Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Hu12 (talk | contribs)
91,877 edits
How to search for https:// (s) additions?
Hu12 (talk | contribs)
91,877 edits
Line 572: Line 572:
==How to search for https:// (s) additions?==
==How to search for https:// (s) additions?==
I've seen a few of the "secure", http(s) additions such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Support_and_resistance&diff=prev&oldid=163895672 this]. these arent searchable Are they?--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 04:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
I've seen a few of the "secure", http(s) additions such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Support_and_resistance&diff=prev&oldid=163895672 this]. these arent searchable Are they?--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 04:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
== bollywoodworld spam ==
Adsense pub-8760512791838786 <br>
*http://spam.bollywoodworld.com
*http://spam.bollywoodworld.ca
*http://spam.bollywoodtalk.com
*http://spam.bwforums.com
*http://spam.bollywoodmail.com
*http://spam.bollywoodstars.com
*http://spam.bollywoodmusic.com
:*{{spamlink|bollywoodworld.com}}
:*{{spamlink|bollywoodworld.ca}}
:*{{spamlink|bollywoodtalk.com}}
:*{{spamlink|bwforums.com}}
:*{{spamlink|bollywoodmail.com}}
:*{{spamlink|bollywoodstars.com}}
:*{{spamlink|bollywoodmusic.com}}
:'''Spam accounts'''<br>
{{vandal|Kingshah99}}<br>{{vandal|68.127.116.222}}<br>{{vandal|74.114.5.222}}<br>{{IPvandal|69.157.11.182}}<br>--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 04:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:48, 13 December 2007


Shortcut


Archive

Archives

List of archives (with sections)

ifood.tv

I've noticed links to ifood.tv popping up here and there. In most cases, by spot checking, I found the links added by IP users mapping to India. (Look for 122. IPs). I'm not entirely convinced that this is spam ... well ... it's spam, but it's borderline useful content as opposed to merely being a link aggregator or trying to push a commercial product. Maybe I'll be more dogmatic tomorrow, but I thought I would post it here first to see if anyone has a strong opinion one way or the other on removing the links. --B 02:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's monitor how it gets used. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dirk - did this get monitored? There doesn't seem to be a COIBot report, but a link was added on October 24 2007 ([1]). -- SiobhanHansa 16:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Curious, the bot missed that one. Maybe the bot was down at the moment...
Let's try again. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tao-te-king.org

Timestamp. MER-C 03:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"tips" spam

Domains:

UserID's:

Timestamp. MER-C 03:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

famousamericans.net, Act II - Scene 3

These are all domains related to famousamericans.net, adding them here so they get monitored by lwcoibot. There have been ongoing issues concerning verbatim copying of data from this source, and the addition of links to many articles. (original report is here.


Ok, this is getting old - it's looking more and more like COI.. and there is a new sock in town: Pputter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) --Versageek 04:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See our article on the site's owner: Stanley L. Klos as well as the talk page discussion
Also see this list of 241 related domains. —Preceding unsigned comment added by A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well this is interesting: over 400 articles are internally linked to the Stanley L. Klos article. --A. B. (talk) 17:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pputter sure has been busy today..ugh--Hu12 (talk) 17:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, plus these are often added to references - or to completely the wrong guy [2]. I hope all these are getting zapped. Johnbod (talk) 17:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See this discussion:

--A. B. (talk) 18:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another Related Domain - selling books as well..
In addition, it has been confirmed by CheckUser, that the three named accounts (Cedarkey1, Pputter, Damslerset) on the WP:AN thread above, as well as a fourth account Solknats (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are related. If you look at Special:Contributions/Solknats he clearly identifies himself by first & last name, although the last name has been removed from the current version of his userpage. --Versageek 21:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I tested, all websites share the same IP: Special:Linksearch/66.45.34.101.
--Dirk Beetstra T C 17:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

megadry.com

I have spotted some spamming activity on behalf of megadry.com where user Whynotthestars has been adding links to this site, as has Hyperhidrosis. Hyperhidrosis has also removed a link to a non profit organisation that works in the same field.

Accounts

Hyperhidrosis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Whynotthestars (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
--Matt Beard 16:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Add to monitorlist of COIBot. --Dirk Beetstra T C 16:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On the verge of BL here, probably should go on if they are still at it --Herby talk thyme 16:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The link is, for as far as the bots have picked it up, only be used by the above accounts, and by an IP:
--Dirk Beetstra T C 17:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following IP address also seems to be involved:
--Matt Beard (talk) 11:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User Whynotthestars is still acting in a way that I believe is unhelpful. On 19:21, 4 December 2007 he returned to the Sleep_hyperhidrosis page and again removed a link to a non-profit organisation that is dedicated to this field. I think this may be a case of trying to reduce exposure of alternative sites to the one that he has been spamming. He earlier replaced the link to this non-profit with a spam-link to megadry and this action was regarded by Voyagerfan5761 as vandalism.
--Matt Beard (talk) 10:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

spam.videopopcorn.com

Previous incidents
Sites spammed
Spammers

MER-C 11:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still spamming. Blacklisting requested. MER-C 08:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.arc.org.uk

Arthritis Research Campaign

Accounts

Arcinfo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
213.83.109.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) →Arthritis Research Campaign IP
Registered Charity No. 207711--Hu12 (talk) 16:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I consider these links acceptable links to informative pages on the web site of a major non-profit, s an uninvolveded ed. who sometimes works on medical articles, I will reinsert them if they are removed. A good modest job of providing information appropriately to the encyclopedia. The user block is about to expire, so there is no point in contesting it. I consider it very ill-advised. DGG (talk) 06:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • cough*, did you note the IP registered to ARC... or the user "Arcinfo" spamming arc.org.uk, LOL..--Hu12 (talk) 09:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some points:

  • The IP account has a clear conflict of interest, the IP is registered to ARC
  • The name ArcInfo suggest also a conflict of interest, and arcinfo is active/created just shortly after the IP, suggesting that the IP-user created that account (no proof here).
  • These 2 accounts perform link-additions only.
  • The use of {{cite web}} does suggest that the editors have worked more on wikipedia, or are very fast learners.
  • There are only two links to this domain not added by these accounts, one on the page of the organisation, one added by another IP account outside of the range (interestingly, not too far away from 213.83.109.90; IP 213.42.21.156, diff, adding the same text as 213.83.109.90 and arcinfo). If the link is really that useful, then more uninvolved editors would have used it.
  • The accounts do not discuss when pointed that way, a block to remind them that their unilateral additions are considered spamming here, and to promote discussion seems appropriate, I would suggest 24/31 hours.
  • Adding a discussion to the talkpages with a reason why the links might be useful to add to the page takes just as much time as adding the link to the page yourself.
  • Or, if the links are really useful, then I would suggest that these accounts contact an appropriate wikiproject, and when the wikiproject endorses their edits, then they can add the link.
  • The account can be blocked because of the username.

You are of course free to re-insert them, if you really think they are useful, though they might serve better as a reference (that seems to have been the faith of the external link 213.42.21.156 has added as well), and there are on some of the pages already quite some external links (e.g. Osteoarthritis now contains 13, which is arguably more than 'a few'). Hope this explains our efforts here. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to say that I agree completely with all that Dirk has said here. This is excessive placement of external links by someone who has a "conflict of interest". I would certainly have no problem with the indefinitely blocking of the user name under the circumstances --Herby talk thyme 11:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an extra note, we are dealing with a 'campaign' site here, not with an independent site aimed for providing information. Although the site might provide good, reliable information, it should be taken into account that campaign sites may have a promotional agenda. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming of http://spam.artchestra.com

Artchestra LLC

Accounts

76.211.225.165 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
76.192.50.223 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
76.211.224.251 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 07:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phishing site on Gaia Online

Posting this here to have a permanent record of watching the links:

One of the pages on this site, h1.ripway.com/gaiaoline/Login.html contains a phishing site which has been added a couple of times to Gaia Online (to catch the login process).

  1. 2007-12-07 05:26:32: User en:89.114.112.124 (talk - contribs) to en:Gaia Online (diff). Links: h1.ripway.com/gaiaoline/Login.html.
  2. 2007-12-07 04:51:08: User en:75.165.126.211 (talk - contribs) to en:Gaia Online (diff). Links: h1.ripway.com/kingme/Login.html.
  3. 2007-12-07 00:32:08: User en:75.165.126.211 (talk - contribs) to en:Gaia Online (diff). Links: h1.ripway.com/kingme/Login.html.
  4. 2007-12-05 14:50:43: User en:164.116.250.39 (talk - contribs) to en:Gaia Online (diff). Links: h1.ripway.com/kingme/Login.html.
  5. 2007-12-03 15:22:10: User en:164.116.246.128 (talk - contribs) to en:Gaia Online (diff). Links: h1.ripway.com/kingme/Login.html.

--Dirk Beetstra T C 10:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gift spam

Sites spammed

http://spam.best-german-gifts.com

http://spam.best-italian-gifts.com

http://spam.successful-diet-cabbage-soup.com

http://spam.all-slovenia-holidays.com

Spammers

MER-C 11:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Worldwide Business Research (WBR)

See also - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide Business Research
See also - Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Worldwide_Business_Research

Worldwide Business Research
TradeTech

Accounts

Brittenstreet (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
208.49.200.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
38.112.44.252 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Performance Systems International Inc.
Jobance (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Jennyzhang (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 19:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am a little confused here, as i can not see any substantial number of articles the accounts listed have tried to spam. DGG (talk) 06:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see that the edits of the two IP accounts are often to External links sections, Jobance's and Jennyzhang's edits only concern external links. I would define mainly editing to insert external links 'pushing your links', which translates on wikipedia into 'spamming'. Hope this explains. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:35, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Juicy spam

Hi, all. If this isn't the right place for this... I'd be happy to take it where it belongs. I have been removing some spam (and leaving some spam that I wasn't sure about) from the external links section of Juicer. Now I have a user with one edit asking me why I deleted his links and left other spammy links in there (on my talk page). Could someone please check out the external links section of Juicer and give me an honest take on the links there? I'm not sure which (if any) are salvageable. If you go through the history, you should see pretty quick what has been going on. Thanks. -- Swerdnaneb 22:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the links and left a note at the talk page of the IP-address. /SvNH 06:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help. Nice to have a second set of eyes sometimes. -- Swerdnaneb 18:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indian watch online site back

Cleaned funarulez.com from a number of articles. Apparently Spambot has an old variant of this site (\bfunarule\.com) - see User talk:Fun4Guy. Other editors:

Jackollie (talk) 07:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.new-insurancetips.com http://spam.new-fishingtips.com

Adsense pub-3194289089925156

Spammers

6 accounts, 9 spamlink additions. There's something very fishy about this, but any attempt at an investigation comes to a dead end, which makes me think there's more spam out there. See also Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Claudia Spatar. MER-C 11:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Investigative Tools

User A. B. has suggested I repeat an offer I made to him here, so I am reposting my original message:

With ref to your AN post, I have no idea if it will help but I have two possibly relevant tools I can offer.
One - wpW5 - will search article history and tell you when a piece of text (ie. a link) was added and who added it. It takes about 30 seconds in "quick" mode.
The other - lkScan - will search a user's entire contribs and compile every web link they've added to any article and put them into a sortable format.
Maybe these could help you figure out the whole scope of the problem? Let me know if you think they could help. Franamax (talk) 02:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The tools are described a little more fully on my user page. Franamax (talk) 02:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

where can we get these tools? βcommand 02:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would have to email them at the moment, renamed from exe to xxx to get past gmail. Let me know if you want copies. Franamax (talk) 02:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
sure, use the e-mail listed at the top of my userpage. βcommand 02:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Files sent direct from my gmail account. Of course, since you're in Micronesia I assume they will take 2 weeks to get there by boat:) Franamax (talk) 03:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
where did Micronesia come from? βcommand 03:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
TLD of your email address? Ha, maybe I sent them to someone completely different! Franamax (talk) 03:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
that is just my host not where I live :) βcommand 03:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And that is a "straight line" in the comedic sense if I ever heard one! Must - suppress - sarcastic - rejoinder ;) Franamax (talk) 03:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ohh, I want this. I'll shot you an e-mail request. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 20:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.wapsana.com

Adsense pub-5053626743608312
Adsense pub-8326712429072318

Accounts

Wapsana (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 03:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adsense Reference spammer

Adsense pub-8371900312485223

Accounts

Amosjo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Govontario (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
spams references to related Adsense pub--Hu12 (talk) 04:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.gregrian.com

Adsense pub-2259683912738534

Accounts

Code00 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Gregrian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
71.143.1.162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
67.169.199.249 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
65.91.114.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
143.183.121.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
71.9.107.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
71.197.64.26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
68.198.27.89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 06:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.microstockdiaries.com

Adsense pub-4294503212334863

Accounts

Leetorrens (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
86.161.59.57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 06:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.toonopedia.com

Previous incidents

toonopedia.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

Returning spam-only IP, please block. MER-C 09:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.discoverhongkong.com

discoverhongkong.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 09:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thedietfriend

Adsense pub-5670141598159530
Adsense pub-8424308052810939

Accounts

Thedietfriend (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 21:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adsense 4555642371987085

Adsense pub-4555642371987085

Accounts
Not much to this. The editor added two different links to to different articles on the same day which use the same Adsense number. --Ronz (talk) 22:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.MaximisingBestPractice.co.uk

Adsense pub-2835981570956339

Accounts

81.96.189.192 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
--Hu12 (talk) 23:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peruvian handicraft website

Persistent link spammer.

Accounts

Jackollie (talk) 01:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.NicNitro.com

Accounts

DrHair (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
24.97.46.106 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
blog spam--Hu12 (talk) 05:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.allaboutuni.com

allaboutuni.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 10:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AtTask, Inc.

@task speedy twice, spam
AtTask speedy twice, spam. Plus 2 AFD's Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/AtTask, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AtTask (2nd nomination)

Accounts

Natebowler (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)Nate Bowler, chief technology officer for AtTask
Scjnsn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
160.7.248.35 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) UT corp location
Vpdjuric (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 02:11, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.bestbonusonlinecasino.com http://spam.allaboardcruisescorp.com

Accounts

Cruises101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
--Hu12 (talk) 08:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.bollywoodpoint.com http://www.emzr.com http://www.acneclearingdevice.com

Adsense pub-6534719876029376
Adsense pub-4378535185377572

Spam sock accounts

Wisdomking (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Uday4ru (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
59.184.31.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
59.93.90.156 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
59.93.76.208 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
59.184.62.19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
59.184.27.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
59.93.88.19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 08:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pub-4481504379310642

Adsense pub-4481504379310642

Accounts

81.156.46.50 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
--Hu12 (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pub-8043702620473460

Adsense pub-8043702620473460

Accounts

Netgojustin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
--Hu12 (talk) 16:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Sean Connery fansite

The stills on this site are copyright violations, right? Here's an example URL, an IP has been adding links to multiple articles:

  • http://sean-connery.narod.ru/foto28-15.html

GlassFET 16:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rondee Website

A new user Deanvesuvio (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam) has created an article Rondee which appears to be simply an advertisement for a long distance service. I placed a db-spam notice on top which he has removed 3 times, ignoring warnings. He also has two warnings on link spamming other articles with links to the website associated with this company.

Admin assistance here would be appreciated. Calltech (talk) 23:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User Deanvesuvio now has vandalized my user page, talk page and article Conference calls with an obsene graphic. Recommend blocking user as well. Calltech (talk) 23:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article speedied per WP:CSD#G11., user already blocked. Added link search above so COIbot can monitor.--Hu12 (talk) 23:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Hu12! Calltech (talk) 23:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WhereIstand.com

  • Seeing this link pop up on a number of politician webpages like Eliot Spitzer and Libertarian Party (United States)‎. Anyone have any thoughts? I've not heard of it, but from a quick look I don't know if I would consider it to be a reliable source. Any convention on links for politician pages?Montco (talk) 01:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Summary;

Adsense pub-1296760774484088

Accounts

Donnybaseball (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
EsperantoStand (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
72.231.29.80 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Astoria, New York
All additions were added by WP:SPA accounts. The site doesn't seem to be particularly well known, or connected with well known political academics or other commentators. dime a dozen adsense link--Hu12 (talk) 02:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.stepneyfutures.com

Accounts

Stepney (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
87.194.38.69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.conexaodinheiro.com

Adsense pub-4765719238921368

Accounts

200.211.196.130 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
189.60.33.229 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
189.60.11.206 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.onlinetradingconcepts.com

Adsense pub-1400581573812716

Accounts

Relativestrength (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Tradermatt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
ThomasMark (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fxwords.com gocurrency.com forextradingllc.com

see

[[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spam_blacklist/Archives/2007/01#fxwords.com__gocurrency.com_forextradingl

lc.com meta case] Adsense pub-4120591182248492

Accounts

Lgauthie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.stock-charts-made-easy.com

Adsense pub-8329945757009252

Accounts

Ticmarc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.pitrading.com

Accounts

Pivotman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
71.230.55.78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How to search for https:// (s) additions?

I've seen a few of the "secure", http(s) additions such as this. these arent searchable Are they?--Hu12 (talk) 04:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bollywoodworld spam

Adsense pub-8760512791838786

Spam accounts

Kingshah99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
68.127.116.222 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
74.114.5.222 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
69.157.11.182 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 04:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam&oldid=177594303"