User talk:216.81.81.83

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Friends, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Xionbox 11:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

June 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pro Wrestling Illustrated awards. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Papacha (talk) 19:52, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2012[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

  • FYI, contrary to your claim, there is NO discussion at Talk:S. Truett Cathy that supports removing attribution from the opinion that S. Truett Cathy supports anti-gay causes. There has been consensus in support of using the term itself. Be advised, this is a BLP violation. Belchfire-TALK 18:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your edit here to revert the rabid dog blanket deleting my work. It's probably best to leave it be for now since Arzel will just happily launch an edit war over it. Thanks again. See ya later, gator. Cowicide (talk) 02:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm TheIrishWarden. I noticed that you recently removed some content from David V. Aguilar without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 20:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to David V. Aguilar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 20:14, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013[edit]

Your recent editing history at David V. Aguilar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Your edits to Lankhmar[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Lankhmar with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Petrb (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)