User talk:Leafyplant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, I like to fix vandalism and grammar and I’m good natured. Leafyplant


Warning Steps[edit]

Hello, Leafyplant! I saw your warning message to User talk:71.127.203.173; just so you know, vandals should be warned in a series of steps (1, 2, 3, 4, and then a block). I believe you used a 3rd warning template in place of a 1st warning template on the talk page mentioned above. See the Newpage Patrol page for more info on vandal fighting and the appropriate use of warning templates. Keep up the good work! -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 21:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Leafyplant! If you ever need help, I'd be glad to offer my assistance. See you around! -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 21:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comfort women[edit]

Hi, would you please tell me why you considered my editing as a vandalism regarding your modification [1]? Although the statement was added by 220.76.64.167, I was the one who set the primary source to the citation (to the U.S. House of Congress). 218.225.189.142 18:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, it was my intention to remove the random insertion of the word "hello", and I reverted your edit accidentally. Again, My apologies.Leafyplant 18:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I understand your motives. Thank you for getting things back. 218.225.189.142 18:36, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Leafyplant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 18:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you have a clone... sort of[edit]

User:Leavyplant did the usual deletion from Carfax (company). Just thought you'd like to know. Cornell Rockey 16:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is happening with this Carfax article? Is this editing taking place from Carfax HQ? I'm gonna keep putting that legal case info back unless I get a good reason not to. Are you going to get your latest faux-you shut down? Cornell Rockey 19:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is the protect against IPs and newly registered accounts not working? Unless this guy created these joke accounts a while back, he shouldn't be able to edit. Cornell Rockey 17:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think thats the most protection that a page can get. Not sure what else we could do, other than hope we can outlast the endurance of this deleter. WP is on our side, and I have infinite patience. Cornell Rockey 04:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Username[edit]

I just wanted to let you know I cracked up when I saw your username. Wonderful.  :) Have a good day. --Yamla 20:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you need to ask an admin to indef. block this name (i.e. the vandal's, not yours), since it is an impersonation of your name. Please see WP:Usernames to see the policy upon vandals using others usernames as an attack. I saw the report at AIV just a couple of minutes ago. P.S.: Yamla's an admin, so you can ask her to do the block. Real96 00:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I will do it. Real96 00:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carfax (company) sockpuppets[edit]

Hi, I've dealt with Verdict (talk contribs) before in the past, but what's his connection with Carfax (company)? I've only ever noticed him violating WP:3RR on wrestling related articles before. By the way, SpuriousQu is obviously an abusive sockpuppet of someone and has already been blocked. --  Netsnipe  ►  12:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finally[edit]

Thank you for flagging the vandalism going on at the Percy Schmeiser page see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Percy_Schmeiser&action=history

Why people want to remove published legal text and quotes is beyond me...please keep an eye on them as they have already revandalised the page after your revert.

Thanks

Cool (aesthetic)[edit]

It wouldn't hurt if you would have a closer look at edits before you randomly declare them to be "vandalism". Thanks. My apologies, Cool (aesthetic) gets alot of vandalism & I reverted the wrong edit. Leafyplant 13:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar![edit]

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I award you this barnstar for all the effort you have put into fighting vandalism. Keep it up! -Mschel 15:03, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leafy plant![edit]

I love your username!

Beauty!--ĶĩřβȳŤįɱéØ 17:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok, you don't have to be kind. I know and you know we both agree that your username is absolutely wondrous beyond any formal recognition. --ĶĩřβȳŤįɱéØ 19:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MR. LeafyPlant[edit]

I noticed you have been keeping up with the constant vandalism from User:206.224.56.10 thank you. My classmates think it is funny and cute to vandalize and I would greatly appreciate you denying them the pleasure. Just an idea.Avatar of Nothing 12:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Avatar of Nothing[reply]

Cool user name also![edit]

Trampton 20:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Smile![edit]


Saber girl08 16:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous warning by AntiVandalBot[edit]

Your recent edit to John Goodman (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC) I made a false positive report[2]. Thank you for your hardwork VandalBot Leafyplant 17:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fidelity Chess Video[edit]

This is in reference to the message you sent me regarding our chess music video- I added the link due to our frequent response from chess enthusiast from all over the world who have added the video to their websites- I understand Wikipedia is meant to be informative and I feel that it could add extra info to the page- please reconsider the link- thanks- as for the other warning messages I have no knowledge of them being sent as I've only today suscribed to wikipedia. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6711820600051931222 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Boababband (talkcontribs) 12:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Dear Boababband, Welcome to wikipedia! I removed the chess music video because it seemed to contain no notable information about chess, and the inclusion of the email address in the comments made me think it was a promotion for a musical group. If you put the video back I will not remove it again, however I suspect that another editor would remove it. Again, welcome to wikipedia, I hope you like it and stay a while Leafyplant 13:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Polish History[edit]

Hello, Leafyplant: I Have A good Question, I am Highly Educated in Polish History, and I started looking throw most of the polish site here, and most of the information is an outsiders oppinion, not true Polish History, So I start fixing this most of this thing that they had no clue about, Now I am Band from my home computer and Wikipedia is hiding the truth, and making up lies. If you need me to prove that I know more then the one that is making up this information, I can. I will be alerting all Polish organizations if I can resolve this. So Can you Open a dialog with me. Thank Sir Gutowski


Dear Sir Gutowski,

Thank you for your interest in wikipedia. I know nothing about polish history, My only involvement with Golden Freedoms, Golden Freedom and Golden Liberty was to revert edits like [3] [4] which damaged the article by removing proper formatting. I suggest that you contact the editors who wrote the article and discuss your edits with them. Leave messages on the talk pages of User_talk:Piotrus or User_talk:Amatulic. Also, discuss the edits that you would like to make on the talk pages of the article Talk:Golden Liberty. If necessary you can request mediation Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration. Good luck, and please tell me if I can be of anymore help. Leafyplant 17:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In another week or so, I think I'm going to request the page protect be taken down. Thoughts? Cornell Rockey 03:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need Clarification on Vandalism[edit]

Hi. I'm new to Wikipedia, and I thought I'd add some more information to the EM page. I'm not sure why it has been called vandalism, and all changes reverted. I'd like to know, please, so I can do better next time. 219.65.104.122.

Hello, Thank you for your good work on Effective Microorganisms. The article has been vandlized earlier by 72.130.130.77 and I mistakenly reverted your edits. I have restored your version and removed the warning. Please accept my apologies. Leafyplant 20:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For your CV work ;-)[edit]

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your efforts in fighting for a better wikipedia (aka counter-vandalism). Keep going this way & happy editing ;-), Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 11:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Every time I check AIV I see your reports. Stop reporting! I can't block that fast! James086Talk | Email 12:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carfax (company)[edit]

I requested the unprotect. Clearly, we should still keep and eye open on it. All the best! Cornell Rockey 16:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks muchly[edit]

Thanks for the revert. Occupational hazard, I suppose, I'm sure you've had your user page hit a time or three. :-) Always appreciated. Hersfold (talk/work) 02:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Public IP[edit]

Ok leafy, Just to say this quick

this IP is from a school, public school to be exact, And not all my fellow schoolmates are that smart so well... Can you either block or put on that public IP tag on our IP? I can't seem to find it anywhere.

Thanks, From teh schewl. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.14.12.120 (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

PR China[edit]

I cannot understand what part Violate neautral policy of wikipedia? So pls point out it Even Pentagon point out china's extremely military expansion why you can say Un-Neautaral?? And its quite important subject about PR China So, please discuss at note othewise everyone will doubt your neautral position.--202.239.229.7 11:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.239.229.7 (talk) 11:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hello, My reversion of your edit has nothing to do with my opinion of china. Rather your inclusion of your opinion in wikipedia. Consider your statement below.


The Communist Party of China (CPC) will only face unrest among the PRC's growing and rights-deprived middle class and increasingly impoverished peasants as time passes by. The PRC needs to be democratized if its successes over the past few decades are to persist well into this century. Democracy must prevail at some point


It is an opinion, one which most people may agree with, but it does not belong in the wikipedia article, and it should not be in bold. Leafyplant 11:53, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why do you insist on reverting the DJ Premier page? Thanks if you spent time typing that list, but I cleaned it up and added it to the separate production page for premo. A separate page will encourage more edits, views.

When an IP user deletes 72 lines of text with out any comment, it looks like vandalism. Sorry for the mis-understanding.Leafyplant 14:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers![edit]

Thanks for the revert on my talk page. Much appreciated. Will (aka Wimt) 16:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IP[edit]

I'm hoping you are a more experienced recent changes patroller than I am. I want to ask, how can you tell if an IP address is a dynamic IP? What if you think an IP is a work IP? Is there a tag for that? Thank you, --Umalee 17:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
You can check the IP with a few services listed here Wikipedia:Recent_changes_patrol#Trace_IP A more experienced Vandal fighter or admin might be able to give you a better answers. All the best...Leafyplant 17:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Okay, thanks anyway. --Umalee 17:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Much appreciated. Mark (Talk) 11:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Re: Thanks for un-vandalizing my userpage[edit]

You're welcome! Happy to help. Will (aka Wimt) 12:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

86.148.190.57[edit]

I wasn't vandalising, I was testing to edit the wiki.

Thanks[edit]

Hello Leafyplant.

Thank you for reverting on my discussion's site. I'm new on en.wp, testing antivandalizing tools and if here are also vandal fighters. ;) Also how en.wp works. Greetings from Germany, TheWizard 11:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Bassingthwaighte[edit]

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on the Natalie Bassingthwaighte page. Unfortunately the user "80.156.44.1" aka "SeK612" is still doing it. Nbwiki 11:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unholy Alliance[edit]

Hi, no vandalism. I wrote both versions. Just trying to summarize it a bit, so it doesn't exactly reproduce what's under Theodore_Roosevelt#Election_of_1912 which I wrote, too. 68.221.125.185 13:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I reverted my warningLeafyplant 13:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Erroneous warning by AntiVandalBot[edit]

Your recent edit to ElgooG (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 11:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I filed anothe rfalse positive report.Leafyplant 11:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MartinBot[edit]

Hmm, Martin Bot reverted your revert. I dunno why. - Dan D. Ric 11:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

194.66.72.74[edit]

I think it may be time for 194.66.72.74 to be banned, considering the number of warnings and his recent edit on B+ tree. Although it seems that several users may be using the address. (Several reasonable edits have also been made from it.) Mogentianae 17:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

216.229.196.50[edit]

I believe that this IP address needs to be blocked from making edits. I undid a vandalism or sandbox edit (it's hard to tell which) on outer space today and after seeing the talk page for that IP saw your warnings. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kisama (talkcontribs) 20:26, August 20, 2007 (UTC).

You're an Administrator, Right???[edit]

Coz all those colourful signs, pictures, and awards of yours sure make it seem so. If I'm correct, then maybe you can help me. In the article: Iggy Arbuckle, I've been waiting for ages for some images to be uploaded (e.g., character images, an image for the show template). I've already gotten a lot of the ordinary users and account members notified on the matter, but I really want someone who knows and understands all about Wikipedia's policy rights - like an administrator - invovled in the matter. Could you please help us out? Thank you! Wilhelmina Will 02:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Valentine's Day![edit]

User:Wilhelmina Will has wished you a happy Valentine's day, and good luck in love and friendship!

A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

??[edit]

I already read the warning. Whats the point of having it there after that? Its my discussion page, after all. --98.232.180.37 (talk) 03:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Centralized_discussion/Removing_warnings Leafyplant 04:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And it looks like the jury is out. --98.232.180.37 (talk) 04:47, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

edit on oreilly[edit]

My edit was positive that you misidentified as vandalism. I have seen a segment on youtube where Oreilly professes his desire to do his show live. 71.113.228.95 (talk) 04:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re:references for Castillo v. Case Farms of Ohio[edit]

You have new messages Hey, Leafyplant. You have new messages at Shep's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing or tnulling the template.

§hepTalk 02:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism[edit]

I did not write anything that was not truth. I was there and in that unit and saw with my own eyes and talked with about 400 other guys who all said the same thing. Brian J. Menes and Mervyn Jobe are infact some of the WORST leaders in the U.S. Army and that is a fact people should know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.0.249.209 (talk) 20:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Hornbook -- a new law-related task force for the J.D. curriculum[edit]

Hi Leafyplant,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

  • Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
  • It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
  • Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.
  • I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.
2. If you're a law student,
(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)
3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 01:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlligatorFL2007.JPG missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:AlligatorFL2007.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:27, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:BrownAnole.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed[edit]

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
  3. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Current signature:
<b><font color="#009900" >[[User:leafyplant|Leafy</font><font color = "brown">plant]]</font></b>

Fixed signature:
<b>[[User:leafyplant|<span style="color:#009900;">Leafy</span><span style="color:brown;">plant</span>]]</b>

More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help with usability testing[edit]

Hello! The mw:Anti-Harassment Tools team is running a usability test to find out how and where IP addresses are used when patrolling wikis, particularly when patrolling RecentChanges. This could include New Pages or RecentChanges patrol. We want to see your patrolling process and get your views on some prototypes. Getting your perspective would be really helpful to us at this stage of the process. If you’d like to help, and have 30 minutes to spare, please fill out this Google form with your details: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfjYyRNGMkO4_TdNOgG4qmK9cp9YOKzM4GFO5pTd_bEcu23YQ/viewform


For the purpose of the tests we’ll be using Google Forms for recruitment, and UserTesting.com to conduct the actual tests. Please review the privacy statement and release form in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ijmwrIoNO0W1p_zfFU1LBf3_6mFF53kUUFy1L_DCUKc (Google docs link)

Thank you,

NKohli (WMF) (talk) and PSaxena (WMF) (talk) 03:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]