Rubidium-82 chloride

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EmausBot (talk | contribs) at 06:37, 22 March 2013 (Bot: Migrating 1 langlinks, now provided by Wikidata on d:Q7376097). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rubidium-82 chloride
Names
IUPAC name
Rubidium-82 chloride
Systematic IUPAC name
(82Rb)Rubidium chloride
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
ChemSpider
KEGG
  • InChI=1S/ClH.Rb/h1H;/q;+1/p-1/i;1-3 checkY
    Key: FGDZQCVHDSGLHJ-RYDPDVNUSA-M checkY
  • [Cl-].[82Rb+]
Properties
ClRb
Molar mass 117.371 g mol-1
Related compounds
Other cations
Caesium chloride

Lithium chloride
Potassium chloride
Rubidium chloride
Sodium chloride

Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).

Rubidium-82 chloride is a form of rubidium chloride using a radioactive isotope of rubidium. It is marketed under the brand name Cardiogen-82 (Bracco Diagnostics) in the use of Myocardial perfusion imaging (imaging of the heart).[1] It is rapidly taken up by heart muscle cells, and therefore can be used to identify regions of heart muscle that are receiving poor blood flow in a technique called PET perfusion imaging.[2] The half-life of the rubidium 82 is only 1.27 minutes; it is normally produced at the place of use by rubidium generators.[3]

References

  1. ^ Th Wackers, Frans J; Bruni, Wendy; Zaret, Barry L (2007-11-19). "Rubidium-82 Generator". Nuclear cardiology: the basics : how to set up and maintain a laboratory. ISBN 978-1-58829-924-6.
  2. ^ Ballinger, James R. (2009). "Integrating Cardiology for Nuclear Medicine Physicians": 379. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78674-0_32. ISBN 978-3-540-78673-3. {{cite journal}}: |chapter= ignored (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. ^ K. L. Gould et al. "Clinical feasibility of positron cardiac imaging without a cyclotron using generator-produced rubidium-82." Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1986;7:775-789. [1]

Further reading