Intel Nehalem (microarchitecture)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  (Redirected from Nehalem (microarchitecture))
Jump to: navigation, search

Nehalem (pronounced /nəˈheɪləm/[1]) is the codename for an Intel processor microarchitecture,[2] successor to the Core microarchitecture.[citation needed] The first processor released with the Nehalem architecture is the desktop Core i7,[3] which was released on November 15, 2008 in Tokyo and November 17, 2008 in the USA.[4]

Initial Nehalem processors use the same 45 nm manufacturing methods as Penryn. A working system with two Nehalem processors was shown at Intel Developer Forum Fall 2007,[5] and a large number of Nehalem systems were shown at Computex in June 2008.

The microarchitecture is named after the Nehalem Native American nation in Oregon.[citation needed] At that stage it was supposed to be the latest evolution of the NetBurst microarchitecture. Since the abandonment of NetBurst, the codename has been recycled and refers to a completely different project, although Nehalem still has some things in common with NetBurst. Nehalem-based microprocessors utilize higher clock speeds and are more energy-efficient than Penryn microprocessors. Hyper-Threading is reintroduced along with an L3 Cache missing from most Core-based microprocessors.

The first computer to use Nehalem-based Xeon processors was the Apple Inc. Mac Pro workstation announced on March 3, 2009.[6] Nehalem-based Xeon EX processors for larger servers are expected in Q4 2009.[7] Mobile Nehalem-based processors were introduced in September 2009.

Contents

[edit] Technology

Microarchitecture of the quad-core implementation

Various sources have stated the specifications of processors in the Nehalem family:

[edit] Performance and power improvements

It has been reported that Nehalem will have a focus on performance, which accounts for the increased core size.[12] Compared to Penryn, Nehalem will have:

  • 1.1x to 1.25x the single-threaded performance or 1.2x to 2x the multithreaded performance at the same power level
  • 30% lower power usage for the same performance
  • According to a preview from AnandTech "expect a 20–30% overall advantage over Penryn with a 10% increase in power usage. It looks like Intel is on track to delivering just that in Q4."[13]
  • Per Core, clock-for-clock, Nehalem will provide a 15–20% increase in performance compared to Penryn.[14]

PC Watch found that a Nehalem "Gainestown" processor has 1.6x the SPECint_rate2006 integer performance and 2.4x the SPECfp_rate_2006 floating-point performance of a 3.0 GHz Xeon X5365 "Clovertown" quad-core processor.[12]

A 2.93 GHz Nehalem "Bloomfield" system has been used to run a 3DMark Vantage benchmark and gave a CPU score of 17,966.[15] The 2.66 GHz variant scores 16,294. A 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo E6600 scores 4,300.[16]

AnandTech tested the Intel QuickPath Interconnect ("QPI", 4.8 GT/s version) and found the copy bandwidth using triple-channel 1066 MHz DDR3 was 12.0 GB/s. A 3.0 GHz Core 2 Quad system using dual-channel 1066 MHz DDR3 achieved 6.9 GB/s.[17]

Overclocking will be possible with Bloomfield processors and the X58 chipset. The Lynnfield processor will use a PCH removing the need for a northbridge chipset.[18]

The Nehalem processors are the first to incorporate the SSE 4.2 SIMD instructions, adding 7 new instructions to the SSE 4.1 set available in the Core 2 series.

[edit] Code names

Each combination of a Nehalem/Westmere processor die and package has both a separate codename and a product code. Typically, the same dies are used for uniprocessor (UP) and dual-processor (DP) servers, but using an extra QuickPath link for the inter-processor communication in the DP server variant. Where the Core microarchitecture used four different processor sockets, one for each market segment, Nehalem now uses Socket 1366 for the high-end of both UP and DP machines, and Socket 1156 for the low end UP machines. The name for the UP version of Gulftown is not yet known, its product code is 80613 and can be found in Intel's product database[19].

Mobile Desktop
UP Server
DP Server MP Server
Dual-Core 45 nm
Dual-Channel, PCIe, Graphics Core
Auburndale
canceled
Havendale
canceled
Dual-Core 32 nm
Dual-Channel, PCIe, Graphics Core
Arrandale
80617
Clarkdale
80616
Quad-Core 45 nm
Dual-Channel, PCIe
Clarksfield
80607
Lynnfield
80605
Jasper Forest
80612
Quad-Core 45 nm
Triple-Channel
Bloomfield
80601
Gainestown
80602
Six-Core 32 nm
Triple-Channel
Gulftown
80613
Gulftown
80614
Eight-Core 45 nm
Triple-Channel
Beckton
80604

[edit] Variants

These tables list all the processors of Nehalem microarchitecture to have been leaked so far. The table is ordered roughly by descending performance, which usually means descending price and power too. Released processors are set in bold.

Notes:

[edit] 45 nm processors

Codename Market Cores
(Threads)
Socket Brand Processor No. Clock rate Turbo TDP Interfaces L3 cache Release 1k Unit Price
Base Core Uncore Chipset Memory PCIe
Beckton MP Server 8 (16) LGA-1567 130/105/90 W 4x QPI 4x [DDR3 with SMB motherboard] n/a 24 MB Q1 2010[20]
Gainestown DP Server [21] 4 (8) LGA-1366 Xeon[22] W5580 133 MHz 3.2 GHz Yes 130 W 2x QPI 6.4 GT/s 3x DDR3-13331 n/a 8 MB March 29, 2009[23] $1500
X5570 2.93 GHz 95 W $1286
X5560 2.8 GHz $1072
X5550 2.66 GHz $858
E5540 2.53 GHz 80 W 2x 5.86 GT/s 3x DDR3-10661 $744
E5530 2.4 GHz $530
E5520 2.26 GHz $373
L5520 2.26 GHz 60 W $530
4 (4) E5506 2.13 GHz No 80 W 2x 4.8 GT/s 3x DDR3-8001 4 MB $266
E5504 2.0 GHz $224
L5506 2.13 GHz 60 W $423
2 (2) E5502 1.86 GHz 80 W $188
Bloomfield UP Server [24] 4 (8) LGA-1366 Xeon [25] W3580 133 MHz 3.33 GHz Yes 130 W 1x QPI 6.4 GT/s 3x DDR3-1333 n/a 8 MB August 9, 2009 $999
W3570 3.2 GHz March 29, 2009 [25] $999
W3550 3.06 GHz 1x QPI 4.8 GT/s 3x DDR3-1066 August 9, 2009 $562
W3540 2.93 GHz March 29, 2009 [25] $562
W3520 2.66 GHz $284
Lynnfield UP Server 4 (8) LGA 1156 Xeon X3470 133 MHz 2.93 GHz Yes 95 W DMI 2x DDR3-1333 8 MB September 8, 2009 $589
X3460 2.8 GHz $316
X3450 2.66 GHz $241
X3440 2.53 GHz $215
L3426 1.86 GHz 45 W $284
4 (4) X3430 2.4 GHz 95 W $189
Bloomfield Extreme/Performance Desktop [26] 4 (8) LGA-1366 Core i7 Extreme 975 [27] 133 MHz 3.33 GHz 2.66 GHz Yes 130 W 1x QPI 6.4 GT/s 3x DDR3-1066 n/a 8 MB May 31, 2009 $999
965 3.2 GHz November 17, 2008 $999
Core i7 960 [2] 3.2 GHz 1x QPI 4.8 GT/s October 20, 2009 $562
950 [27] 3.06 GHz 2.13 GHz May 31, 2009 $562
940 2.93 GHz November 17, 2008 $562
930 2.8 GHz Q1 2010 $284
920 2.66 GHz November 17, 2008 $284
Lynnfield Performance/Mainstream Desktop 4 (8) LGA 1156 Core i7 870 [28] 133 MHz 2.93 GHz 2.4 GHz Yes 95 W DMI 2x DDR3-1333 1x16 / 2x8 8 MB September 8, 2009 $562
860 2.8 GHz $284
860s 2.53 GHz 82 W Q1 2010 $337
4 (4) Core i5 750 [29] 2.66 GHz 2.13 GHz 95 W September 8, 2009 $196
750s 2.4 GHz 82 W Q1 2010 $259
Clarksfield Extreme/Performance Mobile 4 (8) mPGA-989 Core i7 Extreme 920XM 133 MHz 2.0 GHz Yes 55 W DMI 2x DDR3-1333 1x16 / 2x8 8 MB September 23, 2009 $1054
Core i7 820QM 1.73 GHz 45 W $546
720QM 1.6 GHz 6 MB $364
  • 1 Though there is only one memory controller and it has only three channels, Intel states the Gainestown processors have six memory channels. Gainestown processors have dual QPI links and have a separate set of memory registers for each link[30] so thereby, in effect, a multiplexed six channel system.

The Havendale and Auburndale variants (which contained Gilo and Ironlake) have been cancelled.[31]

[edit] 32 nm processors

Codename Market Cores
(Threads)
Socket Brand Processor No. Clock rate Turbo TDP Interfaces L3 cache Release 1k Unit Price
Base Core GPU Chipset Memory PCIe
Gulftown[32] Extreme/Performance Desktop 6 (12) LGA-1366 Core i7 980X 133 MHz 3.06 GHz n/a Yes 130 W 2x QPI 3x DDR3-1066 n/a 12 MB March, 2010 $999
Clarkdale[33] Mainstream/Value Desktop 2 (4) LGA-1156 Core i5 670 133 MHz 3.46 GHz 733 MHz Yes 73 W DMI 2x DDR3-1333 1 x16 4 MB January 2010 $284
661 3.33 GHz 900 MHz 87 W
660 733 MHz 73 W $196
650 3.2 GHz $176
Core i3 540 3.06 GHz No $143
530 2.93 GHz $123
2 (2) Pentium G6950 2.8 GHz 533 MHz 2x DDR3-1066 3 MB $87
Arrandale[34] Mainstream/Value Mobile 2 (4) mPGA-989 Core i7 620M 133 MHz 2.66 GHz 766 MHz Yes 35 W DMI 2x DDR3-1066 [3] 1 x16 4 MB Q3 2010[35] $332
640LM 2.13 GHz 566 MHz 25 W $332
620LM 2.0 GHz $305
640UM 1.2 GHz 500 MHz 18 W $305
620UM 1.06 GHz $278
Core i5 540M 2.53 GHz 766 MHz 35 W 3 MB $257
520M 2.4 GHz January 2010[36] $225
430M 2.26 GHz
Core i3 350M 2.26 GHz 667 MHz No 35W
330M 2.13 GHz 35W

For the desktop, Gulftown is to be an "Extreme Edition" CPU and so will coexist with Bloomfield. [4] It will have Turbo Boost and similar clock speeds to Bloomfield. [5]

Lynnfield and Clarksfield may make the 32 nm transition in the middle of 2010[34], sometime after Q2 [6], while Beckton will move to 32 nm at the end of 2010.[37] The 32 nm CPUs will not have significantly different clock speeds compared to 45 nm CPUs.[38]

Clarkdale and Arrandale contain the 32 nm dual core processor Hillel and the 45 nm integrated graphics device Ironlake, and support switchable graphics.[31][38][39] The lowest-power variant of Arrandale may have a 10 W CPU TDP, and a maximum clock speed of 1.6 GHz. [7]

A successor to Bloomfield and entry level server chips are also expected in Q2 2010.[31][34][37]

[edit] Westmere

Westmere (formerly Nehalem-C) is the name given to the 32 nm die shrink of Nehalem. Westmere should be ready for a Q4 2009 release provided that Intel stays on target with its roadmap. However, it appears that the bulk of Westmere's versions, excluding mobile versions, will be released sometime in Q1, 2010.[40][41] Westmere's features and improvements from Nehalem have been reported as follows:

  • Native six-core, and possibly dual-die hex-core (12-cores), processors.[42]
    • The successor to Bloomfield and Gainestown is six-core.
  • A new set of instructions that gives over 3x the encryption and decryption rate of Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) processes compared to before.[43]
    • Delivers seven new instructions that will be used by the AES algorithm. Also an instruction called PCLMULQDQ that will perform carry-less multiplication.[44] These instructions will allow the processor to perform hardware-accelerated encryption, not only resulting in faster execution but also protecting against software targeted attacks.
    • AES-NI may be included in the integrated graphics of Westmere.
  • Integrated graphics, released at the same time as the processor.
  • Improved virtualization latency.[45]
  • New virtualization capability: "VMX Unrestricted mode support" -- which allows 16-bit guests to run. (real mode and big real mode).

[edit] Successor

The successor to Nehalem and Westmere will be Sandy Bridge, scheduled for release in 2011, according to Intel roadmaps.[46] The successor to Sandy Bridge will be Haswell, scheduled for release in 2012. It will come with a new cache subsystem, a FMA (fused multiply-add) unit, and a vector coprocessor.[14]

Intel CPU core roadmaps from NetBurst to Sandy Bridge


[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ http://www.metacafe.com/watch/830178/i_am_nehalem/
  2. ^ Intel Corporation (2007-03-28). "http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20070328fact.htm". Press release. 
  3. ^ Gruener, Wolfgang (2008-08-10). "Nehalem = i7: Intel unveils new Core processor brand". TG Daily. http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/38818/135/. 
  4. ^ Hillis, Scott (2008-05-21). "Intel says Nehalem chips on track for '08 2nd half". Reuters. http://uk.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUKN2140939320080521. 
  5. ^ Lal Shimpi, Anand (2007-09-18). "IDF 2007 – Day 1: Nehalem, Intel's GPUs, 32nm and More". AnandTech. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3101&p=2. 
  6. ^ Crothers, Brooke (2009-03-03). "Apple beats Intel to Nehalem-EP chip launch". http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10187569-64.html. 
  7. ^ Morgan, Timothy (2009-02-10). "Intel confirms Nehalem Xeons imminent". http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/10/intel_confirms_nehalem_imminent/. 
  8. ^ Laird, Jeremy (2007-09-19). "IDF: Not all Intel Nehalem CPUs single-die". Tech.co.uk. http://www.tech.co.uk/computing/upgrades-and-peripherals/processors/news/idf-not-all-intel-nehalem-cpus-single-die?articleid=629416659. 
  9. ^ Laird, Jeremy (2007-07-19). "IDF: Intel reveals eight-core PC processor". TechRadar UK. http://www.tech.co.uk/computing/upgrades-and-peripherals/processors/news/idf-intel-reveals-eight-core-pc-processor?articleid=1878171680. 
  10. ^ a b Lal Shimpi (2008-03-17). "Opening the Kimono: Intel Details Nehalem and Tempts with Larrabee". AnandTech. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3264. 
  11. ^ Gelsinger, Patrick P. (2008-03-17). "Intel Architecture Press Briefing" (PDF). Intel. http://download.intel.com/pressroom/archive/reference/Gelsinger_briefing_0308.pdf. 
  12. ^ a b "Intel's dual teamed approached to micro-architecture development" (in Japanese). PC Watch. 2008-01-29. http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2008/0129/kaigai412.htm. 
  13. ^ Lal Shimpi, Anand (2008-06-05). "The Nehalem Preview: Intel Does It Again". AnandTech. http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3326&p=9. 
  14. ^ a b Doc Teraboule (2008-04-08). "IDF 2008 Shanghaï – From Nehalem to Haswell" (in French). Canard PC. http://www.canardplus.com/dossier-35-200-Processeur_de_Nehalem_a_Haswell.html. Retrieved 2009-03-01. 
  15. ^ Nguyen, Tuan (2008-07-09). "'Nehalem' 2.93 GHz Benches Revealed". Tom's Hardware. http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/intel-nehalem-core,news-28701.html. 
  16. ^ "Intel Bloomfield 2.66 GHz: First Comprehensive Evaluation". techPowerUp!. 2008-07-09. http://www.techpowerup.com/?65297. 
  17. ^ "Intel does it again". AnandTech. 2008-06-05. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3326&p=5. 
  18. ^ Botezatu, Bogdan (2008-04-22). "Intel: No Overclocking for Mainstream Nehalems". Softpedia. http://news.softpedia.com/news/Intel-No-Overclocking-for-Mainstream-Nehalems-84019.shtml. 
  19. ^ http://intelmdds.pcnalert.com/MDDS/MddsView.aspx
  20. ^ Nebojsa Novakovic (2009-02-12). "Intel's next bunch of fun CPUs moves to 2010". CNN International. http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/opinion/976/1050976/intel-bunch-fun-cpus-moves-2010. Retrieved 2009-03-01. 
  21. ^ "Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series Product brief, (Document Number: 321579-001US)". Intel. 2009-04-01. http://download.intel.com/products/processor/xeon/dc55kprodbrief.pdf. Retrieved 2009-04-10. 
  22. ^ "Core i7 to make leap to Xeon in early 2009". Legacy.macnn.com. http://legacy.macnn.com/articles/08/11/13/xeon.i7.in.early.2009/. Retrieved 2008-11-24. 
  23. ^ Fuad Abazovic (2009-01-28). "Nehalem based Xeon comes Mar 29th". Fudzilla.com. http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11717&Itemid=1. Retrieved 2009-01-28. 
  24. ^ "Intel Xeon Processor 3500 Series". Intel. 2009-04-01. http://www.intel.com/cd/channel/reseller/asmo-na/eng/products/server/processors/3500/feature/index.htm. Retrieved 2009-04-10. 
  25. ^ a b c Teglet, Traian (2008-11-13). "Intel to Add New Nehalem Xeon Processor". softpedia. http://news.softpedia.com/news/Intel-to-Add-New-Nehalem-Xeon-Processors-97856.shtml. Retrieved 2008-11-13. 
  26. ^ "Intel Core i7 Processor Extreme Datasheet, Volume 2, (Document Number: 320835-002)". Intel. 2008-11-01. http://download.intel.com/design/processor/datashts/320835.pdf. Retrieved 2009-03-24. 
  27. ^ a b Worrel, Jon (2009-02-09). "Core i7 950 and 975 to replace 940 and 965". Fudzilla. http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11906&Itemid=1. Retrieved 2009-02-10. 
  28. ^ "Intel Core i5-750". AnandTech. 2009-06-17. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3585. 
  29. ^ "Intel Quietly Announces Core i5". Xtreview. 2009-06-26. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3585. 
  30. ^ "Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series Datasheet Volume 2". Intel. March 2009. http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/datasheet/321322.pdf. Retrieved 2009-05-01. 
  31. ^ a b c Jansen, Ng (2009-02-10). "Intel Replaces "Havendale" and "Auburndale" With 32nm Die Shrinks". DailyTech. http://www.dailytech.com/Intel+Replaces+Havendale+and+Auburndale+With+32nm+Die+Shrinks/article14225.htm. Retrieved 2009-03-01. 
  32. ^ http://occlub.ru/hardware-news/325-intel-core-i7-980x
  33. ^ "Intel Clarkdale Processor". XTREVIEW. 2009-02-09. http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7818-view-Intel-clarkdale-processor.html. Retrieved 2009-03-01. 
  34. ^ a b c Ng, Jansen (10 February 2009). ""Gulftown" is the Flagship of 32nm "Westmere" Line". DailyTech. http://www.dailytech.com/Gulftown+is+the+Flagship+of+32nm+Westmere+Line/article14227.htm. Retrieved 2009-02-10. 
  35. ^ http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20091113PD209.html
  36. ^ http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20091113PD209.html
  37. ^ a b Ng, Jansen (2009-02-10). "Intel Aims for Efficiency With New Server Roadmap". DailyTech. http://www.dailytech.com/Intel+Aims+for+Efficiency+With+New+Server+Roadmap/article14224.htm. Retrieved 2009-03-01. 
  38. ^ a b Bell, Brandon (2009-02-10). "Intel CPU Roadmap 2009–2010". FS Media, Inc. http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/intel_32nm_westmere_roadmap/page2.asp. Retrieved 2009-03-01. 
  39. ^ "CPU list". http://www.hwinfo.sk/Lists/cpu.htm. 
  40. ^ http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2008/0326/kaigai02.pdf
  41. ^ "VISIO-Intel_CPU_Road Map_.vsd" (PDF). http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2008/0321/kaigai_10.pdf. Retrieved 2008-11-24. 
  42. ^ [1]
  43. ^ Smalley, Tim (2007-09-19). "Westmere is Nehalem's successor". bit-tech.net. http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2007/09/19/westmere_is_nehalem_successor/1. 
  44. ^ "Carry-Less Multiplication and Its Usage for Computing The GCM Mode – Intel Software Network". 2008-04-11. http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/carry-less-multiplication-and-its-usage-for-computing-the-gcm-mode. Retrieved 2009-03-01. 
  45. ^ Fuad Abazovic (2008-09-16). "Westmere 32nm to improve Nehalem features". Fudzilla.com. http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9448&Itemid=1. Retrieved 2009-03-01. 
  46. ^ "The Intel Tick-Tock Model of Architecture & Silicon Cadence". Intel Corporation. http://www.intel.com/technology/tick-tock/index.htm. 

[edit] External links