Jump to content

User talk:Mdmday: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Qwyrxian (talk | contribs)
→‎Rajput: new section
Line 117: Line 117:


[[Image:Information.png|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. The <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Commonwealth_Games_medal_table?diff=388888027 recent edit]</span> you made to [[:2010 Commonwealth Games medal table]] has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. You may also wish to read the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction to editing]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggledelete1 --> [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 13:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
[[Image:Information.png|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. The <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Commonwealth_Games_medal_table?diff=388888027 recent edit]</span> you made to [[:2010 Commonwealth Games medal table]] has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. You may also wish to read the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction to editing]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggledelete1 --> [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 13:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

== Rajput ==

I have reviewed the three sources you used when you insterted the phrase "ruling class" into the article [[Rajput]]. The book by Balfour and the PDF file do not actually use the phrase "ruling class", and the third is a travel guide's website (not a scholarly reliable source). You also inserted the word Hindu, but there are Muslim Rajputs as well so that word needs to be removed. I invite you to discuss these edits on the talk page of the article before you insert them again. Thank you. --[[User:Diannaa|<span style="color:teal;">Diannaa</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Diannaa|Talk]])</sup> 21:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:00, 25 November 2010

Welcome

Hello Mdmday, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Mdmday, good luck, and have fun. --roleplayer 20:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Punjabi diaspora, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Punjabi diaspora was changed by Mdmday (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-05-25T20:40:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:40, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, World One

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, World One. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - World One Mumbai. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at World One Mumbai - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. KuwarOnline Talk 13:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

While some users may no doubt sympathize with violent jihad, calling another user a "zakir naik's ass licking jihaadi" is a violation of the policy on personal attacks. Just a friendly reminder.Pectoretalk 18:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Separatist movements of India. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sikh-History 17:20, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Central Intelligence Agency, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. onebravemonkey 10:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not copy and paste text from news stories into Wikipedia

Your addition to 2010 Kashmir unrest has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Nick-D (talk) 11:11, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

kashmir page

plz check the latest devolpment on kashmir 2010 page and take some action.115.252.41.123 (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page titles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Quit Kashmir Movement (2010) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into 2010 Kashmir unrest. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not do this again. You copied and pasted the page again after I left the previous message. This could be interpreted as intentional disruption of Wikipedia. I don't particularly have an opinion about what the article should be called; but if you do, you should propose a move following the correct process. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 00:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Script Removals

Dear Mdmday, I recently noticed that you have removed many Hindi-Urdu scripts from Bollywood related film articles. As of now, doing so has been prohibited by an administrative decision. The script issue is currently being discussed on the Bollywood talk page. You are welcome to discuss the issue there until a consensus is reached (which will probably not be a while since some of the participants are on a Wikileave). Thanks for your understanding. With regards, AnupamTalk 14:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like some further background on the situation, please also see the archived discussion here. I have also informed the administrator in charge of this situation of the fact that I reverted your edits just so he stays updated (you're not at fault since you didn't know :)). I hope you have a good day. With regards, AnupamTalk 15:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Mdmday. Please be aware of the past discussions at:
The way things stand now, any editors who either add or remove the Urdu script (Nastaliq) from Bollywood film articles risk being sanctioned. If you want to reopen this issue, I suggest you start a new thread at Talk:Bollywood. If you want the discussion to reach a formal result, I can help you set up a WP:Request for comment. Ultimately, it is not my decision as to what rule is adopted about Nastaliq script, but I will continue to enforce the standstill until a consensus is reached one way or the other. The standstill means: no addition and no removal. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to 1942: A Love Story has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. WookieInHeat (talk) 15:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Dus constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. WookieInHeat (talk) 15:31, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. WookieInHeat (talk) 15:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Reverting !!!

I am seeing that you are reverting my correct edits with no reason, stop reverting my edits. The reliable sources which i have given in the article of World One, are most authentic, which says the building is currently Approved or Proposed, but not under construction at all, but you reverted these links, without giving any explanation. The other sources still do not say that its under construction. So please bring the sources which say your point. And do not revert until the discussion reach some consensus.


Nabil rais2008 (talk) 15:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

+1. Please stop reverting. There are no sources that World One is under-construction. All contributions at Wikipedia need reliable sources; which is not the case at yours. Jerchel (talk) 15:35, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to 2010 Commonwealth Games medal table has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rajput

I have reviewed the three sources you used when you insterted the phrase "ruling class" into the article Rajput. The book by Balfour and the PDF file do not actually use the phrase "ruling class", and the third is a travel guide's website (not a scholarly reliable source). You also inserted the word Hindu, but there are Muslim Rajputs as well so that word needs to be removed. I invite you to discuss these edits on the talk page of the article before you insert them again. Thank you. --Diannaa (Talk) 21:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]