Talk:Bill Clinton: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:25, 19 July 2007

Please use the archive parameter to specify the number of the next free peer review page, or replace {{Peer review}} on this page with {{subst:PR}} to find the next free page automatically.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bill Clinton article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

Skip to table of contents

Bill Clinton has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 1, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
June 16, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
October 8, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
May 19, 2006	Good article reassessment	Kept
Current status: Good article

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Politics and Government A‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
A	This article has been rated as A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Michael Booth (April 30, 2007). "Grading Wikipedia". Denver Post. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Template:Maintained

Template:FAOL Template:V0.5

Archives

Peer Review, Suggestions, help

Hi, I think this article with a little work could reach FA status. However I think a peer review would be a good first step to finding some of the articles faults and locating areas for improvement. Can someone familiar with the peer review process please nominate the article for one? Furthermore does anyone have any suggestions for improvement that I could work on? LordHarris 14:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ive nominated for a peer review. LordHarris 12:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abortion?

Didn't Clinton at one point pay to have an ex-girfriend abort her pregnancy resulting from a relationship with Clinton (this was when he and Hilary just met)? I think I heard that on the E True Hollywood Story. If he did, shouldn't this be mentioned somewhere in the article? Perhaps under the family article? On all of the encyclopedias I have seen, a list of a person's children included miscarriages, stillborns, etc., so why not a terminated pregnancy? Emperor001 20:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a reference from a reputable source then please add it to the article.LordHarris 21:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I do add it, where do I put it? There is no family section. Emperor001 21:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't bother. Oh, the irony. Roe v. Wade was all about the right to privacy; and I assure you those who attend to our WP:BLP policy will not allow such an entry to stand, even if someone did say it happened on some tabloid TV show -- unless Clinton himself has publicly discussed such thing. Criminy. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 21:37, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The show had a video-taped interview with both Clinton and the ex-girlfriend admitting to the pre-marital affair and the abortion. I don't think they are to concerned about keeping something private if they admitted it in an interview that could and would be put on TV. Besides, E! True Hollywood Story isn't some tabloid. It's a documentary series that clearly distinguishes between fact and rumor. Emperor001 19:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Approval Rating Graph

I made that graph, maybe you would like to put it on the page.

--Jean-Francois Landry 17:06, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 |action4oldid=130471667
-|currentstatus=A
+|currentstatus=GA
 }}
 {{WikiProjectBanners