User talk:Umofomia

Stroke order

• You noticed there : Talk:Stroke_order#Calligraphic_Stroke_Order, that stroke order may change.

I'm sorry to don't have a perfect english, but I wrote this Stroke_order#Read_the_Stroke_order_from_the_graph & Stroke_order#Three_National_stroke_order_schools which may answer to you Yug (talk) 17:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Taiwanese Mandarin

Posted on User talk:LDHan 08:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out the distinction between perfect and perfective. I just felt the translation of 你吃了吗? as "did you eat?" is not really idiomatic English. And if the two phrases are not interchangeable, then perhaps they are not a useful illustration of the 有 construction. Please correct if I've made any mistakes. LDHan 10:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Replied 00:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Fix this template

Posted on User talk:Wikimachine 22:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Replied 23:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm very sorry for messing up the template. I tried to fix it according to a new proposal laid out in WikiProject Korea's discussion page. Thanks for your concern. (Wikimachine 22:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC))

Stroke order according to each country

hello, The article Stroke order now contain data to answer to a previous question : Talk:Stroke order#Calligraphic Stroke Order

• see : Stroke order#Three national schools of stroke order
• and : Which stroke order for each style

Other question : do you allow me to archive your question "Talk:Stroke order#Calligraphic Stroke Order" in one week ? Yug (talk) 16:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

........... I want archive it exactly for such cases : it's the 2nd time I inform you about this......... Sorry......

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Yug (talk • contribs) 16:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied on User talk:Yug 17:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Noticed. thanks for your answer. ;) Yug 15:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Gweilo

Posted on User talk:HenryLi 23:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I've just restored the deleted. — HenryLi (Talk) 15:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Chinese cash

You have previously participated in discussions of the title of the article Chinese wén. If you care, please discuss a resolution of this issue by suggesting your preferred title at Talk:Chinese wén. — AjaxSmack 01:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Extremaduran language

Would you can to help me, in the article Extremaduran language? —Preceding unsigned comment added by El estremeñu (talk • contribs) 01:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Replied on User talk:El estremeñu 01:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

You can to help me, correcting ortographics or linguistic errors, please, make it... :::My English is very bad... —Preceding unsigned comment added by El estremeñu (talk • contribs) 01:48, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on User talk:Courcelles 21:39, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Article_titles#Non-Roman_characters_in_redirects_to_articles

There is currently a policy discussion that may concern a Wikiproject that you are a member of Wikipedia_talk:Article_titles#Non-Roman_characters_in_redirects_to_articles. Handschuh-^{talk to me} 02:18, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Research survey invitation

Greetings Umofomia-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 18:44, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested

WikiProject Writing Systems is conducting a poll regarding its future goals, and we have identified you as a person with a vested interest in the future of that project. Whether you are a member of the WikiProject, a frequent contributor, or a passerby with an interest in the subject, we want your input as to the future emphasis that the Writing Systems project will take. Please take a moment to peruse the entries and add your comments where you have an opinion. You can visit the poll by clicking here, or on the project image, 書, on the right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanisaac (talk • contribs) 12:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Two variants of lowercase G

[1] you were actually wrong at this point, they do: g ɡ. Use some tools to reveal Unicode code points next time, before boldly editing data you are not familiar with. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)