User talk:Mitchazenia/Archive15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ping[edit]

User talk:SandyGeorgia#Can you withdraw WP:FAC/New York State Route 28 --ROGER DAVIES talk 23:04, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 5 - May 2008[edit]

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #16[edit]

The April issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Help needed[edit]

''{{User_talk:Arctic.gnome#Help_needed|reply notice}}''

Pond Eddy Bridge[edit]

I created a stub article for Pond Eddy Bridge with the standard NRHP templates for you. Go ahead and add text and pictures as you like. I'll keep an eye on it. --Appraiser (talk) 20:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pond Eddy Bridge[edit]

Hmm. I assume you're talking about the article structure. For NRHP bridges, we generally defer to the bridge project guidelines, as if there were any. This is also a pain because I can't find the NRHP nomination for Pond Eddy Bridge in the OPRHP database (Would you want a photo? I could take one, assuming I get reimbursed for the fuel expenses ($10 or so from where I live) at some point by someone).

Tioronda Bridge is the only bridge article I've photographed, started and done primarily from an NRHP standpoint, mainly because it's a (currently, anyway) defunct bridge that could be restored and is now primarily of historical value and not used for transport (unless you're in public utilities, which it still carries).

For NRHP bridges we would generally write about the history of any previous crossings there, if known. If there is anything about the architecture of the bridge that's important, we put that in. The construction info is standard bridge project stuff. And any local historic impact (what changes did it make to the local economy?) ... that's good too. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I suppose I could get around to taking that pic eventually anyway. Don't worry about it :-).

Rereading it, I realized why NYS OPRHP didn't have the nomination ... PA spearheaded that one, so it's here, on the PA ARCH database. Daniel Case (talk) 09:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination for the article 1987 Atlantic hurricane season has passed , see Talk:1987 Atlantic hurricane season noting my passage of the article, and offering suggestions for further improving it. Great work on it! Hello32020 (talk) 23:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it was unclear what I meant, or you may just be waiting to do this, I was referring to creating a table at the begining of the storms section. (Similar to this article's) Hello32020 (talk) 02:05, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter, Issue 4[edit]

Apologies for the late delivery; my internet connection went down halfway through the delivery process.

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 4 • 30 April 2008About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here.Rschen7754bot (talk) 22:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shortman Road[edit]

File:Shortmanroad.jpg
Shortman Road at NY 5.

A few weeks back, you asked if I would be able to get a photo of Shortman Road in Ripley, New York. I was down that way today and snapped this. I hope it is what you were looking for. Skudrafan1 (talk) 03:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is taken standing on New York State Route 5, looking east. It's .58 over the NY/PA state line -- it represents both the first eastbound on-ramp to the New York State Thruway and the first major junction on NY Route 5's 370.87-mile trek across New York.
As far not contributing more goes... I used to contribute A LOT (I have made 17,600+ edits, mostly in the ice hockey project). I did do quite a bit with WP:NYSR when I first started, and I actually am the original creator of quite a few of these New York State Route articles (I created NY 174, for example, which I see you've gotten to FA status!). Lately, though, I've been focusing most of my energy elsewhere in life. I definitely still like to help out where I can. I drive quite a bit through my current major hobby, geocaching, and I feel like if I can also take pictures of road signs and improve Wikipedia while I'm out there, then I'm not wasting my gas quite so much. :) So feel free to make any requests for photos of signage as you'd like -- if it's in Western New York or Northwestern Pennsylvania, I'll likely get there eventually. :) Skudrafan1 (talk) 02:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need your vote[edit]

Saw you archived, so don't know if you saw my earlier not about Arden Valley Road being put up for an AfD. It's doing well in our favor, but you should vote. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arden Valley Road -Airtuna08 (talk) 05:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The planning for the summer Philadelphia meetup has begun. We would appreciate your input.
You're getting this invitation because you're on Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia/Philadelphia meet-up invite list. BrownBot (talk) 21:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Assess[edit]

Can you assess Hurricane Adolph (2001), since you have done several others. Thanks, « Milk's Favorite Cookie ( talk / contribs) 15:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your review and kind words with the Interstate 70 in Colorado and U.S. Route 163 GA nominations.Dave (talk) 19:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK: Pond Eddy Bridge[edit]

Updated DYK query On 11 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pond Eddy Bridge, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai (talk) 15:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a method to my madness concerning wikipedia upgrades, though it might not seem that way. The tropical cyclone rainfall project steers me to an assortment of articles, including the 1981 AHS. I've also been focusing on getting articles I've formerly improved to B class up to GA class. Right now, I'm focusing on that season because there were a few tropical depressions that impacted the lower 48, with two leading to significant rainfall and deaths across Texas and Louisiana. They were the most damaging and deadly tropical cyclones of that season, which is unusual in itself. I'm more than happy to help you out with the tropical depressions within that article. As for getting it to FA, one step at a time. Let's see if we can get this to GA first. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it has enough information and references for GAC, so it is now GACed. I saw someone wrote a summary, which a recently learned was needed for a GACed article. Does the summary need to include the other TDs which did essentially nothing, or no? Thegreatdr (talk) 03:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It finally passed GA. I leave the FACing up to you. Thegreatdr (talk) 14:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The keys to the city for 1979 and 1982[edit]

Here are entries from the Atlantic non-development database for those two years. A word of caution...all of these systems may not have been recognized as tropical depressions in real time. I'd stick to writing up the systems that have newspaper information, or some other source mentioning they were a tropical depression, to back them up. A search of the Daily Weather Map series and the Hurricane Newspaper Archive could help you determine which ones were recognized in real-time. The ones which impacted the United States, Mexico, and Puerto Rico will eventually have pages within the TC rainfall project. If you're still having problems, when I get back to work Thursday evening, I can look at the HPC surface analyses from 1982 to see if they mentioned TD numbers for systems that came near the United States. Our local archive does not go back before 1981, however. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


  • 8120 6/11/1979 M= 6 1 SNBR= 132 XING=0 Tropical Depression #1
  • 8130 6/11* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*174 811 20 0*177 808 25 0*
  • 8150 6/12*181 802 25 0*184 799 25 0*190 796 25 0*195 794 30 0*
  • 8160 6/13*200 792 30 0*205 791 30 0*210 790 25 0*218 790 25 0*
  • 8170 6/14*229 790 25 0*237 790 25 0*245 790 30 0*251 790 30 0*
  • 8180 6/15*259 790 30 0*266 791 30 0*272 794 30 0*281 797 30 0*
  • 8190 6/16*294 799 30 0*308 800 30 0*320 800 30 0*334 802 0 0*
  • 8200 TD
  • 8210 7/ 8/1979 M= 6 2 SNBR= 133 XING=0 Tropical Depression #4
  • 8220 7/ 8* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*204 700 20 0*210 703 25 0*
  • 8230 7/ 9*218 708 25 0*223 711 25 0*230 712 25 0*239 710 25 0*
  • 8240 7/10*247 710 25 0*254 708 25 0*261 704 25 0*270 701 25 0*
  • 8250 7/11*281 699 25 0*292 697 25 0*301 692 25 0*317 681 25 0*
  • 8260 7/12*330 670 25 0*340 655 25 0*350 640 25 0*362 620 25 0*
  • 8270 7/13*378 599 25 0*390 578 20 0*402 552 20 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 8280 TD
  • 8290 7/10/1979 M= 4 3 SNBR= 134 XING=0
  • 8300 7/10* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*300 798 20 0*308 785 20 0*
  • 8310 7/11*315 771 25 0*320 759 25 0*326 741 30 0*326 727 30 0*
  • 8320 7/12*324 712 30 0*321 700 30 0*320 688 30 0*319 666 30 0*
  • 8330 7/13*318 645 30 0*319 624 30 0*320 605 25 0*327 582 20 0*
  • 8340 TD
  • 8350 7/23/1979 M= 4 4 SNBR= 135 XING=0
  • 8360 7/23* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*170 355 20 0*174 372 20 0*
  • 8370 7/24*178 390 25 0*180 405 25 0*182 421 30 0*189 439 30 0*
  • 8380 7/25*195 455 30 0*203 470 30 0*210 489 30 0*220 500 30 0*
  • 8390 7/26*232 510 25 0*245 515 25 0*260 520 25 0*265 525 20 0*
  • 8400 TD
  • 8410 7/31/1979 M= 7 5 SNBR= 136 XING=0 Tropical Depression #6
  • 8420 7/31* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*170 540 25 0*176 563 25 0*
  • 8430 8/ 1*183 586 25 0*194 606 25 0*207 623 30 0*219 635 30 0*
  • 8440 8/ 2*230 648 30 0*244 655 30 0*259 666 30 0*270 670 30 0*
  • 8450 8/ 3*280 675 30 0*291 680 30 0*302 681 30 0*320 685 30 0*
  • 8460 8/ 4*335 685 30 0*350 685 30 0*366 684 30 0*385 675 30 0*
  • 8470 8/ 5*405 665 30 0*420 650 30 0*438 638 30 0*460 600 25 0*
  • 8480 8/ 6*475 555 25 0*482 506 25 0*485 450 20 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 8490 TD
  • 8500 8/25/1979 M= 4 6 SNBR= 137 XING=0 Tropical Depression #8
  • 8510 8/25* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*180 945 20 0*190 950 25 0*
  • 8520 8/26*194 952 205 0*200 960 30 0*208 960 30 0*218 960 30 0*
  • 8530 8/27*227 960 30 0*234 960 30 0*242 961 30 0*249 966 25 0*
  • 8540 8/28*247 971 25 0*240 985 25 0*238 990 0 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 8550 TD
  • 8560 9/ 1/1979 M= 6 7 SNBR= 138 XING=0
  • 8570 9/ 1* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*199 220 20 0*204 230 25 0*
  • 8580 9/ 2*208 236 25 0*212 260 30 0*220 273 30 0*222 287 30 0*
  • 8590 9/ 3*230 300 30 0*233 318 30 0*239 332 30 0*249 349 30 0*
  • 8600 9/ 4*260 365 30 0*272 378 30 0*287 390 30 0*301 395 30 0*
  • 8610 9/ 5*315 398 25 0*329 395 25 0*340 390 25 0*353 385 25 0*
  • 8620 9/ 6*367 379 25 0*378 370 20 0*390 360 20 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 8630 TD
  • 8640 9/16/1979 M= 6 8 SNBR= 139 XING=0 Tropical Depression #13
  • 8650 9/16* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*156 485 20 0*162 492 20 0*
  • 8660 9/17*170 500 25 0*179 506 25 0*190 510 25 0*198 515 25 0*
  • 8670 9/18*208 516 25 0*217 516 30 0*224 517 30 0*230 516 30 0*
  • 8680 9/19*256 516 30 0*270 515 30 0*288 515 30 0*302 515 30 0*
  • 8690 9/20*321 512 30 0*340 510 30 0*359 504 25 0*371 500 25 0*
  • 8700 9/21*390 490 25 0*402 481 25 0*418 470 20 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 8710 TD
  • 8720 10/12/1979 M= 9 9 SNBR= 140 XING=0 Tropical Depression #14
  • 8730 10/12* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*169 873 20 0*172 871 20 0*
  • 8740 10/13*176 869 25 0*179 864 25 0*180 860 25 0*181 855 30 0*
  • 8750 10/14*182 849 30 0*183 844 30 0*184 839 30 0*185 834 30 0*
  • 8760 10/15*188 829 30 0*189 824 30 0*191 821 30 0*193 818 30 0*
  • 8770 10/16*197 814 30 0*200 812 30 0*203 812 30 0*207 814 30 0*
  • 8780 10/17*210 817 30 0*211 821 30 0*212 825 30 0*211 830 30 0*
  • 8790 10/18*210 835 25 0*209 840 25 0*205 844 25 0*202 848 25 0*
  • 8800 10/19*200 851 25 0*197 857 25 0*195 864 25 0*191 869 25 0*
  • 8810 10/20*190 872 20 0*188 879 20 0*186 882 0 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 8820 TD
  • 8830 10/24/1979 M= 6 10 SNBR= 141 XING=0
  • 8840 10/24* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*120 770 20 0*125 773 25 0*
  • 8850 10/25*132 776 25 0*140 780 25 0*148 782 30 0*155 785 30 0*
  • 8860 10/26*164 789 30 0*172 792 30 0*180 800 30 0*179 805 25 0*
  • 8870 10/27*176 810 25 0*173 816 25 0*169 820 25 0*166 821 25 0*
  • 8880 10/28*163 824 25 0*160 826 25 0*158 829 25 0*154 830 25 0*
  • 8890 10/29*150 832 20 0*148 836 20 0*144 838 0 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 8900 TD
  • 8910 11/ 7/1979 M= 4 11 SNBR= 142 XING=0 Subtropical Depression #15
  • 8920 11/ 7* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*245 561 20 0*252 552 25 0*
  • 8930 11/ 8*260 545 25 0*265 536 25 0*271 527 30 0*278 515 30 0*
  • 8940 11/ 9*283 504 30 0*290 495 30 0*291 482 30 0*292 469 25 0*
  • 8950 11/10*292 455 20 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 8960 TD
  • 10030 9/ 6/1982 M= 4 1 SNBR= 160 XING=0 Tropical Depression #3
  • 10040 9/ 6*168 530 20 0*169 541 25 0*170 551 25 0*177 562 30 0*
  • 10050 9/ 7*180 572 30 0*186 582 30 0*190 590 30 0*195 602 30 0*
  • 10060 9/ 8*200 612 30 0*204 622 30 0*210 630 30 0*218 640 30 0*
  • 10070 9/ 9*224 649 25 0*232 655 25 0*240 660 20 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 10080 TD
  • 9/16-20/1982 Tropical Depression #6 Tropical Atlantic
  • 10090 9/24/1982 M= 4 2 SNBR= 161 XING=0 Tropical Depression #7
  • 10100 9/24*253 715 20 0*260 725 25 0*271 730 25 0*281 721 30 0*
  • 10110 9/25*290 715 30 0*300 706 30 0*310 696 30 0*323 685 30 0*
  • 10120 9/26*335 675 30 0*348 662 30 0*360 650 30 0*370 640 30 0*
  • 10130 9/27*380 630 25 0*392 615 25 0*401 601 20 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 10140 TD
I don't know. For 1982, the five named storms plus the 2 unnamed TDs would total 7 depressions...7 TDs plus the 5 named storms would mean they got to TD 12 that season. Go with the annual articles for years prior to 1980 (which you can reference, this database is "unreferencable"). This database was recently digitized, and I was one of the first to see it because I needed a record of tropical depressions between 1980 and 1987 for the TC rainfall project. It may contain errors, and does not appear to have supporting documentation at this time. Thegreatdr (talk) 00:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've more fully annotated which TDs might be which above, using the reanalysis file. TD #4 of 1979 is iffy...not sure which of the systems is TD #4, the one I annotated as such or the one to its southwest which formed closer to the Southeast US. Hope this helps. Thegreatdr (talk) 18:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dropping of a 1983 depression[edit]

The article you used as a reference does not appear to have the information claimed in the article. Is it another MWR article that does, or have I missed it during my two reads? Fact tags have been placed in the appropriate locations until the situation is rectified. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The easiest solution then is to drop the mention of TD6 being dropped after the fact, since it's unreferenceable. While the nondevelopment database is missing the system and you got the response you did from NHC public affairs, the reanalysis file mentions that there's a decent shot this system could have been a tropical storm. With conflicting signals present, dropping this sentence is likely the best route to take for the time being. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the entry from the reanalysis file since it shows the disparity: TD #6 - Recon pressures 1009-1012 mb 18-19 Sep with 35-45 kt winds 80-130 nm NE of center - maximum satellite intensity estimate 30 kt - need ships
There are seven reasonable candidates. TD6 isn't even the best candidate of 1983. Check out the system on July 11, between Bermuda and Nova Scotia. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TDs for 1980-1987[edit]

Once I go through the information from the two files I have, I'll post the tracks on the respective hurricane season pages with a disclaimer. I've posted the relevent 1979, 1982, and 1987 information on the talk pages. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has been done. I've posted the information I put on your talk page from recognized TDs onto the seasonal pages as well. That way, others can help out. I'm only willing to post the information from this period since I've had problems in the past due to a total lack of NHC/MWR information online during this time frame. We definitely have a TD problem in 1981, if what Lixion wrote in the 1988 MWR article is right about 22 TDs. Ugh. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't be too willing to discount high TD numbers. Something changed by 1989 which significantly lowered TD counts from NHC. Some of us noticed the change soon after NHC created proper advisories for TDs which began around 1988 (instead of mere references in the tropical weather outlook). Others noticed that the TD definition itself changed to become more stringent (going from closed isobar to closed wind circulation and including wordage like well-defined and warm-core). While a number of the pre-1989 TDs probably wouldn't be considered TDs nowadays, some of them would have been TSs if meteorologists had the current tools 20-30 years ago. By the way, if you ever see newspaper articles from the mid 80s backward which define the term tropical depression, let me know. With such information, we might be able to create an article detailing the history of tropical cyclone advisories/warnings for the Atlantic basin. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Your GA nomination of New York State Route 317[edit]

The article New York State Route 317 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:New York State Route 317 for things needed to be addressed. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

72.225.50.116 is me not logged in.[edit]

I put in Erie Canal info etc..... I'm 72.225.50.116 (I wasn't logged in!), Swear! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Check77 (talkcontribs) 20:06, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick question[edit]

Hey. Currently the transport GANs has 16 articles from the USRD, of which 12 are yours. Seeing as you just recently nominated another, would you mind holding back, at least until some of the backlog is cleared? Thanks man. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:56, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NY 344[edit]

C.C. told me to point you to [1]. I assume he's OK with you using it. —Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USRD participants list[edit]

As discussed at WT:USRD, the participants list at WP:USRD is being split by state. Due to any of the following factors- your extended participation in WT:USRD discussions, your IRC participation, or your extended participation in Shields or Maps, I have guessed that you are a nationwide editor and have designated you as such in the USRD partiicpants table. This is part of the lengthy process. If this is in error, please let me know immediately. This is especially likely with this group as I have to guess whether you are a national or a state editor. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 21:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Meetup: June 1, 2008[edit]

New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday June 1st, Columbia University area
Last: 3/16/2008
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, elect a board of directors, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wiki Week bonanza, being planned with Columbia University students for September or October.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

Also, check out our regional US Wikimedia chapters blog Wiki Northeast (and we're open to guest posts).
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M-35 FAC[edit]

The Michigan State Highways Barnstar
Thank you for your many reviews and support. M-35 passed its FAC. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


New York State Route 32[edit]

Yes, I'd be glad to help. I don't know how far I'll get this evening, but I'll take it up again tomorrow afternoon or evening. It's much better to copyedit before going to FAC than after, though M-35 worked out fine, I see. Finetooth (talk) 02:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone as far as I can. Whew! Complicated path. I did a lot of low-level, partly invisible stuff like the many nbsp insertions. I think the last paragraph of the lead could use some spiffing; I tried, but I don't feel quite satisfied with my results. I wondered about personal research as an issue. Is it possible to tell from the sources cited that the highway is near a view or passing through a roadcut? Finetooth (talk) 02:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"visible from the road"[edit]

I have included images of the country the road passes through to support the claims made in the text, particularly the one removed here. This image was taken specifically to illustrate the claim. If you'd like me to geocode it to support it, I can do that to. I intend at some point to get further north and take some other pictures. (Not all of the text removed need have pictures to support it ... in fact, some of it was extraneous stuff that should stay out).

Update: Geocoding added. Daniel Case (talk) 15:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taking original images to support claims in the text is the one specific exception to WP:OR. In fact, it's encouraged. See WP:OI. Daniel Case (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have indicated here exactly where the view described here can be photographed. If you'd like me to get up there and shoot it as it's warm and green now, before FA, please let me know. Frankly, it's a gorgeous image at the right time of the right kind of day, and you want it in the article if you're going for FA.

I'll be passing through there on the way to Albany tomorrow. The forecast looks good. I will fast-track any picture into the article. Daniel Case (talk) 13:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Got it today. Haven't edited it yet (it's getting late; I doubt I'd do it well), but I'll try tomorrow. Also got a nice residential neighborhood in Cohoes (a short, extremely low-quality stretch of 32 next to 787 that you'd never guess was part of a long state highway). Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Update: they have both been uploaded and added to the article. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I let Julian know that I took some new pics in Putnam/Dutchess last weekend, some of which will be good in the articles on routes 22, 52 and 311. Daniel Case (talk) 14:44, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the geocoding on the image provides enough verification, though I could make the language less peacock-y. The New Paltz pic I linked to shows both the road and the Gunks (and even the Catskills in the distance). Daniel Case (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think a footnote link to Google maps or whatever would be sufficient to verify a "sweeping view" ... that was Finetooth's point. If you take a picture of something, you don't need a footnote. That's why I take so many pictures. See what Finetooth thinks. Daniel Case (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Guillermo (1997)[edit]

When Hurricane Guillermo (1997) was created, there were evidently copyright issues, as was mentioned on its talk page. Have those been completely removed and dealt with totally, so that they will never be an issue again? I need to know this because I am working on making Category 5 Pacific hurricanes a featured topic, and Guillermo being a GA or better is part of that process; and in order to get Guillermo to GA status there cannot be copyright issues.

Thank you for your assistance. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:09, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond somewhere. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:17, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that most of the copy vios have been fixed, although a lot of the storm history copys the TCR word-for-word. While it would be better off worded differently, since the TCR is a work of the US Gov, it's not a legal problem. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations[edit]

The Special Barnstar
For getting yet another highway article featured. Imzadi1979 (talk) 04:07, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did expand a little bit of history for CR S18 (CA), but it was only for the El Toro Road segment. I can't really find any history for Santiago Canyon Road at the moment, but why don't you review this part of the article and see if this article meets the criteria for GA. If no, please tell me the weak points of the article, and I'll try to fix it. Dabby (talk) 00:51, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, um... I'm sorry, but did you get my previous message? Dabby (talk) 01:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NY 28[edit]

I'd let you know on IRC, but you left, and I don't want to forget...since polaron added a bunch of turnpike info to NY 28, I think it should be good for an FAC very soon. Lemme know what you want to do with it. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page[edit]

Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 13:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 6 - June 2008[edit]

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mitch, I'm back and I believe I have addressed your concerns for this GAC. My apologies it took so long. Thanks for the review.Dave (talk) 17:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I didn't realize how busy you were until I talked with Imzadi on IRC. Good luck juggling all those plates =-)Dave (talk) 20:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Former NY 307[edit]

I don't have one, but I could easily go down to Cornwall and get one, maybe even later today. We'll see. Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Road pics[edit]

I'd be glad to take pics of some of these roads (maybe all). The reason I didn't offer on the Rt 174 and Rt 175 when I saw the articles is because I'm not sure what constitutes a good road picture. A scenic view of the road? A prominent intersection? What DO you look for in a road pic? BTW, went swimming (if you can call a quick dip in frigid water swimming) in Skaneateles Lake today!Lvklock (talk) 00:45, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #17[edit]

The May issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like a Rolling Stone GA[edit]

Thank you so much!!!! I really appreciate it; I've worked so hard on it, and I appreciate that you took the time to review the article. Have a great day. Cheers, Kodster (heLLo) (Me did that) 17:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

50 GAs in 50 states[edit]

If you haven't done Illinois yet Lake Michigan Circle Tour could have a full-fledged LMCT in Illinois article. It would be great to see and I think it is in line with your interests.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are the only person I know to ask to create the article. I have driven the entire LMCT in Illinois and parts of it are very scenic. It passes through some very rich Chicago northern suburbs. I have only had success with historic streets. Anything is better than the one sentence in the LMCT article.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lurie Garden GAC[edit]

Did I resolve your issues?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With as many GAs as you have you should know that you are suppose to update Wikipedia:Good articles/recent, and you are suppose to update the talk page templates? I have done them for you, but as a GA pro you should remember these in the future.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your 50-state GA challenge[edit]

Hey, I saw the list of articles you will be making into GAs. I'm quite honored you chose SR-186, as it contains one of my images :D Well, I thought you'd just like to know. Good luck with the challenge by the way. CL — 19:21, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]