User talk:Nathtate

December 2014[edit]

Please don't add inaccurate information to Wikipedia articles. --John (talk) 22:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Fine Gael. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Snappy (talk) 20:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nathtate, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Nathtate! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 21:49, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fine Gael, you may be blocked from editing.

You appear to be a vandal only account. Any more vandalism may result is a permanent block. Snappy (talk) 18:08, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fine Gael.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:19, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Liz O'Donnell, you may be blocked from editing. Snappy (talk) 18:58, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 19:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mary Harney because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 00:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]