Jump to content

Serbianisation: Revision history

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

8 July 2024

7 July 2024

13 June 2024

22 May 2024

23 February 2024

2 February 2024

22 January 2024

2 January 2024

24 December 2023

12 December 2023

25 November 2023

  • curprev 13:5913:59, 25 November 2023‎ Jingiby talk contribs‎ 82,146 bytes +3,085‎ Rv. not an improvement. Discuss the issue on talk. Thank you. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 13:5813:58, 25 November 2023‎ 46.16.105.46 talk‎ 79,061 bytes −3,085‎ There was NO walachians in bosnia, lika, slavonia and srem, the term vlah was used as a deragatory term by muslims and catholics for orthodox sputh slavs in the region meaning serbs, it foes not make any sense nor is it plausable that the western parts of bosnia and eastern croatia were inhabited by romanian people, those regions spoke shotkavian language which is spoken bu serbs and some catholic south slavs, noy romanians, also, real croats spoke chakavan and kajkavan dialects similar to slove undo Tags: Reverted section blanking Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 13:5513:55, 25 November 2023‎ Jingiby talk contribs‎ 82,146 bytes +1,762‎ Restored sourced content deleted without adequate explanation. Discuss at talk and provide sources. Thanks. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 13:5013:50, 25 November 2023‎ 46.16.105.46 talk‎ 80,384 bytes −1,762‎ Not any real historical accounts of lands east of morava being popilated by bulgarians and romanians, it was populated by dinaric people and dacians before but then assimilated by serbs in the 8th century, there was obly a community of walachians in the far eastern serbia along the danube, and fir bulgarians there werent any, that area was populated by torlakian speakers of serbian language so no, there was not any great expansion by serbs into the "formerly romanian and bulgarian land" undo Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

2 November 2023

1 October 2023

19 June 2023

17 May 2023

16 May 2023

  • curprev 17:3517:35, 16 May 2023‎ 94.189.165.132 talk‎ 81,654 bytes −489‎ →‎Medieval period: The article cited as a source has been misinterpreted. The author of the article wanted to say that "certain Serbian historians" believe that due to the presence of the Serbian Church, the territory of Bosnia was considered Serbian, that is, that Bosnia was no longer seen only as a territory inhabited by Slavs, but as part of the earliest Serbian state. After all, it is not specified who certain Serbian historians are (no names or scientific publications were mentioned). undo Tag: references removed

6 May 2023

28 March 2023

14 March 2023

28 January 2023

5 January 2023

26 December 2022

4 December 2022

3 December 2022

31 October 2022

  • curprev 13:1413:14, 31 October 2022‎ Jingiby talk contribs‎ 82,240 bytes +3,069‎ Restored sourced content deleted without adequate explanation. Duscus at talk. Thanks! undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 13:0413:04, 31 October 2022‎ 95.180.92.183 talk‎ 79,171 bytes −3,069‎ →‎19th century: The theory about the Serbization of the Vlachs has never been proven and is based only on assumptions. It was used several times by Croatian nationalists and neo-Nazis to deny the Serbian identity of the Orthodox people in Croatia. It is simply impossible that the Serbian church could spread propaganda or convert people in the mountainous regions of Croatia that were under the rule of Catholic monarchies. I also believe that the works of Ivo Banac cannot be considered reliable undo Tags: Reverted section blanking

22 October 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbianisation"