User talk:DarthFlappy: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 23:18, 2 May 2024

This is DarthFlappy's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

1.3K+

This edit has made enough edits to recognize that edit count does not matter.

This user is concerned about the WMF's unsustainable spending.

This user is an expert in Nothing
Do not trust this user in any topic!

Jane Haining[edit]

Hello - your edit [1] has been reverted As it introduced a spelling mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:9313:B900:9CEE:858C:22CA:2558 (talk) 22:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a spelling mistake. See WP:ENGVAR. It it simply a variation between American English vs. British. S0091 (talk) 22:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per cent is the standard spelling, with percent being a corrupt niche variant. You will also note the article is about a British person, and in Britain standard spelling is used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:9313:B900:9CEE:858C:22CA:2558 (talk) 22:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I look at it, it is fine with me. Sorry to waste your time. DarthFlappy (talk) 22:55, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. British person means British spelling so per cent is correct in this instance. If they were an American, then percent is the correct spelling. S0091 (talk) 23:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved Thread about Judy Mikovits from Ppimitx [2][edit]

mistake on Judy Mikovits, she is NOT an anti-vaccine activist. Her job is to study and create vaccines. Please fix!!!

While that may be true Ppimtx, the best place is to talk about it on the the article's talkpage[3] DarthFlappy (talk) 22:38, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response to COI comment under your comments[edit]

Please see my talk page for comments related to yours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suwritter251 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, don't forget to sign you messages with ~~~~! Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 18:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RedWarn - Quick Survey[edit]

Hello DarthFlappy! Thank you so much for testing RedWarn so far. I kindly ask that you fill in a short survey regarding the future of RedWarn and to help me visualise general user opinion surrounding certain features.

To access the survey, visit: https://devices.edxt.net/redwarnSurvey

Thank you again for your continued feedback and support, it is greatly appreciated. Ed6767 talk! 22:15, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like to opt-out of receiving messages regarding RedWarn, or have any questions, please let me know on my talk page.

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm ProcrasinatingReader. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The Queen—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 19:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ProcrasinatingReader:I don't see how removing "loves z German bratwurst" was unconstructive. Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 19:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DarthFlappy, sorry, my bad! I believe I hit revert on the previous commit but you got there first, and I missed the update. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 19:04, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it's alright. Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 19:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted[edit]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: for pinging me at the middle of the night. ps: it is actually my fault i have left my phone on at night. Trains2050 (talk) 04:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I live in EST, so I was late afternoon for me (; Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 17:33, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i understand and i was joking. :) Trains2050 (talk) 18:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ps: you need more user boxes, :) hahahah Trains2050 (talk) 18:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

TonyBallioni (talk) 01:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your edit[edit]

You reverted a change I made. I think it's perfectly clear what is meant by 'incidental content.' But if you're happier with a tedious account that swamps the page, I'm not going to argue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8084:609E:4800:5405:59E1:795B:C911 (talk) 00:56, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@2A02:8084:609E:4800:5405:59E1:795B:C911: Sorry about that, I guess I was a trigger happy. Thanks for pointing it out! Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 01:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good work[edit]

Looking to send a congrats to the 'Police Brutality in the US' team. It's inclusive, thorough, easy to add info where needed. Nice. Pasdecomplot (talk) 20:59, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't work on it that much, but thanks Pasdecomplot! Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 22:30, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for fixing the page. When Wikipedia said I was #40 in line and to be patient, I thought they meant a few days. It was about 30 minutes or less. Memdmarti (talk) 19:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Memdmarti! Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 22:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote[edit]

Dear DarthFlappy,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gonzalo Barrios[edit]

Is there any reason why you approved this edit here with your pending changes rights? theinstantmatrix (talk) 02:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Theinstantmatrix: Considering that I don't remember the edit and that the diff was deleted I guess I should not have. Sorry, I must have been going too fast. Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 16:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi, I was trying to fork Wikipedia:Dashboard/Pending changes for my userpage so that it displays the current number of pages, like this:

Pending edits awaiting review (5 pages)
With {{Pending Changes backlog}} and Special:PendingChanges of course.

but I can't seem to fugure out what how to use User:DatBot/pendingbacklog (what {{Pending Changes backlog}} uses) to get the current backlog number. Any suggestions? Thanks! Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 22:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That template uses a switch based off of the first parameter to determine which value to return. The value you want is called 'info'. To use it bare naked, you'd say something like:

Pending changes awaiting review: {{User:DatBot/pendingbacklog|info}}

Which would render looking like:

Pending changes awaiting review: 1 pages according to DatBot

I think that's the only tricky part, you seem to have the rest down. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 17:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck[edit]

Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.

Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 18:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Terren Peizer[edit]

MOVED

Moved to Talk:Terren Peizer — Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 18:51, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(not an admin)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Why did you remove the link to the Ontrak website? Since we want to have any many references as possible for this page, linking to the page that shows that he's the director should be useful.

Also, you are aware that the "COI" in the edit request stands for "Conflict of Interest"?
Mr. Peizer obviously hired some PR hack to whitewash his page, so we should be very careful in following her wishes.
He's using dozens of shell companies to hide his actions, and Crede is one of them (which as actually currently involved in a lawsuit re. stock price manipulation), so we should keep those names in public view (I've added a section with all his shell companies now).

Frescard (talk) 22:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Frescard: are you referring to this one were I removed the external link,^[1] or this one were I removed "and Crede Capital Group"? I'm ok with reverting the "and Crede Capital Group" edit if you want, but I don't think that we should keep the EL (anyway, when I open it it's dead). I stopped editing when how much it looked like a bad faith COI request sunk in. _{this sentence was toned down to (hopefully) comply witih WP:AGF.} Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 02:15, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For whatever it's worth, I'm sincerely trying to make requests aligned with Wikipedia best practices, and specifically with WP:BLP. I believe a lot of the article, cited as it is to legal documents, press releases, and other primary sources, violates WP:NOR. (The various inline external links also contravene the MoS, as noted.) I've provided some thoughts on the most obvious issues, but I'm open to feedback as well. Frescard, I'm aware you've also responded on Talk:Terren Peizer, but I didn't want to miss responding here either. Mary Gaulke (talk) 03:21, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the article has a bunch of primary external links acting like sources. I'm not sure why Frescard readded the EL I removed or what's going on with the Financial Vehicles section. @Frescard:? I think that I'll work on the article some (no promises, live's busy!).

Now that I think about it, I should have worded my comment better, sorry about that. (I was angry with the "stock promoter" thing) I feel kind of bad for you because, of all the editors out there, the two editors who look at your COI request both have userpages complaining about POV pushing.

One more thing: I think we should close this thread, copy it the Talk:Terren Peizer page, and continue the conversation there, any objections?. Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 13:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree! Thanks for the response. Mary Gaulke (talk) 17:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since the thread is still here, I'm gonna reply quickly:

It looks like there was a syntax error in the Ontrak link (to the board of directors). I've fixed that now, and it should work.

Re. Financial vehicles: Since anybody who's interested in Peizer will be interested mainly in his investments, we should list the names that he invests under (they're basically aliases). Unfortunately, he has a lot, but I think we need them all to give a complete picture.

Re. May Gaulke's bad faith edits: I don't see her *contributing* to the article. All I see are deletion requests, hiding behind technicalities like in-line links and primary sources. If one reads those respective guidelines neutrally — *without* looking for a loophole to remove unwanted content, then it's obvious that both are acceptable in the cases I used them.

Frescard (talk) 17:45, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ I removed the external link because external links "should not normally be placed in the body of an article". (WP:EL)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Custom signature[edit]

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are out of order.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Move two </sup> tags in your signature, as I did in this edit.

More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures or respond here. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95: is this good? Also, what about all the signatures on other pages. Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 12:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That looks great. Thanks for fixing it. As for the signatures on other pages, they are on a very long list of (literally millions of) pages to be fixed. You can hunt them down and fix them if you want, but it is probably easier to let a gnome or bot take care of it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:53, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi...[edit]

Hi,

Thank you for taking the time to review Request Edits at Talk:DeVry University#Request Edit May 27. As I mentioned at the time, I had a second round of requests to make on behalf of DeVry but did not want to overwhelm the reviewer. But I see now that the Request Edit queue has 80 items and seems to be moving very slowly. Since you already familiarized yourself with the article, I wonder if you might give an independent review to the second batch of requests located at: Talk:DeVry University#Request Edits July 23. Thank you either way for your work as a volunteer. NaturaRagazza (talk) 19:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to get to it. I have some things to do both on Wikipedia and IRL first so I am not sure how long it will take. Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 11:47, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DeVry University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memphis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck[edit]

Hi DarthFlappy,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

User talk:ProseKobe[edit]

I think that instead of just putting a COI notice 7 months later on a user that's only been here in December-January span for a single subject, it would be better to look at the user's edits and make changes to them if needed. 2606:6000:60CC:C900:581C:E21B:9836:D906 (talk) 20:28, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, the COI notice was a waste of time. Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 12:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Change of Cardano ADA to Ada[edit]

Hi DarthFlappy,

I noticed you changed a key component of the name in the Cardano (cryptocurrency platform) page. This is improper nomenclature use. Just like Ethereum is called ETH and Bitcoin is called BTC, Cardano is called ADA (as is seen by the ticker symbol on the right hand side). Sadly, since the admin changed the edits I am unable to revert or change the edit back! Would it be possible to revert this change?

- EDIT I actually double checked the website and it seems it doesn't really matter what the capitalization is... So perhaps you are right ;) Thank you for making the edits :)

Thank you :) Blockchainus Maximus (talk) 20:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck[edit]

HI DarthFlappy,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages[edit]

I see you recently accepted a pending change to January 12 that did not include a direct source.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the edit notice on that page, the content guideline and/or the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide.

All new additions to the DOY pages without references are now being either reverted on-sight or in some cases where the patroller is especially motivated, immediately sourced. I've gone ahead and backed this edit out.

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, it's not required but it sure would be helpful if you didn't accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you and please keep up your good work! Toddst1 (talk) 23:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

help[edit]

I am really struggling with all this. I just want the correct information about me to be updated and edited.

All the information about me is on my website to see and that is the only proof I have short of sending a copy of my deedpoll - www.sophiamackieellis.com and on https://www.spotlight.com/interactive/cv/2457-1209-5589 and on https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2405497/

I can't even understand how to use this site, I don't understand the use of coding or tildes. I just need someone to help me update this old incorrect information. I have a film to promote in 8 days and this information is detrimental to my career. Whoopsieboots (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review[edit]

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Fox Suggested Edit[edit]

Can you please review my talk comments regarding suggested changes for the Terry Fox page? I made a comment in August & have not even received a response. 24.255.224.90 (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. (talk) 05:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C[edit]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] I removed the external link because external links "should not normally be placed in the body of an article". (WP:EL)

[1]