User talk:Jim1138/Archive 61

Archive 55

←

Archive 59

Archive 60

Archive 61

Archive 62

Changes to Deshpande wikipedia page

I am the son of Peter Brackett, I personally know Deshpande from the age of 5. The statements that I've made are true, I have personally witnessed these facts. Were it not for my father, Deshpande would never have had such success. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve Brackett (talk • contribs) 07:15, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Jim, should I create a page for Peter Brackett and use it as a reference? How is one to publish events they have witnessed. This is first hand knowledge, not interpretations of media articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve Brackett (talk • contribs) 07:39, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

@Steve Brackett: A wp:selfpublished website, blog, video, book, article, etc., is not WP:RS. Use an RS. Give the lack of sources, perhaps it shouldn't be added to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 07:46, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Ilaro Court

Hello Jim,

The challenge with sourcing within the article is difficult since all the information about Ilaro Court is in hard copy at one of my country's newspapers as well as a book I have in my possession, so any referencing within the article would not be beneficial since the persons visiting would not be able to access the original document in any case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeA7772 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Cheers, —PaleoNeonate – 09:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt and PaleoNeonate: Thank you! It's been ten years! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

That's close! - Sorry that I noticed only so much later. - I received my award a year and a day after joining ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:26, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: I know, you just want me not to feel too old! Jim1138 (talk) 17:33, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Congrats ten years ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (alt) (talk to me) 01:04, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day

Hey, Jim1138. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Kpgjhpjm 01:59, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

User talk:73.102.218.240

Per WP:BLANKING, the IP should not remove the shared IP template. No excuse for him :) ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 09:27, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello

As a regular user of Wikipedia you are aware that users are not to remove other user’s comments or alter them so please refrain from your vandalism on Talk:The Big Bang Theory and respect the rules Talk:The Big Bang Theory is not your personal talk page and therefore gives you no right to remove another person’s comments, despite if you think they are personal attacks or not. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.33.13.52 (talk) 09:57, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Replied on editor's talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 10:04, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

ygm

~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 11:08, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Notfication That You Have Been Reported.

Please see here if you would like to make any comments on the report. 69.36.183.89 (talk) 11:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

IP blocked ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 12:07, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Information about the website

Kindly unblock the jamestomess because he is not a spammer he is just pulled and fill the archeived links with different links and also do help for the wikipedia but you were blacklisted on it kindly review once again here is there report kindly review this 21:53:37, Mon Aug 06, 2018 - Jamestomess - UserReport — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.165.231.8 (talk) 05:19, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

jamestomess (talk · contribs) at this time has never been blocked. Jim1138 (talk) 06:30, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't know what report you are referring to. Jim1138 (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

The domain jamestomess was spamming was indeed blacklisted globally by an administrator because of persistent cross-wiki spam. —PaleoNeonate – 07:31, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

More information: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spam/LinkReports/skncosmetics.com. If you wish to request that it be removed from the blacklist (I doubt it would succeed), you can try at [1]. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 07:37, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

@PaleoNeonate: Wow! They have been trying hard to get skncosmetics.com wp:blacklisted! Jim1138 (talk) 07:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Seems so. —PaleoNeonate – 07:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Small edit to domestic violence article.

I made the change to the sentence of Bancroft citing research in his book. The version of that book that I have has no citations at all so it seems more accurate to state that "Bancroft claims research exists" instead of "Bancroft cites..." when he, in fact, doesn't cite any research. Has this changed in newer a version of the book? 2601:404:CF80:1BC4:7820:6C:F0F2:9E4 (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your wording completely changes the meaning of the sentence. That sentence has been there for quite some time; at least four years. It is more likely that the citation is simply not complete. A {{Page needed}} would seem more appropriate. Jim1138 (talk) 15:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your contributions to the color list discussions and actions.

FYI, I'm keeping track of the colors removed as part of this at: Talk:List_of_colors/Colors_removed

Just in case we need a record for any reason. I added three you removed yesterday to that list.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:17, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

-

Man, I hope I'm putting this in the right place - Cleveland Tx page edit

@Jim1138: 

To save me rewriting maybe thousands of words on this, please see this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cleveland,_Texas#2011_rape

The entire discussion is here as well as some kind of poll(?). In short, when compared to wiki pages on other cities in the U.S., it appears there is some type of vendetta against a small city near Houston, Tx concerning a seven-year old breaking news event. Please note my comment comparing the wiki notation on a mass murder event in Chicago,IL history to what appears in the Cleveland, TX wiki page. LazLong Sr (talk) 09:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC) +++++++++++++++++++

Thank you Jim1138 for your help, and forgive my ignorance in failure to use "edit summery." I know you have more important things to do than this, so thank you for your time as well as helping me through your expertise. LazLong Sr (talk) 10:04, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	People make errors - it's what we ALL have in common. The way one corrects another can make them either listen or "bow up" (to use the vernacular). Just a thanks for providing more help to me in the last couple of hours, than I've received from others over a period of weeks. LazLong Sr (talk) 10:40, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

sorry its by mistake

I am unable to login now due to net work problem...how can i proceed editing ?

Actually my user id is user:Bonagongura . (106.77.179.116 (talk) 09:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC))

You can edit as an anonymous IP. Bonagongura (talk · contribs) is not registered. Maybe you forgot your user name and are logging in with the wrong account? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:14, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jim1138, this IP is Nsmutte, as is the account Bonagongura. --bonadea contributions talk 12:26, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Product Environmental Footprint

Hi Jim1138,

a few months ago we created this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_Environmental_Footprint.

I work for thinkstep AG and we are heavily involved in the product environmental footprint topic. Unfortunately we created this page without the permission of our partner that we are working together with in the field of product environmental footprints. They want us to take down the page asap.

Is there any way this page can be taken down? This is really urgent and is affecting the relationship with our partner negatively.

Best regards,

Rafael — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rafael.ibrahimi (talk • contribs) 14:40, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

@Drmies: Opinions? Should it / can it be taken down? Product Environmental Footprint (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Rafael.ibrahimi (talk · contribs) is its recent page creator, but not the only significant contributor. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

@Rafael.ibrahimi: No replies. I would suggest you add your request and reasoning to talk:Product Environmental Footprint. See help:talk pages and wp:talk page guidelines. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Wayne Carey

Although I'm unsure about the exact spelling, I can categorically tell you that Carey's middle name is Francis - he himself confirmed so when asked on Triple M Radio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.147.211.5 (talk) 01:04, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Content, especially with wp:biographies of living persons must be wp:verifiable. To do so, wp:cite a wp:reliable source for significant content. See help:referencing for beginners. I have no idea how to verify what you stated above. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 02:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

No worries Jim. Yeah, that's what makes this particular editing scenario difficult isn't it? Being unable to verify what Carey said on radio. Personally, I'd make the edit by putting a citation template next to Carey's name at the top of the page, but that's just me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.147.211.5 (talk) 07:45, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Unless you can find an RS that others would agree on, it's probably best left out. I imagine there are a lot of middle names missing. Many people are probably glad they are. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:51, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

When I Found You (Jasmine Rae song)

I am trying to correct factual mistakes re When I Found You (Jasmine Rae song). Please kelp me stop these being reverted back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JRFangirl2018 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

@JRFangirl2018: I strongly suggest you do it by discussing the issue(s) on talk:When I Found You (Jasmine Rae song). See help:talk pages, wp:talk page guidelines, and wp:dispute resolution. Remember to wp:cite wp:reliable sources If you keep reverting you will likely find yourself wp:blocked. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for reverting and protecting enwiki from Vandalism PATH SLOPU (Talk) 09:45, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Dudley O'Shaughnessy

Hello,

I had changed something on Dudley O'Shaughnessy's page, I had added that the name of (Lil_saint) was from Myth of Soma,

The fact that he was known as lil_saint is via the computer game "myth of soma" I was updating where he was known as lil_saint from, unfortunately, I cannot provide the source but if you are able to locate the source with which he is called Lil_saint you will see that it is from Myth of Soma — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.98.55.128 (talk) 13:04, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Please see WP:BURDEN, which explains that it is your responsibility to locate and cite reliable sources for any content you wish to add to an article. General Ization ^Talk 13:07, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

General Ization is correct. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 19:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

24 (season 7) edits

Hello Jim! I just wanted to let you know about the edits I made on 24 (season 7). Two of the edits were corrections to the plot line of the story, and a third was a clarification. I'll leave your reverts alone because It's not a big deal to me if those plot errors stay there but I just wanted to let you know that I personally do believe the edits were constructive for this reason. 67.1.122.245 (talk) 20:58, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

My apology. I misunderstood your edit. I undid my revert. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:26, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

No problem! thanks! :-) 67.1.122.245 (talk) 06:29, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Turtlewong's problem editing behavior

@Jim1138: the editor Turtlewong seems to write major changes on his sandbox and then just posts those major changes into articles. Anyone who disagrees with one of his changes ends up having to revert which creates a situation of an edit war. Please help with this problem editor.ThanksPushkinalex (talk) 08:37, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

I just found this editor changing sourced information at Woldemichael Solomon. Not a good source, but correct and I've replaced it with an academic one. This edit[2] seems to contradict the source. Also look at this split notice[3] pushing the argument into the article page. There's also a comment in the argument for the split at Talk:Tigrayans#Split: Biher Tigrinya and Tigrayans that suggests anyone who disagrees may not be being honest. Doug Weller talk 12:36, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Pushpinalex blocked as a sock. Doug Weller talk 18:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

John Wick: Parabellum

Title is John Wick 3: Parabellum per RT.--Let There Be Sunshine 10:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

@Let There Be Sunshine: I was sure it was sans 3 when I moved it... {{db-move}} added to John Wick 3: Parabellum. Thanks for the note! Jim1138 (talk) 12:55, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Kuttanad

Hello, I have noticed a recent edit by you in the page Kuttanad, which has removed some contents. I am adding a reference to authenticate what was written there. I hope you will review it and based on which you will revert the edit.http://www.irtcbsf.com/great-leader Thanks Kuttanadan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuttanad Heritage (talk • contribs) 14:17, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Any ideas

about this edit? Thanks:-)∯WBG^converse 13:23, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

That was interesting. I think what happened is that only the last edit showed up on Huggle as the other two were in March 2018. As I only saw the one edit removing the content added in March, I reverted as "unexplained removal". As there was one character difference - a new line, Huggle went ahead and reverted. I left a welcome and an apology on the editor's talk page. Thank you very much for bringing this to my attention. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Majik Ninja Entertainment. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:52, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

San Diego Wikimedians User Group October 2018 meetup invitation

Who: All members of the public

What: Filipino American History Month-themed Edit a thon in Mira Mesa, San Diego.

When: Sunday 7 October 2018, 1:00PM PST / 1300 until 3:00PM PST / 1500

Where: Mira Mesa Branch Library

Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )

Your host: RightCowLeftCoast (talk · contribs)

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to limited space available.

(Delivered: 01:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)

Hurricane Grace

I was looking at the Hurricane Grace article and comparing it to the Spoken file (which I recorded) and noticed that the fatalities were changed by user TanyaR11. Revision history indicates that you reverted this user's changes but I still see them and I don't see a source for the fatalities. Did I miss something? PopularOutcast ^talk2me 23:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

@PopularOutcast: At the bottom of Hurricane Grace#Preparations and impact, the loss of the Andrea Gail and her six crew is mentioned. Not sure if it would be considered the same storm. So, I'll leave it up to you. Perhaps start a discussion on talk:Hurricane Grace? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Okay, sorry, I didn't see that and the reference doesn't link. I, personally, would not consider those the same storm. I will add to the talk page as you suggested. Thank you. PopularOutcast ^talk2me 02:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

IP address, 202.52.36.61 Please not this address has been hacked. No edits should ever come from this address, sorry for any unauthorised edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.52.36.61 (talk) 18:00, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

your deletion of my addition to the Hindu astrology testing section

I have opened a talk page concerning your deletion of my addition to the Hindu astrology testing section Kahouna Dreaming (talk) 18:34, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

hindu astrology

I have not seen your reply to my comments about testing section of the hindu astrology page.The section is unbalanced; not every one shares your skeptic stance. There are many national associations of vedic astrology. they are composed of dedicated researchers into the subject of Jyotish. Many of these people have high academic qualifications (i.e. David Frawley, Dennis Flaherty .Ronnie Gale Dreyer Gary Gomes,Karina Weil,Dennis M. Harness. I could continue... These are just a small sample. This subject (Jyotish) with its vedic traditions should be treated more respectfully and not dismissed, with no counter argument, by an author who probably has little or no interest in and probably not much knowledge of the subject (after all why would you bother researching a subject which you consider worthless!) The so called RS source which you quote in your 27 astrologers article would not meet any scientific criterion of a valid test. Over half of the astrologers used were amateurs (hobbyists as described ) the children used in the experiment were chosen by members of the skeptic organisation and lastly no accurate birth data was used (birth times did not come from birth certificates) It amazes me that you (or somebody) considers this as RS! Your source Dr Jayant Narlikar betrays his motives. He tries to maintain that Jyotish probably came to India from Greece and has no place in the vedic tradition as no mention is made in the four vedas (yajur,Sama, Rig and atharva) as a matter of fact neither do they mention ayurveda(which now has received acceptance in medical circles) stapatyaveda, bhagavad gita ,puranas, bramha sutras and many other works including Parashara (the founder of Jyotish) . Parashara is the atributed author of certain sections of the Ṛigveda i.e. verses 1.65-73 which are all in praise of Agni (the sacred fire), and part of 9.97 (v.31-44) which is in praise of Soma. This links Jyotish to the Rig veda via Parashara. To suggest that this classic work, written in sanskrit somehow came from Greece is laughable. Dr Jayant Narlikar wished to separate Jyotish from the vedic pantheon so that he may more easily dismiss it. The vedic philosophy and all of its branches of knowledge is held in reverence in India. Many universities offer degree courses in Jyotish. People with skeptic views will probably find this an anathema, however the lack of balance being demonstrated in this article does nothing to improve the current lack of credibility which wikipedia is experiencing. I look forward to seeing your response to this comment, and why I you think should not make the proposed amendments to the testing section of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kahouna Dreaming (talk • contribs) 17:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

@Kahouna Dreaming: I replied to your talk on Talk:Hindu astrology#my edit of the testing section. This discussion belongs there and not here. Another editor also commented on that section as well. Jim1138 (talk) 18:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification

I'm not familiar with Wikipedia editing, policies et.c, but i believe at least in the past i've seen talk page used similarly to how i used it there, for instance to point out what are seemingly blatantly false entries, which is why i consulted the talk page instead of outright editing the article. Do you have any advice on how to go about rectifying on what i believe is to be not only a falsehood, but pure libel? I'll watch under this talk page since it's entirely possible my IP will change in the IP-user talk, and i don't plan on being dedicated enough contributor to make an account. 87.92.152.36 (talk) 12:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Replied on editor's talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 20:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your informant reply. I've gone through the links, regulations and rules with a fine toothed comb and i kind of understand now why pretty much everyone involved with any sort of media critical movement or watchdog organization have such poorly represented, biased and downright insultingly wrong portions on their biographies, as well as the movements themselves. Wikipedia does not let the person speak for themselves other than that of footnotes such as "describes themselves as..." nor do youtube videos with larger coverage, general viewerbase or overall traffic count for Wikipedia's reliable sources, which is understandable in a fashion, but then small, highly biased, highly agenda-driven outlets like The Mary Sue, Breitbart, Jezebel, Heat Street or Mic.com are taken as so-called "reliable sources". It seems an unwinnable uphill battle to rectify these pages with factual data as opposed to whatever a journalist has decided to write under op-ed or similar glorified blog post, no matter how wrong or downright libelous. It is very unfortunate to see that a highly valuable resource like Wikipedia is used as a de facto battleground for ideological differences, and is smeared in the process. 87.92.152.36 (talk) 13:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

No subject

Jim

Isabel Oakshott is a well-known for her right-wing views and articles she writes, she's certainly not from the left and would be appalled if she was ever given such a label. However, it appears that Journalists or individuals who follow the Left are allowed to be labelled, Left-Wing, Hard-Left, but those who follow the Right are not allowed to be given a label for what they are. Isabel Oakshott is a Right-Wing Journalist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.241.200.97 (talk) 11:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Jim

I am scholar based in Virginia US, the subject of the "Ogaden War" is part of my research work. I believe I started this page way back. However I haven't reviewed it since 2016. I notice significant errors, irrelevant political statements, poor or fallacious referencing, writing errors, Typos and more. This has to be resolved. If you are the author of the erroneous material , I will escalate the matter for further arbitration.

The article needs a comprehensive revision — Preceding unsigned comment added by AAHMED2010 (talk • contribs) 08:55, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_gaming

Hi Jim,

You have blocked my addition to cloud_gaming article. The reason for decline is that I did not provide a source.

There is no source for it. I'm a professional working in gaming industry and I'm aware of this technology.

Here is description of p2p cloudless game streaming platform: https://techcrunch.com/startup-battlefield/company/drova/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maximsdrozd (talk • contribs) 09:04, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello Jim

Yes, the source was me. I am the source. But thank you very much for contacting me! If you have any other concerns, you may silde into my dm's on Instagram @prinsessakia. Have a good day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:14BB:51:7B53:D15:778D:8A5D:14D (talk) 09:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Crimean war, source

Zayonchkovski, Andrei Medardovich (2002) [original year unspecified]. Восточная Война 1853–1856 [Eastern War 1853–1856] (in Russian). Volume II part 2. (Russian author: Андре́й Меда́рдович Зайончко́вский). Saint Petersburg, Russia: Полигон [Polygon]. ISBN 5-89173-158-4. OCLC 701418742. Retrieved 2015-01-25.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrei_Zayonchkovski — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.74.94.130 (talk) 10:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

User:R. Balu Mahendra continues his destructive edits

I don't know the subject, but he apparently doesn't understand Wikipedia. En example - he has replaced a correct link with a disambiguation one. Xx236 (talk) 12:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

@Xx236: Might be a wp:competence problem. Are the edits being done to highlight favorite actors/actresses? Cyphoidbomb, an admin, left a question on Mahendra's talk page. You might start a discussion with Cyphoidbomb. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jim1138,

I appreciate your advice.

Did you happen to read the wall of text?

72.208.204.252 (talk) 09:01, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Removal of edit of Sport in Sri Lanka

Hi, you removed my edit to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_in_Sri_Lanka stating that there was no source, but a source was provided. Can you please clarify? Thank you. 220.245.0.133 (talk) 11:24, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, it seemed that if cricket is the most popular, why is volleyball the "national sport"? Your source seemed dubious. I googled and found that it was the Sports Ministry that stated that. I undid my edit, rephrased it to state that the Sports Ministry called it such, and added another source. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:38, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Matt Jansen Page

Hi Jim,

I currently work for the sports agency Bianchi Kirk Management (www.bianchikirkmanagement.com) and Matt Jansen is one of our clients. Matt has asked me to update his wikipedia page as the career statistics as both a player and manager are incorrect, so he gave me the correct figures and i made the ammendments.

I hope you can reinstate the changes i have made, as the source was Matt himself.

Thanks in advance Callum — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callumward15 (talk • contribs) 08:42, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

I have added the relevant sources to the Matt Jansen managerial record now, i hope this will suffice for his manager record — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callumward15 (talk • contribs) 09:05, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

@Callumward15: Seems OK given my quick glance. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:07, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

"Involvement in crime"need to remove this topic for Muthappa Rai

There is no evidence for this Information. Everything is wrong. Please confirm the " Involvement in Crime" section news after only we need to bullish. So Kindly Please remove this Content Information Immediately.

Talk:Muthappa Rai Need to Remove content: Involvement in crime — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karthrai (talk • contribs) 17:35, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

You are just doing wrong with Awliya ALLAH. You are just Replacing thing with a wrong Information. You don't know who is the Sajjada Of GOLRA Sharif. I am doing this with full responsibility. Each day , when I correct this , I get something Good from my Almighty ALLAH. God bless you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.25.120.253 (talk) 06:15, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Amendments

Hi Jim

I removed the detail as the information was incorrect so I would like this edit to remain. There are a number of inaccuracies, but not sure how to edit some of them. MaryL1970 (talk) 10:39, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

@MaryL1970: OK, please use an wp:edit summary to explain your reasoning, especially when removing citations. Jim1138 (talk) 10:44, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Jim

Hi Jim

I wi out on some more detail around the reasons for the edit. Many thanks

Just out of interest, do you monitor this page as I have had to remove some fairly unsavoury comments previously, not sure how I can prevent this from happening? MaryL1970 (talk) 10:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

@MaryL1970: I probably won't watch the page. You can add it to your wp:watch list. Go to the page you wish to watch, click on the star. Go to your Preferences (at the top of any page while you are logged in). On the User profile tab, go to the bottom and select Email me when a page or a file on my watchlist is changed and Email me also for minor edits of pages and files wp:MINOR edits to your watch list won't be emailed unless the second item is selected. The only criteria for a minor edit is that the "This is a minor edit" box is checked. (Rather strange). I see that you have setup your email, so I won't go into that. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Spot welding

An article that you have been involved in editing—Spot welding—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pensées de Pascal (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I see you working lightning fast tonight, reverting vandalism. Strong work. Ifnord (talk) 05:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Thesis

Dear Jim, thank you for your message. The linked article below ("Grundlegendes zur Masterarbeit") contains information that is not documented in Wikipedia. Let me give you an example. In the link the Bologna process is very well explained, why it was introduced and what kinds of works there are. The Bologna process is not even mentioned in the Wikpedia article under Germany, although this has caused major changes (eg abolition of the diploma thesis). In that sense, I would be glad if you would leave the link. greetings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selina934 (talk • contribs) 09:15, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

@Selina934: That is a website seeking pay to write student's thesis. Linking to it is the definition of wp:spam and doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 09:19, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Kris Radlinski

Hi Jim

I was only adding further context to the section that I felt was common knowledge.

Apologies

Rob — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.144.148.34 (talk) 10:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

The right information about LEGO NEXO KNIGHTS

Hi and thank you for sending this but I did not make any mistake You made a mistake that I have developed a knowledge about Nexo Knights season 5 Reason for canceling season 5 is funding and also because of LEGO and not of Tommy Andersen It is the reason why the company is canceled the program https://mobile.twitter.com/TommyAndreasen/status/1042295059683500032/actions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.237.192.10 (talk) 10:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your link above doesn't work. Twitter is not a wp:reliable source as it is wp:selfpublished. See WP:NOTRS. Use of your own knowledge is wp:original research and is not accptable on Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 10:43, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

COP

Jim1138, I note you restored the page of Circle Oil Plc. This company went into administration in 2017 so therefore my amendments to the page were to bring matters up to date. I would appreciate if you could restore the amendments. Many thanks. Investor uk10 (talk) 12:20, 12 October 2018 (UTC)<https://www.independent.ie/business/irish/circle-oil-to-be-wound-up-after-sale-of-28m-in-assets-35403178.html></https://www.independent.ie/business/irish/circle-oil-assets-sold-as-it-enters-administration-35404488.html<http://www.cityam.com/244412/circle-oil-suspends-amid-strategic-review-revenue-tumbles>>

Sorry

Because I saw a picture of Royal Ulster Constabulary using a STEN submachine gun, I tried to add a STEN submachine gun to it, and I accidentally deleted your content This is my first time using wiki, and I am a novice. I am sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 法国大救星贝当元帅 (talk • contribs) 05:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

About the chinese taipei, they didnt compete as chinese taipei before, they compete as chinese. they must did not included all of the medal under china NOC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.5.69.53 (talk) 05:51, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Nancy Nova

Hi Jim, Nancy here. My changes are correct !! Sorry, i just happened to find this page & thought i'd make the changes. I've no idea how all this works! But i was in the original group , masterminded by Sheen. We sang & recorded my songs ( co written with Ken Gibson). When I was asked to join EMI as a solo Artist, Anita took my place. Do get back to me if you need to know more & sorry for stepping on your toes!! nancynova@btinternet.com

Best, Nancy x  2A00:23C4:AF08:CF00:C172:F7CC:1E30:1784 (talk) 08:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:AF08:CF00:C172:F7CC:1E30:1784 (talk) 08:47, 13 October 2018 (UTC) 

Nancy Nova

Sorry, i should have signed the last missif with 2A00:23C4:AF08:CF00:C172:F7CC:1E30:1784 (talk) 08:48, 13 October 2018 (UTC) Nancy

Please note that I have no idea who you are as wp:Wikipedia is anonymous. Wikipedia goes by what wp:reliable sources state.

Per wp:verifiability any significant content must wp:cite a wp:reliable source (RS). See help:footnotes. If you wish, leave a link to an RS on this page in this section and I will add the information back into the article. Please understand that as most anyone can edit, Wikipedia's only path to credibility is through its citations. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:53, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your efforts. Samitus mallicus 13:35, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

@Samitus mallicus: Many thanks! I needed that after the immediate note above. Thanks again! Jim1138 (talk) 21:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Unhelpful edit summaries

Today I have encountered you restoring incorrect links to German wikipedia with the summary "policy?", and later restoring reams of incomprehensible garbage like "Causality and frame-independence (Poincaré invariance) are explicit, contrary to quantization in the instant-form method." with the edit summary "nope". If you want to be helpful, then when you revert, you note the policy or guideline that has motivated your revert. If you want to be unhelpful, then just putting a single irrelevant or vaguely insulting word is certainly a good way. So it seems you're in the latter camp. 51.7.23.71 (talk) 12:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

I see you are now blocked for edit warring and personal attacks. Extended to 60 hours for battleground and personal attacks. Your talk page privileges have been revoked as well. I probably am not going to see a reply, so no point in continuing... Jim1138 (talk) 21:11, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Nancy Nova

I'm not sure if you got my message, as your TOTO COELO page is still incorrect. I was there at the start...named the band....wrote their songs.....recorded in my studio.....performed for A & R guys in my house........way before Anita & Barry Blue came on board!! So, do get back to me if you'd like the facts, Best, Nancy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:AF08:CF00:C172:F7CC:1E30:1784 (talk) 06:57, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

I did please see above #Nancy Nova Jim1138 (talk) 06:59, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

No subject

Hello, Jim.

You considered my edit of the Milpa page a mistake. The current source for the translation is the DRAE. While it is a very good source for words in spanish, we have to remember this word comes from nahuatl. It is not unusual for the DRAE to have mistakes in words originating in nahuatl, which can be easily contrasted with historical dictionaries and grammars.

Anyway, even the etymological analysis of milpa is wrong. The base word is mīlli with the locative suffix -pan. When joining the word stem with the locative, it looses the absolutive suffix, becoming mīl- -pan -> mīlpan. Final word n is very weak in nahuatl, so it is a very common sound to be lost, which is attested in various locative names. Tepalcapan (On the potsherds) becomes Tepalcapa.

The meaning of mīlli can be searched in various nahuatl-spanish dictionaries. The first reference I'd use is Karttunen, F. (1992). An analytical dictionary of Nahuatl. Norman: Univ. of Oklahoma Press. On this book, where we find a direct english translation reads: Mīlli. cultivated land, field / heredad (M), sementera (C). M and C mean Molina and Carochi, respectively. If we look for the meaning of heredad and sementera we'll find they both mean cultivated field.

A second source would be Siméon, R. (1977). Diccionario de la lengua Nahuatl o Mexicana: Redact. segun los documentos, impresos y manuscritos más auténticos. Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno. Which also gives the same meaning.

The locative suffix -pan means on the surface of... So the complete meaning of Mīlpan would be On the cultivated field. Hope this helps. Have a nice night.

189.216.65.93 (talk) 07:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Keep up the good work. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 07:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

@Mythdon: Thanks for the recognition! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:24, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Killarney Provincial Park Observatory

Hi Jim,

Thank you for your update to the Killarney Provincial Park Observatory page.

I am a lightweight editor of the Wiki so am not so experienced. What section did you remove so that I can re-add it with the appropriate source material?

Thanks and best regards,

Bruce — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.51.250.178 (talk) 08:26, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

@Brucewaters: I presume you are signed out. I left a message on user talk:Brucewaters. The answer is the article is very poorly sourced. Jim1138 (talk) 08:36, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

aiv report

I've ranged blocked the IP - he started changing IP addresses... not that incompetent!

Blocked 2405:0205:232F:757A::/64

2405:205:232F:757A:F9BF:167D:5624:6B6C

2405:205:232F:757A:D4B5:567A:AEBE:CF4D

A /64 block is usually one person. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 15:04, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for changing the vandalism Barry Ne (talk) 15:42, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Edits

The same edits have again been made on the pages Naseer-uddin-Naseer, Golra Sharif and Shrine of Meher Ali Shah but this time by a Wikipedia account user. The edits specially on Naseer-uddin-Naseer don't even make any sort of sense. Can we do something to get this account blocked as it might be the same person?

Zaydbinumar (talk) 10:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

@Zaydbinumar and PohranicniStraze: I suspect the anon and account will need to keep it up longer before a RfPP report will be addressed. Please "template" the user with a warning message. Use disruptive, delete, or something pertinent from WP:WARNING. Example:

{{subst:uw-delete1|Golra Sharif}} ~~~~

Start off with a 1, then progress through 4. Then report to wp:AIV. Use {{diff2}} to list evidence - example:

{{IPVandal|103.25.123.211}} persistent removal of sourced content and addition of primary sourced religious content. Changes IPs and repeats periodically. {{diff2|863988648|1}} {{diff2|863997524|2}} {{diff2|.|3}} {{diff2|...|4}} {{diff2|...|5}} ~~~~

Get the code 863988648 from the right of the url:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shrine_of_Meher_Ali_Shah&diff=prev&oldid=863997524

There needs to have been an edit after this one otherwise it doesn't work. Be careful not to escalate too fast. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@Zaydbinumar and Jim1138: Hello, both of you. I've actually templated them up to level 4 already, based on repeatedly violating the MOS. Since it's the same edits as in September, if one of you wanted to go ahead with the level4im message for any of the above reasons, that should work I would think. PohranicniStraze (talk) 01:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Double-Standard? "Personal Attacks"?

@Jim1138: Hello, you left a message on my talk page saying 'no personal attacks' and claiming that you "noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Misandry that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner." What exactly about my comment do you think was not civil? I am unable to review the comment since you removed it, but nothing I said was intended to be a 'personal attack'. The comment you are referring to was a response to a comment that I feel was very disrespectful, in which the user @Binksternet refused to answer my questions (which were made in an attempt to reach a consensus regarding the page) and said "I'm not going to waste my time." - Why is this disrespectful comment permitted? It is hardly 'polite and respectful'. Please advise. Chimchongchiggedydo (talk) 12:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

@Chimchongchiggedydo: Your edit history on misandry would appear to speak for itself. Here, I undid your edit with an ES of rv again, unsourced / not in source given (Note the 'again'). You reverted with an ES of No reason given why terms were removed; all terms previously added are valid.. I believe this falls under "trolling"? Unless you have something constructive to add here, please don't. Jim1138 (talk) 13:08, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

@Chimchongchiggedydo: You may wish to consider that your argument appears to be based on assertions of bad faith by other editors, and that they have grown tired of your aggressive attitude that is on display there. They are within their rights to declare that they're not going to engage, even going so far as to declare that they don't want to waste their time arguing with you: hardly disrespectful or unreasonable, given the manner in which you've interacted with them. Acroterion (talk) 13:10, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

@Jim1138 I understand the error with the edit you provided and am not disputing that edit - after you reverted that edit, I provided a modified addition and attempted to provide a source. Instead of explaining why this most recent edit is unacceptable, it was reverted, and I was accused of ‘edit warring’ - even though this was the first time the added content was disputed, and was not the same as the previously reverted edits. After being told to attempt to reach a consensus regarding the page ‘Misandry’, I attempted to do so but was treated disrespectfully and called a “waste of time” - an obvious personal degradation that is not constructive, polite or respectful. I have followed instructions, asked questions, and attempted to collaborate on this page, and fail to see how any of my actions ‘fall under “trolling”’. Please advise. @Acroterion: You say that other editors “have grown tired of my aggressive attitude that is on display” - can you please explain to me what I said that you consider to be ‘aggressive attitude’? I understand they are within their rights to declare they’re not going to engage, but if they don’t wish to participate, why make personal attacks that they are not willing to explain? I have been told "Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.” - it is known that there is a disagreement, yet the user @Binksternet has not attempted to reach a consensus - so my question remains, why is this double-standard acceptable? I have not been disrespectful or unreasonable, and have tried to reach a consensus, have never personally attacked anyone, and have modified my additions based on other users’ suggestions; and yet, everything I say has been met with insults, disrespect, and criticism for not following rules that are not being followed by the user making the critiques against me! Please advise. Chimchongchiggedydo (talk) 15:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

I'll reply on your talkpage to avoid burdening Jim1138's talkpage. Acroterion (talk) 15:38, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Loretto School

Hi @Jim1138: Could you please help us get our edits published on the Loretto School page? Please let us know what we should do for our changes to be approved. We're received some complaints about some content which is found to be defamatory and we really need to remove it. Thanks!

Hi @Jim1138:. How do I contact sources to ask for the removal of information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loretto Communications (talk • contribs)

@Claire9876: For discussion for removal on Wikipedia, start a discussion on talk:Loretto School. If you want more eyes, I would suggest an wp:edit request or wp:Request for comment. See help:talk pages and wp:talk page guidelines. I would suggest you abandon your username and get one that meets wp:username policy. Mention your abandoning it to avoid [[wp:sockpuppet] accusations. You will likely find your account wp:blocked for username violations. Please "sign" your talk with four tildes: "~~~~" The tildes get translated into your name and time stamp - like what follows: Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Kujuvar

@Jim1138:

Hello Thank you for your message. Kojaabad have been changed into its historical name (Kujuvar). I want to redirect Kojaabad Page into Kujuvar but I can't. Please redirect it. You can see extra explanation in this Persian wikipedia page: https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%DA%A9%D9%88%D8%AC%D9%88%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B1

Sahandiran (talk) 09:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@Sahandiran: You want the article titled Kujuvar? Are you sure? Google translates that article to Kojovar. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:38, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Yes. Kujuvar. The correct form is Kujuvar. Sahandiran (talk) 10:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@Sahandiran: I moved the page from Kojaabad to Kujuvar, but there are many articles that link to the former name of [What links to Kojaabad. Those need to be resolved. See wp:moving a page. I should have checked first, but I'm rather overwhelmed with vandalism patrol. I think we messed up! Jim1138 (talk) 11:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Don't worry. It's a Turkish name and it has been written Kücüvar . In Turkish language J is C! Sahandiran (talk) 11:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@Sahandiran: OK, that list of links needs to be resolved if they are redirects. Otherwise the mention of Kojaabad on a particular is wp:redirected to the Kujuvar page. That is not generally a good idea. Please reply below this. Threads should remain in the same section. Try to keep your talk compact so it doesn't take a lot of space. Thanks Jim1138 (talk)

Truro School

Hello. I’m sorry about the edits but the boading at Truro School has now changed but I do not care anymore. I’m sorry Ethan21030 (talk) 19:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Removal of links on page "List of World War II Weapons"

Removed dead links that were connected to no actual pages or other lists. Such clutter should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.112.81.173 (talk) 07:01, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

"Allahabad" page edit

I was trying to update the page as the official name has been changed to prayagraj. but i got your messages that it is not constructive. what is the problem? i tried to change the name as it should be. Suyash.dy (talk) 09:39, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

@Suyash.dy: Please read the message I left and read the links. That will tell you why I undid your edit and provides instructions on how to add your change. Jim1138 (talk) 09:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

My edit

Hi Jim. Sorry about the edit. I was pulling a prank of my friend. I’m sorry if if I caused any trouble😅 Thewikiller (talk) 10:43, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jim

Hi Jim, thanks for your message, I'm the source for the post about Nexus 5X, so, do I need to create a webpage first and I can't write directly as myself is the source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.98.58.157 (talk) 12:03, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Re: Charles Dutoit

Hello Jim1138: I have been trying to do some editing on Charles Dutoit's Wikipedia page but my edits keep being reverted by 2 editors. I am providing references (one of my edit is a new job with the St Petersburg Philharmonic) which belongs in the biography as it is actual news. Mr Dutoit has been accused of sexual misconduct in the press and I am trying to provide truthful and referenced information regarding this. I have tried to add that none of these allegations have been proven in a court of law but am being told by one editor is it irrelevant. In my opinion, it is not irrelevant to clarify this as it is reported in such a way in the press and it is important to remember this fact. I believe Wikipedia readers need to have a concise and clear view of the situation. I also plan on working on the numerous paragraphs on these allegations as it is too long, according to Wikipedia, and some of the information is repetitive and redundant. I will also provide references to the honours and prizes as it is requested. What do you think and how do you suggest I proceed? Thank you for your assistance, Gabala (talk) 13:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop deleting my sourced content

Please stop deleting my sourced content, are you working for LG? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.98.58.157 (talk) 00:27, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Again, chatrooms are not reliable sources. Jim1138 (talk) 00:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Link to Wikipedia's policy on user-generated content.—Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:34, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Fred Toettcher

Hi, Jim. Thanks for your message.

As far as the comment about Fred's bike, it was sourced to Fred's own Instagram page.

Regarding the info about his kids, I listen to him for an hour plus a day. I struggled with adding it without an actual "source" but considering how often he mentions it on air, I felt it was okay.

Clapag22 (talk) 00:32, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Clapag22

@Clapag22: A lot of that would appear to fall under wp:primary. I think the bike is OK given that it doesn't appear self-serving. Listing children needs to be carefully sourced per WP:BLP Not sure what to recommend, anyone else listen to him that posts as a wp:reliable source? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:37, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

References

Thanks for the info, Jim. I guess that makes sense regarding children. Thanks for going on easy on me. :-) Clapag22 (talk) 00:43, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Clapag22

@Clapag22: You are welcome! Thank you for engaging in discussion. Unfortunately, being nice is a lot more work than mashing the "vandalism" button on wp:Huggle. I do WP:RCP... If you want some better advice, wp:teahouse or wp:help desk might be a good place. I should have though of that before... Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)