Jump to content

Talk:Assyrian people: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Not persecution: new section
Line 88: Line 88:
== Not persecution ==
== Not persecution ==


[[User:Hijiri88]] here. Still trying to figure out how to log in on my iPad. Apparently I am trying to hijack my own account from the same device I have been using to edit logged in since last February.
[[User:Hijiri88]] here. Still trying to figure out how to log in on my iPad. Apparently I am trying to hijack my own account from the same device I have been using to edit logged in since last February. It's not my mobile (semi-dynamic) IP either; yesterday I had the same problem [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AStaygyro&type=revision&diff=757213437&oldid=750835606 editing] at home. It's only this device, which is the only one I can use outside,and even at home is more convenient than my computer.


Anyway... {{tq|During the eras of Mongol rule under Genghis Khan and Timur, there was indiscriminate slaughter of tens of thousands of Assyrians and destruction of the Assyrian population of northwestern Iran and central and northern Iran}} is clearly out of place under the current heading. If it was "indiscriminate" (and I don't doubt that it was), that is the opposite of "persecution" of Assyrian Christians as discussed in the rest of the subsection.
Anyway... {{tq|During the eras of Mongol rule under Genghis Khan and Timur, there was indiscriminate slaughter of tens of thousands of Assyrians and destruction of the Assyrian population of northwestern Iran and central and northern Iran}} is clearly out of place under the current heading. If it was "indiscriminate" (and I don't doubt that it was), that is the opposite of "persecution" of Assyrian Christians as discussed in the rest of the subsection.

Revision as of 16:46, 31 December 2016

Warning: Rules for this page

Re-posting this. Fut.Perf. 18:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been a cesspit of some of the most ridiculous ethnic tendentious editing for years and years, from all sides of this sorry mess of an ideological conflict. This needs to stop. I will therefore be applying a new set of administrative rules here, with a zero tolerance approach to tendentious editing:

  1. Any editor making substantial content changes in the article that have the potential of being contentious, without discussing and explaining them on the talkpage beforehand, will be blocked.
  2. Any editor reverting another editor without explaining the need for the revert on the talkpage beforehand (with the exception of cases of plain and obvious vandalism), will be blocked.
  3. Any editor calling another's edits "vandalism" when they are not will be blocked.
  4. Any editor who makes edits in the article that are obviously aimed at giving preferential treatment to one of the ideological parties or terminological preferences involved (pro-"Assyrian", pro-"Aramaean" etc.) or at bolstering up historical claims associated with such preferences, will be blocked.
  5. Any editor misusing the talkpage for any form of argument about which of these ideological positions is "correct" or about his own opinions regarding their ethnic identity, will be blocked. The only thing everybody is expected to use the talkpage for is to discuss how this group and its history are described in high-quality, neutral reliable sources, and how the article should be changed so that it reflects those sources.

Please pay special attention to this last point, as pretty much everybody has been abusing the talkpages for those kind of arguments in the past.

Any such blocks will be imposed immediately, without further individual warnings, for periods no shorter than two weeks on a first offence, and regardless of whether an editor is experienced or new. You have been warned.

That said, the article clearly needs to change, as it is currently quite obviously written from a tendentious perspective. To get the ball rolling, I will myself make a start by entirely removing the "Assyrian continuity" section, which appears to be one of the most tendentious bits and whose sourcing is abysmal. This is a somewhat uncommon thing for an administrator to do, but given the special history of this article and the long-term well-documented inability of its habitual editors to maintain a constructive and encyclopedic editing debate on this topic, I believe it is justified and will not change my status as an uninvolved and neutral administrator. (Which means I also reserve the right to block editors should they reinsert it, as I would consider such an edit a clear violation of principle 4 above. Material about the idea of an "Assyrian continuity" may ultimately be reincluded, if and when the overall NPOV profile of the article has been fixed and a policy-based WP:CONSENSUS for the appropriateness of such material has been established; not earlier.) Fut.Perf. 09:30, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Future Perfect at Sunrise: Can I get an explanation of why the section "Legends Mythology used as historical evidence to promote notions of Assyrian Continuity" was collapsed?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Assyrian_people#Legends.2FMythology_used_as_historical_evidence_to_promote_notions_of_Assyrian_Continuity
The explanation given does not make any sense...."another thread veering off into exchange of personal ideological talking points." it could not of possible been the case, since there was only my single post in the section. It could not have been an "exchange" nor "veering off", and the rest of the edit was in complete compliance with the Rules.

Sr 76 (talk) 13:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Assyrian people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Assyrian people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2016


Replace the word 'anarchy' with 'chaos' in this sentence: "Since the 2003 Iraq War social unrest and anarchy have resulted in the unprovoked persecution of Assyrians in Iraq, mostly by Islamic extremists, (both Shia and Sunni), and to some degree by Kurdish nationalists."

Stoyson (talk) 00:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - seems reasonable to me - Arjayay (talk) 21:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not persecution

User:Hijiri88 here. Still trying to figure out how to log in on my iPad. Apparently I am trying to hijack my own account from the same device I have been using to edit logged in since last February. It's not my mobile (semi-dynamic) IP either; yesterday I had the same problem editing at home. It's only this device, which is the only one I can use outside,and even at home is more convenient than my computer.

Anyway... During the eras of Mongol rule under Genghis Khan and Timur, there was indiscriminate slaughter of tens of thousands of Assyrians and destruction of the Assyrian population of northwestern Iran and central and northern Iran is clearly out of place under the current heading. If it was "indiscriminate" (and I don't doubt that it was), that is the opposite of "persecution" of Assyrian Christians as discussed in the rest of the subsection.

I would (re)move it myself, but see the explanation above for why I am logged out.

182.251.140.189 (talk) 16:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]