User talk:Deepfriedokra/Archive 12

Vandalism is futile Please understand that this userpage is frequently vandalized, and vandalism is reverted pretty quickly. You will not accomplish anything by vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to try test editing, you may do so in our sandbox located at Wikipedia:Sandbox or create a test subpage by putting "/test" after your username and clicking "create page." Thanks

Contacting me

If you wish to contact me, the quickest and easiest way is to CLICK HERE.

If you have a question about a deleted article, please leave a message by CLICKING HERE. You can also appeal a deletion by clicking this link to Deletion Review and following the directions found there.

Archives

1. Mar 3, 2006 - May 4, 2006

2. May 5, 2006 - May 25, 2006

3. May 26, 2006 - Aug 3, 2006

4. Aug 5, 2006 - Aug 25, 2006

5. Aug 25, 2006 - Sep 27, 2006

6. Oct 3 2006 - Oct 29 2006

7. Oct 30, 2006 - Nov 29, 2006

8. Nov 29, 2006 - Jul 7, 2007

9. Jul 8, 2007 - Sep 17, 2007

10. Sep 15 - Oct 13, 2007

11. Oct 13, 2007 - Nov 29, 2007

Messages

You are now an administrator

Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at The Administrators' how-to guide and the Administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. Some have found the practice exercises at the New admin school useful. If you have any questions drop me a message at My talk page. Best wishes, WjBscribe 14:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! (at least I was in time for this) henrik•talk 14:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

More nominator congrats - and WJB's first ever admin promotion!! Enjoy the tools buddy. Try the new admin school to test them out - deleting the main page and blocking your nom's is not the way forward !! Pedro :  Chat  16:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Well done! Hope it gets you what you need! :) — Rudget _{contributions} 19:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Will do. I'm glad you got "the mop!". — Rudget _{contributions} 19:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations. - Rjd0060 19:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Wield me! Wield me!

Congratulations on your successful RfA! Here are your shiny new mop and bucket. Use them wisely! :-) Festive regards, Húsönd 20:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Nice job!   jj137 ♠ Talk 21:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! Well done :) - Alison ^❤ 22:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Wield it with pride! Make us proud!

On that note, did you personilize the thanks? I've seen several different titles for it from you... every nice, warm fuzzy touch. And "Booming Support" on mine? You shouldn't have... :D ----Jump! Slash! Dash! Ouch! Super Mario SonicBOOM! 17:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

An RfA message from AGK

Congratulations on your recent acquisition of the mop. I offer to you a few words of wisdom:

• Start slowly and carefully. There's a huge temptation to start flying through your new duties as soon as the 'crat pushes the button - resist it. Avoid close calls for your first week or two, and leave it to those who happened to get their tools a little earlier than you.
• Be sure to connect in with other users on IRC, if you can. There's a whole pool of channels there where you can get assistance in your newly-acquired buttons, and get your new colleagues used to your name.
• Be ready for criticism in your first few weeks, but at the same time don't be a push-over. If you feel worried over a decision, get another user to take a look at it.
• When blocking, ask yourself if everything you've entered into that form will benefit Wikipedia: is the block length sufficiently long to prevent further disruption by a vandal, or is it so long that it will put them off ever returning? Is your protection just going to be a minor hiccup in the edit warrior's grand scheme of disruption, or will it hinder the growth of the encyclopedia?

Best of luck with your new buttons, and don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any queries.

Anthøny 19:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

About your RfA

The admins' T-shirt. Acalamari 22:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations on your successful request for adminship. I am glad you passed, and you are welcome for the support. For information on using your new tools, see the school for new admins; you will find it very useful. Good luck! Acalamari 22:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC) Acalamari 22:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I wish you all the best as a sysop :) Dihydrogen Monoxide ^♫ 23:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Dlohcierekim 23:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Good luck and congratulations! Midorihana_{(talk)(contribs)} 06:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations!--chaser - t 08:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Congrats and all the best! — Satori Son 16:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! now go and be useful by deleting the main page, blocking a few bureaucrats or even Jimbo, and protecting pages that haven't been edited in years because they must be in the best condition. :-) Carlossuarez46 18:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Congrats, Dlohcierekim. I've only been an admin for a little more than 2 months, and I still obviously don't know everything, but if you have any basic questions or need some advice, hit me up. You'll make a great admin. Good luck! нмŵוτнτ 17:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The 'inuse' template

It is listed at Wikipedia:Template messages/Maintenance. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Dillen Source

It took some hunting through the Tennis Corner site, which isn't particularly well designed. If you've traversed enough websites with "twisty passages that all look alike", you start to get a sense of how to deconstruct them with a few clicks to orient yourself. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

== What?

==

WHAT?

Are you a admisistrator?

Freshly minted today. Dlohcierekim 02:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

ender fights buggers

Are you an administrator? Yes Dlohcierekim 02:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Userbox

Hi! You'll probably want to replace {{User:Henrik/ubx/User contrib|<edits>|<Username>}} on your userpage with {{User:Henrik/ubx/User contrib|15000|Dlohcierekim}}, otherwise it'll look strange (especially for people without the javascript installed). I should really try to clarify the instructions, you're not the only one who did that. Cheers! henrik•talk 14:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

I was just thrilled that the thing automatically updates. Will do as you suggest. Thanks. Dlohcierekim 14:47, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Much better! Dlohcierekim 14:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

belated congrats

Belated congrats on making admin. You may now smile at the bride speak your mind much more freely, which is a good thing (=make use of that). Anyhow, yeah, just wanted to drop a line saying basically that. Best regards, I dorftrottel I talk I 22:01, December 1, 2007

Joseph tiedemann

First off congrats on becoming an admin. I notice someone else has already deleted the article as I am writing this so it probably moot (sorry about delay) but... I would probably have deleted the article personally as I think the intent of 'planted the church' is so unclear as to be probable nonsense or just that he is the elder at that church. Nothing else in the article strikes me as an assertion of notability. Of course if he had actually 'planted a church' that would be very notable but I somehow doubt it! If you have any doubt however remove the speedy tag and prod it instead to give others the chance to look it over. Hope that is some help and don't hesitate to drop me a message if I can be any help in the future. Davewild 22:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for the support. Oh, and a belated congratulations on the RfA, I didn't even notice until I saw it here. Good to hear you've got the mop! Tijuana Brass 03:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

About 'nocontext' articles

Hi, I tagged articles like Carlos Orejuela with a {{db-nocontext}}... you might have mistaken it for an nn tag since that's what you indicated in your comment... it was just someone creating articles of footballers with a filled-in template only... nothing written... that's why. -- Mentifisto 03:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, you're right... so next time there's such an article what do I do? (Also since I'm not sure how I could write a lead if I don't know about the subject...) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mentifisto (talk • contribs) 03:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks, and sorry for tagging them so quickly. -- Mentifisto 04:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey, no worry. Like I say, a bunch of them got deleted. and I don't think you were the only one tagging. Other admins did not see it as I did. You did nothing wrong. Just a difference of opinion on how to interpret "no context." Dlohcierekim 04:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay. :-) -- Mentifisto 04:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Congratulation!

Hello Dlohcierekim. I am Masterpiece2000. I am a relatively new Wikipedian. Congratulation! I hope you will do a great job as an admin. I wish you all the best. Regards, Masterpiece2000 04:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Email

Quite suprised I haven't enabled my email before. I'm certain it has been enable now, although if that isn't the case, just let me know. Thanks for the heads up. Kaiser matias 20:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

You may want to resend what ever it was you sent. At the time you responded to me, I had a setting blocking and deleting most unknown mail, so yours was deleted. Kaiser matias 04:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Cup Of Twee?

I received a note (automated) from you on my talk page about how Cup Of Twee had been nominated for speedy-delete, however, I did not create that page, so I'm wondering how I got notified? I myself left a delete template there a bit ago. RedZionX 23:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Aces and Eights

It didn't specify an exact name but I guess it could have been an attack at someone. It seems it was speedied under G10 now.   jj137 ♠ Talk 23:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

That makes sense.   jj137 ♠ Talk 23:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Wow! You say "more edits in a day than you could get in a week", and I say "more (real) barnstar offers in a day than I've gotten in all of 1½ years at Wikipedia". Thanks for the offer!   jj137 ♠ Talk 03:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that!   jj137 ♠ Talk 03:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Message from unhappy editor

Please don't write on my userpage. I haven't vandalized anything since the last two admins wrote on my user page. So why are you threatening me with a new warning? Stop please. 24.68.253.80 14:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

More unconstructive edits appeared to follow prior warnings. Then you blanked your talk page. Futile gesture. Please try to make constructive edits. Dlohcierekim 14:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

There were no further unconstructive edits. IF you are referring to my addition of the stub tag to the vandals vs trolls page, you are mistaken. "blanking my talk page" wasn't a futile gesture to hide my work. your accusations are insulting. do not write on my talk page any further. 24.68.253.80 14:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

IRC Administrator's channel

If you remember, you left me a query concerning access to the Administrator's IRC channel. In response to that (since you appear to have missed my original answer :), what is your IRC nickname? Anthøny 20:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: my RFA

Hello, I have responded to your question on my RFA nomination. Thanks for your support, and please let me know if you have any other questions. Brianga 20:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks...

for the barnstar. Hopefully it'll be a decent article. — Scientizzle 23:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For your continued and plentiful contributions to Requests for Administrative tools I bequeath you with The Working Man's Barnstar. Your contributions there always seem to be well-thought out and useful to the discussion. SorryGuy 01:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Surely. You really do deserve it. Cheers. SorryGuy 01:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Esperanto

Thank you, Dlohcierekim, for your efforts on behalf of "aspiring Esperantists" (a phrase that must mean, I suppose, that we're very, very hopeful) in preserving the page on Bertilo Wennergren from threatened speedy deletion.

I'm a novice Wikipedian whose main experience has been with minor proofreading, and I'm still feeling my way carefully to avoid making too many egregious mistakes.

You asked about my Esperanto skills. My ability to speak and write Esperanto is extremely limited, unfortunately, but texts written by others are relatively easy for me to understand because of their similarity to other languages with which I am familiar. (I was born in Denmark to Norwegian and Danish parents, have now learned English to a professional level, and have studied French and German.) Obviously, my reading ability in foreign languages is greater than my productive ability, so I would not attempt to translate into Esperanto, at least for now.

Kindest regards, Erik Pedersen (objectivesea) Objectivesea 03:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

non native student work

I'd like to discuss the multiple deletions of my student's work (Satoe2158) in her user page. I am teaching students for whom English is a second language, so am asking them to use their user space to construct their articles which will then be moved to the namespace. The first deletion was by User:hmwith and occurred approximately 20 minutes after she had copied a portion of the Uzbekistan-Japan_Center, while she was still logged in.

The second deletion by User:Dlohcierekim occurred after a smaller section had been inserted and the inital process of converting the explanation so as to provide a template for an appropriate article, which was done at the end of class to give the student some basis to complete the first steps of the assignment. There was no warnings or discussion for the Uzbekistan-Japan_Center, so it certainly appears to be an appropriate model, but if there are problems, they should be addressed in the authentic namespace and not going into a student's personal user page. I appreciate the problems with spamming and vandalism, but for constructing an article and having it proofread by a native speaker, the sandbox is not a feasible alternative. Furthermore, the Minamata Open Center is an non-profit academic center, established by the Japanese Ministry of Education, to research Minamata disease, so I believe that it fulfills the requirements of inclusion in the wikipedia.

Please advise if there is an alternative process to this, the other students who are working with wikipedia are utilizing the same process and do not seem to be having the same scrutiny applied. Tomeiter 07:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd also note that in the Speedy_deletion section it specifically notes that

Testing is permitted in the sandbox and in users' own user space. If this is not official Wikipedia policy, please let me know. Tomeiter 08:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

After some review I've restored some of these speedy deletions, please see User_talk:Tomeiter and User_talk:Satoe2158#Page_Deletions for my rationale. You do not appear to be online right now, but I wanted to let you know about this. Please talk page me if you think this still needs to be deleted, or feel free to MFD it if I'm not around. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 13:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Comment at RfA

Hi. this was a comment that's rather below the belt. Nominees can't be held to account for what other people write on their RfA page, whether in support or opposition. It also seems very out of character for you... Anyway, I warmly invite you to revert yourself. --Dweller 14:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

<ding> You've got mail. --Dweller 15:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I'm happier now - the comment which upset me at first makes perfect sense coming from someone who was reconsidering their position in a positive way. Thanks also for being someone who is prepared to listen to other editors and isn't afraid to change his mind - something far too few of us will do! Best wishes, DuncanHill 16:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletions

Thank you for letting me know that you have declined a speedy deletion I requested.

One note, though... when I am on new page patrol, I can put quite a lot of CSD tags, and I do follow up on them, to make sure it is not the author that removes them. Of course, I expect that a certain percentage of the requests I make will be denied by admins, and I do not have any problem with that. So, I would suggest that you make that kind of notification only when you see a patroller repeatedly making the same mistake (for example, requesting SDs on articles on the grounds that they are unsourced). --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 00:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Uncle Chen

You're absolutely right, just a case of careless RC patrol on my part. I'll be more careful. Thanks for catching it, sorry about that. Peace, delldot talk 01:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

HAHA

Users of Wikipedia make me laugh sooo much. Well, I have edited some things that r true. So don't push it.TK(film) (talk) 14:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Have some respect for people

I'm not using Wikipedia for self premotion or anything like that. If I see something new on the net that's true, I'll put/edit it on Wikipedia. Respect and Peace :D TK(film) (talk) 15:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

A question

I need to know who created some Youtube celebrites like Smosh. Did Smosh themselves right that article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TK(film) (talk • contribs) 15:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Interesting. Never saw that before. Are you saying that you don't think they meet guidelines for notability and verifiability? Are you further saying, "if they have an article, why not me?" Unfortunately, there are too many articles that should not be. The existence of one cannot and will not justify the existence of others. I've not the time to look at their claims to notability at present. However, I will probably nominate that article for deletion too. Thanks for the heads up. Dlohcierekim 16:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Guennol Lioness speedy declined

Oh, no problem. I'm just used to seeing pages like this. When I added the tag, it was a sentence fragment. Don't worry about it! -Carados (talk) 03:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Try the link. Someone else remade it. -Carados (talk) 03:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Agh! Sorry about that. The speedy deletion tags have been coming fast tonight and I didn't take the time to check the history on that one. My apologies. Feel free to toss some disciplinary templates onto my talk page in revenge if you'd like. Tijuana Brass (talk) 03:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

sig

Btw, the new simpler sig looks a lot better to me. ¶ dorftrottel ¶ talk ¶ 06:56, December 6, 2007

Salty Walrus

While I can't really argue against an AfD like this, personally I don't think it should have been deleted. There seems to be a bias on Wikipedia against anything sex-related (possibly due to the witch-hunt against Taxwoman), which is why I try to at least do minor cleanup on these pages periodically to give them a fighting chance. I think this is at least as valid - and sourceable - as Donkey Punch, which has survived more AfDs than anything I can think of other than Daniel Brandt. — iridescent 20:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Taxwoman wrote a lot of articles on an increasingly odd range of sexual practices, before being blocked for sockpuppetry under highly dubious circumstances, leaving behind a huge pile of highly dubious articles which certain Defenders of the Wiki seem to have made it their life's work to play shoot-till-you-win at AfD until the whole lot's gone. You can find a reasonably accurate summary of the whole sorry saga at The Attack Site We Do Not Link To. — iridescent 20:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:Havefun

Hi. Thanks for deleting it. That was disgusting. Are users allowed to have this type of stuff in userspace? Wouldn't it be more of "innapropriate usage" than "vandalism"? Does policy state that mainspace is the only place for sexual images, and userspace as well as wikipediaspace and templatespace should be kept free of porn? It is true that nobody is allowed to use WP:CENSORED to argue against deletion of something like this, since it is innapropriate for mainspace anyway? Can this type of stuff be speedydeleted without XfD? Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 01:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey, regarding my page I wans't trying to recreate it, this is just my first time really using these tools and I probably pressed the wrong thing. Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul918 (talk • contribs) 03:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your vote on my RfA

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with a vote of 41/0/1. Please accept a slice of panettone as an expression of my gratitude. Feel free to help yourself to some chocolate zabaglione as well. I am humbled by the trust placed in me to use the tools wisely. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 20:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Michael Willis speedy

Thanks for letting me know. Just so as I know for next time, you don't think, say, the 2nd and 3rd para's here are prima facie nonsense? Although, there could be some offsetting material elsewhere on the page that would merit saving, of course. Anyway, thanks for letting me know. --AndrewHowse (talk) 16:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply. Dlohcierekim 16:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the subsequent updates, too. My 2 cents are now where you might expect them to be. --AndrewHowse (talk) 02:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

cool. Dlohcierekim 02:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Plse consider blocking User:128.243.253.111 - see recent actions at Michael Willis. Thanks. --AndrewHowse (talk) 16:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

deleted article page

you punk... that was a bad move deleting my page.... baaaaaaadd move —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shmacka069 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Judge Regan Miller

a State official who engages in hate speech in a documented public forum (NPR) is self-evidently notable.

Removed article page content from talk page. Redacted text can be seen by clicking Here.

Please do not use my talk page as a soapbox. I read all of this on the article page. I do not see any assertion of notability, nor do I find significant media coverage. Please provide verifiable sources attesting to notability. Just because you find his views reprehensible is no reason to have an article, or to recreate the article contents on my talk page. I see no evidence of NPR. Dlohcierekim 03:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Restored and sent to AfD. Dlohcierekim 03:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I find it unfair to delete the article, and then criticize me for having to carry it around in the discussion. Had you left it as a link, I would have been happy to link at it. I hardly need your user page as a soapbox eh? Thanks, I appreciate the community process. Benjamin Gatti (talk) 03:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Move

Thanks, but do project Userboxes go in user space? Best, --S.dedalus (talk) 04:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and I already tried a move so we have a dead redirect page at User WPContemporary. Should be deleted too. Thanks --S.dedalus (talk) 04:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, me neither. I was modeling this one on Template:User WPClassical. --S.dedalus (talk) 04:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help, and no problem. This was confusing me too! --S.dedalus (talk) 05:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Reww

This user continues to reinstate deleted articles under the titles Yung xx or Yung XX. I am requesting a temporary block for a day or so if this continues.--Manderson198 (sprech) 15:52, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

He's new and perhaps overly enthusiastic. I might send the thing to AfD. A previous incarnation had a PROD and was blanked by creator. Don't know if he reaches notability or not. Doubt it, but it might be there. Still ooking around he web. Another problem is the corelbot tag as copyvio. Have to check on that. I'll keep an eye on him for now. Thanks, Dlohcierekim 15:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Also, no one gave him a Not notable warning. He might just have wondered why is creation disappeared. Dlohcierekim 16:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I placed a not notable warning on a previous article of the same name and he blanked the page. I also checked for outside sources and was unable to find any. --Manderson198 (sprech) 16:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I guess I retract my request for a temporary block. I posted on his talk page and referred him to WP:SALT. Manderson198 (sprech) 16:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

<<edit conflicted response>> No prob-- I deleted the latest incarnation of Yung XX and asked him to not repost. He's edited and created a whole slew of articles that need to be looked at. If he continues, warn him some more and then report him at WP:AN/I. Unfortunately, I have to eat lunch and go to work. I'll try to go through his other contribs tomorrow. Thanks and happy editing. Dlohcierekim 16:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good. Thanks a lot. Manderson198 (sprech) 16:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Horton,AL

Hello Dlohcierekim, I`m user:1bookfan (Creator of the article Horton,AL) thank you for expanding Horton,AL.--DJ 21:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Bicester Community College

References

1. ^ Bicester Athletic Club scoop Thames Valley public TV vote and Lottery cash. Big Lottery Fund (30th November 2007). Retrieved on 2007-12-18. 2. ^ Business alarm at bad GCSE results for town Oxford Mail, October 27, 2006 3. ^ Bicester school "worst in county" Oxford Times Online, January 12, 2007 4. ^ Inspection Report. Ofsted (8th November 2007). Retrieved on 2007-12-11.

Can number 2 be perm deleted from requests of the school as this is old and now everything is fine

Please provide a source showing the change. Wikipedia is uncensored and unbiased. It does not only cover the "good parts". If the information is obsolete, please update it and cite a reliable source. Dlohcierekim 16:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Many Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefogster (talk • contribs) 16:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my userpage! It's really the first time that that's happened to me, and I was away... meh. Thanks again! ----Jump! Slash! Dash! Ouch! Super Mario SonicBOOM! 17:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes I have sources.

Thank you for leaving me a message. I will post sources of Jonah House. Thanks. rkmlai (talk) 22:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

A tad late

I already blocked him because he was spamming SIHULM. He's out for 72 hours and the article he was mainly harassing is protected. I'm looking over his edits. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 02:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the automatically updating thing. I try to improve the day in history thing, so its good to get a Thanks!

Any time. Dlohcierekim 02:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

deletion of teacher article

my science teacher is not wanted becuase hes not important. WOw that makes anyones day... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluetim1 (talk • contribs) 03:35, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank-You

"notability of living people" . wow....... he is important and im not vandalizing. Just because someone doesnt think someone is important or "made a change in the world" doesn't mean everyone thinks that way. So in order for someone's life to be significant and worthy of reading on an encylopedia, that people spend way too much of their own living time on instead of becoming notable for aiding the world themselvs', they must do something "special or outstanding". This criteria could be easily met, with some arguing but of course everyone ahs to put in their 2cents even if its worthless. Thank you for veryfing that peoples lives are unworthy of a single document by which they can remember they did something good. No, they have nothing to their name. "notability of living people".... in order for my life, or yours' for that matter to be worth living, it must be in wikipedia... to be in wikipedia they must be notable. That is the greatest standard for living in the world, screw the people who die everyday and make the rich and famous richer. Cycle of poverty and the "untouchables" are still in todays society. People who are blind fail to reconginize it. Thank-you for reading even though my life is pointless according to your notability standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluetim1 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Information about pointless celebrities and pornographic actors, yet not the most imporant and underpayed profession in the world. Without them then no other profession could be taught. The least you could let me due is make a page that is dedicated to Teacher Appreciation and actual list of names which is important and not just their deeds. And anyways, its not like anyone treats wikipedia seriouslly or else there would be no vandals, conflict information, and it would be a notable trusted source. A pathetic website run by conformists sitting in their chair more important then our names and lives. w/e [Not going to sign because its invalid inforamtion for an encyclopedia] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluetim1 (talk • contribs) 04:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

And scientists, and historical figures, and leaders, and philanthropists, and cities, and plants, and animals. . . . Dlohcierekim 04:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

They already have their own page. Thankyouverymuch.

Vandal!

Hello, could you check out this user: Tux Unit(talk)? He keeps vanderlising the Club Penguin article, I keep warning him, but he does'nt seem to care. And the only thing he seems to have done is vanderlise that article, according to this: [1]. Thanks, you were the first admin that came to my mind for this sort of thing!--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 07:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

And also it would be helpful if you could semi-protect the Club Penguin article?--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 08:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks! I asked for semi-protection so that IPs can't edit it. They always only seem to vanderlise in that Article (I have checked it's history).....--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 15:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

At Work Username

Question, out of curiosity, on your MikeReichold username. Couldn't you just use identical sigs for each account, and have a redirect from MikeReichold to your normal userpage/talk? That way you wouldn't need to comment about the 'Dlohcierekim at work' each time. Avruch^Talk 17:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

i dont understand y u deleted my artilce.. could u tell me y? it has notable meaning, and i kno i cited everything corrrect.. i worked all day on it for nothing.. i cant evn get my writing bak.. =( please reply —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benyuyu123 (talk • contribs) 01:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

dj tekben deletion

so are u saying that a myspace wouldnt be a reliable source? it ahs everthing i wrote on the article in the myspace... plus i read that blogs would be a reliable source and thats basiccally all myspace is..

i dont understand allthe codes and a7 codes and wat not.. i jsut want to kno wat in specific made u delete the article..

and thanks for the compliments, ya i was working on it since i got home at 4.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benyuyu123 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

dj tekben deletion

so does that mean he's not famous enough to be in wikipedia?

if not, can u tell me, in plain english, specifically wat i hav to do to make the article nonn-deletable please?

it would be a huge help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benyuyu123 (talk • contribs) 01:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

dj tekben delete

so uve herd about everyother techno dj out on wikipedia? and i cant write about him for years? urggggg haha =(

Benyuyu123 (talk) 02:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)tekben editor

dj tekben deletion

so theres nothing i can do to make it so i can write about him??

Benyuyu123 (talk) 02:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)tekben editor

tekben edit

hello? did u reply to my last messages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benyuyu123 (talk • contribs) 02:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

deletion

ok let me kno as soon asu can cuzz i reely wanna get it posted..

Benyuyu123 (talk) 02:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)tekben editor

Thank you!

Hi there! Just a note to say "thanks very much" for your support on my successful RfA. I appreciate your participation, and I'm humbled by the support I received. I'll do my best to use the tools with care and for the benefit of the encyclopedia. Thanks again! Tony Fox (arf!) 06:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

PD-image

remember this? Miranda 08:17, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which closed successfully with 44 support, 4 oppose, and 3 neutral. I will work hard to improve the encyclopedia with my new editing tools (and don't worry, I'll be careful).

  jj137 ^♠ 01:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

MC Renni

MC Renni is a local star. He is quickly becoming famous , i cannot see why you have deleted his page. As you can see a few people have pulled together to make his page better and you have ruined it. This saddens me, i now have to make the page again.

I see no evidence of meeting WP:BIO or WP:Music, so sadly, it will likely be deleted again. I see no verifiable sources. Happy Holidays, Dlohcierekim 15:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Periodistas

Didn't mean for the warning to be spam-related; my larger concern was with notability (and the lack of it), combined with foreign language sources. Thanks! --Mhking (talk) 02:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

About User:Iamastabbingrobot and his articles

Ok, if you want to give the kid a chance, let's give him it. Sorry if I act like a dictator or something, I just hate the way people treat Wikipedia....not that I never commited a mistake...but c'mon, I've never done so much crap as people are doing here. Anyway, let's wait five days for Iamastabbingrobot's progress. Victao lopes (talk) 03:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

That's impossible. Too many non-good-enough articles. My first one was not, because I've edited very much as an IP, and this taught me a lot about Wikipedia before I officially entered as a User. However, two of them were speedy deleted, one because of nonsense, the other because of lack of references and notability. But who knows, maybe you can instruct the guy to become a good editor. Victao lopes (talk) 03:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Great success! Thank you for supporting my RfA, which passed with a final tally of 53-3-2. Special thanks goes to Shalom for both the suggestion and the nomination. I'm honored by the trust that the community has shown in me, and will do my very best as an administrator. Thanks again! faithless (speak) 08:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Rammstein

Regarding your comment here, Rammstein is seriously an awesome band. If you plan on checking them out, I suggest the albums Mutter, Reise, Reise, or Sehnsucht. All three are incredibly good (if you're into Neue Deutsche Härte and Industrial Metal, anyway). --Sharkface217 20:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, i'm looking forward to trying them out. Dlohcierekim 23:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Bobo feet

Hi. Am I missing something? A hoaxster creates hoax articles (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Agents: Jack Warrior, that is the hoaxster) and we keep the hoax title of one as a redirect? So if I create Caca Feet then that can redirect to Happy Feet also? What am I missing here? Thanks. --Alfadog (talk) 21:21, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Hooray

It was an exhilarating thrill for me to have visited a page on C:CSD, only to find that you already removed the tag (rightly so, of course). I love seeing new(ish) admins in action.

...okay, exhilarating might've been a little strong of a word. But still happy.Tijuana Brass (talk) 04:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Question regarding vandalism by Strider Phoenix

Hello. Thanks for deleting the "Strider Phoenix" hoax article. I noticed in his contribution history that he's been making edits to other pages, all of which turned out to be self-promotional vandalism. I was wondering how I could report him. I read the WP:WARN page, but it wasn't exactly clear to me whether the vandalism warning needed to go directly onto his talk page or someplace else. I was wondering if you could clarify that for me. Thanks. Mh29255 (talk) 05:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you again: Question about "Durban Strategy" Page

The Durban Strategy page was nominated on the AfD with two votes to keep the page, but now the page is completely gone and only contains a redirect. (There is no apparent history to undo.) How can I notify an administrator about this? The AfD nomination page is here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durban Strategy (2nd nomination). Thanks for your help. Mh29255 (talk) 05:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

No bother. You just did. Uncle G moved it per his reasons on the afd page. Not sure I understand moving an article during an AfD, but there it is. Durban Strategy redirects to the page under its new name. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 05:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

An Administrator is I!

KoL images are copyrighted, so I'll use this PD one instead.

Adventurer! The Council has identified a number of strange occurrences (such as "vandals" and "articles for deletion") in the surrounding wilderness. The Council would check it out, but they have important Councily-type things. But never fear: brave adventurers known as "sysops" roam the lands!

Thank you for your support in my quest to become a sysop. Although I am now wielding the keys to my very own Bitchin' Meatcar, I promise to uphold the laws of the land, martini in hand, in a way that would make Saint Sneaky Pete proud. I will do my best to be a Jack of Several Trades (although I may be a Master of Nuns). I promise to Heart Canadia. And I will make it my goal to Make War, Not ... er, Wait, Never Mind.

I am glad to serve my guild, the League of Wikipedians. If I can be of any assistance, or you have any questions, suggestions, or criticisms in the future, please let me know. And if you are at a loss for what any of the above actually means, see this website.

Thanks again.

An Encyclopedia is We! - Revolving Bugbear 22:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Dear Deepfriedokra, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind support on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (72/19/6).

Now that I am a sysop, do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.

Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. — E ^talk 12:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

re. Recall

Probably - my aim isn't to get recalled in the first week, but it's to say to everyone that look, I'm open about what I'm doing, I intend to do the right thing, and I will reconsider if I'm not doing the right thing. Plus I think that most of the current recall methods (6 editors, RFC, etc.) are a joke, in most cases...— Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 21:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:RfA questions

Thanks. I got the idea from another user (I forget which), so I don't really deserve all the credit. Nousernamesleft^{talk and matrix?} 19:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Pajama Test deletion

Can you elaborate on why you deleted the term "pajama test"? Interaction design and related project management is my area of expertise and training, and although the term seems humorous (and perhaps for that very reason) it has proved rather helpful to myself and others, in just the way I attempted to communicate. It appears it didn't serve that purpose for you, however :-)

If I indeed made a mistake in creating the entry, my hope is to understand better its nature, in an effort not to repeat it at some future time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meyerw (talk • contribs) 17:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:2005 GoT cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:2005 GoT cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:2005 FfC cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:2005 FfC cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

speedy deletion of my page

Hi - I created a page on 'Irevna' and placed a description of this division of the company I work for. Irevna is a well known in the field of Knowledge Process Outsourcing. I cant understand why the page I created has been deleted. pls help at the earliest. thanks Ramyakrishnananil (talk) 13:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Ramyakrishnananil

Back to Iamastabbingrobot

So, it seems the article of the book survived...too bad the same didn't happen to the author's. However, I still think Iamastabbingrobot should watch his tone when writing at Wikipedia. Victao lopes (talk) 00:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

You think that's bad? One time a user was editing his user page without logging in. I reverted the edits, thinking it was vandalism. He had a few choice words for me about that! Hopefully he will mellow a little. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 00:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Guidelines

Thaank you for the guidelines, These may require me to spot and solve other issues on articles. I am currently working on the articles that require cleanup from January 2006. If there were other problems, I would find a solution to them too. ThanksSnikSpot (talk) 02:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

U R Welcome. Cool. Dlohcierekim 02:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks very much for that. I'm actually 'Realiseyourdignity' but i've forgotten my password.

I think you guys don't realise what your're oing the internet was aoriigninally a weapon of war, and you are helping everyone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.91.33.130 (talk) 03:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about not signing in.

is the objectivity of the article ok? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notpayingthepsychiatrist (talk • contribs) 02:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

U R welcome. I don't know. I've never read it. Dlohcierekim 02:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Admor of Nadvorna.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Admor of Nadvorna.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Catherine Lip

That's fine, it was a rambling article which didn't look very reliable, thanks for cleaning it up. Harland1 (^t/_c) 16:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

My pleasure. Dlohcierekim 17:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jenny Sparks.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jenny Sparks.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Ooops! Bearian (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: "articles with quotes"

I've seen that you left a comment on my talk page about creating redirects with the article name in quotes, is that right? To the best of my knowledge, I only create redirects where say, a company or a TV show or anything in general which has an article with the title say, X is also known in other regions of the world as Y. As you said, it's highly improbable that anyone would search for articles with quotes, and you're right in speedily deleting them. I still don't completely understand what it is that you're talking about, could you leave an example by my talk page, so I may reply authoritatively? Thanks , so speaks rohith. 18:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Nope, I don't think I make such redirects. I do feel that they're highly improbable. I don't think that anyone would search for an article in quotes. Thanks anyway, so speaks rohith. 19:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[[[Mi-5 Persecution]]

Thanks for your notice. I realize the danger in creating a controversial entry, but the posts have hit all of my Usenet groups, and people are just starting to notice because he's changed his style. Since the earliest version was copied from Notable Usenet personalities, I went back and edited that to reflect WP:BLP. If you can help in any other way besides deletion, thanks. MMetro (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

NOTICE FOR ADMINS

If anyone willing to tell me how to actually use Wikipedia properly, (I'm relatively inexpierienced with the project) then please drop me a line at my talk page, thanks.--Hammerandclaw (talk) 23:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)hammerandclaw

Thank you Dlohcierekim, dude, you've started me on my way!--Hammerandclaw (talk) 23:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)hammerandclaw

I'm glad. Dlohcierekim 23:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Anon Prod Removal

An anon has removed the prod from Carlos Redman claiming the references at the bottom of the article prov he is notable. Ridernyc (talk) 00:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Cool. They might just. Dlohcierekim 00:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed nearly unanimously with 46 support, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral. Thanks for supporting me!

-Djsasso (talk) 17:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

The whole DJ Derrida thing turned out to be a silly hoax (a rather funny one) so I deleted our previous conversation due to its irrelevency. I hope you understand this deletion and thanks for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ Derrida (talk • contribs) 17:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Dear Deepfriedokra, Thank you for voting in my RfA, which closed successfully with 34 support, 2 oppose, and 0 neutral. I appreciate your support! I promise I will wield the mop wisely, and do my best to improve Wikipedia.

-- AKeen (talk) 15:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Dlohcierekim, I am still new here, and am possibly "out of sorts", and would like to thank you for your welcome and for pointing out my mistakes. You have helped me out lots! Writelydie (talk) 17:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

SOCK PUPPETEERING

I've been accused of being a sock puupet. I frankly do not see how this can be possible, since I have made almost no edits bar those to my user page/talk page, and have only just started up. The sock puppeteer in question seems to have over a hundred suspected accounts to his name, and he is not someone I am familiar with. Certainly, I find it hard to believe he really has so many aliases. Can someone please give me an explanation, my accuser, has left no trace on any of my pages, and I would lie to find him/her, and have my sock puppet status removed. Contact me on my talk page.--Hammerandclaw (talk) 23:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)hammerandclaw

Smile

NHRHS2010 (talk · contribs) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

NHRHS2010 Happy Holidays 23:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

..

RfA !vote

Any chance you could reconsider your vote on the TPH RfA again? I have no connection to him or any reason to canvass on his behalf, but I hate to see the RfA fail based on one or two opposes that push it over the edge numbers-wise. I think that controversy attaches to anyone who participates so actively in AfD discussions, and inevitably in a large number of decisions some will be found that folks can disagree with. Perhaps since you supported initially, you can reconsider again?

Thanks, ^Avruchtalk 16:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

It seems it has been closed as unsucessful, ah well. Rudget. 17:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Yup. Bummer. Was a squeaker. ^Avruchtalk 17:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Drat. Dlohcierekim 14:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)