Jump to content

User:LadyofShalott: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Habeebah (talk | contribs)
m I have added concrete evidence of notable resources for my article on Shon Brooks. Please revive or bring back my article for inclusion. Thank you.
move to talk page
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ShonBrooks}}

To whom it may concern please add the following references to my article.

1) http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3779078/contact

2) Shon Brooks Financial and Entertainment Consultants by "American City Business Journals" http://profiles.portfolio.com/company/us/ca/coronado/shon_brooks_financial_and_entertainment_consultants/744033/

3) United States Olympic Committee

4) Certified Retirement Specialist.


{| style="width:100%; background:#FFF0F5; margin-top:1.2em; border:1px solid #C71585; font-family: Comic sans ms, sans-serif;"
{| style="width:100%; background:#FFF0F5; margin-top:1.2em; border:1px solid #C71585; font-family: Comic sans ms, sans-serif;"
|style="width:54%; color:#000"|
|style="width:54%; color:#000"|

Revision as of 07:54, 16 June 2010

This administrator will consider reasonable requests to provide copies of deleted articles.

The Lady of Shalott

Random observations and thoughts

Tapestries recounted histories in their pictures. Here we see my predecessor taking a break from weaving her encyclopedia entry.
Tapestries recounted histories in their pictures. Here we see my predecessor taking a break from weaving her encyclopedia entry.
  • It's best to use good grammar when criticising someone else's: "People that's et onions is bad judges of who's et onions and who aint." -- Thornton Wilder
  • I really, really do not like the use of exclamation marks in words (unless they are indicating a click as in !Kung). Using it for terms such as "!vote" hampers my reading of the comments.
  • We should strive to keep articles from being biased. I'm not sure what it would mean for an article to be bias; I think that has something to do with how fabric is cut.
  • Demanding an apology from another editor with whom you've had a disagreement is rarely fruitful and tends just to prolong the drama. It's probably better just to let it go and get on with building the encyclopedia.
  • Encyclopedia writing should be formal. It is therefore inappropriate to refer to John Doe as John.
  • No matter how wonderful your best friend is, he or she is probably not a suitable subject for a Wikipedia article. Even if he or she is notable, you probably should not be the person to write it. The same goes for you, yourself. Similarly, no matter how awful your enemy, you should not write about him either.
  • You, are, and be are words; u, r, and b are letters. If u wish other editors 2 take u seriously and not just b annoyed at first glance, u r advised 2 remember that fact.
  • Weirdness happens. Try to assume good faith. This is a reminder to myself as much as anyone else.
  • When making an argument, try to get your facts correct. If you want to allege that we don't use images of someone, make sure you look at the article before posting. If there are seven or eight depictions of that person, you'll look silly saying there are none.

Awards

User:LadyofShalott/Awards

Articles that...

If you can improve any of these, please do!

I've started

I've significantly expanded

The Beach

I like to play in the sand.

Things that (may) need creation

My life in userboxen