User talk:Mz7/December 2020–February 2021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2020 China–India skirmishes

Can you restore your ECP protection on 2020 China–India skirmishes? Same IP users with zero willingness to discuss their edits are back. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 02:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Aman.kumar.goel, sorry for the delay in responding. Looks like another administrator applied a 1-year semi-protection. Let's see how that holds for now. Mz7 (talk) 22:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).

Administrator changes

removed Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020

Interface administrator changes

added Izno

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Mz7. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 15:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Dimpletisha

Hey M, I know you just did a CU on Dimpletisha (and thank you), but I noticed Gbhgcvvb, an obvious throw-away account, come out of a 9-month retirement to edit at Harshad Chopda, their only area of interest, and a frequent interest of Dimpletisha's. This was a day after you blocked Dramionex, so the timing is highly suspect and I can't exactly block on duck evidence. Any chance you could see if they're related to the recent accounts? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Cyphoidbomb, thanks for your message. I ran a check, and I think this is a different person. Definitely a curious coincidence, but the CU data says  Unlikely. Mz7 (talk) 22:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Hmm. Intriguing. Thanks for looking! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for giving me a second chance. I know a lot of admins that wouldn't have done that, and I am very grateful that you gave me one. I will stick to my promises and never sock again. Thanks again. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 17:44, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-50

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time. Some wikis already had this function. [1][2]

Changes later this week

  • Information from Wikidata that is used on a wiki page can be shown in recent changes and watchlists on a Wikimedia wiki. To see this you need to turn on showing Wikidata edits in your watchlist in the preferences. Changes to the Wikidata description in the language of a Wikimedia wiki will then be shown in recent changes and watchlists. This will not show edits to languages that are not relevant to your wiki. [3][4]
  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 8 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 9 December. It will be on all wikis from 10 December (calendar).

Future changes

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

16:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

UTRS

Hi,

Can you please take a look at this appeal on UTRS? You're the blocking admin and I'm in two minds whether or not I unblock the user or restore TPA to allow the unblock discussion to take place there. I'm inclined to restore TPA access.-- 5 albert square (talk) 00:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi 5 albert square, thanks for your message. I had to refresh my memory a bit to recall this particular case. It appears the editor behind this range has an extensive history of disruptive editing, edit warring on The Angry Beavers for much of the past year. Reading over the details of the UTRS request, to be honest I am not really convinced that unblocking them would be a good idea. Although they claim they will not edit war in the future, when they explain how they will avoid edit warring, they write, if there's any information that should or must stay in the article, I won't delete the information, but will just leave it alone because it should or must be in the article. I feel this explanation misunderstands what edit warring is. It isn't that they were removing information that was so important that it had to be in the article, but rather, they were repeatedly restoring their preferred version of the article without attempting to discuss their changes on any kind of talk page.
With all of this being said, I do see that the block expires next week anyway, and I'm happy to defer to whatever you think is best. Given the choice between unblocking and restoring TPA, I'd restore TPA, although for the reasons above I think consideration should also be given to declining the request outright. Mz7 (talk) 04:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

please perform CU check

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Architect 134, thank you very much sir, and when it's confirmed please counter and ban the account. 156.219.58.255 (talk) 03:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello Mz7,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Recent IP block

The IP editor who was changing politicians' names created an account right around the time of your block Matthew deputy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and also created this draft: Draft:Pappy. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 02:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Wallyfromdilbert, thanks for the heads up. Blocked now. Mz7 (talk) 02:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 02:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-51

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • There is a Wikipedia app for KaiOS phones. It was released in India in September. It can now be downloaded in other countries too. [5]

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 15 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 16 December. It will be on all wikis from 17 December (calendar).

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

21:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-52

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Tech News

  • Because of the holidays the next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 11 January 2021.

Recent changes

  • The {{citation needed}} template shows when a statement in a Wikipedia article needs a source. If you click on it when you edit with the visual editor there is a popup that explains this. Now it can also show the reason and when it was added. [6]

Changes later this week

  • There is no new MediaWiki version this week or next week.

Future changes

  • You can propose and discuss what technical improvements should be done for geographic information. This could be coordinates, maps or other related things.
  • Some wikis use LanguageConverter to switch between writing systems or variants of a language. This can only be done for the entire page. There will be a <langconvert> tag that can convert a piece of text on a page. [7]
  • Oversighters and stewards can hide entries in Special:AbuseLog. They can soon hide multiple entries at once using checkboxes. This works like hiding normal edits. It will happen in early January. [8]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

20:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Mz7, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
Starzoner (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

I wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays! Starzoner (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, Starzoner! To you as well. Mz7 (talk) 19:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

A Joyous Yuletide to You!


JACKINTHEBOX • TALK is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy holidays

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!


Hello Mz7, Wishing you a joyous holiday season and a happy and peaceful New Year. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Mz7, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 02:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

@Mz7 Celebrate this Christmas with great joy, happiness and gratitude. Merry Christmas to you and your family! RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 02:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!

We wish you a Merry Christmas,
We wish you a Merry Christmas,
We wish you a Merry Christmas,
And a Happy New Year!
May your holidays be filled with peace and joy. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! TheSandDoctor Talk 16:23, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Adapted from {{Xmas6}}. Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:Altamel/Christmas}} to their talk page.

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays & January 2021 appeal of arbitration enforcement sanction

Happy holidays and happy new year, Mz7! I sincerely hope you've been doing well, and I hope you and your loved ones have been safe and coping well amidst the pandemic! Tomorrow is the new year! You told me to return to you in January 2021 to submit my appeal of arbitration enforcement sanction from the summer of 2020. In January 2021, I hope the appeal can be lifted as I have learned from my past wrongdoings and mistakes. During the timeframe of my sanction, I have engaged in proper behaviour and etiquette on Wikipedia by fully abiding by the community guidelines and regulations. I fully refrained from edit-warring with any users and I tried my utmost best to collaborate with fellow members of the Wikipedia community.

I once again pledge and promise to you that I will never, ever, use a second sockpuppet account again for disruptive purposes. I promise I will never edit war or remove sourced material with out clear summary. I understand that I need consensus from others. If things do not go my way, I have to understand that's OK. I understand that things will not always go my way, and that is perfectly normal and okay - it's not the end of the world. It's okay if others don't agree with me as everyone has different views and stances on various subjects. The most important and crucial thing is to respect everyone and their perspectives. I have to respect the contributions and inputs of others. It's not just about me, wikipedia is a community-driven platform. I cannot just go on about edit warring with others like I own the place, - if everyone did that Wikipedia would be a disruptive mess. Wikipedia is for everyone and I have to respect the insights of others, not just my own. Thanks to preventative measures meant to preserve the integrity of Wikipedia, Wikipedia can be the wonderful place it is today. During my ban, I read over the Wikipedia guidelines very carefully again. I pledge to carefully abide by all of these guidelines. You can trust me in that I will not edit war or abusively use a second sockpuppet account since I recognize that disruptive edits won't help anyone and goes against the community-driven based ideals of Wikipedia. When I make contributions to Wikipedia, I will think before publishing the edit, and I will never edit war with others. If someone reverts my edit, I will not edit war with them. There is a reason for talk pages and edit warring does nothing productive for the community. I want to be able to engage in civil discourse with others on topics of my interest, such as modern US politics. I want to collaborate with others to make this website a better place. I want to be able to give my insights, but I also want to take in the insights of others. I want to be able to prove that I am capable of learning from my mistakes and capable of doing better. I recognize that my actions were wrong and harmful. It is my fault and my fault alone. I will not give any excuses for my wrongful actions because there is no excuse for disruptive actions on Wikipedia or not knowing the rules. I have received several warnings before, it was my own fault that I disrespected the rules. Not familiarizing myself with the rules is not an excuse.

I deeply regret the disruptive damage I previously have caused before on Wikipedia. I want to reassure you that I have learned my lesson since then. I fully understand if you believe it still has been too short of a timeframe for you to trust me again and I fully will respect any decision you will make. In writing this, I have no intention at all of troubling you or giving you any hard time. I am so sorry if this is currently an inappropriate time to be asking or if I am being bothersome. Thank you so much for your time, and sorry for any inconveniences. I hope you have yourself a wonderful holiday and new year!

Happy new year and happy holidays! All the very best, Sincerely Yeungkahchun (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi Yeungkahchun. Happy New Year, and I apologize for my delay in responding. Do you think you could explain some of the context behind some of the complaints on your user talk page since you were unblocked, such as User talk:Yeungkahchun#December 2020? Additionally, what kinds of edits do you intend to make in the US politics topic area if this ban is lifted? US politics is quite the controversial editing area, especially over the past several months, which is the main reason I am hesitant to lift these restrictions. I understand, however, that you have been relatively forthcoming about your situation, and it has been some time since you were blocked for sockpuppetry, so I'm not strictly opposed to loosening this. Mz7 (talk) 22:54, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

I intend on making small productive edits while adhering to wikipedia guidelines from time to time on politician pages as I sometimes see typos or vandalism such as promotion of Trump's false claims of voter fraud. I don't see an urgent need to be editing the 2020 presidential election page as it is quite controversial and heated right now and also I think it is well taken care of. The big pages such as the 2020 presidential election page and Donald Trump page are well-taken care of right now so I don't see myself making edits on those pages.

And as for the User talk:Yeungkahchun#December 2020 situation, the reason for my edit was in support of another wikipedia user's (user Stonksboi) viewpoint on the talk page Talk:2022_Winter_Olympics#Politicization_of_the_2022_Olympics_lead_section. User_talk:Normchou keeps adding a sentence that was already mentioned in the article, as seen discussed on here User_talk:Normchou. As other wiki users have stated on User_talk:Normchou, "the edits made were in consensus with all previous and future Olympic articles, controversy belongs to the controversy subsection.User_talk:Normchou gave no explanation why the 2022 games are an exception to this." As seen on User_talk:Normchou, this user has a history of disruptive editing on China related articles and has been reverting multiple multiple users' edits. However once my edit was reverted by user Normchou, I did not engage in editwarring with this user nor did I commit sockpuppetry to revert the revert of my edit. Since my blocking, I have learned my lesson and I no longer revert others' reverts of my edits nor do I engage in editwarring and sockpuppetry with others. Yeungkahchun (talk) 23:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

@Yeungkahchun: Regarding the 2022 Olympics situation, I think the main issue is that you didn't leave an edit summary, so it is not clear to other editors why you removed the content. (I also noticed that most of the editors who have complained on Normchou's talk page have since been blocked from editing, so it makes the claim that Normchou "has a history of disruptive editing on China related articles" somewhat dubious. Admittedly, I haven't looked too deeply at that editor's contributions, so maybe I'm missing something.) In the future, and especially in controversial areas like American politics, you should strive to leave an edit summary with every single edit that you submit to Wikipedia, so that it is clear to other editors why you are making the change. Additionally, if your edit is "in support of another wikipedia user's ... viewpoint on the talk page", then ideally you should also leave an edit at the talk page discussion.
Based on all of your statements to me, I suspect you already know most of this stuff, and I don't want to sound like a broken record. It has indeed been almost five months now since you were unblocked, and in that time you have been relatively forthcoming and cooperative about your sanctions. I think your planned strategy of sticking to fixing typos and vandalism is good; it's best to start slow before diving into extremely controversial areas. In light of that, I am okay with lifting your topic ban. I will file the paperwork to do so shortly. Please be aware that in the event of further disruption in this topic area, you may be sanctioned again. Please edit carefully. Best of luck, Mz7 (talk) 05:12, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for lifting the sanction, I highly appreciate it! Starting from now I will leave edit summaries for every edit so it is clear to editors as to why I made changes (in the past I rarely made edit summaries). I also will refrain from removing huge portions of content unilaterally, instead I will start a discussion on the talk page discussion in order discuss improvements to the page with the Wikipedia community. Once again, thank you! Best, Yeungkahchun (talk) 21:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Empire AS Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS Talk! 13:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!
Hello Mz7:


Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

Starzoner (talk) 15:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

I wish you a prosperous 2021! Starzoner (talk) 15:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Images

Hey Mz7. A small favour, now you see the page of Zoran Tegeltija, Chairman of the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosnian Prime Minister), does not have an image of him and I can't see to find one that respects copyright rules. My mentality is that a Prime Minister of a country should have a decent image of them on their page. Could you somehow, if you want to of course, try to find a decent, non-copyright image of Tegeltija and send me a link so I could put it up? I would greatly appreciate it.

Also, Dušan Bajević a Bosnian football manager and player has an old image of him put up, precisely 1974. I also looked for a much newer image of him to put up, particularly this one. Could you somehow see if its copyrighted? Even if not that one, another newer image of him can do. I know I'm asking for a bit much, but I really looked for images of them and couldn't find any that are ok too use. Sadly, their images on Flickr are all not fair to use. So if you could just look in to it a bit I would honestly really appreciate it. But again though, your call. :) Kirbapara (talk) 19:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

@Kirbapara: Unfortunately, if an image is not clearly stated to be available under a free license, then we have to assume that it is copyrighted, so it's not likely that we can use the image that you linked in the article. Mz7 (talk) 21:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Reconstruction Amendments

Hey. I'm thinking about nominating Reconstruction Amendments for GA again. Would you mind giving it a once-over first? For context, you quick-failed Talk:Reconstruction Amendments/GA1. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@DannyS712: Sorry for the delay in responding—I've been trying to find time to dig into the sources and give the article a more thorough look through, but I haven't gotten the chance to yet. However, after a cursory look-through, it does seem like you've added inline citations for all of the claims in the article's body, which addresses the reason I quick-failed the article back in August, so if you were to nominate it again, it won't be quick-failed again. Mz7 (talk) 18:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

A message of gratitude for your guidance and helping me on the page

I just wanted to apologize to you personally for the whole situation right now, just after I just got of a topic ban lift. It’s not good to be editing the first sentence of a highly visible page without any discussion first. It hadn’t come to me that you should make discussions before editing the first sentences of pages but I sincerely thank you for that tip with respect to RECKLESS, as I don’t want to be getting in trouble with anyone or cause any disruptions. From here on out I won’t be editing the first sentence of a lede of highly visible pages without discussion. Once again, I want to thank you for all the tips you’ve been sharing with me to help my better improve myself on wikipedia I truly do not want to cause any disruptions nor do I want you to be disappointed or regret your decision Best Yeungkahchun (talk) 06:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

@Yeungkahchun: My disappointment still remains because although you gave me the impression earlier that you would start slow and avoid editing controversial pages related to the 2020 election, you went ahead and did just that. Please demonstrate your understanding through actions, not words. Mz7 (talk) 06:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

I deeply regret this entire situation. Without thinking, I just edited that page so hastily in the heat of the moment not realizing that, with this being a big page, this goes against my pledge of stay off big pages for now. I take full responsibility for this fallout and I won’t make excuses for this reckless action and lack of judgment. I understand your disappointment.

I have been truly grateful for the second chance you gave me when you unbanned me yesterday, I don’t want you regretting further and disrespecting your trust. 

I respect you, and thus I need to show respect through my actions. I have to do better and I must do better. Best, Yeungkahchun (talk) 07:03, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-02

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • You can choose to be reminded when you have not added an edit summary. This can be done in your preferences. This could conflict with the CAPTCHA. This has now been fixed. [9]
  • You can link to specific log entries. You can get these links for example by clicking the timestamps in the log. Until now, such links to private log entries showed no entry even if you had permission to view private log entries. The links now show the entry. [10]
  • Admins can use the abuse filter tool to automatically prevent bad edits. Three changes happened last week:
    • The filter editing interface now shows syntax errors while you type. This is similar to JavaScript pages. It also shows a warning for regular expressions that match the empty string. New warnings will be added later. [11]
    • Oversighters can now hide multiple filter log entries at once using checkboxes on Special:AbuseLog. This is how the usual revision deletion works. [12]
    • When a filter matches too many actions after it has been changed it is "throttled". The most powerful actions are disabled. This is to avoid many editors getting blocked when an administrator made a mistake. The administrator will now get a notification about this "throttle".
  • Advanced item There is a new tool to build new skins. You can also see existing skins. You can give feedback. [13]
  • Advanced item Bots using the API no longer watch pages automatically based on account preferences. Setting the watchlist to watch will still work. This is to reduce the size of the watchlist data in the database. [14]
  • Advanced item Scribunto's file metadata now includes length. [15]
  • Advanced item CSS and JavaScript code pages now have link anchors to line numbers. You can use wikilinks like w:en:MediaWiki:Common.js#L-50. [16]
  • Recurrent item There was a new version of MediaWiki last week. You can read a detailed log of all 763 changes. Most of them are very small and will not affect you.

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 January. It will be on all wikis from 14 January (calendar).

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy adminship anniversary!

Wishing Mz7 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! History DMZ (talk)+(ping) 10:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Huh. Four years, and I'm still here. Who would've known? Mz7 (talk) 19:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:43, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Logo error in MonoBook

As you closed the discussion, see Talk:Main_Page#Main_page_banner_proposal_for_20th_anniversary. Can the display error in MonoBook be fixed? Fences&Windows 23:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

@Fences and windows: Sorry for the delay in responding, but I see this appears to be resolved now. Mz7 (talk) 04:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thank you for stepping up to make a well-written, time-sensitive close. I never thought I'd agree with a "let's just count the votes" rationale, but here we are, lol! Levivich harass/hound 23:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
I came here to say the same thing about this close. Concise, well-reasoned, and timely. Good show. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Something to look at

It's on the Commons, but you might be interested in this, particularly when seen alongside this and this. Would it help to repost this here? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:36, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Davidwr, thanks for your message. I ran a check, and Squadaloo is Red X Unrelated to Snowballgamers from a technical standpoint. They're probably a different user with an interest in the same topic. With that being said, during the course of my check, I discovered that Squadaloo has been socking under other accounts; I've documented my findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drhunterhamilton21. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 22:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-03

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 19 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 20 January. It will be on all wikis from 21 January (calendar).

Future changes

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

16:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Individual vs bulk suppression requests

Hi there, I am asking this question as I saw you handled some requests I sent in earlier. If I have several pages to request for suppression, is it preferable to send them all in a single email or send each page in an individual email? Zupotachyon (talk) 08:49, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

@Zupotachyon: Unfortunately, I think this is a question where you might get different answers depending on who you ask. Personally, I would prefer that you send the requests just in one email so that I can just respond to all of the requests in one reply, but I think some other oversighters may prefer to receive multiple emails to separate out the requests. Later today I might ask around and get back to you. Mz7 (talk) 08:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Okay, thank you. I remember a couple of times some of my individual requests were handled separately by different oversighters; I was assuming there was a sort of ticket system so I've been sending in separate requests. Zupotachyon (talk) 04:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-04

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Problems

Changes later this week

  • Bracket matching will be added to the CodeMirror syntax highlighter on the first wikis. The first wikis are German and Catalan Wikipedia and maybe other Wikimedia wikis. This will happen on 27 January. [20]
  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 26 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 27 January. It will be on all wikis from 28 January (calendar).

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

18:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Close

While I can't really fault a no consensus at "Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Replace hyphen with en-dash in Wikipedia browser tab name – MediaWiki:Pagetitle", an element of the close is fallacious (specifically WP:CSF) within the Wikipedia context: "other reputable websites (e.g. The New York Times) also use hyphens or even pipes in their page titles" has no relevance, because WP has its own style guide and NYT has a separate and very different one. What other publishers are doing is immaterial, unless and until such time that what others are doing becomes such an overwhelming norm that our own style guide changes. "[M]ost readers will never notice this change" is also irrelevant; most readers will never notice a zillion things WP does in the background, but this is not a reason to not implement them if we have internal reasons for implemeting them (like, say, not contradicting our own guidelines).

I respectfully ask that you remove those two elements from the close (or keep the but note they are not applicable). Mingled in with applicable argument, they are are not just extraneous but misleading – they inspire editors with some nit-picking axe to grind to bring up rationales that are not valid on Wikipedia any time they want to get their way, and to expect those rationales to be considered and enumerated in the close. But they clearly should not be. From WP:NHC: "The closer is there to judge the consensus of the community, after discarding irrelevant arguments: those that flatly contradict established policy, those based on personal opinion only, those that are logically fallacious, and those that show no understanding of the matter of issue." These two particular arguments qualify as several of these at once, even all four if one understands "policy" is this statement in the mass-noun sense, inclusive of policies (count noun), guidelines, processes, and other norms that the community enforces in RfCs. (And since we do enforce them in RfCs, this is necessary the meaning of "policy" in that sentence. :-)
 — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  20:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

SMcCandlish, thank you for your note, but I'm afraid I don't agree. This discussion did not revolve around article content, but rather a minuscule technical feature whose importance on the grand scale of things has to be close to the bottom rung. The reference to The New York Times is not to point out that they have a different style guide than us (in fact, it would be quite surprising to me if their internal style guide was any different to our own with respect to en-dashes), but to emphasize that even other publications with a reputation for paying attention to style also do not consider the hyphen vs. dash debate to be important in the narrow context of the HTML title element. Essentially, the argument is that the slight stylistic imperfection is so trifling that we need not correct it, particularly combined with the cost of taking up limited browser tab space (while it was not cited during the discussion, the essay WP:BIKESHED comes to mind for me). I understand that you disagree with this argument, but unfortunately, I do not think it would be accurate to discard it as "irrelevant", as "flatly contradicting established policy", or as "logically fallacious". Mz7 (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
You clearly have not read their style guide. :-) Like most news style guides, it is completely different from ours on dashes. You're simply recycling the same fallacy again. All major publishers with style guides, public or in-house, are "other publications with a reputation for paying attention to style" (or they would not be major publishers), but we do not imitate them, because we have our own style guide. And you've done the same with the second fallacy. It does not matter that some editors consider it too trifling to bother with; that is never a reason for us to not make a change for which there are other rationales beyond whether it is intrinsically important (such as consistency with our own guidelines so we do not confuse people or inspire ignoring the guidelines because WP won't itself follow them). Yes, BIKESHED does come to mind; you are inadvertently helping enable the perpetuation of bikeshedding by ignoring the clear instructions at NHC, by giving weight to arguments that cannot have any weight here, thereby inspiring others to continue trying to bicycle-shed and wikilawyer over trivia for petty, subjective reasons. I did not come here to relitigate the RfC arguments with you, but seem to have inspired you do so, as if you are "retro-supervoting". LOL. I don't mind that the close is no consensus. It's okay that the argument to be consistent with our own guidelines did (somehow) not carry the day. But the argument that it should not carry the day because some other site does something a different way, or that it's not important to the average reader, are patently invalid arguments (and as the closer you shouldn't be advocating either of them, just observing they exist and whether the fit the NHC criteria, which they clearly do not). There was absolutely no reason to list and weight those two arguments, since there are already sufficient valid arguments behind the oppose !votes to result in the same no consensus. I.e., this is not entirely a proper close, and encourages a degradation of future RfCs, but is very easy to fix. It's taken you way longer to argue against fixing it than to just fix it. Unless you ping me back I will not press this further; I've made the case, and my intent isn't badgering you. Just be aware that some of us care a lot about the rationales provided in closes since they often have a strong effect on what arguments others try to use in later ones.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mojtaba2361

Hi. I noticed you archived Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mojtaba2361 - the reason I filed the second report (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mojtaba2361/Archive#14 January 2021) was because I thought that the investigation overlapped with/should be merged with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArmanAfifeh and its archives, and it was concluded that the accounts are likely to match - shouldn't the pages be merged then? --DannyS712 (talk) 12:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

DannyS712, I noticed that, but I also noticed that CaptainEek mentioned that it's not strictly necessary to reblock the master per WP:DENY, so I assumed that it wasn't a big deal to leave the cases unmerged on that basis. Mz7 (talk) 18:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Okay, I just wanted to avoid having two "active" cases (where "active" refers to places where people can report socks, not necessarily that there are any reports still open) DannyS712 (talk) 18:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
DannyS712, all right, having taken a second look, I've unarchived the case and asked for the merge. Mz7 (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-05

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Problems

Changes later this week

  • You can soon use Wikidata to link to pages on the multilingual Wikisource. [22]
  • Often editors use a "non-breaking space" to make a gap between two items when reading but still show them together. This can be used to avoid a line break. You will now be able to add new ones via the special character tool in the 2010, 2017, and visual editors. The character will be shown in the visual editor as a space with a grey background. [23][24]
  • Advanced item Wikis use abuse filters to stop bad edits being made. Filter maintainers can now use syntax like 1.2.3.4 - 1.2.3.55 as well as the 1.2.3.4/27 syntax for IP ranges. [25]
  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 2 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 3 February. It will be on all wikis from 4 February (calendar).

Future changes

  • Minerva is the skin Wikimedia wikis use for mobile traffic. When a page is protected and you can't edit it you can normally read the source wikicode. This doesn't work on Minerva on mobile devices. This is being fixed. Some text might overlap. This is because your community needs to update MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext to work on mobile. You can read more. [26][27]
  • Advanced item Cloud VPS and Toolforge will change the IP address they use to contact the wikis. The new IP address will be 185.15.56.1. This will happen on February 8. You can read more.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

22:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Reggieplata is back

Somehow Reggieplata has returned in the form of another sock puppetry account with Familyplata8384. I believe we need to block him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.56.62.31 (talk) 11:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Looks like Familyplata8384 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is already blocked. Mz7 (talk) 03:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

F1 IP editor (Gareth)

He seems to be back again. Eagleash (talk) 13:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

(Originally Rowde – master; last sock was 'GBThomas2000'). Eagleash (talk) 13:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Eagleash, ah yes indeed. I've blocked the account. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Ta muchly! Eagleash (talk) 21:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Some people never give up. Eagleash (talk) 01:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
    Eagleash, blocked. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
    Thanks; now to try to sort what he's done and whether we need some of it! Eagleash (talk) 07:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Please review my request for PCR

Hello, I have applied for pending changer reviewer and it seems like plenty of backlog. Please kindly review if possible. Happy editing cheers. Kichu🐘 Discuss 10:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Mz7 (talk) 20:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

Hey again Mz7. :) So, it seems that I am again related as a Sockpuppet of Bakir123... It's getting really iritating now. I mean there is no even logic since I was cleared by both you and another editor and my account being looked up by a checkuser. The editor Oleola is suspecting it now. I don't get that as I had actual messages with Bakir123 on both of our talk pages and both of us thanking each other for our edits. And now I'm in a situation fearing that I might somehow for an unknown reason get blocked for doing absouletly nothing wrong. Bakir123 as well. I would appreciate it if you would look in to that. Here is the investigation page: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bakir123. I belive you were mentioned in it as well. Kirbapara (talk) 16:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

Hi! It is me now, haha! Look, the Oleola guy is yet again posting some sort of evidence. I really don't know what his problem is. I have just been confirmed as unlikely being Kirbapara by another checkuser, Oshwah, and yet he is still trying to achieve something. I respect him for his edits, but I mean come on, two devices!? That is complete balony, sorry for the language. Can you please just end this, I, and I belive Kirba too, just want to edit in peace. I'm done with this sockpupetry thing. I messaged Oshwah with this simmilar edit on his talk page, asking him as well, just so you know! Bakir123 (talk) 22:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Monte Cristo Research and Educational Institute logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Monte Cristo Research and Educational Institute logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Request for Pending changes reviewer rights

Hi @Mz7: Good morning, I hope you are good, I Need a help from you i have placed one request for PCR rights in Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer, so if you dont mind then can you review my request and please tell me that i am eligible or not?, I left a message in your talk page because i saw that you are the admin of this wikipedia, Thanks Have A Good and Safe Day.BubblySnow  💬 05:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-06

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

Changes later this week

  • You can see edits to chosen pages on Special:Watchlist. You can add pages to your watchlist on every wiki you like. The GlobalWatchlist extension will come to Meta on 11 February. There you can see entries on watched pages on different wikis on the same page. The new watchlist will be found on Special:GlobalWatchlist on Meta. You can choose which wikis to watch and other preferences on Special:GlobalWatchlistSettings on Meta. You can watch up to five wikis. [29]
  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 9 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 10 February. It will be on all wikis from 11 February (calendar).

Future changes

  • When admins protect pages the form will use the OOUI look. Special:Import will also get the new look. This will make them easier to use on mobile phones. [30][31]
  • Some services will not work for a short period of time from 07:00 UTC on 17 February. There might be problems with new short links, new translations, new notifications, adding new items to your reading lists or recording email bounces. This is because of database maintenance. [32]
  • Advanced item Last week Tech News reported that the IP address Cloud VPS and Toolforge use to contact the wikis will change on 8 February. This is delayed. It will happen later instead. [33]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

17:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Request

Hi@Mz7:, First of all, I apologize for coming to your talk page Previously I had temporary Rollback rights, which have now lapsed. Now I would like to be actively involved in reverting Vandalism..I’m already applied for this right in January here .but I have not received any reply yet I request you to consider my request..whether it is Positive or negative...Thanks -- Padavalam🌂  ►  19:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-07

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Problems

  • There were problems with recent versions of MediaWiki. Because the updates caused problems the developers rolled back to an earlier version. Some updates and new functions will come later than planned. [34][35]
  • Some services will not work for a short period of time from 07:00 UTC on 17 February. There might be problems with new short links, new translations, new notifications, adding new items to your reading lists or recording email bounces. This is because of database maintenance. [36]

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 16 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 17 February. It will be on all wikis from 18 February (calendar).

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

17:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-08

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • The visual editor will now use MediaSearch to find images. You can search for images on Commons in the visual editor when you are looking for illustrations. This is to help editors find better images. [37]
  • Advanced item The syntax highlighter now works with more languages: Futhark, Graphviz/DOT, CDDL and AMDGPU. [38]

Problems

  • Editing a timeline might have removed all text from it. This was because of a bug and has been fixed. You might need to edit the timeline again for it to show properly. [39]

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 February. It will be on all wikis from 25 February (calendar).

Future changes

  • Advanced item There is a user group for developers and users interested in working on Wikimedia wikis with the Rust programming language. You can join or tell others who want to make your wiki better in the future.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

00:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Request for revdel

Dear Mz7 (talk · contribs) I'm currently working on the draft article over at Draft: That vegan teacher, but some of the revisions contain massive amounts of BLP violations and original research. There aren't that many revisions, can you please go through and strike the necessary revisions? Theleekycauldron (talk) 18:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

@Theleekycauldron:  Done. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 18:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

If you could read, I actually added CITATION NEEDED, but you know. To each their own. Aeyeu (talk) 13:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Aeyeu, adding a {{citation needed}} template to your own edits is absolutely not a defense against violating our biographies of living persons policy. We require citations for controversial information about living persons from the moment you insert them to Wikipedia. This is a very serious policy, as getting this wrong can and will bring the project into disrepute. Please be aware that you may be blocked from editing if you persistently violate our policies. Mz7 (talk) 19:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mz7/December_2020–February_2021&oldid=1145995558"