake photo as "a meme" shared "in jest".[335][336]
The FBI search ignited apocalyptic, violent rhetoric among Trump supporters, including members of the far-right,[337] on media including Fox News, Newsmax, PJ Media, the Blaze, and right-wing talk radio.[264] Talk of civil war and violence spiked online among far-right users on platforms such as Truth Social, Gab, Telegram, and Twitter, including from conservative commentator Steven Crowder and white supremacist commentator Nick Fuentes.[338][322] The New York Young Republican Club blamed the search on "internationalist forces and their allies intent on undermining the foundation of our Republic".[337] Experts on political violence said that the extremist rhetoric creates a dangerous atmosphere and heightens the risk of violent acts.[337]
Threats against government officials
FBI Director Christopher A. Wray denounced online threats against federal agents and DOJ employees.[339] Wray said the FBI would "stay vigilant and adjust our security posture accordingly" given a surge of threats to FBI employees and property following the search of Mar-a-Lago.[136] The names of the two FBI agents who signed the warrant paperwork were redacted in the official court-released documents; the right-wing outlet Breitbart published leaked versions of the documents that revealed the agents' names, exposing them to harassment.[340][341]
The federal magistrate judge who approved the search was the target of antisemitic vitriol, misinformation, and threats on sites such as 4chan;[104][136][342][343] due to online threats against him, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida removed information about the magistrate from its online directory for his protection.[104][344][136] The synagogue he attended had also received threats and is under additional security.[342][343]
The FBI and Department of Homeland Security issued a joint bulletin warning of an "unprecedented" increase in threats and acts of violence against federal law enforcement officials, including "calls for the targeted killing of judicial, law enforcement, and government officials associated with the Palm Beach search, including the federal judge who approved the Palm Beach search warrant". Multiple possible targets of violence had their personal information posted online.[345][346][347] The bulletin noted a threat to place a dirty bomb in front of FBI Headquarters.[261][348]
A man in Mercer County, Pennsylvania, was charged in US District Court with making online threats against FBI agents on the Gab social networking site.[349][350]
On August 19, lawmakers on the House Oversight Committee contacted social media companies and requested information about recent threats made against law enforcement officials by users of their platforms.[351] Letters sent by lawmakers specifically cited threats published on Truth Social, which has seen a significant increase in app downloads following the Mar-a-Lago search.[352][353] The letter expressed concern because "reckless statements by the former president and Republican Members of Congress have unleashed a flood of violent threats on social media" and they urged platforms to take immediate, concrete action to limit incitement of violence against law enforcement agencies.[353][354]
FBI field office attack
Ricky Shiffer, a 42-year-old Trump supporter wearing body armor and armed with an AR-15 style rifle and a nail gun, attempted to breach the FBI field office in Cincinnati, Ohio, on August 11 and died in a subsequent confrontation with police officers. He had taken part in the January 6 United States Capitol attack,[355][356] and was one of the most prolific posters on Trump's social media platform Truth Social, where he posted on about his desire to kill FBI agents after the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago.[357] Shiffer had engaged in violent extremist rhetoric on social media for years,[358] and the FBI received a tip about him in May 2022.[359]
Republican elected officials and candidates
The Republican National Committee, as well as most Republicans, responded to the FBI search by attacking the FBI and depicting Trump as a victim and political martyr.[360] Republicans said that the search made the U.S. into a "third-world country" or "banana republic", although democracies such as France, South Korea, and Israel have all investigated and prosecuted former leaders for criminal offenses.[361] Many Republicans vowed to investigate the DOJ if the party retook control of Congress in the November 2022 elections.[360] There is no evidence of improper conduct by federal investigators,[87] and no evidence that the search was politically motivated.[299]
Several Republican politicians, including U.S. Senators Rick Scott and Marco Rubio of Florida, and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis condemned the search.[96][362] In a tweet, House Minority Leader, Kevin McCarthy said the Justice Department "has reached an intolerable state of weaponized politicization" and said: "When Republicans take back the House, we will conduct immediate oversight of this department, follow the facts, and leave no stone unturned. Attorney General Garland, preserve your documents and clear your calendar".[96] Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia called for the FBI to be defunded.[96] Senator Rand Paul called for the Espionage Act to be repealed.[363][364] Anthony Sabatini, a Republican member of the Florida House of Representatives called for the state to "sever all ties with DOJ immediately" and called for FBI agents to be "arrested upon sight".[365]
Many Republicans accused the DOJ and FBI of a double standard for their previous treatment of the Hillary Clinton email controversy, where former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton was investigated but not charged over classified material found on her private email server during her tenure as US secretary of State.[366][367][368][369] Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina predicted the likelihood of street violence if Trump was indicted.[370][369]
Some Republicans took a more restrained tone upon reports that the documents seized were highly classified, but nonetheless questioned the search.[371][261][372] Multiple Republicans called on the DOJ and FBI to release or share to Congress documents surrounding the search, particularly the affidavit used as the basis of the warrant.[372][373][152] Mike Turner, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said that he was "very concerned about the method that was used in raiding Mar-a-Lago"; Brian Fitzpatrick questioned whether "the law is being enforced equally" and with "parity".[374]
Republican congresswoman Liz Cheney, the top Republican on the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack, criticized her party's response to the federal investigation of Trump, writing, "I have been ashamed to hear members of my party attacking the integrity of the FBI agents involved with the recent Mar-a-Lago search. These are sickening comments that put the lives of patriotic public servants at risk".[339]
On September 22, Senators Thom Tillis and Lindsey Graham acknowledged that there's a "process" for declassification, and Senator John Thune said the process "ought to be adhered to and followed". Senator Mike Braun said he was unaware of "the proper methodology" for declassification. Senator Mike Rounds commented on the importance of storing information correctly: "People can get hurt, people can get killed if it's not stored correctly, and if that information gets out."[375] On September 25, Senator John Barrasso, pressed by ABC host George Stephanopoulos, acknowledged: "I don't think a president can declassify documents by saying so, by 'thinking about'."[376]
Congressional Democrats
House Democrats praised the search as a step toward accountability for Trump.[377][378] Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, said in an interview after the search, "We believe in the rule of law. That's what our country is about. And no person is above the law. Not even the president of the United States. Not even a former president of the United States".[379] Senate Democrats offered more reserved reactions; in the immediate aftermath of the search, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said he would "withhold comment until we know more".[378]
Scholars and former officials
Following the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago, Reuters and Al Jazeera cited scholars and former officials, who said the way Trump used the residence presented a highly unique security "nightmare".[380][381] Commenting on a 2017 North Korea strategy meeting between Trump and Shinzo Abe which was surrounded by guests, national security lawyer Mark Zaid stated, "What we saw was Trump be so lax in security that he was having a sensitive meeting regarding a potential war topic where non-U.S. government personnel could observe and photograph".[380] Mary McCord, a former Department of Justice official, stated: "Clearly they thought it was very serious to get these materials back into secured space. Even just retention of highly classified documents in improper storage – particularly given Mar-a-Lago, the foreign visitors there and others who might have connections with foreign governments and foreign agents – creates a significant national security threat".[380] In 2019, a Chinese citizen with false passports, possessing a thumb drive containing malware, was arrested attending a function there.[382]
Experts considered Trump "the perfect profile of a security risk: He was like a disgruntled former employee, with access to sensitive government secrets, dead set on tearing down what he believed was a deep state out to get him".[33] Columbia University political scientist David Rothkopf viewed the Mar-a-Lago search as a reminder that Trump "was, and is, a national security risk unlike any the United States has ever faced".[383]
Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Michael Sallah of the Pittsburg Post-Dispatch discovered that a Ukrainian-born Russian speaker using a fake name who claimed to be a Rothschild family heiress had frequented the residence over a year's time, even posing there for photos with Trump and Senator Lindsey Graham.[384][385]
Intelligence community
Former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency John Brennan called the storage of sensitive documents at Mar-a-Lago "the height of recklessness and irresponsibility".[386] On Twitter, Michael Hayden, former Director of the CIA and Director of the National Security Agency, showed approval of comments[clarification needed] by Michael Beschloss comparing Trump's actions to the espionage case of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg which ended in their execution. The comments provoked criticism from Jerry Dunleavy, a writer for the Washington Examiner.[387]
Dan Coats, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) under Trump from 2017 to 2019, defended the FBI stating that “my first thought was Chris [Wray] would not have signed off on that unless he thought the process was not working or they were not getting the right answers back from lawyers or others and it was serious enough to take that action”.[388]
Asha Rangappa, a former FBI agent and former associate dean at Yale Law School, stated that Trump's acknowledgment that the documents seized were covered or potentially covered by executive privilege indicated that he had kept presidential records that he was not authorized to have under 18 USC 2071. She stated: "And so it's not clear that executive privilege would even be relevant to the particular crime he's being investigated for and yet in this filing, he basically admits that he is in possession of them, which is what the government is trying to establish".[389][390]
Jeffrey Smith, former general counsel to the CIA, and David Laufman, former chief of the counterespionage section at the DOJ's National Security Division, warned of the investigation not having strong enough evidence to have a conviction at trial.[198]
Former Trump administration figures
Former Vice President Mike Pence stated that the search undermined public confidence in the justice system, noting that "no former President of the United States has ever been subject to a raid of their personal residence".[391]
Trump's former chief of staff, John F. Kelly, said that Trump has a long track record of disregarding rules for handling sensitive documents; that Trump "didn't believe in the classification system"; and that Trump held U.S. intelligence in disdain.[33] William Barr said in an interview that he could not think of a legitimate reason for Trump to be in possession of classified documents and that the documents, whether classified or not, belong to the government and should have been turned over to NARA.[392][393]
Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton said "almost nothing would surprise me about what's in the documents at Mar-a-Lago". He recalled that although Trump usually did not read the President's Daily Brief, he would sometimes ask his briefers "to keep the highly classified visual aids, pictures, charts and graphs" that were prepared for him, and that Trump sometimes refused to return these materials when asked by his briefers.[33]
On 3 November 2022, Trump adviser Kash Patel testified before a federal grand jury investigating the handling of records taken to Mar-a-Lago home. The judge granted Patel immunity from prosecution on any information he provides to the investigation.[394]
Notes
- ^ 18 U.S.C. § 793: Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information.
- ^ 18 U.S.C. § 2071: Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally.
- ^ 18 U.S.C. § 1519: Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy.
- ^ Judicial Watch, Inc. v. NARA, No. 10-1834 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2012).
- ^ Unites States' Response to Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief (with Attachments), In re Search of Mar-a-Lago, No. 22-cv-81294 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2022) (Dkt. 48, -1). The photograph reproduced here is Attachment F.
- ^ United States' Motion to Unseal Limited Warrant Materials, In re Sealed Search Warrant, No. 22-mj-8332 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 11, 2022) (Dkt. 18).
- ^ The documents were obtained and reported on by multiple news organizations on August 12 before the formal unsealing, as they were acquired by multiple news organizations.[98][135]
- ^ Judicial Watch, Inc.'s Motion to Unseal Search Warrant, In re Sealed Search Warrant, No. 9:22-mj-8332 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 10, 2022) (Dkt. 4).
- ^ Motion of The Washington Post, CNN, NBC News, and Scripps to Intervene, for Access to All Search Warrant Records, and in Support of the United States' Partial Motion to Unseal, In re Sealed Search Warrant, No. 9:22-mj-8332 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 11, 2022) (Dkt. 22).
- ^ The New York Times Company's Motion to Intervene for the Limited Purpose of Obtaining Access to Search Warrant Court Records with Supporting Memorandum of Law, In re Sealed Search Warrant, No. 9:22-mj-8332 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 10, 2022) (Dkt. 8).
- ^ These included the conservative group Judicial Watch and the Times Union (of Albany, New York);[145][h] CNN, The Washington Post, NBC News, and Scripps;[146][i] The New York Times Company;[j] and CBS, the Palm Beach Post, the Miami Herald, the Tampa Bay Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Associated Press, and ABC.[147]
- ^ Second Notice of Filing of Redacted Documents, In re Sealed Search Warrant, No. 22-mj-8332 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 15, 2022) (Dkt. 57).
- ^ Order on Motions to Unseal, In re Sealed Search Warrant, No. 22-mj-8332 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2022) (Dkt. 80).
- ^ Notice of Filing of Redacted Memorandum, In re Sealed Search Warrant, No. 22-mj-8332 (S.D. Fl.a Aug. 26, 2022) (Dkt. 98). "The United States hereby gives notice that it is filing the attached document, which is a redacted version of material previously filed in this case number under seal: the United States' Sealed, Ex Parte Memorandum of Law Regarding Proposed Redactions (DE89)".
- ^ Paperless Order, In re Search of Mar-a-Lago, No. 9:22-cv-81294 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 23, 2022) (Dkt. 10) (paperless order requesting supplemental filing). Judge Cannon asked Trump's team to provide detail about "the asserted basis for the exercise of this Court's jurisdiction ... the precise relief sought, including any request for injunctive relief ... [and] the effect, if any, of the proceeding before [Judge Reinhart]".
- ^ Supplemental Filing in Support of Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief, In re Search of Mar-a-Lago, No. 9:22-cv-81294 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 26, 2022) (Dkt. 28).
- ^ Armstrong v. Bush, 924 F.2d 282 (D.C. Cir. 1991). Quote: " ... the PRA accords the President virtually complete control over his records during his term of office."
- ^ Preliminary Order on Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief, In re Search of Mar-a-Lago, No. 9:22-cv-81294 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 27, 2022) (Dkt. 29). Judge Cannon provides a "notice of [the court's] preliminary intent to appoint a special master".
- ^ Notice of Receipt of Preliminary Order and Attorney Appearance, In re Search of Mar-a-Lago, No. 9:22-cv-81294 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 29, 2022) (Dkt. 31).
- ^ Dkts. 39 and 40, In re Search of Mar-a-Lago, No. 9:22-cv-81294 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2022).
- ^ The News Media's Joint Motion to Intervene for the Limited Purpose of Obtaining Access to Court Records and to Unseal Same, with Supporting Memorandum of Law, In re Search of Mar-a-Lago, No. 22-cv-81294 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 31, 2022). The News Media are: ABC, AP, CNN, CBS, Dow Jones & Company (publishers of The Wall Street Journal), E. W. Scripps Company, The Palm Beach Post; Gray Media Group on behalf of WCJB-TV, WJHG-TV, and WWSB-TV, three local Florida television stations; NBCUniversal, The New York Times, Tampa Bay Times, and The Washington Post.
References
- ^ a b c Haberman, Maggie; Thrush, Glenn; Savage, Charlie (August 12, 2022). "Files Seized From Trump Are Part of Espionage Act Inquiry – The materials included some marked as top secret and meant to be viewed only inside secure government facilities, according to a copy of the warrant". The New York Times. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e Savage, Charlie (August 12, 2022). "Trump claims he declassified all the documents at Mar-a-Lago. Even if that's true, it probably doesn't matter". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ a b Wolf, Zachary B.; O'Key, Sean; Hickey, Christopher (August 26, 2022). "The affidavit behind the FBI's search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago, annotated". CNN. Archived from the original on August 26, 2022. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e Sneed, Tierney; Lillis, Katie Bo (September 2, 2022). "Mar-a-Lago search inventory shows documents marked as classified mixed with clothes, gifts, press clippings". CNN. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f Smart, Charlie; Buchanan, Larry (September 3, 2022). "What the F.B.I. Seized From Mar-a-Lago, Illustrated". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 5, 2022. Retrieved September 5, 2022.
- ^ a b c Haberman, Maggie; Kantor, Jodi; Goldman, Adam; Protess, Ben (August 22, 2022). "Trump Had More Than 300 Classified Documents at Mar-a-Lago". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 23, 2022. Retrieved August 23, 2022.
- ^ Lowell, Hugo (August 23, 2022). "Trump stash retrieved from Mar-a-Lago runs to hundreds of classified files". The Guardian. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f g Haberman, Maggie; Thrush, Glenn (August 13, 2022). "Trump Lawyer Told Justice Dept. That Classified Material Had Been Returned". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 13, 2022. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Herb, Jeremy; Sneed, Tierney; Cohen, Marshall; Perez, Evan; Murray, Sara (August 30, 2022). "Justice Department says classified documents at Mar-a-Lago were likely 'concealed and removed' to block investigation". CNN. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
- ^ a b Foer, Franklin (October 11, 2022). "The Inevitable Indictment of Donald Trump: It's clear to me that Merrick Garland will bring charges against Donald Trump. It's just a matter of when". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on October 11, 2022. Retrieved October 11, 2022.
- ^ a b Stein, Perry (October 14, 2022). "Justice Dept. asks appeals court to end Mar-a-Lago special master". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 14, 2022. Retrieved October 14, 2022.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; October 15, 2022 suggested (help) - ^ a b Lynch, Sarah N.; Lange, Jason (September 4, 2022). "FBI found more than 11,000 government records at Trump's Florida home". Reuters. Retrieved September 8, 2022.
- ^ a b Sneed, Tierney; Polantz, Katelyn (September 29, 2022). "Trump pushing back on special master's request for him to declare in court whether DOJ inventory is accurate". CNN. Retrieved September 29, 2022.
- ^ a b c Barrett, Devlin; Leonig, Carol D. (September 6, 2022). "Material on foreign nation's nuclear capabilities seized at Trump's Mar-a-Lago". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 7, 2022. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ Peng, Evan; Korte, Gregory (August 10, 2022). "Why Trump's Mar-a-Lago Document Dump May Be a Crime". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on August 10, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Langford, John; Florence, Justin; Newland, Erica (August 10, 2022). "Trump's Presidential Records Act Violations: Short- and Long-Term Solutions". Lawfare. Archived from the original on August 9, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Bump, Phillip (August 10, 2012). "Citizen Trump may have broken a law that President Trump made a felony". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f Savage, Charlie (August 13, 2022). "Laws and Lists in Search Warrant Offer Clues to Trump Document Investigation". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e Mulligan, Stephen P.; Elsea, Jennifer K.; Berris, Peter G.; Foster, Michael A. (August 29, 2022). "The Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant: A Legal Introduction". Congressional Research Service (LSB10810). Retrieved September 22, 2022.
None of the statutes listed in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant requires that the materials at issue be classified, although the classified status of such documents may be relevant to a court's determination under the Espionage Act as to whether the documents contain information that is closely held by the government and thus meet the definition of national defense information.
- ^ Elsea, Jennifer K. (August 12, 2022). "The Protection of Classified Information: The Legal Framework" (PDF). Congressional Research Service (RS21900): 1. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ Wolf, Zachary B. (August 15, 2022). "Analysis: The number of people with Top Secret clearance will shock you". CNN. Retrieved August 16, 2022.
- ^ Information Security Oversight Office. 41 CFR 105-53.133. Retrieved 31 August 2022
- ^ Goldsmith, Jack (October 31, 2020). "Can Trump Sell U.S. National Security Secrets With Impunity?". Lawfare. Retrieved September 1, 2022.
- ^ Graff, Garrett M. (October 30, 2020). "'There Are No Boundaries': Experts Imagine Trump's Post-Presidential Life if He Loses". Politico. Retrieved September 1, 2022.
- ^ Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (August 15, 2022). "Why Donald Trump's declassification claim might not be that outlandish". Politico. Retrieved August 16, 2022.
- ^ "Loss, possible compromise or unauthorized disclosure." 32 CFR 2001.48. Code of Federal Regulations. Retrieved 31 August 2022
- ^ a b Mazzetti, Mark (August 11, 2022). "The Poisoned Relationship Between Trump and the Keepers of U.S. Secrets". The New York Times. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ Liptak, Kevin (August 14, 2022). "Mar-a-Lago – and its owner – have long caused concerns for US intelligence". CNN. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ Parker, Ashley (October 18, 2022). "New Woodward audiobook shows Trump knew Kim letters were classified". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved October 19, 2022.
... the comments by Trump show he was well aware that the 27 letters exchanged between himself and Kim were classified ... Woodward also said he observed no classified markings on any of the letters he was given, though U.S. officials have indicated that they were classified documents.
- ^ Gangel, Jamie; Stuart, Elizabeth; Herb, Jeremy (October 18, 2022). "Exclusive: Bob Woodward releasing new audiobook 'The Trump Tapes' with eight hours of recorded interviews". CNN. Retrieved October 18, 2022.
- ^ "Transcript: Kim Jong Un's letters to President Trump". CNN. September 9, 2020. Retrieved October 18, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Parker, Ashley; Dawsey, Josh; Hamburger, Tom; Alemany, Jacqueline (February 5, 2022). "'He never stopped ripping things up': Inside Trump's relentless document destruction habits". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Dawsey, Josh; Helderman, Rosalind S.; Alemany, Jacqueline; Barrett, Devlin (August 13, 2022). "Trump's secrets: How a records dispute led the FBI to search Mar-a-Lago". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ Karni, Annie (June 10, 2018). "Meet the guys who tape Trump's papers back together". Politico. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Shelton, Shania (August 8, 2022). "Photos show handwritten notes that Trump apparently ripped up and attempted to flush down toilet". CNN. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ Allen, Mike (August 8, 2022). "Exclusive photos: Trump's telltale toilet". Axios. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f g Lybrand, Holmes; Cohen, Marshall; Rabinowitz, Hannah (August 12, 2022). "Timeline: The Justice Department criminal inquiry into Trump taking classified documents to Mar-a-Lago". CNN. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Lippman, Daniel; McGraw, Meridith; Lemire, Jonathan (August 16, 2022). "Inside the frantic, final days of record-keeping that landed Trump in hot water". Politico. Archived from the original on August 17, 2022. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
Some aides recalled that staff secretary Derek Lyons attempted to maintain a semblance of order in the West Wing despite the election uncertainty. But he departed the administration in late December, leaving the task of preserving the needed records for the National Archives to others. The two men atop the office hierarchy – then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and Trump – took little interest in it, aides and advisers recalled. Meanwhile, responsibility for overseeing the pack up of the outer Oval and dining room, an area where Trump liked to work when not in the Oval Office, was left to Trump's assistants, Molly Michael and Nick Luna, according to multiple former aides.
- ^ Ballhaus, Rebecca; Salama, Vivian; Leary, Alex (August 14, 2022). "Trump's Final Days Draw Scrutiny as Handling of Documents Investigated". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Montague, Zach; McCarthy, Lauren (August 12, 2022). "The Timeline Related to the F.B.I.'s Search of Mar-a-Lago". The New York Times. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ Trump, Donald J. (January 19, 2021). "White House letter to the Archivist of the United States: Updated Trump Designation of PRA Representatives" (PDF). Archives.gov. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
- ^ a b Bump, Philip (August 15, 2022). "The curious timing of Trump naming two allies to access his records". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ a b Trump, Donald J. (June 19, 2022). "Former President Trump's Letter to the Acting Archivist of the United States, Designating PRA Representatives" (PDF). Archives.gov. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
- ^ Barrett, Devlin; Nakashima, Ellen; Dawsey, Josh (August 25, 2022). "Trump's secret papers and the 'myth' of presidential security clearance". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 7, 2022. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ Sanger, David E. (February 6, 2021). "Biden Bars Trump From Receiving Intelligence Briefings, Citing 'Erratic Behavior'". The New York Times. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ Orr, Gabby; Brown, Pamela; Reid, Paula (February 13, 2022). "Archives threatened to go to Congress and Justice Department to get Trump to turn over records". CNN. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Herb, Jeremy; Stuart, Elizabeth (October 3, 2022). "National Archives alerted lawyers for Trump about missing letters with North Korean leader in May 2021, records show". CNN. Retrieved October 4, 2022.
- ^ Haberman, Maggie; Benner, Katie; Thrush, Glenn (August 20, 2022). "The Final Days of the Trump White House: Chaos and Scattered Papers". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 20, 2022. Retrieved August 25, 2022.
- ^ Dawsey, Josh; Alemany, Jacqueline (August 24, 2022). "Archives asked for records in 2021 after Trump lawyer agreed they should be returned, email says". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 25, 2022.
- ^ Feuer, Alan; Haberman, Maggie (August 24, 2022). "Email Shows Early Tension Between Trump and National Archives". The New York Times. Retrieved August 24, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Alemany, Jacqueline; Barrett, Devlin; Zapotosky, Matt; Dawsey, Josh (February 10, 2022). "Some Trump records taken to Mar-a-Lago clearly marked as classified, including documents at 'top secret' level". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 11, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Caputo, Marc; Reilly, Ryan J. (August 8, 2022). "FBI search at Trump's Mar-a-Lago home tied to classified material, sources say". NBC News. Archived from the original on August 9, 2022. Retrieved August 9, 2022.
- ^ a b Wall, Debra Steidel (May 10, 2022). "Letter from Debra Steidel Wall, Acting Archivist of United States, to Evan Corcoran" (PDF). National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
As the Department of Justice's National Security Division explained to you on April 29, 2022: '... According to NARA, among the materials in the boxes are over 100 documents with classification markings, comprising more than 700 pages.'
- ^ Barrett, Devlin; Stein, Perry (August 26, 2022). "Affidavit to search Trump's Mar-a-Lago says 184 classified files found in January". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Sneed, Tierney; Cohen, Marshall (August 26, 2022). "Takeaways from the Mar-a-Lago search warrant affidavit". CNN. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f g Haberman, Maggie; Protess, Ben; Schmidt, Michael S.; Broadwater, Luke; Rashbaum, William K. (August 9, 2022). "F.B.I. Search of Trump's Home Pushes Long Conflict Into Public View". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 9, 2022. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; August 10, 2022 suggested (help) - ^ a b c d Haberman, Maggie; Schmidt, Michael S. (August 8, 2022). "A look at the inquiry that led to the F.B.I. search of Trump's Florida home". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 10, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2022.
- ^ a b Barrett, Devlin; Dawsey, Josh; Stein, Perry; Harris, Shane (August 11, 2022). "FBI searched Trump's home to look for nuclear documents and other items, sources say". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Bender, Bryan (August 12, 2022). "Need to know: The rarified world of the government's most closely guarded secrets". Politico. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ a b Perez, Evan; Orr, Gabby; Brown, Pamela (August 11, 2022). "Feds removed documents from Mar-a-Lago in June with grand jury subpoena". CNN. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e Thrush, Glenn; Haberman, Maggie; Protess, Ben (August 11, 2022). "Trump Search Said to Be Part of Effort to Find Highly Classified Material". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Barnes, Julian E.; Mazzetti, Mark (August 26, 2022). "Classified Material on Human Intelligence Sources Helped Trigger Alarm". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ Dawsey, Josh; Alemany, Jacqueline (October 3, 2022). "Trump's lawyer refused his request in February to say all documents returned". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 5, 2022. Retrieved October 5, 2022.
- ^ Haberman, Maggie; Schmidt, Michael S. (October 3, 2022). "Lawyer Declined Trump Request to Tell Archives All Material Was Returned". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 5, 2022. Retrieved October 5, 2022.
- ^ Orr, Gabby (October 3, 2022). "Lawyer refused Trump instruction to tell Archives all records had been returned". CNN. Retrieved October 5, 2022.
- ^ Perez, Evan; Orr, Gabby (August 16, 2022). "White House lawyers interviewed by FBI". CNN. Retrieved August 16, 2022.
- ^ Haberman, Maggie (August 16, 2022). "F.B.I. Interviewed Top White House Lawyers About Missing Trump Documents". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 16, 2022. Retrieved August 16, 2022.
Mr. Philbin was interviewed in the spring ... It was unclear when Mr. Cipollone was interviewed. Mr. Cipollone and Mr. Philbin were Mr. Trump's representatives to deal with the National Archives; they were named to the positions shortly before the president's term ended, in January 2021. At some point after National Archives officials realized they did not have Trump White House documents, which are required to be preserved under the Presidential Records Act, they contacted Mr. Philbin for help returning them.
- ^ a b Orr, Gabby; Holmes, Kristen; Perez, Evan; Herb, Jeremy (August 25, 2022). "Inside Trump's public bravado and private resistance over Mar-a-Lago documents". CNN. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
- ^ a b c Gerstein, Josh (March 1, 2012). "Judge won't seize Bill Clinton-Taylor Branch audiotapes". Politico. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
- ^ Klein, Joe (September 24, 2009). "Bill Session". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 24, 2012. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
- ^ Feuer, Alan (August 23, 2022). "Trump Kept More Than 700 Pages of Classified Documents, Letter From National Archives Says". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 23, 2022. Retrieved August 24, 2022.
- ^ Cheney, Kyle; Desiderio, Andrew; Seligman, Lara (August 23, 2022). "Documents recovered at Mar-a-Lago were among government's most classified, letter shows". Politico. Retrieved August 24, 2022.
- ^ a b Lillis, Katie Bo; Perez, Evan; Gangel, Jamie; Cohen, Zachary (August 29, 2022). "Intel agencies began reviewing some Mar-a-Lago documents in May to assess classification level and risk to sources". CNN. Archived from the original on August 30, 2022. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ Cheney, Kyle (August 31, 2022). "Days before Mar-a-Lago subpoena, Trump lawyer claimed she scoured his office, closets and drawers". Politico. Archived from the original on August 31, 2022. Retrieved October 4, 2022.
- ^ Luke, Broadwater; Katie, Benner; Haberman, Maggie (August 26, 2022). "Inside the 20-Month Fight to Get Trump to Return Presidential Material". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 28, 2022. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ^ Feuer, Alan; Haberman, Maggie; Broadwater, Luke (August 17, 2022). "Jan. 6 Grand Jury Has Subpoenaed White House Documents". The New York Times. Retrieved October 5, 2022.
- ^ O'Connor, John (October 15, 2022). "Former Guam man a key witness in Trump scandal". The Guam Daily Post. Archived from the original on October 16, 2022. Retrieved October 16, 2022.
- ^ "FY18 Supply Active Duty Chief Petty Officer Results" (PDF). Navy Supply Corps Newsletter: 22. September 2017. ISSN 0360-716X. Retrieved October 16, 2022.
Waltine Nauta
- ^ Barrett, Devlin; Dawsey, Josh; Harris, Shane (October 13, 2022). "Key Mar-a-Lago witness said to be former White House employee". Washington Post. Retrieved October 16, 2022.
- ^ Hartmann, Margaret (October 14, 2022). "Trump Was Betrayed by His Diet Coke Valet". New York. Retrieved October 16, 2022.
- ^ "Trump ordered records moved after subpoena, Mar-a-Lago staffer said – reports". the Guardian. October 13, 2022. Retrieved October 16, 2022.
- ^ a b Cohen, Marshall (September 13, 2022). "Judge unseals less redacted version of affidavit used for Mar-a-Lago search warrant". CBS 58 Milwaukee. Retrieved September 14, 2022.
- ^ a b Tucker, Eric (September 14, 2022). "Judge Unseals Additional Portions Of Mar-A-Lago Affidavit". HuffPost. Retrieved September 14, 2022.
- ^ Palmer, Ewan (August 31, 2022). "Trump Lawyers Stopped FBI Agents Checking Storage Room Boxes". Newsweek. Archived from the original on August 31, 2022. Retrieved October 7, 2022.
- ^ Arkin, William M. (August 10, 2022). "Exclusive: An informer told the FBI what documents Trump was hiding, and where". Newsweek. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ a b c Cheney, Kyle; McGraw, Meridith (August 11, 2022). "Trump world gripped with anger, fear and a host of conspiracies about the FBI search". Politico. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Hooper, Kelly (August 11, 2022). "Mulvaney: Mar-a-Lago informant would have to be 'really close' to Trump". Politico. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Lowell, Hugo (August 10, 2022). "FBI searched Trump's home seeking classified presidential records – sources". The Guardian. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Leary, Alex; Viswanatha, Aruna; Gurman, Sadie (August 10, 2022). "FBI Quest for Trump Documents Started With Breezy Chats, Tour of a Crowded Closet". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Mizelle, Shawna (August 11, 2022). "Wall Street Journal: Informant tipped off investigators about more documents at Mar-a-Lago". CNN. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Perez, Evan; Collins, Kaitlan; Murray, Sara (August 13, 2022). "Trump lawyer claimed no classified material was at Mar-a-Lago in signed letter to Justice Department". CNN. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Herb, Jeremy; Sneed, Tierney (August 31, 2022). "Trump's attorneys face scrutiny over level of cooperation with Justice Department on classified docs". CNN. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
- ^ a b Barrett, Devlin; Dawsey, Josh; Helderman, Rosalind S.; Alemany, Jacqueline; Hsu, Spencer S. (August 9, 2022). "Mar-a-Lago search appears focused on whether Trump, aides withheld items". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 9, 2022. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ Collins, Kaitlan; Liptak, Kevin; Polantz, Katelyn; Murray, Sara; Perez, Evan; Orr, Gabby; Berman, Dan (August 8, 2022). "FBI executes search warrant at Mar-a-Lago, Trump says". CNN. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f g Lizza, Ryan (August 9, 2022). "After the search: GOP torches FBI, hugs Trump". Politico. Archived from the original on August 9, 2022. Retrieved August 9, 2022.
- ^ Gurman, Sadie; Viswanatha, Aruna (August 15, 2022). "Merrick Garland Weighed Search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago for Weeks". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e Woodruff Swan, Betsy; Cheney, Kyle; Wu, Nicholas (August 12, 2022). "FBI Search warrant shows Trump under investigation for potential obstruction of justice, Espionage Act violations". Politico. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Sangal, Aditi; Vogt, Adrienne; Wagner, Meg; Hammond, Elise; Macaya, Melissa (August 12, 2022). "Judge unseals Trump Mar-a-Lago search warrant". CNN. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ a b Lowell, Hugo (August 12, 2022). "Trump under investigation for potential violations of Espionage Act, warrant reveals". The Guardian. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Sangal, Aditi; Vogt, Adrienne; Wagner, Meg; Hammond, Elise; Macaya, Melissa (August 12, 2022). "Mar-a-Lago search warrant identifies 3 federal crimes investigators are looking at, report says". CNN. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Sherman, Amy (August 9, 2022). "Can Donald Trump run for president if charged and convicted of removing official records?". PolitiFact. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ Savage, Charlie (August 9, 2022). "If Trump illegally removed official records, would he be barred from future office?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e Musgrave, Jane (August 10, 2022). "Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart faces political firestorm after signing Mar-a-Lago search warrant". The Palm Beach Post. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ a b c Sneed, Tierney; Perez, Evan; Rabinowitz, Hannah; Cohen, Zachary (August 12, 2022). "Merrick Garland says DOJ filed motion to unseal Trump Mar-a-Lago warrant and property receipt". CNN. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Choi, Matthew (August 9, 2022). "FBI search of Trump home was likely vetted carefully, despite Texas Republicans' claims of a witch hunt". The Texas Tribune. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
But legal experts assert there would have been a very high standard of probable cause to execute such a politically charged operation.
- ^ Hutzler, Alexandra (August 10, 2022). "What investigators needed to get a search warrant for Trump's home, according to experts". ABC News. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
While probable cause is a lower legal standard than beyond a reasonable doubt or preponderance of evidence, experts said it's likely the federal case is airtight given the gravity of raiding the residence of a former president.
- ^ Bump, Philip (August 9, 2022). "Donald Trump has been preparing for this moment for a long time". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 9, 2022. Retrieved August 9, 2022.
- ^ a b "Trump Says the FBI Raided Mar-a-Lago and Broke Into His Safe". New York. August 9, 2022. Archived from the original on August 9, 2022. Retrieved August 9, 2022.
- ^ Lowell, Hugo (August 8, 2022). "FBI searches Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home and seizes documents". The Guardian. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Massie, Graeme; Bowden, John (August 12, 2022). "FBI were looking for 'classified nuclear documents' during search of Mar-a-Lago". The Independent. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ LeBlanc, Paul (August 12, 2022). "The Washington Post: FBI searched Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence for classified nuclear documents". CNN. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Teh, Cheryl (August 9, 2022). "Eric Trump says he was the 'guy who got the call' that the FBI was executing a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago". Business Insider. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Shivaram, Deepa; Lucas, Ryan (August 9, 2022). "Trump says FBI agents searched his Mar-a-Lago home in Florida". NPR. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ a b Farhi, Arden (August 10, 2022). "Trump lawyer who was at Mar-a-Lago for FBI search describes the scene". CBS News. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Teh, Cheryl (August 12, 2022). "Trump and his family watched the FBI search Mar-a-Lago via the property's security feed, says the former president's lawyer". Insider. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ a b Hooper, Kelly (August 12, 2022). "Trump denies reports of classified nuclear documents at Mar-a-Lago". Politico. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ a b c Orr, Gabby; Murray, Sara; Collins, Kaitlan; Polantz, Katelyn (August 17, 2022). "Trump considering releasing surveillance footage of FBI Mar-a-Lago search". CNN. Retrieved August 18, 2022.
- ^ Teh, Cheryl (August 16, 2022). "Eric Trump says the Trumps will share surveillance tapes of the Mar-a-Lago raid 'at the right time'". Business Insider. Retrieved August 18, 2022.
- ^ Weaver, Jay (August 12, 2022). "FBI search warrant points to possible espionage and obstruction case against Trump". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on August 13, 2022. Retrieved August 16, 2022.
According to sources familiar with the investigation, FBI agents with security clearances worked in "taint" teams as they examined the documents stored in his office, and other areas of Mar-a-Lago to ensure that they did not collect any "privileged" correspondence between Trump and his attorneys. If they were to cross that line, that could risk compromising some of the evidence uncovered and seized in the Justice Department's investigation.
- ^ Epstein, Jake (August 31, 2022). "FBI agents found 3 classified documents inside desks in Trump's office at Mar-a-Lago, DOJ says in court papers". Business Insider. Retrieved September 1, 2022.
- ^ Bowden, John (August 24, 2022). "FBI found documents 'lying in unsecure places' at Mar-a-Lago, report says". The Independent. Archived from the original on August 25, 2022. Retrieved August 25, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Leary, Alex; Viswanatha, Aruna; Gurman, Sadie (August 12, 2022). "FBI Recovered 11 Sets of Classified Documents in Trump Search, Inventory Shows". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ a b Lizza, Ryan; Daniels, Eugene (August 10, 2022). "Playbook: Trump lawyers provide new info but no warrant". Politico. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ a b Woodruff, Judy; Johnson, Carrie (August 9, 2022). "What we know about the FBI's search of Trump's Florida home". NewsHour. PBS. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ a b c "Attorney General Merrick Garland Delivers Remarks". United States Department of Justice. August 11, 2022. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
Copies of both the warrant and the FBI property receipt were provided on the day of the search to the former President's counsel, who was on site during the search.
- ^ Izadi, Elahe (August 9, 2022). "How a former Florida political operative broke the Mar-a-Lago FBI story". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 10, 2022. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
- ^ Collinson, Stephen (August 11, 2022). "The Justice Department is in a no-win situation as Trump's fury rages". CNN. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Perez, Evan (August 10, 2022). "Some Justice Department officials chafe at silence on Mar-a-Lago search". CNN. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Stein, Perry; Barrett, Devlin (August 11, 2022). "The latest: Trump, in post, comments on search but doesn't say if he'll agree to release of search warrant". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ a b c Carlson, Adam (August 11, 2022). "AG Merrick Garland says he signed off on Trump search, denounces attacks on law enforcement". ABC News. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Cheney, Kyle; McGraw, Meridith (August 11, 2022). "Merrick Garland calls Trump's bluff". Politico. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Sangal, Aditi; Vogt, Adrienne; Wagner, Meg; Hammond, Elise; Macaya, Melissa (August 12, 2022). "Trump's legal team agrees to the release of Mar-a-Lago search warrant". CNN. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Sangal, Aditi; Vogt, Adrienne; Wagner, Meg; Hammond, Elise; Macaya, Melissa (August 12, 2022). "Judge unseals Mar-a-Lago search warrant documents". CNN. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Shabad, Rebecca; Caputo, Marc; Gregorian, Dareh (August 12, 2022). "Trump Mar-a-Lago search warrant, property receipt show agents found trove of classified docs". NBC News. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
NBC News and other news organizations obtained the documents shortly before a federal judge was expected to authorize their public release.
- ^ a b c d Campbell, Josh; Schneider, Jessica; O'Sullivan, Donie (August 12, 2022). "FBI investigating "unprecedented" number of threats against bureau in wake of Mar-a-Lago search". CNN. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ a b c Barrett, Devlin; Dawsey, Josh (August 12, 2022). "Agents at Trump's Mar-a-Lago seized 11 sets of classified documents, court filing shows". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ Bump, Philip (September 7, 2022). "Trump's classified Mar-a-Lago documents, catalogued". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 7, 2022. Retrieved September 11, 2022.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; September 8, 2022 suggested (help) - ^ Sangal, Aditi; Vogt, Adrienne; Wagner, Meg; Hammond, Elise; Macaya, Melissa (August 12, 2022). "Trump's attorney signed search warrant receipts". CNN. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Gregorian, Dareh (September 1, 2022). "Trump's seized passports could be a problem for him, legal experts say". NBC. Retrieved September 6, 2022.
- ^ a b c Lynch, Sarah N. (September 6, 2022). "U.S. judge agrees to special master in Trump search case, delaying probe". Reuters. Retrieved September 6, 2022.
- ^ Barrett, Devlin (October 21, 2022). "Mar-a-Lago classified papers held U.S. secrets about Iran and China". Washington Post. Retrieved October 21, 2022.
- ^ Alemany, Jacqueline (October 1, 2022). "National Archives says it's still missing records from Trump officials". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 1, 2022. Retrieved October 1, 2022.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; October 2, 2022 suggested (help) - ^ Schmidt, Michael S.; Haberman, Maggie; Benner, Katie (October 6, 2022). "Justice Dept. Is Said to Believe Trump Has More Documents". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 7, 2022. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ Stein, Chris (August 10, 2022). "Trump says he invoked fifth amendment in New York attorney general's investigation: 'I declined to answer' – as it happened". The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Sneed, Tierney (August 11, 2022). "CNN and other news outlets ask court to unseal entire court record related to Mar-a-Lago search". CNN. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ a b Polantz, Katelyn; Rabinowitz, Hannah (August 15, 2022). "DOJ opposes making public details in Mar-a-Lago search warrant's probable cause affidavit". CNN. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ a b c Cheney, Kyle (August 15, 2022). "DOJ says release of Mar-a-Lago affidavit would harm ongoing criminal probe". Politico. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Polantz, Katelyn (August 16, 2022). "Judge to hold hearing on request to unseal Mar-a-Lago affidavit". CNN. Retrieved August 16, 2022.
- ^ a b c Wu, Nicholas; Desiderio, Andrew; Cheney, Kyle; Gerstein, Josh (August 18, 2022). "Trump Mar-a-Lago investigation still in 'early stages', top DOJ official reveals". Politico. Retrieved August 18, 2022.
- ^ a b c Sneed, Tierney; Rabinowitz, Hannah; Polantz, Katelyn; Royal, Denise (August 18, 2022). "Takeaways from the court hearing on releasing more documents from the Mar-a-Lago search". CNN. Retrieved August 18, 2022.
- ^ a b Okun, Eli (August 16, 2022). "Politico Playbook PM: Reinhart tees up affidavit showdown". Politico. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ Sneed, Tierney; Polantz, Katelyn; Hammond, Elise; Chowdhurry, Maureen; Vogt, Adrienne; Sangal, Aditi (August 18, 2022). "The latest on the Trump Mar-a-Lago search documents". CNN. Archived from the original on August 18, 2022. Retrieved August 20, 2022.
- ^ Blake, Aaron (August 18, 2022). "Trump: Release the full affidavit! Trump's lawyers in court: Meh". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 20, 2021.
- ^ Spencer, Terry; Balsamo, Michael (August 19, 2022). "Judge appears willing to unveil some of Mar-a-Lago affidavit". Associated Press. Retrieved August 20, 2022.
- ^ a b Mazzei, Patricia; Feuer, Alan (August 18, 2022). "Judge May Release Affidavit in Trump Search, but Only After Redaction". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 18, 2022. Retrieved August 18, 2022.
- ^ Cheney, Kyle (August 22, 2022). "Judge says FBI's evidence for searching Mar-a-Lago is 'reliable'". Politico. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ a b Cheney, Kyle; Gerstein, Josh (August 25, 2022). "Justice Department proposes deletions for Mar-a-Lago affidavit". Politico. Retrieved August 25, 2022.
- ^ a b c Sneed, Tierney (August 25, 2022). "Justice Department submits proposal under seal for redacting the Mar-a-Lago search warrant affidavit". CNN. Retrieved August 25, 2022.
- ^ Sneed, Tierney (August 25, 2022). "What's next in the fight over the Mar-a-Lago FBI search affidavit". CNN. Retrieved August 25, 2022.
- ^ a b Vogt, Adrienne; Sangal, Aditi; Hammond, Elise (August 26, 2022). "Live updates: DOJ releases redacted Mar-a-Lago search warrant affidavit". CNN. Archived from the original on August 26, 2022. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Cohen, Marshall; Sneed, Tierney; Herb, Jeremy (August 26, 2022). "Justice Department releases redacted Mar-a-Lago search warrant affidavit". CNN. Archived from the original on August 26, 2022. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
- ^ Savage, Charlie (August 26, 2022). "The Affidavit for the Search of Trump's Home, Annotated". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 27, 2022. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ Phillips, Amber; Blake, Aaron (August 26, 2022). "Read the partially redacted Mar-a-Lago search affidavit, annotated". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 27, 2022. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Vogt, Adrienne; Sangal, Aditi; Hammond, Elise (August 26, 2022). "Mar-a-Lago search warrant affidavit lists 4 main goals of investigation". CNN. Archived from the original on August 26, 2022. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
- ^ a b Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (August 26, 2022). "Trump Mar-a-Lago affidavit reveals 'handwritten notes,' highly classified material led to warrant request". Politico. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ Thrush, Glenn; Savage, Charlie; Haberman, Maggie; Feuer, Alan (November 18, 2022). "Garland Names Special Counsel for Trump Inquiries". The New York Times. Retrieved November 19, 2022.
- ^ Tucker, Eric; Balsamo, Michael (November 18, 2022). "Garland names special counsel to lead Trump-related probes". AP News. Retrieved November 19, 2022.
- ^ Anderson, Scott R.; Dhanani, Saraphin; Jurecic, Quinta; McBrien, Tyler; Orpett, Natalie K.; Wittes, Benjamin (November 18, 2022). "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington". Lawfare. Brookings Institute. Retrieved November 19, 2022.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Feuer, Alan (August 22, 2022). "Judge in Trump Search Case Issues Written Order Seeking Redactions". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 22, 2022. Retrieved August 23, 2022.
- ^ Polantz, Katelyn; Collins, Kaitlan; Sneed, Tierney (August 22, 2022). "Trump's legal team asks for 'special master' to go through Mar-a-Lago evidence and determine if some should be returned". CNN. Archived from the original on August 22, 2022. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (August 22, 2022). "Trump files suit demanding special master in Mar-a-Lago search case". Politico. Archived from the original on August 23, 2022. Retrieved August 23, 2022.
- ^ Bump, Philip (September 6, 2022). "Why might Trump have wanted Judge Cannon for his Mar-a-Lago challenge?". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 6, 2022.
- ^ Marimow, Ann E.; Barrett, Devlin (September 6, 2022). "Judge's special-master order a test of Trump's post-White House powers". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ Polantz, Katelyn (August 23, 2022). "Judge sets Friday deadline for Trump to refine his request for a special master". CNN. Archived from the original on August 24, 2022. Retrieved August 23, 2022.
- ^ a b c Sneed, Tierney (August 27, 2022). "Trump re-ups request for 'special master' but glosses over some questions from the judge". CNN. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Cheney, Kyle; Gerstein, Josh (August 26, 2022). "Trump lawyers renew plea for outside supervision of Mar-a-Lago search trove". Politico. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ Friedman, Dan (August 27, 2022). "Trump's Lawyers Don't Seem to Have Much of a Defense". Mother Jones. Archived from the original on August 27, 2022. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ Sneed, Tierney (August 27, 2022). "Judge says she has 'preliminary intent' to appoint special master to oversee Mar-a-Lago search review". CNN. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ Cole, Devan (August 31, 2022). "Judge Aileen Cannon: Trump's request for 'special master' puts one of his judicial appointees in the spotlight". CNN. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
- ^ Feuer, Alan; Haberman, Maggie (August 27, 2022). "Judge Signals Intent to Appoint Special Master in Mar-a-Lago Search". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 27, 2022. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ Nakamura, David (August 27, 2022). "Judge signals intent for special master to review Mar-a-Lago documents". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 27, 2022. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; August 28, 2022 suggested (help) - ^ Folmar, Chloe (August 27, 2022). "Judge announces intent to appoint special master to review Mar-a-Lago documents". The Hill. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ Cheney, Kyle; Gerstein, Josh (August 27, 2022). "Judge signals she's likely to back Trump request for Mar-a-Lago special master". Politico. Archived from the original on August 27, 2022. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
{{cite web}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; August 28, 2022 suggested (help) - ^ Savage, Charlie (September 28, 2022). "'Giant Backfire': Trump's Demand for Special Master Is Looking Like a Mistake - The former president failed to derail the criminal investigation into his hoarding of sensitive documents and is stuck paying for a costly process that threatens to undermine his public claims". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 29, 2022. Retrieved September 29, 2022.
- ^ Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (August 29, 2022). "DOJ indicates Trump's demand for special master may be too late". Politico. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ a b Barrett, Devlin (August 29, 2022). "Trump's Mar-a-Lago documents already examined by FBI, Justice Dept. tells judge". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 29, 2022. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ Savage, Charlie; Thrush, Glenn; Feuer, Alan (August 29, 2022). "Trump Request for Special Master Could Open Door for Delays to Investigation". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 30, 2022. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
Appointing a special master could block the government from continued access to the files until the special master has gone through them and would potentially pave the way for lengthy litigation that could bog down the investigation. As a matter of substance, the request is puzzling. Mr. Trump's lawyers made it far too late, so the F.B.I. has already seemingly examined everything ... A hearing is scheduled for Thursday in West Palm Beach, Fla. Judge Cannon may change her mind after the Justice Department presents its arguments. The government apparently has a lot to say. Its three-page filing on Monday indicated it would soon provide 'more detail in its forthcoming supplemental filing.' Hours later, it requested permission to file a reply that would exceed the court's usual limits — and was granted it. Any injunction blocking the government from continued access to the files while a special master, either a judge or a former official with high-level security clearance, reviews them could cause difficulties [and slow the government's case].
- ^ Scannell, Kara (August 29, 2022). "'Limited set of materials' potentially covered by attorney-client privilege found in Mar-a-Lago search, Justice Department says". CNN. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ Barrett, Devlin (August 31, 2022). "Trump team may have hidden, moved classified papers, Justice Dept. says". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 31, 2022. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; September 3, 2022 suggested (help) - ^ a b c d e Wolf, Zachary B. (August 31, 2022). "Analysis: The case against Trump is starting to come into focus. Here's what we know". CNN. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ a b "READ: The Justice Department's response to Trump's request for a special master". CNN. August 30, 2022. pp. 8–11. Retrieved September 1, 2022.
On June 3, 2022, three FBI agents and a DOJ attorney arrived at the Premises to accept receipt of the materials [in response to a May 11 subpoena]. (p. 8) ... the FBI agents and DOJ attorney were permitted to visit the storage room. (p. 9) ... Critically, however, the former President's counsel explicitly prohibited government personnel from opening or looking inside any of the boxes that remained in the storage room, giving no opportunity for the government to confirm that no documents with classification markings remained. (p. 9) ... Counsel for the former President offered no explanation as to why boxes of government records, including 38 documents with classification markings [handed over on June 3], remained at the Premises nearly five months after the production of the Fifteen Boxes [in January 2022] and nearly one-and-a-half years after the end of the Administration. ... Through further investigation, the FBI uncovered multiple sources of evidence indicating that the response to the May 11 grand jury subpoena was incomplete and that classified documents remained at the Premises, notwithstanding the sworn certification made to the government on June 3. ... The government also developed evidence that government records were likely concealed and removed from the Storage Room and that efforts were likely taken to obstruct the government's investigation. ... This included evidence indicating that boxes formerly in the Storage Room were not returned prior to counsel's review. (p. 10) Against that backdrop, and relying on the probable cause that the investigation had developed at that time, on August 5, 2022, the government applied to Magistrate Judge Reinhart for a search and seizure warrant ... (p. 11)
- ^ Gurman, Sadie; Wolfe, Jan; Leary, Alex (August 31, 2022). "DOJ Points to Likely Obstruction in Investigation of Documents at Trump's Mar-a-Lago". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 31, 2022. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
- ^ Sneed, Tierney; LeBlanc, Paul (August 30, 2022). "DOJ to file lengthy response to Trump's request for a special master to oversee Mar-a-Lago search review". CNN. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (August 30, 2022). "Trump team likely sought to conceal classified docs at Mar-a-Lago, DOJ tells judge". Politico. Retrieved September 1, 2022.
- ^ Thrush, Glenn; Savage, Charlie; Feuer, Alan; Haberman, Maggie (August 31, 2022). "Documents at Mar-a-Lago Were Moved and Hidden as U.S. Sought Them, Filing Suggests". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 31, 2022. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Herb, Jeremy; Cohen, Marshall; Sneed, Tierney (August 31, 2022). "Takeaways from the historic Justice Department court filing on the Mar-a-Lago search". CNN. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Gerstein, Josh (August 31, 2022). "Garland's perilous path to prosecuting Trump". Politico. Retrieved September 1, 2022.
- ^ a b Campbell, Josh; Lillis, Katie Bo (August 31, 2022). "Dissecting 7 key pieces of the Mar-a-Lago photo". CNN. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Herb, Jeremy; Sneed, Tierney; Scannell, Kara; Lybrand, Holmes; Cohen, Marshall (August 31, 2022). "Trump tells court that classified material should have been expected in presidential records found at Mar-a-Lago". CNN. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle; Wu, Nicholas (August 31, 2022). "Trump team makes its 11th hour plea for independent review". Politico. Retrieved September 2, 2022.
- ^ a b Quinn, Melissa; Sganga, Nicole; Legare, Robert (September 1, 2022). "Judge orders release of detailed list of property seized in Trump FBI search". CBS News. Retrieved September 2, 2022.
- ^ a b Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle; Wu, Nicholas (September 1, 2022). "Judge considers temporary limit on DOJ access to Trump documents". Politico. Retrieved September 2, 2022.
- ^ Sneed, Tierney; Cohen, Marshall (September 1, 2022). "Revelatory moments from the 90-minute Mar-a-Lago special master hearing". CNN. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ "Read: Full list of documents seized from Mar-a-Lago". CNN. September 2, 2022. Retrieved September 5, 2022.
- ^ Wu, Nicholas; Cheney, Kyle (September 2, 2022). "Prosecutors detail items seized from Trump estate, including dozens of empty 'classified' folders". Politico. Retrieved September 5, 2022.
- ^ a b Savage, Charlie; Feuer, Alan (September 2, 2022). "F.B.I. Found 48 Empty Folders That Had Contained Classified Documents at Trump's Home". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 2, 2022. Retrieved September 2, 2022.
- ^ a b c Cheney, Kyle; Wu, Nicholas; Desiderio, Andres (September 5, 2022). "Judge orders halt to DOJ review of documents seized from Trump". Politico. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Sneed, Tierney; Cohen, Marshall; Herb, Jeremy; Lybrand, Holmes (September 5, 2022). "Judge grants Trump's request for a 'special master' to review materials seized from Mar-a-Lago". CNN. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ Savage, Charlie (September 5, 2022). "'Deeply Problematic': Experts Question Judge's Intervention in Trump Inquiry". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 6, 2022. Retrieved September 6, 2022.
- ^ Mazzei, Patricia; Haberman, Maggie; Feuer, Alan (September 7, 2022). "Trump Ruling Lifts Profile of Judge and Raises Legal Eyebrows". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 7, 2022. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ a b Savage, Charlie; Feuer, Alan; Thrush, Glenn; Haberman, Maggie (September 9, 2022). "Justice Dept. and Trump Legal Team Clash Over Special Master Candidates - The two sides had sharply diverging views of who could serve as a special master and what that person would do". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 10, 2022. Retrieved September 10, 2022.
- ^ Stein, Perry; Barrett, Devlin (September 8, 2022). "Justice Dept. Asks Judge to Lift Block on Trump Documents Investigation". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 8, 2022. Retrieved September 9, 2022.
- ^ Thrush, Glenn; Feuer, Alan; Savage, Charlie (September 8, 2022). "Justice Dept. Asks Judge to Lift Block on Trump Documents Investigation". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 8, 2022. Retrieved September 9, 2022.
- ^ Legare, Robert (September 10, 2022). "Special master candidates submitted by Trump and Justice Dept. in Trump documents case". CBS News. Archived from the original on September 20, 2022. Retrieved September 20, 2022.
- ^ Barrett, Devlin; Stein, Perry (September 12, 2022). "Justice Dept. says it would accept Trump's candidate for special master". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 12, 2022. Retrieved September 13, 2022.
- ^ Quinn, Melissa (September 15, 2022). "Politics Judge denies DOJ request to regain access to some documents seized in Trump search". CBS News. Retrieved September 16, 2022.
- ^ Haroun, Azmi (September 16, 2022). "A judge swiftly appointed a special master to review documents taken by Trump from the White House – but Trump will have to pay for it". Business Insider. Retrieved September 16, 2022.
- ^ Savage, Charlie; Feuer, Alan; Trush, Glenn (September 15, 2022). "Judge Keeps Block on Inquiry Into Mar-a-Lago Files and Names Special Master". The New York Times. Retrieved September 16, 2022.
- ^ Cheney, Kyle; Gerstein, Josh (September 15, 2022). "Judge appoints special master, rejects DOJ bid to delay Mar-a-Lago ruling". Politico. Retrieved September 16, 2022.
- ^ "Motion for partial stay pending appeal" (PDF). United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. September 16, 2022. Retrieved September 17, 2022.
- ^ a b Thomsen, Jacqueline (September 17, 2022). "Justice Dept. asks appeals court to allow review of classified documents in Trump probe". Reuters. Retrieved September 18, 2022.
- ^ a b Trush, Glenn; Feuer, Alan; Savage, Charlie (September 16, 2022). "U.S. Asks Appeals Court to Restore Access to Sensitive Records Seized From Trump". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 17, 2022. Retrieved September 17, 2022.
- ^ a b Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (September 16, 2022). "Justice Dept. asks appeals court to restore access to Trump raid documents". Politico. Retrieved September 17, 2022.
- ^ Cheney, Kyle; Gerstein, Josh (September 21, 2022). "Trump suffers setback as appeals panel rejects Cannon ruling". Politico. Retrieved September 21, 2022.
- ^ Savage, Charlie; Thrush, Glenn; Feuer, Alan (September 21, 2022). "Appeals Court Restores Justice Dept.'s Access to Sensitive Files Seized From Trump". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 21, 2022. Retrieved September 21, 2022.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; September 22, 2022 suggested (help) - ^ a b Liptak, Adam; Savage, Charlie (October 4, 2022). "Trump Asks Supreme Court to Intervene in Review of Mar-a-Lago Records". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 5, 2022. Retrieved October 5, 2022.
- ^ Singh, Kanishka; Ayyub, Rami; Thomsen, Jacqueline; Scarcella, Mike (September 30, 2022). "U.S. Justice Dept seeks expedited ruling in Trump special master case". Reuters. Retrieved October 5, 2022.
- ^ Polantz, Katelyn; Sneed, Tierney (October 5, 2022). "Federal appeals court to expedite case weighing legality of Mar-a-Lago special master". CNN. Retrieved October 5, 2022.
- ^ Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (October 10, 2022). "Appeals court expedites DOJ challenge to Mar-a-Lago special master". Politico. Retrieved October 14, 2022.
- ^ Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (October 14, 2022). "DOJ asks appeals court to end outside review of Trump Mar-a-Lago documents". Politico. Retrieved October 14, 2022.
- ^ Kise, Chris (November 10, 2022). "USCA11 Donald Trump v. USA, Case: 22-13005, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Case No: 9:22-cv-81294-AMC" (PDF). Retrieved November 25, 2022.
- ^ Sneed, Tierney (November 22, 2022). "Mar-a-Lago documents: Appeals court hearing to determine future of special master review". CNN Politics. Retrieved November 22, 2022.
- ^ De Vogue, Ariane; Polantz, Katelyn (October 11, 2022). "DOJ urges Supreme Court to stay out of Mar-a-Lago documents fight". CNN. Retrieved October 12, 2022.
- ^ Liptak, Adam (October 13, 2022). "Supreme Court Rejects Trump Request to Intervene in Documents Case". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 14, 2022. Retrieved October 14, 2022.
- ^ Hurley, Lawrence (October 13, 2022). "Supreme Court rejects Trump's request in dispute over Mar-a-Lago documents". NBC News. Retrieved October 13, 2022.
- ^ Sherman, Mark; Gresko, Jessica (October 13, 2022). "High court rejects Trump plea to step into Mar-a-Lago case". Associated Press. Retrieved October 14, 2022.
- ^ Feuer, Alan; Savage, Charlie (September 20, 2022). "Special Master Expresses Skepticism of Declassification Claims by Trump's Lawyers - The former president insists he shouldn't have to state in a legal proceeding that he declassified the documents, while casting doubt on their status". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 22, 2022. Retrieved September 21, 2022.
- ^ Stein, Perry; Barrett, Devlin; Jacob, Shayna (September 20, 2022). "Special master prods Trump lawyers: 'You can't have your cake and eat it' - Donald Trump's attorneys joust with Judge Raymond Dearie on classification question, access to Mar-a-Lago documents". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 20, 2022. Retrieved September 20, 2022.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; September 21, 2022 suggested (help) - ^ Freifeld, Karen; Cohen, Luc; Lynch, Sarah (September 20, 2022). "Judge asks Trump's lawyers if he declassified records in FBI search". Reuters. Archived from the original on September 21, 2022. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (September 20, 2022). "Special Master expresses skepticism with Trump team's assertions". Politico. Retrieved September 20, 2022.
- ^ Cohen, Marshall (September 23, 2022). "Mar-a-Lago special master orders Trump team to back up any claims of FBI 'planting' evidence". CNN. Retrieved September 23, 2022.
- ^ Dearie, Raymond J. (September 22, 2022). "Trump v. USA, No. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON, Case Management Plan" (PDF). pp. 1–2. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ Katersky, Aaron; Faulders, Katherine; Mallin, Alexander (September 22, 2022). "Special master sets timeline for review in Trump docs case, says he must explain claims of privilege". ABC News. Archived from the original on September 23, 2022. Retrieved September 23, 2022.
- ^ Bump, Philip (September 29, 2020). "Did the FBI really seize 200,000 pages of documents at Mar-a-Lago?". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 29, 2022. Retrieved October 6, 2022.
- ^ Wire, Sarah D. (October 14, 2022). "Justice Department appeal contends special master review of Mar-a-Lago search records is unnecessary". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 14, 2022.
- ^ Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (September 29, 2022). "Judge again sides with Trump in Mar-a-Lago documents fight". Politico. Retrieved September 30, 2022.
- ^ Savage, Charlie; Feuer, Alan (September 29, 2022). "Judge Overrules Special Master's Demands to Trump in Document Review". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 29, 2022. Retrieved September 30, 2022.
- ^ Cannon, Aileen M. (September 29, 2022). "Trump v. USA, No. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON, Order Accepting in Part and Rejecting in Part Amended Case Management Plan" (PDF). pp. 1–6. Retrieved September 30, 2022.
- ^ Savage, Charlie; Feuer, Alan (October 18, 2022). "In Documents Review, Special Master Tells Trump Team to Back Up Privilege Claims". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 23, 2022. Retrieved October 23, 2022.
- ^ Lowell, Hugo (October 18, 2022). "'Where's the beef?': special master says Trump's Mar-a-Lago records claims lack substance". The Guardian. Archived from the original on October 20, 2022. Retrieved October 23, 2022.
- ^ Polantz, Katelyn; Sneed, Tierney (November 14, 2022). "Trump tells Mar-a-Lago special master that he got to decide which White House documents were his to keep". CNN. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Savage, Charlie; Feuer, Alan (November 14, 2022). "Justice Department and Trump Lawyers Clash Over Status of Seized Documents". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 16, 2022. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
- ^ Tau, Byron (November 14, 2022). "Trump Lays Out Executive-Privilege Claims on Mar-a-Lago Documents". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b Wu, Nicholas; Cheney, Kyle (February 25, 2022). "House Dems step up investigation into Trump's handling of sensitive records". Politico. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ Wu, Nicholas (August 13, 2022). "Top House lawmakers ask intel officials to review national security damage from Trump document handling". Politico. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ Murray, Sara; Cohen, Zachary; Polantz, Katelyn; Diaz, Daniella (August 13, 2022). "House Democratic chairs request federal intelligence damage assessment after classified docs seized at Trump's Mar-a-Lago". CNN. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ a b Desiderio, Andrew; Wu, Nicholas (August 27, 2022). "Intel officials to assess national security fallout from Trump's Mar-a-Lago documents". Politico. Archived from the original on August 27, 2022. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ Herb, Jeremy; Grayer, Annie (August 27, 2022). "US intelligence chief tells Congress she's conducting damage assessment of documents taken from Mar-a-Lago". CNN. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ Saric, Ivana (August 14, 2022). "Marco Rubio, Mark Warner send bipartisan request for info on Mar-a-Lago search". Axios. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ a b c Niedzwiadek, Nick; Woodruff Swan, Betsy (August 14, 2022). "FBI warns of heightened threats as Hill Republicans demand more from Garland on Mar-a-Lago search". Politico. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ Herb, Jeremy; Grayer, Annie (August 27, 2022). "US intelligence chief tells Congress she's conducting damage assessment of documents taken from Mar-a-Lago". CNN. Archived from the original on August 27, 2022. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ Desiderio, Andrew (August 22, 2022). "Gang of 8 wants to see Trump Mar-a-Lago search docs". Politico. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ a b Folkenflik, David (August 9, 2022). "Analysis: Fox and right-wing media snap to Trump's defense after FBI search". All Things Considered. NPR. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
For the record, the White House has said President Biden learned of the search from media reports and, as of late Tuesday afternoon, had not been briefed on the investigation by the Justice Department. No credible reporting has surfaced to contradict those claims.
- ^ Mason, Jeff; Alper, Alexandra; Oatis, Jonathan (August 9, 2022). "Biden not briefed on raid at Trump's Florida home, White House says". Reuters. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ Quinn, Melissa (August 9, 2022). "Biden didn't know about FBI search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago ahead of time, White House says". CBS News. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
- ^ "WH says it wasn't made aware in advance of Mar-a-Lago FBI raid". Yahoo News. August 9, 2022. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ Klein, Betsy (August 17, 2022). "Biden 'rejects' defunding the FBI amid calls from some Republicans". CNN. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ Collins, Kaitlan; Liptak, Kevin; Bertrand, Natasha (August 19, 2022). "White House officials privately express concern about classified information taken to Mar-a-Lago". CNN. Retrieved August 20, 2022.
- ^ Liptak, Kevin (August 26, 2022). "Biden scoffs at Trump's declassification claims". CNN. Archived from the original on August 26, 2022. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
- ^ Vogt, Adrienne; Sangal, Aditi; Hammond, Elise (August 26, 2022). "Biden says he'll let DOJ determine possible national security threat at Mar-a-Lago". CNN. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
- ^ Sullivan, Kate (August 30, 2022). "Biden condemns 'sickening' attacks on FBI following Mar-a-Lago search and slams GOP over January 6". CNN. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
- ^ Lemire, Jonathan; Cadelago, Christopher (August 30, 2022). "Biden dodges the August curse". Politico. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
- ^ "Press Statements in Response to Media Queries About Presidential Records". National Archives. February 14, 2022. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ^ "Records Released In Response to Presidential Records Act (PRA) questions under the Trump Administration". Archives.gov. October 12, 2017. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ^ Amiri, Farnoush (September 13, 2022). "National Archives Still Not Certain It Has All Trump Records, House Committee Says". HuffPost. Retrieved September 13, 2022.
- ^ Cohen, Zachary; Cole, Devan (August 29, 2022). "National Archives receives threats and praise for its role in Trump documents case, but doesn't want either, letter says". CNN. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ^ Steidel Wall, Debra (August 24, 2022). "Update on Trump Administration Presidential Records" (PDF). Archives.gov. Retrieved August 24, 2022.
- ^ Maloney, Carolyn B. (September 13, 2022). "Letter to Ms. Debra Steidel Wall, Acting Archivist of the United States National Archives and Records Administration" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 1, 2022. Retrieved October 1, 2022.
- ^ Solender, Andrew (September 13, 2022). "House oversight panel seeks review of 'unaccounted' Trump documents". Axios. Archived from the original on October 1, 2022. Retrieved October 1, 2022.
- ^ Wall, Debra Steidel (September 30, 2022). "Letter to The Honorable Carolyn B. Maloney, Chairwoman of the Committee on Oversight and Reform" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 1, 2022. Retrieved October 1, 2022.
- ^ Solender, Andrew (October 1, 2022). "National Archives tells Congress some Trump admin records still unaccounted for". Axios. Archived from the original on October 1, 2022. Retrieved October 1, 2022.
Wall specifically cited official business that was conducted 'using non-official electronic messaging accounts that were not copied or forwarded [appropriately]' as an area of particular concern ... Wall said the Archives will consult with the DOJ on whether to 'initiate an action for the recovery of records unlawfully removed' – as in the case of the DOJ's lawsuit against former White House adviser Peter Navarro in August.
- ^ Wild, Whitney; Polantz, Katelyn (October 1, 2022). "National Archives says it still doesn't have all Trump White House records". CNN. Retrieved October 2, 2022.
- ^ Schonfeld, Zach (August 14, 2022). "Trump calls for return of privileged documents reportedly seized at Mar-a-Lago". The Hill. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ Shapero, Julia (August 14, 2022). "Trump calls on FBI to return 'privileged' documents seized at Mar-a-Lago". Axios. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ Ward, Myah (August 15, 2022). "Trump world's shifting narrative on the Mar-a-Lago docs". Politico. Archived from the original on August 15, 2022. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Cheney, Kyle; Gerstein, Josh; Wu, Nicholas (August 21, 2022). "Trump's throw-everything-against-the-wall response to the Mar-a-Lago search". Politico. Archived from the original on August 21, 2022. Retrieved August 21, 2022.
- ^ a b c Kanno-Youngs, Zolan; Haberman, Maggie (August 14, 2022). "Trump's Shifting Explanations Follow a Familiar Playbook". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; August 15, 2022 suggested (help) - ^ Arnsdorf, Isaac; Dawsey, Josh; Leonnig, Carol D.; Alemany, Jacqueline; Helderman, Rosalind S. (August 16, 2022). "Trump is rushing to hire seasoned lawyers – but he keeps hearing 'No'". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 23, 2022. Retrieved August 23, 2022.
- ^ a b Haberman, Maggie; Thrush, Glenn (August 28, 2022). "Trump's Legal Team Scrambles to Find an Argument". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 29, 2022. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
The closest thing to a legal quarterback in Mr. Trump's orbit is Boris Epshteyn, a onetime lawyer at the firm Milbank who was a political adviser to Mr. Trump in 2016, ultimately becoming a senior staff member on his inaugural effort and then a strategic adviser on the 2020 campaign. Mr. Epshteyn has championed Mr. Trump's claims, dismissed by dozens of courts, that the election was stolen from him, and has risen to a role he has described to colleagues as an 'in-house counsel,' helping to assemble Mr. Trump's current legal team.
- ^ Collins, Kaitlan; Orr, Gabby; Holmes, Kristen; Scannell, Kara (August 30, 2022). "Former Florida solicitor general Chris Kise joins Trump legal team". CNN. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
- ^ McGraw, Meridith (August 30, 2022). "Trump adds former Florida solicitor general to legal team working Mar-a-Lago probe". Politico. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
- ^ Collins, Kaitlan (September 27, 2022). "Newest addition to Trump's legal team sidelined in Mar-a-Lago search case". CNN. Retrieved September 27, 2022.
- ^ Papenfuss, Mary (October 1, 2022). "$3 Million Attorney Seeks Gentler Path On Mar-A-Lago Case, But Trump Isn't Having It: Report". HuffPost. Retrieved October 2, 2022.
- ^ Schmidt, Michael S.; Haberman, Maggie; Benner, Katie (October 6, 2022). "Justice Dept. Is Said to Believe Trump Has More Documents". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 7, 2022. Retrieved October 7, 2022.
- ^ Dawsey, Josh; Arnsdorf, Isaac (August 17, 2022). "Trump rakes in millions off FBI search at Mar-a-Lago". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 18, 2022. Retrieved August 23, 2022.
- ^ Wilkie, Christina; Mangan, Dan (August 22, 2022). "Trump PAC paid nearly $1 million to defense lawyers in July alone as Georgia and New York probes heated up". CNBC. Archived from the original on August 22, 2022. Retrieved August 23, 2022.
- ^ Meyer, Josh; Garrison, Joey (August 9, 2022). "Watergate 'in reverse'? Historians and legal analysts pan Trump's claims and point to legal peril ahead". USA Today. Retrieved August 21, 2022.
- ^ a b Spencer, Saranac Hale (August 11, 2022). "Social Media, Politicians Make Unfounded Claims of Politicized Mar-a-Lago Search". FactCheck.org. Annenberg Public Policy Center. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ a b Smith, Jillian (August 8, 2022). "'Under siege': GOP reacts to FBI raid at Trump's Mar-a-Lago home". KATU-TV. Archived from the original on August 9, 2022. Retrieved August 9, 2022.
- ^ "Mike Pence shares 'deep concern' over FBI search of Trump's home". BBC News. Archived from the original on August 9, 2022. Retrieved August 9, 2022.
- ^ Lynch, Sarah N.; Freifeld, Karen (August 10, 2022). "Trump uses FBI search of his Mar-a-Lago home to solicit campaign donations". Reuters. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
- ^ Bennett, Kate (August 30, 2022). "An 'annoyed' Melania Trump stays mum on Mar-a-Lago search as she promotes NFT business". CNN. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ^ Feuer, Alan (August 11, 2022). "Trump Baselessly Suggests F.B.I. Planted Evidence in Mar-a-Lago Search". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ a b Wagner, John (August 12, 2022). "National Archives counters Trump's baseless claims about Obama records". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ Massara, Graph (August 13, 2022). "Obama didn't keep millions of classified White House documents". Associated Press. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ Pleat, Zachary (August 12, 2022). "The National Archives debunked Fox and Trump's lies about Obama's handling of classified documents". Media Matters. Archived from the original on September 27, 2022. Retrieved September 27, 2022.
- ^ Blake, Aaron (August 12, 2022). "The story behind Trump's and Fox News's specious 'What about Obama' parallel". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 27, 2022. Retrieved September 27, 2022.
- ^ a b Astor, Maggie (August 12, 2022). "Obama did not keep classified documents, the National Archives confirms". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 13, 2022. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ Lynch, Sarah N. (August 13, 2022). "FBI seized top secret documents at Trump's home; Espionage Act cited". Reuters. Retrieved September 23, 2022.
- ^ Jacobson, Louis (August 11, 2022). "Could Trump argue he declassified the documents found in the Mar-a-Lago search?". PolitiFact. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ a b Mark, Julian (September 22, 2022). "Trump says presidents can declassify docs 'even by thinking about it' - Donald Trump claimed in a Fox News appearance that documents taken to Mar-a-Lago were declassified while he was in office". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 22, 2022. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ Gregorian, Dareh; Caputo, Marc (August 12, 2022). "Trump allies say he declassified Mar-a-Lago documents seized by FBI. Experts are skeptical". NBC News. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
'Trump declassified whole sets of materials in anticipation of leaving government that he thought the American public should have the right to read themselves,' Patel said then [in May 2022].
- ^ Papenfuss, Mary (September 23, 2022). "Special Master Calls Out Lawyers On Trump's Claim That FBI 'Planted' Mar-A-Lago Records". HuffPost. Retrieved September 23, 2022.
Only Trump's staunch ally and former Pentagon official Kash Patel has publicly backed Trump's claim that he had issued a 'standing order' to declassify anything removed from the White House.
- ^ Gangel, Jamie; Stuart, Elizabeth; Herb, Jeremy (August 18, 2022). "'Ludicrous.' 'Ridiculous.' 'A complete fiction.': Former Trump officials say his claim of 'standing order' to declassify is nonsense". CNN. Retrieved August 18, 2022.
- ^ Savage, Charlie (August 14, 2022). "Presidential Power to Declassify Information, Explained". The New York Times. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ a b Ankel, Sophia (August 16, 2022). "Former CIA director says Trump ally's claim that he could instantly declassify documents is 'pretty much BS'". Business Insider. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ Mazza, Ed (September 22, 2022). "Telepathy? Trump Claims He Could Declassify Documents 'By Thinking About It'". HuffPost. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ a b Goldiner, Dave (September 22, 2022). "Trump's claim of declassifying documents 'by thinking about it' is mocked by legal experts". Yahoo News. Archived from the original on September 23, 2022. Retrieved September 23, 2022.
- ^ Thrush, Glenn; Feuer, Alan; savage, Charlie (September 22, 2022). "Trump Claims He Declassified Documents. Why Don't His Lawyers Say So in Court? - Judges this week highlighted the gap between Mr. Trump's public claims that he declassified everything and his lawyers' reluctance to repeat that claim in a courtroom". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 22, 2022. Retrieved September 23, 2022.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; September 23, 2022 suggested (help) - ^ Collinson, Stephen (September 23, 2022). "Trump's strategy in the classified documents case is quickly crumbling". CNN News. Archived from the original on September 23, 2022. Retrieved September 23, 2022.
- ^ a b Kayyem, Juliette (August 9, 2022). "The Bad and Good News About Trump's Violent Supporters". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 9, 2022. Retrieved August 9, 2022.
- ^ Tangalakis-Lippert, Katherine (August 8, 2022). "Trump supporters protest the execution of a search warrant against the former president outside Mar-a-Lago and FBI headquarters". Business Insider. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ "Video: Hear what Trump supporters say about FBI search of Mar-a-Lago". CNN. August 10, 2022. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ "Protests at Columbia FBI building in response to Mar-a-Lago search". WIS (TV). August 10, 2022. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ Ziege, Nicole (August 13, 2022). "Trump supporters protest in Myrtle Beach against FBI Mar-a-Lago raid". The Post and Courier. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ Albani-Burgio, Paul (August 12, 2022). "Small protest of FBI Trump raid held in Palm Springs". The Desert Sun. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ a b "Armed Trump supporters protest outside of FBI office in Phoenix following Mar-a-Lago probe". FOX 10 Phoenix. August 13, 2022. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ Horseman, Jeff (August 10, 2022). "Trump supporters picket Riverside FBI office after Mar-a-Lago raid". Press Enterprise. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ Schneider, Joey (August 15, 2022). "Dozens protest in St. Louis over FBI Mar-a-Lago search". FOX 2. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Dale, Daniel (August 14, 2022). "Responding to FBI search, Trump and allies return to his familiar strategy: flood the zone with nonsense". CNN. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ Schmidt, Michael; Haberman, Maggie (August 26, 2022). "Agency rebuts Trump's claim that it packed boxes of material he took from White House". The New York Times. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
- ^ Cohen, Marshall; Murray, Sara (August 12, 2022). "Key lines from the search warrant and receipt for Trump's Florida home". CNN. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
- ^ Collinson, Stephen (August 18, 2022). "Analysis: Trump looks to seize on feud with FBI as critical court hearing looms". CNN. Retrieved August 18, 2022.
- ^ Yang, Maya (August 12, 2022). "Fox News airs false photo of Trump search judge with Ghislaine Maxwell". The Guardian. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ Hurley, Bevan (August 13, 2022). "Fox News airs edited photo of Trump raid judge with Ghislaine Maxwell". The Independent. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ a b c Feuer, Alan (August 9, 2022). "F.B.I. Search Ignited Violent Rhetoric on the Far Right". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
- ^ Feuer, Alan (August 9, 2022). "The F.B.I. search ignited the language of violence and civil war on the far right". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 9, 2022. Retrieved August 9, 2022.
- ^ a b Wadington, Katie (August 11, 2022). "GOP Rep. Liz Cheney criticizes Republicans 'attacking the integrity of the FBI'". USA Today. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Slisco, Aila (August 12, 2022). "Breitbart Slammed for Doxxing FBI Agents Involved in Mar-a-Lago Raid". Newsweek. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ Feuer, Alan (August 13, 2022). "As Right-Wing Rhetoric Escalates, So Do Threats and Violence". The New York Times. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
Despite that threat, one day later, when the right-wing media outlet Breitbart News published the warrant underlying the Mar-a-Lago search, it did not redact the names of the F.B.I. agents on the document. Almost immediately afterward, posts on a pro-Trump chat board referred to them as 'traitors'.
- ^ a b Ward, Myah (August 12, 2022). "Fox News' Brian Kilmeade clarifies that image of judge at center of Trump search warrant was a fake". Politico. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ a b Dixon, Matt (August 12, 2022). "Florida judge who approved FBI search of Mar-a-Lago faces barrage of antisemitic online attacks". Politico. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
- ^ Sangal, Aditi; Vogt, Adrienne; Wagner, Meg; Hammond, Elise; Macaya, Melissa (August 12, 2022). "Warrant was signed on Aug. 5, three days before Mar-a-Lago raid was executed". CNN. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Sganga, Nicole (August 14, 2022). "FBI/DHS bulletin warns of 'increase in violent threats posted on social media against federal officials and facilities'". CBS News. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Campbell, Josh; Schneider, Jessica; O'Sullivan, Donie; Murphy, Paul P.; Alvarez, Priscilla (August 13, 2022). "FBI investigating 'unprecedented' number of threats against bureau in wake of Mar-a-Lago search". CNN. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Dienst, Jonathan; O'Donnell, Kelly; Alsharif, Mirna (August 14, 2022). "FBI and DHS warn threats to federal law enforcement have spiked since Mar-a-Lago search". NBC News. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Shepardson, David (August 14, 2022). "FBI, DHS warn U.S. law enforcement of threats after Trump search". Reuters. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Ove, Torsten (August 15, 2022). "Mercer County man charged with threats to kill FBI agents after Mar-a-Lago search". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ "Man Arrested for Making Threats of Violence Against FBI". United States Department of Justice (Press release). August 15, 2022. Retrieved August 16, 2022.
- ^ Kelly, Makena (August 19, 2022). "Lawmakers press Facebook, TikTok, and Truth Social over threats against FBI". The Verge. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ Gilbert, David (August 19, 2022). "Trump's Truth Social Has Seen a Huge Spike Since FBI Search". Vice News. Archived from the original on August 22, 2022. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ Breuninger, Kevin (August 19, 2022). "House Democrats urge Twitter, TikTok, Meta and others to address spike in threats against law enforcement after FBI search of Trump home Mar-a-Lago". CNBC. Archived from the original on August 22, 2022. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
Numerous Republican officials quickly issued statements criticizing the raid and supporting Trump ... Some, such as House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., suggested the Department of Justice during President Joe Biden's administration had been weaponized against its political opponents. Even former vice president Mike Pence, whom Trump has considered an enemy ever since Pence refused to reject key electoral votes confirming Biden's win in the 2020 election, said he felt "deep concern" about the "unprecedented" move. The letters sent Friday morning cited numerous threatening posts from Truth Social that "coincided" with the rhetoric from GOP leaders.
- ^ Collins, Ben; Reilly, Ryan J.; Abbruzzese, Jason; Dienst, Jonathan (August 11, 2022). "Man who fired nail gun at FBI building called for violence on Truth Social in days after Mar-a-Lago search". NBC News. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Murphy, Paul P.; Campbell, Josh; Gingras, Brynn (August 12, 2022). "Account bearing name of suspect in Ohio standoff with FBI posted on Trump social media platform and encouraged violence against the agency". CNN. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Harwell, Drew; Kornfield, Meryl (August 12, 2022). "FBI attacker was prolific contributor to Trump's Truth Social website". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ Horton, Alex; Gowen, Annie; Hawkins, Derek; Bikales, James (August 12, 2022). "Gunman in FBI attack was Navy veteran who had served on submarine". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Walinchus, Lucia; Smith, Mitch; Goldman, Adam (August 12, 2022). "Ohio Man Was on the F.B.I.'s Radar for Months". The New York Times. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ a b Niquette, Mark; Korte, Gregory (August 9, 2022). "GOP Casts Trump as Victim, Attacks FBI in Midterm Rally Cry". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Haltiwanger, John (August 9, 2022). "Trump and his allies say FBI raid makes the US like a 'third world' country, but democracies like France, South Korea, and Israel have prosecuted ex-leaders". Business Insider. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Quinn, Melissa (August 9, 2022). "Republicans rail against the DOJ over FBI search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago, vowing investigations". CBS News. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ Saric, Ivana (August 14, 2022). "Rand Paul calls for repeal of Espionage Act after Trump FBI search". Axios. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ Kilander, Gustaf (August 14, 2022). "Rand Paul mocked for call to repeal Espionage Act cited in Trump FBI warrant". The Independent. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ Kilander, Gustaf (August 9, 2022). "Florida lawmaker calls for arrest of FBI agents and for state to 'sever all ties with DOJ immediately'". The Independent. Archived from the original on August 10, 2022. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
- ^ Bump, Philip (August 12, 2022). "Investigate Hunter Biden? Most Democrats say yes. Investigate Trump? Most Republicans say no". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ Olander, Olivia (August 28, 2022). "Trump 'should have turned the documents over,' Blunt says of Mar-a-Lago search". Politico. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
- ^ Blanchet, Ben (August 10, 2022). "CNN Anchor Tears Into GOP Lawmaker Over Clinton, Trump Double Standard". HuffPost. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
- ^ a b McGraw, Meridith; Desiderio, Andrew; Wu, Nicholas; Cheney, Kyle (August 30, 2022). "'There's enormous frustration': Trump forces Republicans off-script... again". Politico. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ^ Collinson, Stephen (August 29, 2022). "Republicans construct political shield for Trump over FBI search". CNN. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
- ^ Desiderio, Andrew (August 12, 2022). "GOP contorts itself in defense of Trump as new FBI search details emerge". Politico. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ a b Collinson, Stephen (August 15, 2022). "Analysis: Republicans pressure Garland as intrigue deepens over search of Trump home". CNN. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Collinson, Stephen (August 15, 2022). "Analysis: Republicans pressure Garland as intrigue deepens over search of Trump home". CNN. Retrieved August 15, 2022.
- ^ Brooks, Emily (August 12, 2022). "GOP displays split in tone on FBI's Trump search". The Hill. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ Raju, Manu (September 22, 2022). "Top GOP senators reject Trump's declassification comments and call for proper storage of secret records". CNN. Retrieved September 26, 2022.
- ^ Harvey, Josephine (September 26, 2022). "ABC Host Smacks Down GOP Senator's Take On Trump's Mind-Declassification Claim". HuffPost. Retrieved September 26, 2022.
- ^ Vu, Nancy (August 9, 2022). "House Democrats are reacting much differently to the FBI search of Donald Trump's home than their Senate counterparts, who are mostly staying silent". Politico. Archived from the original on August 11, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
- ^ a b Olander, Olivia (August 9, 2022). "Biden had no advance notice on Mar-a-Lago search, White House says". Politico. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ Stableford, Dylan (August 9, 2022). "Pelosi: FBI search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago shows 'no person is above the law'". Yahoo! News. Retrieved August 17, 2022.
- ^ a b c Holland, Steve; Freifeld, Karen (August 13, 2022). "Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort posed rare security challenges, experts say". Reuters. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ "Mar-a-Lago, a security 'nightmare' that housed classified records". Al Jazeera. August 13, 2022. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- ^ Shapiro, Ari (April 2, 2019). "Chinese Woman Carrying Thumb Drive Full Of Malware Arrested At Mar-A-Lago". NPR. Archived from the original on April 3, 2019. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ Rothkopf, David (August 9, 2022). "The FBI's Search of Mar-a-Lago Is a Reminder That Trump Has Always Been a National Security Threat". The Daily Beast. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
Trump has been a multi-faceted national security threat since he arrived on the national stage.
- ^ Burnett, Erin (August 26, 2022). "'They never found out': Fake heiress accessed Mar-a-Lago for over a year". CNN. Archived from the original on August 27, 2022. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ Sallah, Michael; Silver, Jonathan D. (August 26, 2022). "Inventing Anna: The tale of a fake heiress, Mar-a-Lago, and an FBI investigation". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Archived from the original on August 26, 2022. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ "How secure are U.S. nuclear weapon secrets? Former CIA director explains". MSNBC. August 12, 2022. Retrieved September 2, 2022.
- ^ Leeman, Zachary (August 12, 2022). "Former CIA Director Accused of Suggesting Trump Should Be Executed Over Nuclear Docs". Mediaite. Retrieved September 2, 2022.
- ^ Chalfant, Morgan (August 24, 2022). "Some Trump appointees become critical figures for Biden". The Hill. Retrieved September 2, 2022.
- ^ Lowell, Hugo (August 24, 2022). "Trump appears to concede he illegally retained official documents". The Guardian. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ Spocchia, Gino (August 24, 2022). "Trump appears to admit some documents were unlawfully taken from White House". The Independent. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
- ^ Schonfeld, Zach (August 9, 2022). "Pence demands 'full accounting' from Garland on Mar-a-Lago search". The Hill. Archived from the original on August 10, 2022. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
- ^ Paybarah, Azi (September 2, 2022). "Barr says no 'legitimate reason' for Trump to have classified documents". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 2, 2022. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ^ Swire, Sonnet (September 3, 2022). "William Barr, on Fox, says there's no legitimate reason for classified docs to be at Mar-a-Lago". CNN. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
- ^ "Trump adviser Kash Patel testified to grand jury investigating Mar-a-Lago documents". CNN. Retrieved November 4, 2022.
External links
- Tracker: Evidence of Trump’s Knowledge and Involvement in Retaining Mar-a-Lago Documents from the Reiss Center on Law and Security at the New York University School of Law
- Trump and the Mar-a-Lago documents: A timeline The Washington Post − Key events, from Trump's departure of the White House on January 20, 2021 up to the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago on August 8, 2022