User talk:Seokgyuhan

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Seokgyuhan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Aristophanes68 (talk) 18:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Offstage instruments[edit]

The article Offstage instruments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTADICTIONARY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KGirlTrucker81^{talk what I'm been doing} 21:58, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Johnuniq. An edit that you recently made to George Frideric Handel seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Johnuniq (talk) 00:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Dawson Dunbar.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dawson Dunbar.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Meaghan Martin, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

As this page has been previously moved, obtain consensus on talk page before moving article.

☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scoring[edit]

Sorry, I reverted your detailed lists of instruments, - thea seem too much detail for an overview such as the infobox. If you don't agree, you can discuss it at the articles' talk pages, or - perhaps better in this general case - on the template's talk, Template talk:Infobox musical composition#Scoring --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Even more sorry that I have to do more reverting, and others feel the same. Please discuss. When you are reverted, it's up to you to ask for consensus for your proposed change, per WP:BRD which is a good idea to prevent "edit warring". Please discuss. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me, what in the above did you not understand. When you are reverted, go and discuss, and find consensus. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:28, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seokgyuhan, I believe Gerda was quite clear--and within policy. Please consider this a warning for edit warring and disruptive editing. This is a collaborative project; consensus is necessary. Drmies (talk) 16:01, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More unwarranted moving[edit]

Cage (organisation) is a British outfit, so British spelling. You've been notified before of problematic moves: kindly do not move articles any more. You can request a move at WP:RM. Drmies (talk) 15:58, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Symphony No. 2 (Mahler)[edit]

Would you care to discuss your repeated revert here at Talk:Symphony No. 2 (Mahler)? Despite other editors removing it, with good reasons, you have now added and re-added it five times. You have made no edit summaries to support your edits and have made no attempt to discuss the matter at the Talk page. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Symphony No. 2 (Mahler) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gerda Arendt, Martinevans123, if this warning doesn't suffice and the editor returns to this pattern (of edit warring and refusing to engage in discussion) I will block. Seokgyuhan, consider this your last warning. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Seokgyuhan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]