User talk:Gogo Dodo

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here. When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind: Use a descriptive subject/headline. If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to. Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless... If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section. Click here to leave me a message

User:JehnCD

Hey Gogo Dodo - just to let you know, I changed the block settings for JehnCD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) from a soft block to a hard block because he was clearly trying to impersonate JohnCD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - hope that's okay with you. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 01:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:25, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Blocked another one. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Message from Brybaby

who is this:( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brybaby (talk • contribs) 04:39, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Your wrong

What i have written is not in any way threating or abusive and is the truth richard foley will vouch for this. So what is the problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daisysmith (talk • contribs) 04:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Dude??!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daisysmith (talk • contribs) 04:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

>:(

why you be so mean to me CRY —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloverulesyou (talk • contribs) 07:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

help

i'd like to send you an email but not here where everyone can read it. Its in refernce to a page you deleted that was an attack on a person. Please help. whoever this person is that writes these things has made other threats on other websites and i must get to the bottom of this. Myrights2010 (talk) 01:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Why was ShieldMaster listing Deleted? Please restore

We do not understand why ShieldMaster was deleted. It is a valuable entry as it is one of the last projects in which Joe Simon was involved (Joe Simon). We would like to have the ShiledMaster listing restored. If a link to Joe Simon is required, please add.Scriptwriter2002 (talk) 16:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

RMQD???

y was my RMQD deleted?>?????? there where no curses and it was perfectlly fine —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Dominicano809 (talk • contribs) 00:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

RE: Ron Christie

Got it. Should have double checked for other authors.

SaveThePoint (talk) 01:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Message from Spunkybailey

uhh hi u reported me dont do that —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spunkybailey (talk • contribs) 02:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

DJ Nihilist Spam

I've noticed that you have also caught a few of these they seem to be coming in from a range of 3-4 IP's hitting about 6 pages. I've done at least 3 rounds of reverts in the last 24 hours. I searched for DJ Nihilist and got less then 100 hits on google all garbage. Ridernyc (talk) 07:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Just had to rollback 10 articles. This time he also blanked a large section of one article. Ridernyc (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for blocking the vandal who kept defacing my user page. A plate of cookies for you!

GLaDOS (talk) 23:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind

but I updated your user page. ThemFromSpace 01:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Thank you. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Message from Medusa1122

The point is valid. They aren't notable enough. And things that aren't notable enough, that don't meet the criteria, shouldn't be on the site. Simple as that, or so you would have me believe. Medusa1122 (talk) 00:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

for reverting this vandalism which impersonated another editor. Keep up the good work. Hallucegenia (talk) 08:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

and on mine too! Leaky Caldron 20:39, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For this. I was told that if you welcome vandals, they will reform their ways...guess not this one. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 06:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Perry Jones/ Kyle Prater

Both articles have been put up for deletion. The person says thay aren't notable because they haven't played on a professional level, but there are lots of non professional athlete pages. I dont see what is wrong with them. They have sources/refs that talk about them. Ice (talk) 22:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Please Remove It Completely.

Hi :) I pleadfully ask you completely remove my deleted "Europe Family Sweden" page entirely. I do not want it to be 'cached', I want it removed completely. Please, I ask this be done as soon as possible as I do not want or need it anymore, and feel uncomfortable with it online now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gghh1122 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the response.

I appreciate the acknowledgement. I hope I was not pressuring. Thank you. I understand and I will be patient. Goodbye :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gghh1122 (talk • contribs) 08:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:24, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Question?

I was just wondering when the approxiamate time of the complete deletion of my "Europe Family Sweden" is? Any estimate? Please reply quick since I have to go soon, thank you and goodbye. :) Gghh1122 (talk) 15:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Victor galindez

Hi. I am sorry you feel that I was condescending to the above editor. That was not my intention. The quality of the articles he created (Blanca Sanchez, Mario Iván Martínez) was such that I was compelled to contact him and advise him to desist from creating articles until he had learned how to do so properly. I suppose I employed stronger language than User:Minimac94, the editor who welcomed him to Wikipedia, who had issued similar advice. I apologize if my language was too strong and I came off as condescending. I assure you that, to the best of my knowledge, that has never been a criticism levelled at me. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

A problem with the baptist article

The baptist article fails to be a neutral page in that it calls baptists a "Protestant" church. In doing so wikipedia is giving sole credence to the common yet mistaken belief that baptists came out of the catholic church. Even if they don't agree with the view that baptists precede Catholics, they should at least remove the word Protestant and thusly leave the article totally neutral. Most of the rest of the article does well with demonstrating wikipedia's stand on remaining a neutral site, but the beginning of the article is disapointing at best. Jakestang (talk) 00:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

An appology for my poor behavior, and response to your reply.

I appologise if I came across ..... un-neutral, my use of the word "heretical" could be considered POV and therefor, biased. As for the other two words you pointed out, I suppose I could have chosen more gentle words. Instead of "slaughtered" I should have said "publically executed in large groups", and instead of "murderers" I should have said "public executioners" or "punishers of those that disagreed with them". However, while harsh, they were not POVs, but historical fact, some accounts of which you can find in Foxe's Book Of Martyrs. I fail to understand, however, why everything I write can be so swiftly removed on the grounds of being "biased" or failing to be "neutral" yet when I point out something that fits both cases, I am told to discuss it in a chat line. And one other little observation, for being supposedly neutral, why is it that one can edit the Baptist and Catholic pages, yet the Muslim page is locked and un-touchable? The stands that wikipedia claims don't always seem to be neutral. I am not sure if I responded to this message the right way -I edited my first one- so I look forward to your response so I can be sure you read this. Jakestang (talk) 05:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Stay Away From Me!

please leave me alone!!! stop it!!! stay away from me! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.84.236.206 (talk) 04:27, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Please review Wikipedia's guideline for musicians for inclusion on Wikipedia and the guideline for writing an autobiography. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Message from Twonkomadness

so it doesn't make any difference if he's a school mate? guess i'll just have to make a youtube video about him, then eh? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twonkomadness (talk • contribs) 19:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:28, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Los Atrevidos

Why have you deleted it? You sturdily built cup? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Losatrevidos (talk • contribs) 22:27, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:33, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

what do i need to do to prove this? I'm sorry but i honestly want to make a page on this team, it is the reason i joined wikipedia, thanks for you help gogo dodo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Losatrevidos (talk • contribs) 22:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

yeah cool but what do i need to do to prove it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Losatrevidos (talk • contribs) 23:01, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:06, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Los Atrevidos FC

Hello Gogo Dodo, i was distraught to learn that you have deleted a part of my heritage - the Los Atrevidos FC page. Please could you explain to me your reasons for this? Kind Regards x —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.201.152.84 (talk) 22:33, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

The article was deleted because it was an obvious hoax article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

This is incorrect, it is in fact an actual team that i support based in Southampton, England. They are plying their trade in the Bundesliga Student League, First Division. They have been playing for a few years now and i would be delighted if you could re-instate the site. This would be muchly appreciated x —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.201.152.84 (talk) 22:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

You may create an account and create a legitimate article about the team if it exists. The "article" that was there was obviously a hoax and I will not be restoring it. If you have an issue with the deletion, you may file a review at WP:DRV. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

To be quite honest with you Gogo, im incensed by this decision to call it a "hoax"!! It is an outrage that has caused chaos upon the local atrevidos faithful! How do i go about proving to you that this is a factual team? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.201.152.84 (talk) 23:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Uh huh, sure... -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:20, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

http://www.goalsfootball.co.uk/Leagues/ Take a look at the southampton league, wednesday bundesliga, students league, liga 1, for my faithful fan here once you have seen the currently impressive 5th position in the league for the team you can then understand my passion as manager to ensure that fans and players gain the exposure they desire. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Losatrevidos (talk • contribs) 23:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Wasted Bandwidth

The amount of bandwidth that is being wasted by the numerous editors who create one hoax article after the other is amazing and sad at the same time. :) It appears as if some school kiddies sitting in class are playing around with their smartphones. Amsaim (talk) 22:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:49, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Protected Article

Hey, thanks for protecting Jeff Zucker. Unfortunately, as you were protecting it, a vandal got it again (diff). Please undo that as well. Thanks! Ajraddatz (Talk - Contributions) 22:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Never mind, you saw it. Thanks again! Ajraddatz (Talk - Contributions) 22:39, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Please mail me the copy

dear admin,

please send me the mail of my first deleted page (Amender technologies), i will be very thankful to you.

Thanks in advance. Mictesting123 (talk) 14:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Letsvidz

Hello, you deleted the page Letsvidz, that I was creating. I had very little text on it, and had the 'under construction' note at the top, then someone else nominated it for deletion for using an article as a test page, so I erased the text, wrote an explanation on the talk page, and went to the sandbox to test. I had just finished in the sandbox and went back to the article and saw that you deleted it because it was a blank page. I am new to creating pages on Wikipedia, and do not know all of the rules. Thank You for your time, please respond as soon as possible. Jamk9 (talk) 01:33, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:51, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Jano Janosik

Pretty poorly written stub. I've checked what I could of with the bands and they do get g-hits, but this guy not so much. PROD or AFD material? -WarthogDemon 03:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Which ones? I can't see anything linking him to The Violets, and one of them was deleted in an apparent AFD, I think: Stewboss, but I can't tell from the AFD what the article was about. -WarthogDemon 03:23, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Found his myspace page. Apparently there are three, Bardo (band), The Violets, and Stewboss. Since we made it two out of three, I'm wondering if perhaps it shouldn't be AFD'd but just needing sources badly. The problem is that I can't seem to find any reliable sources. The problem is that when I Google Jano alongside either of the two, the only hits I get are in networking sites, one or two blogs, and mirrors of the wiki article. -WarthogDemon 03:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)