User talk:Deepfriedokra/Archive 12

Vandalism is futile Please understand that this userpage is frequently vandalized, and vandalism is reverted pretty quickly. You will not accomplish anything by vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to try test editing, you may do so in our sandbox located at Wikipedia:Sandbox or create a test subpage by putting "/test" after your username and clicking "create page." Thanks

Contacting me

If you wish to contact me, the quickest and easiest way is to CLICK HERE.

If you have a question about a deleted article, please leave a message by CLICKING HERE. You can also appeal a deletion by clicking this link to Deletion Review and following the directions found there.

Archives

1. Mar 3, 2006 - May 4, 2006

2. May 5, 2006 - May 25, 2006

3. May 26, 2006 - Aug 3, 2006

4. Aug 5, 2006 - Aug 25, 2006

5. Aug 25, 2006 - Sep 27, 2006

6. Oct 3 2006 - Oct 29 2006

7. Oct 30, 2006 - Nov 29, 2006

8. Nov 29, 2006 - Jul 7, 2007

9. Jul 8, 2007 - Sep 17, 2007

10. Sep 15 - Oct 13, 2007

11. Oct 13, 2007 - Nov 29, 2007

Messages

You are now an administrator

Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at The Administrators' how-to guide and the Administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. Some have found the practice exercises at the New admin school useful. If you have any questions drop me a message at My talk page. Best wishes, WjBscribe 14:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! (at least I was in time for this) henrik•talk 14:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

More nominator congrats - and WJB's first ever admin promotion!! Enjoy the tools buddy. Try the new admin school to test them out - deleting the main page and blocking your nom's is not the way forward !! Pedro :  Chat  16:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Well done! Hope it gets you what you need! :) — Rudget _{contributions} 19:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Will do. I'm glad you got "the mop!". — Rudget _{contributions} 19:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations. - Rjd0060 19:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Wield me! Wield me!

Congratulations on your successful RfA! Here are your shiny new mop and bucket. Use them wisely! :-) Festive regards, Húsönd 20:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Nice job!   jj137 ♠ Talk 21:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! Well done :) - Alison ^❤ 22:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Wield it with pride! Make us proud!

On that note, did you personilize the thanks? I've seen several different titles for it from you... every nice, warm fuzzy touch. And "Booming Support" on mine? You shouldn't have... :D ----Jump! Slash! Dash! Ouch! Super Mario SonicBOOM! 17:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

An RfA message from AGK

Congratulations on your recent acquisition of the mop. I offer to you a few words of wisdom:

• Start slowly and carefully. There's a huge temptation to start flying through your new duties as soon as the 'crat pushes the button - resist it. Avoid close calls for your first week or two, and leave it to those who happened to get their tools a little earlier than you.
• Be sure to connect in with other users on IRC, if you can. There's a whole pool of channels there where you can get assistance in your newly-acquired buttons, and get your new colleagues used to your name.
• Be ready for criticism in your first few weeks, but at the same time don't be a push-over. If you feel worried over a decision, get another user to take a look at it.
• When blocking, ask yourself if everything you've entered into that form will benefit Wikipedia: is the block length sufficiently long to prevent further disruption by a vandal, or is it so long that it will put them off ever returning? Is your protection just going to be a minor hiccup in the edit warrior's grand scheme of disruption, or will it hinder the growth of the encyclopedia?

Best of luck with your new buttons, and don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any queries.

Anthøny 19:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

About your RfA

The admins' T-shirt. Acalamari 22:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations on your successful request for adminship. I am glad you passed, and you are welcome for the support. For information on using your new tools, see the school for new admins; you will find it very useful. Good luck! Acalamari 22:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC) Acalamari 22:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I wish you all the best as a sysop :) Dihydrogen Monoxide ^♫ 23:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Dlohcierekim 23:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Good luck and congratulations! Midorihana_{(talk)(contribs)} 06:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations!--chaser - t 08:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Congrats and all the best! — Satori Son 16:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! now go and be useful by deleting the main page, blocking a few bureaucrats or even Jimbo, and protecting pages that haven't been edited in years because they must be in the best condition. :-) Carlossuarez46 18:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Congrats, Dlohcierekim. I've only been an admin for a little more than 2 months, and I still obviously don't know everything, but if you have any basic questions or need some advice, hit me up. You'll make a great admin. Good luck! нмŵוτнτ 17:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The 'inuse' template

It is listed at Wikipedia:Template messages/Maintenance. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Dillen Source

It took some hunting through the Tennis Corner site, which isn't particularly well designed. If you've traversed enough websites with "twisty passages that all look alike", you start to get a sense of how to deconstruct them with a few clicks to orient yourself. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

== What?

==

WHAT?

Are you a admisistrator?

Freshly minted today. Dlohcierekim 02:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

ender fights buggers

Are you an administrator? Yes Dlohcierekim 02:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Userbox

Hi! You'll probably want to replace {{User:Henrik/ubx/User contrib|<edits>|<Username>}} on your userpage with {{User:Henrik/ubx/User contrib|15000|Dlohcierekim}}, otherwise it'll look strange (especially for people without the javascript installed). I should really try to clarify the instructions, you're not the only one who did that. Cheers! henrik•talk 14:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

I was just thrilled that the thing automatically updates. Will do as you suggest. Thanks. Dlohcierekim 14:47, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Much better! Dlohcierekim 14:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

belated congrats

Belated congrats on making admin. You may now smile at the bride speak your mind much more freely, which is a good thing (=make use of that). Anyhow, yeah, just wanted to drop a line saying basically that. Best regards, I dorftrottel I talk I 22:01, December 1, 2007

Joseph tiedemann

First off congrats on becoming an admin. I notice someone else has already deleted the article as I am writing this so it probably moot (sorry about delay) but... I would probably have deleted the article personally as I think the intent of 'planted the church' is so unclear as to be probable nonsense or just that he is the elder at that church. Nothing else in the article strikes me as an assertion of notability. Of course if he had actually 'planted a church' that would be very notable but I somehow doubt it! If you have any doubt however remove the speedy tag and prod it instead to give others the chance to look it over. Hope that is some help and don't hesitate to drop me a message if I can be any help in the future. Davewild 22:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for the support. Oh, and a belated congratulations on the RfA, I didn't even notice until I saw it here. Good to hear you've got the mop! Tijuana Brass 03:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

About 'nocontext' articles

Hi, I tagged articles like Carlos Orejuela with a {{db-nocontext}}... you might have mistaken it for an nn tag since that's what you indicated in your comment... it was just someone creating articles of footballers with a filled-in template only... nothing written... that's why. -- Mentifisto 03:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, you're right... so next time there's such an article what do I do? (Also since I'm not sure how I could write a lead if I don't know about the subject...) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mentifisto (talk • contribs) 03:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks, and sorry for tagging them so quickly. -- Mentifisto 04:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey, no worry. Like I say, a bunch of them got deleted. and I don't think you were the only one tagging. Other admins did not see it as I did. You did nothing wrong. Just a difference of opinion on how to interpret "no context." Dlohcierekim 04:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay. :-) -- Mentifisto 04:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Congratulation!

Hello Dlohcierekim. I am Masterpiece2000. I am a relatively new Wikipedian. Congratulation! I hope you will do a great job as an admin. I wish you all the best. Regards, Masterpiece2000 04:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Email

Quite suprised I haven't enabled my email before. I'm certain it has been enable now, although if that isn't the case, just let me know. Thanks for the heads up. Kaiser matias 20:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

You may want to resend what ever it was you sent. At the time you responded to me, I had a setting blocking and deleting most unknown mail, so yours was deleted. Kaiser matias 04:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Cup Of Twee?

I received a note (automated) from you on my talk page about how Cup Of Twee had been nominated for speedy-delete, however, I did not create that page, so I'm wondering how I got notified? I myself left a delete template there a bit ago. RedZionX 23:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Aces and Eights

It didn't specify an exact name but I guess it could have been an attack at someone. It seems it was speedied under G10 now.   jj137 ♠ Talk 23:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

That makes sense.   jj137 ♠ Talk 23:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Wow! You say "more edits in a day than you could get in a week", and I say "more (real) barnstar offers in a day than I've gotten in all of 1½ years at Wikipedia". Thanks for the offer!   jj137 ♠ Talk 03:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that!   jj137 ♠ Talk 03:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Message from unhappy editor

Please don't write on my userpage. I haven't vandalized anything since the last two admins wrote on my user page. So why are you threatening me with a new warning? Stop please. 24.68.253.80 14:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

More unconstructive edits appeared to follow prior warnings. Then you blanked your talk page. Futile gesture. Please try to make constructive edits. Dlohcierekim 14:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

There were no further unconstructive edits. IF you are referring to my addition of the stub tag to the vandals vs trolls page, you are mistaken. "blanking my talk page" wasn't a futile gesture to hide my work. your accusations are insulting. do not write on my talk page any further. 24.68.253.80 14:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

IRC Administrator's channel

If you remember, you left me a query concerning access to the Administrator's IRC channel. In response to that (since you appear to have missed my original answer :), what is your IRC nickname? Anthøny 20:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: my RFA

Hello, I have responded to your question on my RFA nomination. Thanks for your support, and please let me know if you have any other questions. Brianga 20:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks...

for the barnstar. Hopefully it'll be a decent article. — Scientizzle 23:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For your continued and plentiful contributions to Requests for Administrative tools I bequeath you with The Working Man's Barnstar. Your contributions there always seem to be well-thought out and useful to the discussion. SorryGuy 01:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Surely. You really do deserve it. Cheers. SorryGuy 01:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Esperanto

Thank you, Dlohcierekim, for your efforts on behalf of "aspiring Esperantists" (a phrase that must mean, I suppose, that we're very, very hopeful) in preserving the page on Bertilo Wennergren from threatened speedy deletion.

I'm a novice Wikipedian whose main experience has been with minor proofreading, and I'm still feeling my way carefully to avoid making too many egregious mistakes.

You asked about my Esperanto skills. My ability to speak and write Esperanto is extremely limited, unfortunately, but texts written by others are relatively easy for me to understand because of their similarity to other languages with which I am familiar. (I was born in Denmark to Norwegian and Danish parents, have now learned English to a professional level, and have studied French and German.) Obviously, my reading ability in foreign languages is greater than my productive ability, so I would not attempt to translate into Esperanto, at least for now.

Kindest regards, Erik Pedersen (objectivesea) Objectivesea 03:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

non native student work

I'd like to discuss the multiple deletions of my student's work (Satoe2158) in her user page. I am teaching students for whom English is a second language, so am asking them to use their user space to construct their articles which will then be moved to the namespace. The first deletion was by User:hmwith and occurred approximately 20 minutes after she had copied a portion of the Uzbekistan-Japan_Center, while she was still logged in.

The second deletion by User:Dlohcierekim occurred after a smaller section had been inserted and the inital process of converting the explanation so as to provide a template for an appropriate article, which was done at the end of class to give the student some basis to complete the first steps of the assignment. There was no warnings or discussion for the Uzbekistan-Japan_Center, so it certainly appears to be an appropriate model, but if there are problems, they should be addressed in the authentic namespace and not going into a student's personal user page. I appreciate the problems with spamming and vandalism, but for constructing an article and having it proofread by a native speaker, the sandbox is not a feasible alternative. Furthermore, the Minamata Open Center is an non-profit academic center, established by the Japanese Ministry of Education, to research Minamata disease, so I believe that it fulfills the requirements of inclusion in the wikipedia.

Please advise if there is an alternative process to this, the other students who are working with wikipedia are utilizing the same process and do not seem to be having the same scrutiny applied. Tomeiter 07:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd also note that in the Speedy_deletion section it specifically notes that

Testing is permitted in the sandbox and in users' own user space. If this is not official Wikipedia policy, please let me know. Tomeiter 08:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

After some review I've restored some of these speedy deletions, please see User_talk:Tomeiter and User_talk:Satoe2158#Page_Deletions for my rationale. You do not appear to be online right now, but I wanted to let you know about this. Please talk page me if you think this still needs to be deleted, or feel free to MFD it if I'm not around. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 13:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Comment at RfA

Hi. this was a comment that's rather below the belt. Nominees can't be held to account for what other people write on their RfA page, whether in support or opposition. It also seems very out of character for you... Anyway, I warmly invite you to revert yourself. --Dweller 14:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

<ding> You've got mail. --Dweller 15:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I'm happier now - the comment which upset me at first makes perfect sense coming from someone who was reconsidering their position in a positive way. Thanks also for being someone who is prepared to listen to other editors and isn't afraid to change his mind - something far too few of us will do! Best wishes, DuncanHill 16:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletions

Thank you for letting me know that you have declined a speedy deletion I requested.

One note, though... when I am on new page patrol, I can put quite a lot of CSD tags, and I do follow up on them, to make sure it is not the author that removes them. Of course, I expect that a certain percentage of the requests I make will be denied by admins, and I do not have any problem with that. So, I would suggest that you make that kind of notification only when you see a patroller repeatedly making the same mistake (for example, requesting SDs on articles on the grounds that they are unsourced). --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 00:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Uncle Chen

You're absolutely right, just a case of careless RC patrol on my part. I'll be more careful. Thanks for catching it, sorry about that. Peace, delldot talk 01:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

HAHA

Users of Wikipedia make me laugh sooo much. Well, I have edited some things that r true. So don't push it.TK(film) (talk) 14:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Have some respect for people

I'm not using Wikipedia for self premotion or anything like that. If I see something new on the net that's true, I'll put/edit it on Wikipedia. Respect and Peace :D TK(film) (talk) 15:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

A question

I need to know who created some Youtube celebrites like Smosh. Did Smosh themselves right that article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TK(film) (talk • contribs) 15:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Interesting. Never saw that before. Are you saying that you don't think they meet guidelines for notability and verifiability? Are you further saying, "if they have an article, why not me?" Unfortunately, there are too many articles that should not be. The existence of one cannot and will not justify the existence of others. I've not the time to look at their claims to notability at present. However, I will probably nominate that article for deletion too. Thanks for the heads up. Dlohcierekim 16:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Guennol Lioness speedy declined

Oh, no problem. I'm just used to seeing pages like this. When I added the tag, it was a sentence fragment. Don't worry about it! -Carados (talk) 03:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Try the link. Someone else remade it. -Carados (talk) 03:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Agh! Sorry about that. The speedy deletion tags have been coming fast tonight and I didn't take the time to check the history on that one. My apologies. Feel free to toss some disciplinary templates onto my talk page in revenge if you'd like. Tijuana Brass (talk) 03:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

sig

Btw, the new simpler sig looks a lot better to me. ¶ dorftrottel ¶ talk ¶ 06:56, December 6, 2007

Salty Walrus

While I can't really argue against an AfD like this, personally I don't think it should have been deleted. There seems to be a bias on Wikipedia against anything sex-related (possibly due to the witch-hunt against Taxwoman), which is why I try to at least do minor cleanup on these pages periodically to give them a fighting chance. I think this is at least as valid - and sourceable - as Donkey Punch, which has survived more AfDs than anything I can think of other than Daniel Brandt. — iridescent 20:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Taxwoman wrote a lot of articles on an increasingly odd range of sexual practices, before being blocked for sockpuppetry under highly dubious circumstances, leaving behind a huge pile of highly dubious articles which certain Defenders of the Wiki seem to have made it their life's work to play shoot-till-you-win at AfD until the whole lot's gone. You can find a reasonably accurate summary of the whole sorry saga at The Attack Site We Do Not Link To. — iridescent 20:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:Havefun

Hi. Thanks for deleting it. That was disgusting. Are users allowed to have this type of stuff in userspace? Wouldn't it be more of "innapropriate usage" than "vandalism"? Does policy state that mainspace is the only place for sexual images, and userspace as well as wikipediaspace and templatespace should be kept free of porn? It is true that nobody is allowed to use WP:CENSORED to argue against deletion of something like this, since it is innapropriate for mainspace anyway? Can this type of stuff be speedydeleted without XfD? Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 01:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey, regarding my page I wans't trying to recreate it, this is just my first time really using these tools and I probably pressed the wrong thing. Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul918 (talk • contribs) 03:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your vote on my RfA

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with a vote of 41/0/1. Please accept a slice of panettone as an expression of my gratitude. Feel free to help yourself to some chocolate zabaglione as well. I am humbled by the trust placed in me to use the tools wisely. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 20:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Michael Willis speedy

Thanks for letting me know. Just so as I know for next time, you don't think, say, the 2nd and 3rd para's here are prima facie nonsense? Although, there could be some offsetting material elsewhere on the page that would merit saving, of course. Anyway, thanks for letting me know. --AndrewHowse (talk) 16:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply. Dlohcierekim 16:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the subsequent updates, too. My 2 cents are now where you might expect them to be. --AndrewHowse (talk) 02:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

cool. Dlohcierekim 02:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Plse consider blocking User:128.243.253.111 - see recent actions at Michael Willis. Thanks. --AndrewHowse (talk) 16:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

deleted article page

you punk... that was a bad move deleting my page.... baaaaaaadd move —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shmacka069 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Judge Regan Miller

a State official who engages in hate speech in a documented public forum (NPR) is self-evidently notable.

Removed article page content from talk page. Redacted text can be seen by clicking Here.

Please do not use my talk page as a soapbox. I read all of this on the article page. I do not see any assertion of notability, nor do I find significant media coverage. Please provide verifiable sources attesting to notability. Just because you find his views reprehensible is no reason to have an article, or to recreate the article contents on my talk page. I see no evidence of NPR. Dlohcierekim 03:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Restored and sent to AfD. Dlohcierekim 03:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I find it unfair to delete the article, and then criticize me for having to carry it around in the discussion. Had you left it as a link, I would have been happy to link at it. I hardly need your user page as a soapbox eh? Thanks, I appreciate the community process. Benjamin Gatti (talk) 03:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Move

Thanks, but do project Userboxes go in user space? Best, --S.dedalus (talk) 04:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and I already tried a move so we have a dead redirect page at User WPContemporary. Should be deleted too. Thanks --S.dedalus (talk) 04:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, me neither. I was modeling this one on Template:User WPClassical. --S.dedalus (talk) 04:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help, and no problem. This was confusing me too! --S.dedalus (talk) 05:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Reww

This user continues to reinstate deleted articles under the titles Yung xx or Yung XX. I am requesting a temporary block for a day or so if this continues.--Manderson198 (sprech) 15:52, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

He's new and perhaps overly enthusiastic. I might send the thing to AfD. A previous incarnation had a PROD and was blanked by creator. Don't know if he reaches notability or not. Doubt it, but it might be there. Still ooking around he web. Another problem is the corelbot tag as copyvio. Have to check on that. I'll keep an eye on him for now. Thanks, Dlohcierekim 15:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Also, no one gave him a Not notable warning. He might just have wondered why is creation disappeared. Dlohcierekim 16:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I placed a not notable warning on a previous article of the same name and he blanked the page. I also checked for outside sources and was unable to find any. --Manderson198 (sprech) 16:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I guess I retract my request for a temporary block. I posted on his talk page and referred him to WP:SALT. Manderson198 (sprech) 16:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

<<edit conflicted response>> No prob-- I deleted the latest incarnation of Yung XX and asked him to not repost. He's edited and created a whole slew of articles that need to be looked at. If he continues, warn him some more and then report him at WP:AN/I. Unfortunately, I have to eat lunch and go to work. I'll try to go through his other contribs tomorrow. Thanks and happy editing. Dlohcierekim 16:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good. Thanks a lot. Manderson198 (sprech) 16:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Horton,AL

Hello Dlohcierekim, I`m user:1bookfan (Creator of the article Horton,AL) thank you for expanding Horton,AL.--DJ 21:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Bicester Community College

References

  1. ^ Bicester Athletic Club scoop Thames Valley public TV vote and Lottery cash. Big Lottery Fund (30th November 2007). Retrieved on 2007-12-18.
  2. ^ Business alarm at bad GCSE results for town Oxford Mail, October 27, 2006
  3. ^ Bicester school "worst in county" Oxford Times Online, January 12, 2007
  4. ^ Inspection Report. Ofsted (8th November 2007). Retrieved on 2007-12-11.

Can number 2 be perm deleted from requests of the school as this is old and now everything is fine

Please provide a source showing the change. Wikipedia is uncensored and unbiased. It does not only cover the "good parts". If the information is obsolete, please update it and cite a reliable source. Dlohcierekim 16:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Many Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefogster (talk • contribs) 16:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my userpage! It's really the first time that that's happened to me, and I was away... meh. Thanks again! ----Jump! Slash! Dash! Ouch! Super Mario SonicBOOM! 17:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes I have sources.

Thank you for leaving me a message. I will post sources of Jonah House. Thanks. rkmlai (talk) 22:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

A tad late

I already blocked him because he was spamming SIHULM. He's out for 72 hours and the article he was mainly harassing is protected. I'm looking over his edits. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 02:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)