User talk:Treki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Treki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Tone 20:32, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Atomik_harmonik.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Atomik_harmonik.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Penske[edit]

I reverted your addition of Category:American Formula One drivers to the Roger Penske article. Penske owned an F1 team and drove sports cars, but never drove in F1. --rogerd 11:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing the links you sent, I realize I was wrong. If have put your addition back, and you have my apology. --rogerd 04:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kimi Räikkönen[edit]

Hi Treki. I notice you recently increased Kimi Räikkönen's number of F1 pole positions from 12 to 13. FORIX only gives him 12. Are you able to point me to a source which says he has 13? Alternately, can you give me a list of the 13 races? Note that I'm not saying you're wrong (FORIX has been wrong in the past!) but we probably need to add a reference if we're going to quote a number different to FORIX, otherwise people will keep "correcting" it. Regards. DH85868993 10:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my mistake. It's the 2005 Italian Grand prix, which is confusing. On wikipedia article of Kimi Raikkonen there are 13 poles, on formula 1 website there are 12. So I guess there are 12.

No problem. Welcome to WP:F1! DH85868993 12:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Polka.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Polka.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Polkaholik.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Polkaholik.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vriskaaaaj.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vriskaaaaj.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:562.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:562.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:225.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:225.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:227.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:227.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brizgalna.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Brizgalna.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Vriskaaaj.jpg)[edit]

You've uploaded Image:Vriskaaaj.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Treki

I've noticed that you make major contributions to this article, and I would like to thank for the good work you do, and hope you continue to do that.

As the month of November nears its end, I like to ask when do you think it would be appropriate to unveil the events of January? If we do that at the beginning of December, that means there will be almost 2 months of future events, and this section would be very long (it's allready too long IMO). I would suggest that we don't add a whole month at once, but in several sections. I think one week each time would be best. What do you think?

Also, I like to note that the schedule of the Men's World championship in handball is incomplete, and the last stages including the semifinals and classification matches are missing. I checked the tournament's website and it's there, but in a non-text format that I couldn't copy and paste into the article. I would appreciate if you find a solution for this, and also add the missing games to the championship's article (I guess that you copied the schedule from there and didn't notice there are missing games).

Speaking of which... I doubt if these detailed schedules are really necessary for future events... It's the main reason for the extreme length of the upcoming events section, and hiding the schedules until a week or two before the championship start would be a good compromise IMO. If anyone is interested in these schedules he can normally find it in the event's particular page, or on the event's website quite easily.--Nitsansh (talk) 17:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also suggest that we stop linking the dates. If anyone cares what historic events occured on that date or who was born or died, he can use the calendar on top of the sidebar. That will save editors lot of time...--Nitsansh (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But if we do that, we should put the full month name.--Nitsansh (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A little note... the character between scores, as well as between dates, should be a dash (–) instead of minus (-). If your keyboard doesn't have a key for dash, like mine, simply copy the character from another place in the article...--Nitsansh (talk) 12:50, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FLRC[edit]

I have nominated List of Formula One drivers for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

Orphaned non-free image File:Atomik Harmonik - Brizgaaaaj! album cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Atomik Harmonik - Brizgaaaaj! album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGatalk 23:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Sports calendar March 2007, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports calendar March 2007. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WOSlinker (talk) 21:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sports calendar March 2007[edit]

Hello Treki, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Sports calendar March 2007, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:TenPoundHammer. This has been done because the page is a recently created article that that duplicates an existing English Wikipedia topic (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:TenPoundHammer. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 06:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:31, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Atomik Harmonik - Brizgaaaaj! Še več in dlje! album cover.jpg)[edit]

You've uploaded File:Atomik Harmonik - Brizgaaaaj! Še več in dlje! album cover.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crazy Frog cover art.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crazy Frog cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:34, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Treki

Thank you for helping with the maintenance of the sidebar. However, it's very important to make sure that events are listed in the day-to-day section before deleting them from the sidebar. If you are short of time or don't know how to do that probably, it's OK for me if you just copy the sport and the event headline, exactly as it appears in the sidebar (excluding the dates).--Nitsansh (talk) 17:39, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another note: If you have spare time... many results are missing in January 2012 in sports... mostly winter sports on the last two weekends (20-22 and 27-29). If you do that, please look out for rescheduled events that might be missing (most likely on Fridays), because I didn't update the schedules since the start of the season (it was enough time-consuming to do it once).
Since Cs-Wolves took a vacation or whatever, we are too short on manpower to do it properly. I don't have the time to do all the scores, especialy on weekends when the workoads increases (and in my country, Sunday is a regular workday). We badly need new editors if Cs-Wolves is no longer available. Is there a way to call for help?--Nitsansh (talk) 14:11, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Editor's Barnstar
Congratulations, Treki, for recently making your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia!

Thank you for helping improve and expand sports and television related articles, and for all your contributions to the encyclopedia. Keep up the great work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sidebar[edit]

Hi Treki, my name is Giuseppe from Italy,

FIRST OF ALL: excuse me for my bad english ;-)

I've noticed that the sidebar is not more updated...maybe you don't have time to do it. I believe that this sidebar is very useful...and it's a pity that it remains not updated; furthermore I think that your work is very very good. I'd like to help you to update it but I don't know where you get the source of data contained in it (a very very good scheduling of daily sports); if you can give me this information, I will help you to keep updated this sidebar.

Thank you very much... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.44.100.6 (talk) 03:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Treki, Thanks For Contributions for Sports-Current Events. You forgot Giro d'Italia I think. (Cycling Upcoming event shows Dauphine Libere)176.40.113.73 (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Current events/Sports[edit]

There is a proposal to redesign Portal:Current events/Sports. Please comment at Portal talk:Current events/Sports#MFD?.

And, of course, thank you for your diligence in maintaining the sidebar! -- John of Reading (talk) 19:33, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Na Seniku (song)[edit]

The article Na Seniku (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 14:29, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Na Seniku.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Na Seniku.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:52, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Luka Zahović[edit]

The reference you added does not mention Luka Zahović won the league. SLBedit (talk) 22:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Slovenia invite[edit]

Hello, Treki, and thank you for your recent contributions to Wikipedia's Slovenia-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Slovenia? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's Slovenia-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. Please see our list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future!

--Eleassar my talk 11:54, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to List of previous General Hospital cast members defies the website's policy on years. Also, please make sure you're including an edit summary in your edits. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits and edit summaries[edit]

It appears that you click the "minor edit" checkbox on almost every one of your edits. Would you mind not using it so much? Since you are changing content, it doesn't really qualify as "minor" (see WP:ME). Also, it would be helpful if you would start using edit summaries to explain your edits. Thanks! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:04, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Treki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Josef Joffe[edit]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Josef Joffe. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Josef Joffe, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 23:16, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Treki. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Treki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]