User talk:Darrentzw

Welcome!

Hello, Darrentzw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Find the rest of the Singapore community![edit]

Yeap, you can find us in these pages:

Do leave your name at the notice board, and thanks again for making wikipedia your online abode! ;) — Kimchi.sg | Talk 07:05, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions do not assert the notability of their subjects and have been reverted or removed. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Nsevs 02:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. JHMM13 (T | C) 06:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Read guidelines to write articles[edit]

Please read the guidelines how to write and edit an article as posted on your welcome note. Do not copy everything from what you find, and wikify articles. Also, please add edit summaries in your edits. Could you post your article creations on the SGpedians' notice board. Do leave your name leave us and consider adding yourself into this category. --Terence Ong ^Talk 16:11, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling of Terence[edit]

There are many spellings of Terence. Terence Cao is not Terrance Cao as in MediaCorp's website. Spell the name officially, not to what you wish. This is an encyclopedia. --Terence Ong ^Talk 05:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ter e nc e Ong 04:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you discuss[edit]

Could you discuss topics to be added into Singapore article, before adding information in it. I have reverted your edit on that, please cooperate. --Ter e nc e Ong 16:08, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, please take a moment to review[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that a number of your recent edits had been reverted by other editors and wanted to give you a heads up on why that might be happening.

Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia (as explained at Wikipedia:Introduction), and so anyone may edit its articles. Its policy, nonetheless, is that articles must be written from a Neutral Point of View, representing all majority and significant-minority views fairly and without bias, as is discussed extensively at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Part of maintaining that tone is making sure that information we use in our articles is verifiable, as discussed at Wikipedia:Verifiability. In order to do so, we request that participants cite their sources when adding or changing information; you can find more information on how to do so at Wikipedia:Citing sources.

I noticed that some of the editors have already contacted you here on your Talk page. Its important to listen to their concerns; they're trying to give you some tips on the policies and procedures that Wikipedia uses and keep you from running afoul of our system. If there's anything I can help explain or any questions you have, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. Happy editing! .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 16:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions are rather fine, but the repetition of information on the main article of Singapore is not needed. For example, you added the population density in the Demographics section (which is actually in the infobox). Also, you wrote a section about education which is actually not needed in the main article and one could look at Education in Singapore. If you have any help contact my talk page. Many of your edits are from your POV (Point of View). I hope that you read the policies and discuss on the talk page. --Ter e nc e Ong 16:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Singapore skyline.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading images Image:Singapore skyline.jpg, Image:Sg fireworks.jpg and Image:Sg skyline.jpg. However, the images may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Elle _{vécut heureuse} ^{à jamais} (Be eudaimonic!) 15:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same image as a 200x100cm poster, with small text mentioning that the image is copyrighted. 19:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Biren.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Biren.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Biren.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded, Image:Biren.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Also, please do not add {{sprotected}} notices to pages that have not been protected. --Alan Au 23:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Bds.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bds.gif. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:04, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Aileen.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aileen.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism notice[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Aileen Tan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ter e nc e Ong 11:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Hbr69.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hbr69.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Also, the image has a very obvious watermark, which indicates a probable copyright violation. --Alan Au 18:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Singapore 7.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Singapore 7.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not take away the pictures[edit]

I notice that some editors have been taking away the pictures in Singapore. Please do nt do that. Thanks.

Next thing is that some editors have been putting Huang Biren's birth year in Huang Biren page. Huang Biren said she does not want anyone to know her age. Thanks

No, I can't promise you! There are too many photos on the topic of Singapore. Why did you put so many photos over there? Anyway! I will remove them all if you put them again. 70.52.67.214 05:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about Hong Kong, but I only feel interested in Singaporean topics. You put too many fotos and hurt the layout. 70.52.67.214 07:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so! Singapore is very popular and many people know what Singapore looks like. Youu worried too much! 70.52.67.214 07:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

again, you are too sensitive! you worried too much! Singapore is much better than any other countries in Asia. 70.52.67.214 07:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't put too many photos, let keep Singapore a bit of mystery. If you put too many photos, nobody would like to come because they have already seen your photos. 70.52.67.214 07:25, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore is a very very small outcrop, not much better than Holy see, don't you think we are doing "hard sell"? And it is too hot like hell as well, I think that you had better improve the content of Singapore's topic rather than put photos over there, what do you think?70.52.67.214 07:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Top_pic_huang.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Top_pic_huang.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Star Awards[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Star Awards, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Awards. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --Lijnema 15:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC) --Lijnema 15:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I won't decide whether the article gets deleted or not. Someone else will, and it will be based on the voting. Looking at the votes right now, I don't think you need to worry about the article getting deleted. --Lijnema 12:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signing posts[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --Lijnema 12:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

all your edits to mediacorp drama serials[edit]

first, your efforts in creating new articles on the above subject matter is noted. however, please be mindful of the proper wp formatting style, including grammar and point of view. thank youChensiyuan 04:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Million Treasures[edit]

Goh wz has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Thank you for your continued contributions to Wikipedia on matters related to Singapore and its television scene! Goh wz 16:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

On another note, I have found that your version of A Million Treasures, an article you recently created, contains instructions for the readers to view the show. It reads, "Audience who are not in Singapore and/or are interested to watch the show again may go to Youtube and type A Million Tresures on the search engine, where the videos can be found. Viewers could also subscribe to MobTV."

I would like to alert you to WP:NOT, an official policy on Wikipedia. By its being a policy, it is implied that "it has wide acceptance among editors and is considered a standard that all users should follow." Specifically, WP:NOT#IINFO states, "While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places, and things, Wikipedia articles should not include instructions or advice (legal, medical, or otherwise), suggestions, or contain 'how-to's."

A statement that would read like it fits Wikipedia would probably go, "In addition to its being broadcast on the free-to-air channel Channel 8, episodes of the show have also been uploaded onto YouTube. It is also available to the subscribers of MobTV." Of course, this information must not belong to a section by itself, so as not to run afoul of WP:NOT#IINFO. The information must also be cited as per WP:V.

It also seems from an online tool that you wrote an edit summary only for 1% of your last 150 major edits. Edit summaries make it convenient for editors to tell what you changed in pages, and is reflected in very many areas throughout Wikipedia. Please help the rest of the editors by filling in your edit summaries.

For any other questions, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page, at Wikipedia_talk:SGpedians'_notice_board or at Wikipedia:Help_desk. —Goh wz 16:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Next time you add an image...[edit]

make sure it's not replacing a pre-existing one. --DrBat 20:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:250px-Zgd.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:250px-Zgd.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Biren111.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Biren111.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CLP1965.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:CLP1965.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Biren2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Biren2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think that image can be deleted already. Because I think it is of no use now. Thanks. fatty 12:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Marsvsvenus.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Marsvsvenus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Picture+192.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Picture+192.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:37, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

crunchy[edit]

Hi, don't put video link that is a copyright infringement on wiki, especially when is a us based web site, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sorbetsu (talk • contribs) 22:21, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:HBR2006.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HBR2006.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ohconfucius 08:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:The Peak1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Peak1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The-peak1.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The-peak1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Switched mdc.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Switched mdc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HEA.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HEA.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TGLOA.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TGLOA.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bigphoto01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bigphoto01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:B undisclosed.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:B undisclosed.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bbfnb.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bbfnb.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1108pen10.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:1108pen10.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 09:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:31a.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:31a.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:24, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:31a.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:31a.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 02:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:266.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:266.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Future SG skyline.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Future SG skyline.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mars vs Venus.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mars vs Venus.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LIS.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:LIS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shisanbian2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shisanbian2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pojianerchu.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pojianerchu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lolmcs.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lolmcs.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tkps.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tkps.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:House-of-joy-2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:House-of-joy-2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Darrentzw! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Chew Chor Meng - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Xiang Yun - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MVV screenshot.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MVV screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:17, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucky charm.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lucky charm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:H&P.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:H&P.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of MediaCorp Chinese series (2006)[edit]

The article List of MediaCorp Chinese series (2006) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a schedule for airing, and the need for this page does not appear to be necessary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 18:42, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mvvending.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mvvending.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mars04.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mars04.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:59, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:MVV screenshot.jpg 2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MVV screenshot.jpg 2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Telok Kurau Primary School for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Telok Kurau Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telok Kurau Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 20:50, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tvagrant.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tvagrant.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of You Are the One (Singaporean TV series)[edit]

The article You Are the One (Singaporean TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:Notability, lack of independent sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 01:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Through It All[edit]

The article Through It All has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since its creation - fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ukexpat (talk) 12:48, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bconnection.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bconnection.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Hotel (Singaporean TV series)[edit]

The article The Hotel (Singaporean TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, undersourced television show has been tagged as needing additional references for twelve years fails both WP:GNG and WP:NTV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aspects (talk) 21:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]