User talk:DZwarrior1

Possibly unfree File:Logo FC Internazionale Milano.svg.png[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo FC Internazionale Milano.svg.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:56, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Inter Milan.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Inter Milan.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright images on football kits[edit]

As stated in Template:Football kit, club badges, sponsor logos, and manufacturer logos should never be included in kits. Wikipedia EN has a strict policy on copyright images. Please do not included them. LRD 14:59, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Talk:Inter Milan, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 15:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at List of Inter Milan players, you may be blocked from editing. Fenix down (talk) 10:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Inter Milan.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Inter Milan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2018–19 Inter Milan season. Giant Snowman 07:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SSC Napoli[edit]

Please don't move any controversial move yourself. The club's WP:Commonname is Napoli, using Italian spelling as a proper noun, not your alleged S.S.C. Naples. Matthew_hk t c 06:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 10:28, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SPAL[edit]

I had a message and sort of warning to you in Talk:S.P.A.L.. Matthew_hk t c 01:47, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liverpool FC.svg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:AtalantaBC.svg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Udinese calcio.png[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RM[edit]

Please start RM for any Inter Milan article, including Inter Milan Youth Sector. BTW see the wall of RM in the top of talk page ? Matthew hk (talk) 02:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again, we use common name not official name, please start RM your proposed Inter Elite Academy which for unknown reason dropping the word Milan. Even the club call the section as "Elite Academy" as official name, it is not a common name (yet?). Matthew hk (talk) 14:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Matthew hk (talk) 12:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Are you there? You are risking an indefinite block from editing and you just bold move ACF Fiorentina??? Matthew hk (talk) 13:19, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to ACF Fiorentina, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at ACF Fiorentina. Please provide reliable source for the alleged full name. BTW it was long determined that there is no such full name of the club. See Talk:ACF Fiorentina/Archive 1#Associazione Calcio Fiorentina, i doubt you can find any source for that. It is a wrong name that may be worth as unprintworthy redirect, but not as WP:article titles Matthew hk (talk) 13:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Above two additional warnings were for Special:Diff/887079401. Matthew hk (talk) 13:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 13:32, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked you indef since you apparently learned nothing from the previousl block and failes to engage into communication about your edits. If you want to be unblocked, you now need to post an unblock request as detailed above and convince an unblocked administrator that the block is not needed anymore.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:29, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DZwarrior1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock my account, i wasn't informed well about the rules in the past but recently i've read too much and i won't repeat the same mistakes

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:33, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DZwarrior1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock my account, i wasn't informed well about the rules of wikipedia in the past but recently i've read too much and i won't repeat the same mistakes made in the past,thanks. DZwarrior1 (talk) 18:42, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've made progress, but I don't yet feel comfortable in unblocking you. You will need to give a more detailed explanation than merely stating that you understand, so others are assured that you actually do understand. I must decline your request. 331dot (talk) 11:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What mistakes did you make, and what steps will you take to change in the future? You can't be unblocked until you can adequately answer those questions. 331dot (talk) 19:04, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

block reason[edit]

i was blocked because i failed to engage into communication about my edits, that was the reason they sent me, but now i've learned about discussion and talk pages and before any big change i should go there to see before changing. DZwarrior1 (talk) 01:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's part of it. Do you also understand WP:COMMONNAME and requirements for reliable sources? No need to create a new section, just edit this section to answer. 331dot (talk) 09:41, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is simple. Start WP:RM for any move that potentially controversial. Except typo, actually many move are potentially controversial. Matthew hk (talk) 14:24, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yes, i understand this very well, thanks for these clarifications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DZwarrior1 (talk • contribs) 2019-08-20T18:09:12 (UTC)

In my line of work if have "teach back". It goes something like, "just so we know we have the same understanding, please tell us what this means in your own words".-- Dloh cier ekim 11:18, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair. He need to be teach to the basic when he was blocked also in it-wiki and wikidata. And for any unblock attempt, i would say due to this he need to explain more in order to eligible to any standard offer. Matthew hk (talk) 13:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yes now i understand WP:COMMONNAME very well for example on wikipedia we can use the common name of things not necessarily the official name like for example: Inter Milan and not FC Internazionale Milano or Bill Clinton and not William Jefferson Clinton etc. and about reliable sources also i learned that i need to put a reliable sources and that sources on Wikipedia refer to 3 things: The piece of a defined work, The creator of the Work and The publisher of the work. DZwarrior1 (talk) 18:40, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DZwarrior1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, i request you to kindly do the needful concerning my block, just wanted to tell you that now i understand WP:COMMONNAME very well for example on wikipedia we can use the common name of things not necessarily the official name like for example: Inter Milan and not FC Internazionale Milano or Bill Clinton and not William Jefferson Clinton etc. and about reliable sources also i learned that i need to put a reliable sources and that sources on Wikipedia refer to 3 things: The piece of a defined work, The creator of the Work and The publisher of the work and they are necessary in making any topic otherwise the article won't have any value. DZwarrior1 (talk) 10:44, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Although you've been asked to explain about WP:RS, you have so far not done so. It's unclear (because you haven't explained) whether you understand what makes a source reliable. Yamla (talk) 11:06, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.