User talk:Kyorosuke/Archive/2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive. To post new messages, see User talk:Sean Black.

closing of commands[edit]

re the closing of commands and fonts, etc the problem is not that people aren't closing things. It is that Wikipedia yet again is screwing up and already closed commands that have worked for months have suddenly been screwed up by some glitch in the system. It happened to me some months ago. I had no idea why because I had changed nothing and everything had worked correctly with the same commands before. Eventually I found that the problem was with WP and not me. It was raised with the village pump. It turned out some bot had screwed up. It had to be undone and suddenly everything worked again. If you find this problem is happening again, let the experts at the pump know. No doubt some bot has fucked up again and individual users, to their puzzlement, are finding themselves accused of not closing commands when they are all entered correctly. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 22:15, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not a bad comparison[edit]

Now you come to mention it, political philosopher is quite a good way of hinting "nutjob". SlimVirgin (talk) 07:23, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Om-Com[edit]

Looks like Terence took care of this while I was offline, but yeah — The Shooting Scripts doesn't say anything about what Om-Com is short for. But as you say, TD10's theory is plausible this time. (Not sure if it's notable, but I think we let this one go.) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 13:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: signatures[edit]

Don't worry about it—now that I reread what I wrote, I sounded rather curt myself. I'm glad we got it figured out! Thanks for being understanding! — Knowledge Seeker দ 05:27, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zombie dog[edit]

You have to give me a chance to respond to you, I'm not on the computer all day. Don't get all snippy because I'm not at your beck and call.

I deleted it because it's patent nonsense. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:39, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Thanks for tweaking my rewrite of the Nightmare on elm street page. I still have a lot to add to it when I have time. Just look over everything, and please tweak it with my blessing. I'm going to continue to edit some of the horror and music pages, please look over the edits I did on the Samhain(band) page. I'm still getting used to the wikipedia writing style, so sorry about some of the mistakes.

RFA?[edit]

Hey, You've been nominated, accept or reject as you see fit. Redwolf24 (talk) Attention Washingtonians! 01:37, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno, saw you edit some article on my watchlist, you've always been quite nice ;-) Redwolf24 (talk) Attention Washingtonians! 01:46, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA[edit]

Thanks for your support. I've now been made an administrator. I'll do my best not to let you down :) --Sherool (talk) 02:28, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

my RfA[edit]

You see? We have something in common. One of my grandpas was Polish too and I also hate it when people treat me as if I were a Pole and not Halibutt. Regards Halibutt 03:04, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. WikiThanks.
Thanks. WikiThanks.
I would like to express my thanks to all the people who took part in my (failed) RfA voting. I was both surprised and delighted about the amount of support votes and all the kind words! I was also surprised by the amount of people who stated clearly that they do care, be it by voting in for or against my candidacy. That's what Wiki community is about and I'm really pleased to see that it works.
As my RfA voting failed with 71% support, I don't plan to reapply for adminship any more. However, I hope I might still be of some help to the community. Cheers! Halibutt 05:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for supporting me for adminship. The RfA passed today. I look forward to working with you to make Wikipedia a better place. --Nlu 03:42, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Norse mythology naming proposal[edit]

Hi, Haukurth. I'd like to vote at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Norse mythology), but I'm a little unclear on a couple things: under this proposal, for example, would Thor stay where it is, but with a redirect from the 13th century names, or the other way around? Thanks.--Sean|Black 02:43, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Thor would indeed stay where it is - with redirects from the original Old Norse form "Þórr" and other anglicized forms. Less known names, like Veðrfölnir and Eikþyrnir would be listed under the Old Norse spelling with redirects from all anglicized forms and with the anglicized forms listed in the article. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 10:16, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

hey there, again[edit]

I'd be glad to help you with the horror film pages. Let me know which ones you want me to work on. Ghidorah 72 22:27, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wills1.jpg[edit]

Looks like one of Anneke Wills' standard promotional pics from the 60s - could have come from anywhere, really, like a cropped version from DWIA, for example. I'd just stick a {{promotional}} tag on it. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 23:44, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

GraemeL's RFA[edit]

Hi Sean Black,

I am now an administrator and would like to thank you for your support on my RfA. I was very surprised at the number of votes and amount of and kind comments that I gathered. Please don't hesitate to contact me if I mess up in the use of my new powers. --GraemeL (talk) 15:05, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

TheDoctor10[edit]

I'm talking about it on Talk:Rose Tyler. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 22:45, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ianblair23's RfA[edit]

G'day Sean,

I would like to thank you for supporting me on my RfA. It closed with the final tally of 57/0/0. I can only hope I can live up to the expectations that this wonderful community of ours demands from each of its administrators. If you ever need anything, please just let me know. Cheers! -- Ianblair23 (talk) 02:13, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[No Header][edit]

Hope I'm doing this right. I'm new. Find this site the greatest thing since the invention of the wheel. Do have some problems with it, and need to find a way to communicate with somebody to find solution. Gprice157 14:23, 22 November 2005 (UTC)gprice157Gprice157 14:23, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RuneScape cheats AfD[edit]

  • OK, here's a list of game specific items:
    • Casting weaken on tree stump
    • Scar is RuneScape specific
    • Random events is very RuneScape specific - other games have yet to implement this workaround (google it)
    • Armour trimming - explicitly game specific
    • Alt-F4 scam (google it: it comes up with 3 runescape hits on the first page, and NO other games)
    • there are more but that's a quick list. Jonathan888 (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

MONGO RfA[edit]

Thank you for supporting my RfA. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you!--MONGO 04:20, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NoEs[edit]

Thanks for getting all the tables in order. I will try and work on the plots for the others after the holidays. Oh, and thanks for the welcome message. Bignole 05:17, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re-direct[edit]

Hey Sean. Thanks for the redirect tidy up for Constituencies in United Kingdom. Didn't understand why the person re-directed it in the first place !! doktorb 12:21, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CSD talk[edit]

Hmmm... wait ten minutes and see if it solves anything. If that was all that the problem was, whatever happened to {{sofixit}}? I'm fairly certain that this had some deeper philosophical root, which is why it was impossible to get anything precise about what was actually wrong. Plus I'm really cranky this morning anyway, so I probably should not be interacting with humans. - brenneman(t)(c) 23:27, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks[edit]

I'd like to thank you for your support of my RfA. As I wrote, I was looking forward to feedback from the community, and I would like to let you know that you should please feel free to leave any further feedback for me you may have for me in the future at my Talk page. Thanks again. Jkelly 08:37, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks[edit]

Thanks for the welcome you left on my page.--Pomegranite | talk 18:48, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I will[edit]

I apreciate that message. I may ask you to honour that someday because this just gets more confusing as it goes. Got two messages now and they are both from you. Good luck and thanks again.--Pomegranite | talk 19:41, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're a sysop![edit]

Hi, Kyorosuke/Archive/2, Congratulations on Becoming a Sysop

Hey there. I'm pleased to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator! You've volunteered to do housekeeping duties that normal users sadly cannot participate in. Sysops can't do a lot of stuff: They can't delete pages just like that (except patent nonsense like "aojt9085yu8;3ou"), and they can't protect pages in an edit war they are involved in. But they can delete random junk, ban anonymous vandals, delete pages listed on Votes for deletion (provided there's a consensus) for more than one week, protect pages when asked to, and keep the few protected pages that exist on Wikipedia up to date.

Almost anything you can do can be undone, but please take a look at The Administrators' how-to guide and the Administrators' reading list before you get started (although you should have read that during your candidacy ;). Take a look before experimenting with your powers. Also, please add Administrators' noticeboard to your watchlist, as there are always discussions/requests for admins there. If you have any questions drop me a message at My talk page. Have fun! =Nichalp «Talk»=

Please also add your name to WP:LA. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:02, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations[edit]

Congratulations. --Nlu 08:03, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Congratulations, and you're quite welcome! --Merovingian 09:40, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seconded Thirded Fourthded(?)! And no probs with th support - you'll be fine. If you need any advice on how to use your new superpowers, feel free to drop me a note :) Grutness...wha? 13:31, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A very big congrats from me Sean. :) --a.n.o.n.y.m t 14:52, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
And from me! Just promise you won't start rolling your eyes back in your head and talking about infinite power and the end of free will, OK? :D —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:59, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and I'll pass you the key to the Khao-club executive washroom later. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 07:06, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So funny!-TheDoctor10 (talk|email) 08:09, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

TheDoctor10[edit]

I am preparing an RFC against User:TheDoctor10 for speculation, revert warring and personal attacks. Would you please review the draft User:TimPope/Requests for Comment/TheDoctor10 and leave any comments on my talk page if you would be prepared to endorse if I should list it formally at WP:RFC. I would also be grateful for any additional examples of any attempts you have made to resolve the dispute.

Thanks! --TimPope 10:33, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations[edit]

I vote very rarely in RFA's but yours happened to catch my eye, you would have won without my vote of course but I am happy to show my support for good editors. Derktar 16:57, 26 November 2005 (UTC).[reply]

Congrats, congrats! Use your powers wisely, and I hope to see you around! -Mysekurity 19:32, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seaborn[edit]

Hands off Seaborn Roddenberry for a few minutes, please, I'm trying to fix some vandalism and big chunk of near-simultaneous edits. (The vandal has been blocked indefinitely.) DS 00:25, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • ...okay, thank you. Fixes are complete, article is unprotected. And your addition of his successor is useful information (how'd you find it so quickly?) DS 00:31, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • oh, and for the record, it's "grammar". DS 00:45, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Transit[edit]

Aloha. I was wondering if you had requested a checkuser for Mr. Transit. I'm currently in an email discussion with him, and so far, he sounds just like Eddie. I'm hoping he'll convince me otherwise. --Viriditas 00:28, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats[edit]

You're welcome. Sure you'll do good job.--Dakota t e 02:11, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite welcome. I have alot of confidence that you will make a supurb admin. Banes 15:41, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blogging Tories[edit]

The closing admin confirmed that he had muffed the count on deletion review. Phil Sandifer 05:31, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RfC[edit]

Take a glance at the expansion of my response here, please. Thanks,--TheDoctor10 (talk|email) 07:28, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: RFA[edit]

I was pleased to support your candidacy. I was impressed with your work before, and your politeness and quick willingness to correct misunderstandings in our earlier interaction sealed my support for you. Congratulations! — Knowledge Seeker দ 08:39, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 3RR[edit]

I was under the impression that the three-revert rule did not apply to vandalism. I regard Everyking's senseless reverts of my edit as vandalism, because I was also under the impression that he was forbidden to edit the Ashlee Simpson article for one year, because of previous vandalism and revert-wars. I have to ask, was Everyking and the other user banned for 24 hours as well? If not, why not? They are removing my edit, not the other way around. wikipediatrix 15:38, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome[edit]

Thanks for your welcome, and I note that you recently became an admin; congrats. --TidyCat 07:51, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RfC - another thread[edit]

Cc: Tim Pope, Khaosworks, Josiah Rowe, Snowspinner, 23skidoo

I know I'm not quite ready for an RfA yet, but since my RfC has been up for five days now, should it come down (especially since I'm away all weekend anyway).--TheDoctor10 (talk|email) 18:12, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Explain removal of comments and people alerts in LM[edit]

KCLS user 198.104.0.100

Edits to Jimmy Wales[edit]

Thanks! By the way - I noticed that they are also in the history of the page itself, not only on the talk page. They are the edits by User:220.247.227.44; User:220.247.255.86; User:222.165.171.139; User:222.165.174.207; User:220.247.246.63; User:222.165.169.8; User:222.165.171.39; - this seems to be a continuation of the vendetta from the Ashida Kim cronies. They claim that someone posted personal information about Ashida Kim's true name and address - we should remove anything in taht article's history that contains similar personal information - I am going to try to find it. Trödel|talk 02:58, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There is a bunch of deleted edits on the complainer's page - I am guessing these are the ones with the personal info since I can't find any. Trödel|talk 03:17, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again - Trödel|talk 11:08, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IIPM Page[edit]

Dear Sean,
The IIPM article has been going through a revert war for the past week or so. The reason is that the article was created as partof a slander campaign against the institute by a group pf bloggers - this was instigated by a lawsuit IIPM filed against a blogger for unsubstantiated allegations. Lets leave the legality of filing a lawsuit against a blogger aside for now, and instead focus on why Wiki is allowing itself to be used in this manner - the IIPM article is biased and has severe POV comments and uncited allegations, most from bloggers.
Thats the background behind the revert war. I read up on WIki policy, and asked a mediator to step in - Konrad West is acting as outside mediator. He too commented on how biased the article is. So thats why we've been reverting. I apologise if I broke the 3rr rule: I am aware of it and didn't mean to break it.
--Iipmstudent9 03:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania[edit]

Thanks for the heads-up, Sean. Summer seems a long way off, and I won't know my plans at least until spring. But I'll keep an eye on the preparations for this — sounds interesting! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 22:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from Erkabo[edit]

Hi Sean, thank you very much for fixing the link from Andreas Floer to our userpage! I did not know how to do it. Rolf of Erkabo 15:40, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who CIN Special[edit]

{{spoiler}} I fail to see how the contrasting roles part is POV, as being "the most devoted supporter" of the most evil wizard and a person who has saved the world a 100 times is quite contrasting Sceptre 19:31, 3 December 2005 (UTC) {{endspoiler}}[reply]

From Kalmia[edit]

RE: Hammond, Indiana

I don't know who Fred Starr was, but do you know anything about Edward C Minus? You removed him.

Mindmatrix scam adminship[edit]

I have recently been granted greater access to your systems, and can begin the process of salvaging the sensitive information from my politically unstable land, as I promised. Please accept this loonie as a token of faith that I will conduct myself as required to complete our transaction. Thank you for your support. Mindmatrix 20:38, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats and Hi from Potsdam[edit]

Hi Sean,

Congratulations on your recent successful VfA. I wanted to say "Hi" as I am living just down the road from you in Potsdam, New York, I teach chemistry at SUNY Potsdam and I contribute a lot on Wikipedia. If you're coming over to our bustling metropolis let me know, we should meet up. Cheers, Walkerma 06:04, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for fixing my post for Cleared as filed on wikibreak. And I 100% agree on the message at the top of your page. I tend to leave jokes to people when I see they are stressed. After all of the arguments and users who have left, I've decided to add myself to Esperanza. Anyhow thanks and since it looks like you are on a partial wikibreak yourself....A small boy is lost so he goes up to a policeman and says."I've lost my dad" The cop asks, "What's he like? The little boy says, "Beer and women!" KnowledgeOfSelf | talk. 06:08, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime :-D I'm using a table very much like that (at least it looks the same) (I think I was just in too much of a hurry because I've seen enough of it lol) to create 2003 NFL Draft. It is long and tedious process. Do you have any pointers on how to make it easier, or faster would be just as good as I don't mind hard work that much. lol KnowledgeOfSelf | talk. 06:22, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's a conspiracy![edit]

Hi, sorry, I am in self-imposed exile pending the closing of the contentious arbitration. I'm just not editing text for the duration. My edits have become magnets for more nasty attacks. Not worht it. Alas. I think you are correct, the new lead is awful. Just rewrite it and ask for support from some of the other sane editors who lurk on the page. Otherwise, bourbon. I have become a WIki-eventualist. Eventually, we will clean up the page. In the meantime--bourbon, or a nice bottle of St. Emilion[1].--Cberlet 23:25, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi; I've been away and am now back, but still busy. I'll go through the Conspiracy theory talk page later today or this evening. Thanks for your efforts at facilitating the discussion. Tom Harrison (talk) 18:09, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking action[edit]

Thanks for taking action about a certain IP address that was giving me a lot of trouble. It is always good to see strong admins who are taking action wherever needed. Keep up the good work man!—Preceding unsigned comment added by QzarBaron (talk • contribs) 22:17 5 December 2005

Thank you[edit]

For listening to me.  :) --VKokielov 06:00, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Accident[edit]

I'm sorry, it was an accident - I was in fact reverting to this version not this. I was revering two edits by Maoririder and two edits by an anon (check history). I didn't know that you or DanielCD had made subsequent edits (the edit conflict was with the second anon edit). Izehar (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The prodigal, returned![edit]

I have, I have! Thanks for the welcome back, mate. Good to see that you're doing well, and as an admin, too... brilliant! Well, well, glad to see that you've done well in my absence. Yeah: I found that I was still using the 'pedia, and I couldn't just sit by and watch it languish... but man, that break felt good. It's back to work, now, though. Blackcap (talk) 22:12, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A thank you from Ann[edit]

Hi, Sean. I just want to thank you for voting to support me in my RfA, and of course to congratulate you on yours. I know I'm very late thanking you, but I've been a bit caught up with college work. I hope I'll live up to the expectations of those who voted for me. Please let me know if you ever have a problem with any admin action that I carry out. Thanks again. Cheers. AnnH (talk) 00:49, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Early RFA thanks[edit]

Hi Kyorosuke/Archive/2,

Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. It has done very well and is currently at 67/0/2. As such, I am posting this in advance of its closure. If I can ever help with anything or if you have any comments about my actions as an admin, please let me know. Thank you once again! – NSLE (T+C+CVU) 06:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

a favor, please[edit]

Please block 84.64.77.177 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) (adequately warned, and appears to be reincarnation of a previous IP 203.145.159.45 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)). — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 08:01, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My failed RFA :)[edit]

Dear Sean Black,

I would like to thank you for supporting me on my RfA. Even though it failed with a with the final tally of 55/22/6, I want to thank you anyways. I don't want to be one a admin anymore until I reach 10,000 edits now that it's over with. Thanks --Jaranda wat's sup 02:48, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cleared talk entries for Chaosfeary[edit]

I see you did a restore on Chaosfeary's user talk page. You may want to take a look at this earlier edit he made to his talk page when he removed a significant amount of content from it. --StuffOfInterest 23:25, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User Bill of Rights[edit]

You may be interested in Wikipedia:User Bill of Rights. (SEWilco 04:21, 10 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

thanks - and question[edit]

Thanks for the welcome! Hope to add a little as I can, but seems like y'all are already doing a great job.

I started off adding a new article on "Sapiosexual", but it was deleted, and don't think it should have been. I looked over several "undelete" pages, but not sure really what to DO about it still. Any help would be great.

thanks! Rock808 21:36, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Esperanza elections[edit]

File:Voting box clipart.gif
Hi Kyorosuke/Archive/2: This is a quick note just to let you know that there's an election under way at Esperanza. If you'd like to become a candidate for Administrator General or the Advisory Council, just add your name here by 15 December 2005. Voting begins at 12:00UTC on 16 December.

You've received this spam because you signed up for it here. To stop the spam, pop over and remove yourself and you'll never hear from Esperanza again!

➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:02, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive[edit]

I just wanted to say that you seem to really be on top of things, speedying AfDs which are requested by the original authors and such. Great job and all that.  :) -- Dpark 00:22, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zero x 3RR[edit]

I reviewed the first edit Zero made on the Riots article, and I am no longer sure if it may be counted as a revert myself... Certainly a borderline case, but not a clear revert. Anyhow, could you please take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RR#User:Ian_Pitchford? Jayjg has protected the page, but he didn't notice the 3RR violation. He was too buisy since. Again, I think it would be unnecessary to actually block Ian, just revert his edit and tell him not to do it again. --Heptor 02:16, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but could you also undo his fourth revert? --Heptor 03:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Now with a nice(er) signature -- Heptor 03:22, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my response on the 1948 Arab-Israeli War issue. Best regards, Heptor 04:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Are you willing to mediate[edit]

It will take a lot of work but without a mediator the pages on israeli-Pal conflict will remain protectd for ever. It is important to use the same guidelines to all articles. Zeq 15:27, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greengrocers' apostrophe - thanks[edit]

Hi, Sean. Thanks for fixing the wiki-link on my user page. I see, from looking through the history of Apostrophe (mark), that it has been wrong since 24 October, when someone changed the heading of that section from "Greengrocers' apostrophes" to "Greengrocers' apostrophe". [2] I suppose I should check these things more frequently. Cheers. AnnH (talk) 09:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:1948 Arab-Israeli War mediation[edit]

Hi Sean. It looks like what you're doing is fine. As the admin who protected the page, I'm reluctant to get involved for now, but if there is consensus to unprotect, I can get involved then. Jayjg (talk) 19:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA[edit]

Hello there Sean, thank you so much for voting support on my RFA. I wont let you down! Cheers! — Moe ε 00:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RfB[edit]

I appreciate your vote on my RfB! You may, however, want to fix your signature ;-) Thanks again! Alex Schenck (that's Linuxbeak to you) 03:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Time to hear from the mediator ?[edit]

Can you state your observation. I trust your neutrality and I would like to hear your proposal. We need to move toward releasing the protect from the article. Thank You. Zeq 17:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Banned user[edit]

Hey Sean.

129.7.35.102 (talk · contribs) is a banned user from wikipedia known as user:Enviroknot (+ many different sockpuppets).

Please see the following histories

Was blocked yesterday and is evading the ban. He is evading an arbCom ruling, a 3rr block and a block for vandalism. He has switched many IPs and is probably the worst wiki user you have ever seen ;). Look through contribs. So please reblock. Thanks --a.n.o.n.y.m t 21:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah edits like these [3]. Jayjg tried a range block yesterday, but this user just won't go away.--a.n.o.n.y.m t 21:44, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Sean. Fastest admin around. :-) Keep an eye on those pages though. That guy will definitely come back. Thanks --a.n.o.n.y.m t 21:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sean, please note the block I used just before your block. You have to block the range, not just the individual IP, or he'll get another IP. Jayjg (talk) 22:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfC addition[edit]

Hi Sean, Freestylefrappe is disputing my right to add evidence to the RfC page after it was certified/endorsed [4]. Just to make sure everything's on the up-and-up, I am letting everyone who certified/endorsed the dispute summary before I made edits of the changes I made. In your case, it was just a brief summary of my evidence near the top. Obviously you're free to suggest I change what I wrote and/or withdraw your endorsement if you see fit. -- SCZenz 22:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kyorosuke/Archive/2&oldid=1096950532"