Jump to content

User talk:Unbroken Chain: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:Hell in a Bucket/Archive 11) (bot
Once more: new section
Line 37: Line 37:


I resemble that remark to a T. Best regards, --[[User:Scalhotrod|Scalhotrod]] [[User_talk:Scalhotrod|(Talk)]] ☮ღ☺ 16:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
I resemble that remark to a T. Best regards, --[[User:Scalhotrod|Scalhotrod]] [[User_talk:Scalhotrod|(Talk)]] ☮ღ☺ 16:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

== Once more ==

You [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&diff=645984168&oldid=645976824 asked] about double standards. Please read [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]]. I don't have to chase down every other disruptive editor on Wikipedia and sanction them before, or if, I sanction you. No, an administrator can deal with whatever disruption comes into view. Do yourself a favor and only respond to questions about your behavior from arbitrators or uninvolved editors. Everybody else, you can safely ignore (battle participants), and definitely you want to stop casting aspersions at others. Nothing any battle monger says about you can get you in trouble. What can get you in hot water is what you say and do yourself. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 03:41, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:41, 7 February 2015


Recent Changes

List of abbreviations (help):
D
Edit made at Wikidata
r
Edit flagged by ORES
N
New page
m
Minor edit
b
Bot edit
(±123)
Page byte size change

11 October 2024

11 October 2024


Deletion of the User:Alanbanaqeeb

I am not promotional in my presentation. I would request you to please, remove the tag from my user's page. Please, remove it. Please, help improve the page by your valuable suggestions. I am looking forward to learn from you. Wikipedia is a great success only because of the collaborative work. So, please, let others learn from you by being a wikipedian. Thanks a lot.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanbanaqeeb (talkcontribs)

Hi Hell in a Bucket, how's it going? Could you please refactor or remove your comments at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Community comments (TKOP) as they are incivil and not helpful to the discussion. Thanks, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:CallaneccDo you really want to know lol? On a serious note I've had a discussion on this with RD and my reasoning was here [[1]]. That being said what would you like changed or diff'd I'm happy to do the latter and will grudginly change the wording if the problematic wording is pointed out. I will change the words but the meaning will not be changed, It's a different set of clothes is all, I have reasons to believe that and have a few diffs to pull if needed. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ARCA

I deleted my comment at LB's amendment request at ARCA. But, it's good to see that the arbitrators are coming around to my observation that the Wiki-community should handle it. :) GoodDay (talk) 14:25, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

Do not spam comments about the same issue to multiple user talk pages, as you have been doing, because this is disruptive. Further disruption of that nature may result in a block. I did not even read what you said, and I don't care what you said, but your spamming lit up my watchlist because you hit the talk pages of many (all?) arbitrators with apparently the same post by the looks of the section name and byte count. This is obnoxious behavior and will stop, either by your own decision to stop, or by somebody blocking your account. Enough said. Jehochman Talk 15:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jehochman why don't you post your dispute on the arbca page? The committee has already responded to my concerns which were in good faith and seeking a resolution that satisfis everyone. Maybe next time read the comment before opening your mouth and making yourself look less then competent in warning. Your choice but no arbs has stated anything against what I said and infact it was used to start another resolution so forgive me if I don't take your advice. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Birds of a feather...

"Let's face the facts, I talk about accountability a lot. Here's mine, I am argumentative, I get hot headed. I have a difficult time with dishonesty, corruption and controlling my mouth when provoked or under stress. I do however accept and encourage disagreements as long as they are backed by a valid rationale. I am far far from perfect, but when I'm being portrayed as the problem when I present a huge amount of evidence of behaviors and I'm still the issue I have a problem with that."[2] from Roger Davies page.

I resemble that remark to a T. Best regards, --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 16:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Once more

You asked about double standards. Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I don't have to chase down every other disruptive editor on Wikipedia and sanction them before, or if, I sanction you. No, an administrator can deal with whatever disruption comes into view. Do yourself a favor and only respond to questions about your behavior from arbitrators or uninvolved editors. Everybody else, you can safely ignore (battle participants), and definitely you want to stop casting aspersions at others. Nothing any battle monger says about you can get you in trouble. What can get you in hot water is what you say and do yourself. Jehochman Talk 03:41, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]