User talk:Basshead69

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Basshead69, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to do lots more. Some useful pages to visit are:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 16:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC).

April 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Jeraphine Gryphon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Trinity Mirror because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 09:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Jeraphine Gryphon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Birmingham Mail, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please refrain from adding sensationalistic unsourced content, especially to the top of the article. This is an encyclopedia we're running here. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 12:47, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Birmingham Mail. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't try to use Wikipedia for advocacy, you can't just post unsourced controversial information at the top of an article because you imagine that it's super important. Please do not reinstate that edit again, and if you do then add it in neural language and provide a reliable independent source and put in an appropriate part in the article i.e. not the top. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:47, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Birmingham Mail has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Birmingham Mail was changed by Basshead69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880092 on 2015-05-04T16:44:06+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. kelapstick^(bainuu) 16:54, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Birmingham Mail. Did you not get the hint last time? — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources are required for the kind of statements you're making. Do you understand what a source is? Like a link or something. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're clearly not listening at all. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 19:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to use wikipedia as a soapbox despite numerous warnings, and no attempts to discuss the issue or present sources for your claims. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Abecedare (talk) 19:52, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]