User talk:TriiipleThreat/Archive 12
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Happy New Year, TriiipleThreat!
TriiipleThreat,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010Talk 00:20, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Neutral notice
As an editor who commented at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film between Jan. 1, 2019, and today, you may wish to join a discussion at that page, here.--Tenebrae (talk) 00:02, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Red Room.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Red Room.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Evangeline Lilly and Paul Rudd as Wasp and Ant-Man.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Evangeline Lilly and Paul Rudd as Wasp and Ant-Man.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Josh Brolin as Cable.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Josh Brolin as Cable.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Marvelwolverine.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Marvelwolverine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Infobox photo discussion
Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which of two photos is preferable in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gaea Marvel Comics.png
Thanks for uploading File:Gaea Marvel Comics.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sinestro character poster.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Sinestro character poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Wonder Woman by Jose Luis Garcia-Lopez.png
Thanks for uploading File:Wonder Woman by Jose Luis Garcia-Lopez.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Elizabeth Olsen as Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Elizabeth Olsen as Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Jon Bernthal as Punisher.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jon Bernthal as Punisher.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:51, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Aubrey Joseph and Olivia Holt as Cloak & Dagger.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aubrey Joseph and Olivia Holt as Cloak & Dagger.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Aubrey Joseph and Olivia Holt as Cloak & Dagger.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aubrey Joseph and Olivia Holt as Cloak & Dagger.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Krysten Ritter as Jessica Jones.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Krysten Ritter as Jessica Jones.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Cover of Captain Marvel 1 - 2013.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cover of Captain Marvel 1 - 2013.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Brie Larson as Captain Marvel.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brie Larson as Captain Marvel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Carol Danvers first apearance.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Carol Danvers first apearance.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Guardians of the Galaxy team in the 2014 film.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Guardians of the Galaxy team in the 2014 film.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:58, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Isabelle Cornish as Crystal.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Isabelle Cornish as Crystal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
File:X-Men 4 March 1964.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:X-Men 4 March 1964.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Avengers 16 May 1965.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Avengers 16 May 1965.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Captain Marvel audience reception discussion
Hello, I saw your recent edits on the Captain Marvel article and just wanted to come here to respond with my thoughts. I have now noticed that at the bottom of the Deadline Hollywood article, it was in fact updated again where the movie's definite recommend score moved up to 73%. I am also willing to leave the point about analysts deeming the RT score the result of online trolling. However, we absolutely cannot leave that point from the Deadline Hollywood writer talking about RT as 'an ancient 1990s device full of hideous troll noise' or however he put it. It's such a provacative, over-the-top and generalising take that we simply can't have it sitting there as some kind of established or consensus view on RT, this movie or movies in general. You can find a plethora of sources that corroborate the poor RT reviews with scathing reviews of the movie themselves, such as here[1] and here[2]. Thus, the line is in clear violation of WP:NPOV, where it does not merely stick to reporting the facts in the source (such as the male to female viewer ratio) but also expresses one man's partisan opinion to artificially construct a narrative. For such a line to be valid, it would need more sources than just one to express that kind of hostile view, and it would still be in violation of WP:DUE as other sources exist to support the RT reviews. I'm perfectly happy to compromise and leave the DR score and analyst notes, but this last one from the one DW writer should definitely be removed. Davefelmer (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- The Reason.com article, though admittedly has a libertarian slant, doesn't mention the RT scoring, and TheBlemish.com does not seem reliable at first glance. I'd argue that Deadline Hollywood is highly reliable for entertainment news, literally used thousands of times on Wikipedia. So its use here is not without justification. That said, I am not the one that added it. Perhaps @Adamstom.97: might like to weigh in here.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- In no way am I questioning the reliability of Deadline Hollywood as a source itself. Like I said, it is reliable, has been used countless times and I support its inclusion on the article for the fairly described points of fact it delves into, such as the male to female ratio of people that went to see the film etc as I've already stated. I am merely questioning the use of it to project a lone partisan and highly provacative 'hot take' from a single journalist and publishing it in the article as if it is some sort of conformed to opinion regarding RT or the Captain Marvel movie. Its use in that manner and as the sole point to project that hostile argument against RT with violates both WP:NPOV and WP:DUE.
- And the movie reviews don't have to necessarily mention the RT scores by name. They serve to counteract the DH writer's point about RT being some ancient relic full of mindless trolls because lots of reviews outside of RT including by frequently used and respected movie sites have similarly given it bad reviews that corroborate a lot of the RT reviews. They mainly reinforce just how lacking in WP:DUE that point is because it's giving one partisan opinion that doesnt hold up against wider context. For some other poor reviews of the film, see here[3] and here[4]. There are many more examples.
- So like I said, what's fair is fair. I'm happy to compromise on the other points but this last point violates multiple wiki rules and seems to exist solely to paint an angle that is not from a NPOV. Davefelmer (talk) 22:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Per WP:PSTS, reliable sources are well within their right to make analyses, interpretive, or synthetic claims. The view itself is appropriately attributed in the article to the author per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV.
And the movie reviews don't have to necessarily mention the RT scores by name.
They do, if you are going to use them to counter criticism of RT's audience score. A poor review of the film does not mean that the author agrees with how RT conducted its audience polling. Suggesting otherwise is WP:SYNTH.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 11:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Per WP:PSTS, reliable sources are well within their right to make analyses, interpretive, or synthetic claims. The view itself is appropriately attributed in the article to the author per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV.
References
File:Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Tales of Suspense 57.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tales of Suspense 57.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hawkeye 2012 2.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hawkeye 2012 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Dark Reign The List Avengers 1.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dark Reign The List Avengers 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:She-Hulk Vol 1 5 Textless.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:She-Hulk Vol 1 5 Textless.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Luke Cage by Stuart Immonen.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Luke Cage by Stuart Immonen.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Brie Larson as Captain Marvel.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brie Larson as Captain Marvel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
Also:
- File:Guardians of the Galaxy team in the 2014 film.jpg
- File:Isabelle Cornish as Crystal.jpg
- File:Krysten Ritter as Jessica Jones.jpg
- File:Carol Danvers first apearance.jpg
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Riri Williams.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Riri Williams.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Black Dwarf.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Black Dwarf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Wayback Machine ref
I found your name linked to the Wayback Machine and was wondering if you could help. The article Fanfreluche (horse) has a DEAD Sports Illustrated link to the huge international story of her 1977 kidnapping. I have found the valid link and will insert it now but would like to ensure it is archived via the Wayback Machine. If you could assist, that would be much appreciated. Thank you. Stretchrunner (talk) 11:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC) Here is the valid link: https://vault.si.com/vault/1977/08/01/the-milliondollar-horse-heist
- (talk page stalker)@Stretchrunner: Simply go to archive.org, copy your live url into the tan box that says "WayMack Machine" and you can see if any archives have been made of the url. If so, you can click the date of the one you wish to use. If not, it gives you option to "save now". I've gone ahead and saved the url you've provided. It exists here, https://web.archive.org/web/20200622155514/https://vault.si.com/vault/1977/08/01/the-milliondollar-horse-heist. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Much thanks. Stretchrunner (talk) 17:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Please
...explain your reverts on User talk:LoreMaster22. Drmies (talk) 01:14, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
I'm serious. I find their edits questionable but you're the one reverting, and for that we need a reason. In fact, you need to provide a reason for reverting--please do that on their talk page. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:20, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done, and for the record I was going to when my reverts were complete. Leaving three messages minutes apart doesn’t do anything if I’m in the middle of editing as I won’t see them.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 01:40, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- For the record, there were 18 minutes between my first note and my last warning. You were editing the whole time, and you still have not provided an explicit reason. Please do so, next time, in the actual edit summary; if you don't, I will remove rollback. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:43, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
While the copy editing is about done. It wouldn't hurt if you can improve on the draft article too if you feel like it. Jhenderson 777 23:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Luke Cage by Stuart Immonen.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Luke Cage by Stuart Immonen.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I am just wondering why the redirect was left though. Doesn't seem useful to keep. Starzoner (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- You’re right. The redirect isn’t necessary.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 23:49, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Could you consider tagging it for deletion? (idk sorry its just, I kind of want to). Starzoner (talk) 23:50, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Redirect from the former draft name into the mainspace can be useful. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. These are routinely kept. BD2412 T 01:15, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Could you consider tagging it for deletion? (idk sorry its just, I kind of want to). Starzoner (talk) 23:50, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Merry Christmas!
BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! |
|
Hello TriiipleThreat, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Happy Holidays! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 14:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! |
|
Hello TriiipleThreat, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
El Millo (talk) 15:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! |
|
Hello TriiipleThreat, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
I wish you Happy Holidays! Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:22, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Merry Merry!
★Trekker (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
★Trekker (talk) 16:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! |
|
Hello TriiipleThreat, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Starzoner (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! |
|
Hello TriiipleThreat, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! adamstom97 (talk) 19:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
|
Merry Christmas TriiipleThreat |
|
Hi TriiipleThreat, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas |
Merry Christmas!
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Hello, TriiipleThreat! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Linguist111talk 23:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}
Merry Christmas
Jhenderson 777 is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Happy New Year!
|
Happy New Year! |
Hello TriiipleThreat: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. |
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message
I wish you a prosperous 2021! Starzoner (talk) 15:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy New Year 2021!
Abishe (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Happy New Year!
Empire AS Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.