User talk:Puccetto
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Morellato Group[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Morellato Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 00:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Buccellati[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Buccellati, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 16:36, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Buccellati for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Buccellati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buccellati until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 22:21, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Morellato Group for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morellato Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morellato Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 22:27, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
pazienza[edit]
devi armarti di molta pazienza perchè molti utenti non conoscono gli argomenti sui quali pretendono metter mano facendo solo danni! Capita pure a me: hai tutta la mia solidarietà! Complimenti per i tuoi contributi!--Pagoprima (talk) 11:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
non saprei darti risposte sicure ma quell'utente ha attaccato un mio articolo per evidente ripicca e frustrazione--Pagoprima (talk) 11:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 2[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buccellati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palm Beach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:Watch manufacturing companies of U.S.A.[edit]
Category:Watch manufacturing companies of U.S.A., which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Aboutmovies (talk) 14:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Don't be discouraged, but keep up the good work![edit]
Hi Puccetto, I noticed you have not been around for a long time yet (less than 2 months by now), so a late welcome at Wikipedia! I also noticed in your communications that you were not too happy with the several "Articles for deletion"-messages you had to undergo. You know what? In my first months, I had the same frustration a couple of times: that my work (composed with good intentions) was not encyclopedia-worthy and, as a matter of consequence, a couple of articles were removed or edits were undone. Later, I had to admit they were not always so relevant. However, I think the most important thing is not to give up but keep these things in mind when writing/improving an article: 1) Try to write in a neutral and structured style. 2) Add enough references, preferably to independent sources (many newspapers and websites have a good reputation at Wikipedia). Keep on writing! Kareldorado (talk) 08:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Re Hanowa[edit]
Ciao, per capirci su en.wikipedia i "voti" inteso come numero contano poco o nulla a meno che non siano univoci verso il mantenimento o la cancellazione, contano di più gli argomenti e le fonti presentate. Poi un amministratore soppesa gli argomenti e con una certa discrezione chiude la discussione in un modo o nell'altro. In caso di voti non univoci come in Hanowa o Breil è spesso un terno al lotto prevedere l'esito finale! Quello che taglia la testa al toro sono le fonti, se gli utenti presentano durante la discussione un paio di nuove fonti possono stare sicuri di aver dato una forte spinta a mantenere la pagina (visto che il principio generale di enciclopedicità su en.wikipedia è questo qui). Poi, nota a margine, è abituale che i voti di utenti "nuovi" o sospetti (per esempio Zipezap che ha votato "delete" per Hanowa e Ciofeca e Teo Pitta che hanno votato "keep" per Breil) vengano quasi sempre ignorati, o cmq gli viene dato molto poco peso, e sicuramente questo ha inciso non poco in entrambe le discussioni. Saluti, Cavarrone 15:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 22[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sector No Limits, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Puccetto. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)